Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 

Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Who has upgraded their Marquee to Ultra?

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
Author Message
Tim in Phoenix



Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 4409
Location: Phoenix

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:56 pm    Post subject: Who has upgraded their Marquee to Ultra?

Guys

Just wondered if it went well. The required items appear to be:

a) Ultra top motherboard

b) Geom/Focus board

c) CLM firmware 4.2c or higher

d) DPB flywire jumper and firmware 5.5 or higher

e) 680 ohm resistors and flywires added to Convergence amp

f) Caps and resistors added to Vertical amp

Did I forget anything?
Back to top
Curt Palme
CRT Tech


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 24396
Location: Langley, BC

TV/Projector: All of them!

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 6:04 pm    Post subject:

I've done it a few times. Worked fine. Iv'e got a 9500 sitting here right now with an Ultra motherboard, I just need a focus board to complete it...
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:41 pm    Post subject:

the mother board can be made an ultra with a few flywires here and there.

As is the HDM, the CVA , Vdm and the DPB. The only thing that you really need that is specific
to an ultra is the FGM. I have always wanted to make a add on board for a stock FCM.

Nashou

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
stridsvognen
Guest






Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:47 pm    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:
the mother board can be made an ultra with a few flywires here and there.

As is the HDM, the CVA , Vdm and the DPB. The only thing that you really need that is specific
to an ultra is the FGM. I have always wanted to make a add on board for a stock FCM.

Nashou


That should be quite simple task if someone with the know how produce a stack of add on boards, but no matter what im sure it will be more expensive than a complete ULTRA machine.

So seeing ULTRA machines go for free or close, and Craig selling a new FGM for 35$ i think its just for someone that dont have anything else to do, or like the challenge.
Back to top
Tim in Phoenix



Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 4409
Location: Phoenix

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:34 pm    Post subject:

Guys

The Ultra was introduced so Ehome wouldn't need a standard Marquee, a Hi-scan Marquee and a Dome Marquee. The other choices were P43 and lenses, so it was easier to keep projectors on the shelf that met most requirements. Firmware 4.0 supports the added geometry functions, but I haven't seen a factory Ultra below 4.2c
Back to top
digitalayon



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 921


Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 5:51 pm    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:
the mother board can be made an ultra with a few flywires here and there.

As is the HDM, the CVA , Vdm and the DPB. The only thing that you really need that is specific
to an ultra is the FGM. I have always wanted to make a add on board for a stock FCM.

Nashou


Nash.....you are NUCKING FUTS!!!!
Back to top
digitalayon



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 921


Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 6:08 pm    Post subject:

I am just curious as to why this is actually needed. I mean....what extra stuff do you really get with the Ultra that you do not get right now? Do not call me ignorant, I just do not know if my image would be effected at all since the projector is almost near center of the screen with my ceiling being so low.
Back to top
Tim in Phoenix



Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 4409
Location: Phoenix

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 6:34 pm    Post subject:

Guys

The Ultra has less banding tendency and some additional geometry functions such as V skew, and top/bottom keystone
Back to top
jbmeyer13



Joined: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 1135


Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:03 pm    Post subject:

Tim in Phoenix wrote:
Guys

The Ultra has less banding tendency and some additional geometry functions such as V skew, and top/bottom keystone


Hey Tim,

Any idea why it has less banding tendency?

_________________
Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
Back to top
Tim in Phoenix



Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 4409
Location: Phoenix

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:45 pm    Post subject:

Well JB

Probably a better management of pulses and waveforms that control convergence, maybe Scott could elaborate.....
Back to top
digitalayon



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 921


Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:23 pm    Post subject:

I am sorry but I thought the banding issues were stemming from the CLM board. If that is not upgraded than I am guessing the ultra boards are acting like some sort of signal or wavelength filter is what I get.
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:44 pm    Post subject:

It is the way the original engineers wrote the scanning algorithm for the vertical deflection pulses/waveforms. The banding mod that the VDC engineer wrote is only on the Vertical wave forms. nothing is written in the add on chip for the Horizontal wave forms.

