| Author |
Message |
thewolfman
Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 1311
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:38 pm Post subject: Red C-element Vs. Rosco 106 Primary Red gel filter |
|
|
For those of you wanting a red c-element one can also use a Rosco 106 Primary Red Gel filter instead of the real thing. It costs less than a pound so I bought 2. Inc. shipping thats like 10 $.
I know what people are talking about now because red has now become vibrantly red, as it should be. I used my lens cover as a mold to make it fit perfectly in front of the lens (almost). At least it's a good substitute until I get the real thing. But don't think I will any longer. noos@xp37+ has one just like it and I decided to try it out for myself. And must say it really makes the image look so much better.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/LIGHTING-FILTER-GEL-PAR-64-THEATRE-CLUB-STAGE-COLOUR-/150658887714?pt=UK_HomeGarden_Lighting_Lamps_Lighting_SM&var=450036118619&hash=item2313f83022
Last edited by thewolfman on Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:10 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
noos@xp37+
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 464
Location: Berlin/Munich
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yep, I use one a 9500 Ultra. Super colours, great contrast and no resolution loss (teset) You only have to push red harder, but who cares...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice.
think i want to try those on my 8500 Ultra with HD8 lenses, must be possible to put it directly on the glass in front of the tube.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