From what Scot told me to re work a new CLM at this stage in the game when that VDC engineer wrote the software for the add on chip would have been more money than VDC was willing to spend on a Phased out technology.

Nashou

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
digitalayon



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 921


Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:05 pm    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:
It is the way the original engineers wrote the scanning algorithm for the vertical deflection pulses/waveforms. The banding mod that the VDC engineer wrote is only on the Vertical wave forms. nothing is written in the add on chip for the Horizontal wave forms.

From what Scot told me to re work a new CLM at this stage in the game when that VDC engineer wrote the software for the add on chip would have been more money than VDC was willing to spend on a Phased out technology.

Nashou


I agree with the option of not going forth with the chip.....but what ever happened to that mod? I remember seeing it one day and then gone the next.
Back to top
Tim in Phoenix



Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 4409
Location: Phoenix

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:23 pm    Post subject:

Guys

I had two CLMs modded for that and both CLMs failed during testing, so I decided not to offer the mod for sale.
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:32 pm    Post subject:

Two i have done seem to work fine. I had other things come up and have not tested thoroughly . I plan to do one of my Longbow CLM's that has the worse of the two banding issues. If I have no problems I might offer the mod but with no guarantees. I think there may be a compatibility issue with some later version softwares. The two I tried them on were pre 4.xx CLM software versions.

On those two, version 3.4, the mod seems to work with the ability to converge all zones. Geometry seemed to work well also.

I told Scott a month ago about the issues others have had and he said there should be none, his friend who wrote the program is currently using it on his Marquee with no issues at all.

So in a few months I'll know more.

Nashou

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
tse



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 1014
Location: Sweatbucket, Fl.

Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 4:26 pm    Post subject:

Tim in Phoenix wrote:
Well JB

Probably a better management of pulses and waveforms that control convergence, maybe Scott could elaborate.....


The FGM has the added analog circuitry for geometry waveforms. The analog waveforms gradually make changes from one screen area to another. That minimizes any banding. The digital zone waveforms can make abrupt changes (especially in the vertical direction) from one zone to another and that causes banding.

Scott

_________________
"Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want bread."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
jbmeyer13



Joined: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 1135


Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 5:42 pm    Post subject:

tse wrote:
Tim in Phoenix wrote:
Well JB

Probably a better management of pulses and waveforms that control convergence, maybe Scott could elaborate.....


The FGM has the added analog circuitry for geometry waveforms. The analog waveforms gradually make changes from one screen area to another. That minimizes any banding. The digital zone waveforms can make abrupt changes (especially in the vertical direction) from one zone to another and that causes banding.

Scott


Hey Scott,

Does the FGM minimize banding even when coupled with non-Ultra boards or does it need to be a full Ultra set to utilize the benefit?

Regards,

Justin

_________________
Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
Back to top
tse



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 1014
Location: Sweatbucket, Fl.

Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 5:53 pm    Post subject:

jbmeyer13 wrote:
tse wrote:
Tim in Phoenix wrote:
Well JB

Probably a better management of pulses and waveforms that control convergence, maybe Scott could elaborate.....


The FGM has the added analog circuitry for geometry waveforms. The analog waveforms gradually make changes from one screen area to another. That minimizes any banding. The digital zone waveforms can make abrupt changes (especially in the vertical direction) from one zone to another and that causes banding.

Scott


Hey Scott,

Does the FGM minimize banding even when coupled with non-Ultra boards or does it need to be a full Ultra set to utilize the benefit?

Regards,

Justin


Well, the firmware has to support the DACs that are on the convergence section of the FGM and maybe some wire jumpers to get the convergence signals to the convergence amps. But yes, a non-Ultra set can be modified to make use of the FGM.

Scott

_________________
"Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want bread."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum