|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Cube
Joined: 06 Dec 2009 Posts: 77 Location: IL, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:38 pm Post subject: Sony 1272 Scheimpflug, blue focus and 16:9 raster tips? |
|
|
I'm finally setting up my used 1272 as a floor mount. The setup is working out okay but I'm not blown away by the sharpness. Got some questions...
-The corner focus is pretty bad but I'm nervous about removing the factory spacers and doing a custom Scheimpflug adjustment. Can you really dial the 1272 that sharp? I don't want to risk cracking the lens casing for nothing. Also it was a big enough pain taking the lenses off once to clean the CRT face.
-Red and green look good to me but the blue is really, really blurry and dim. I think the blue electronic focus needs adjusting but the manual warns you not to do it (it ruins the color balance). Has anyone messed with this and been able to get reasonable gray balance back without a colorimeter?
-The screen is 4:3 and I want to be able to use the whole thing for 4:3 content and a letterboxed image for widescreen. For 720p/1080i memory blocks, I guess this means I should do geometry and convergence with the test pattern projecting into a 16:9 letterboxed space on the screen. (BTW, I was surprised to discover that the test pattern is actually underscanned compared to the actual video signal. Curt's guide suggested it would be the other way around.) However, I was messing with the RGB SIZE adjustment that lets you squeeze the image after convergence, and it seems to actually change the raster space rather than just the video signal. So now I'm wondering if for 16:9 I should do the test pattern geometry setup as 4:3 using the whole screen space and then just RGB SIZE-squeeze the video signal back into 16:9.
(TL/DR: does RGB SIZE change the actual raster scan or will it still scan the unused space after you shrink the image?)
I'd appreciate any tips from somebody who's had experience with a 127x (or maybe even 125x). Thanks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're not ever going to be blown away by the sharpness of a 1272. It just won't ever be very sharp, and it'll be worse if it's not a pretty minty set. How many hours does your machine have on it?
A 1272 is a nice entry-level CRT that will make a very nice 1080i projector - just don't expect to see 1080i scan lines or resolve much more than about half the 1080i signal. I had a couple of 12xx machines, and used a 1271 in my theater daily for a year or so until I moved to a G70... The sharpness was probably the biggest part of the upgrade. A-B'ing between the two was like getting a new eyeglasses prescription. The G70 isn't digital sharp, but it's a big jump up from the 1271 I used daily before.
From my experience (others have different opinions), the HD-8 and Sony PT-xx lenses on my two 12xx's were the limiting factors. I could easily see 1080i scan lines on the tube faces, but not on the screen. Those lenses were made when 480i NTSC and PAL were the two common video formats and even computers were mostly VGA (640x480), and it showed in the optical performance of those lenses. They suck.
As for the flapping mod, it isn't going to improve corner focus per se - it will improve top/bottom and/or side-side focus, depending on how far off the "stock" install you are compared with the spacers you have installed. So, if when you try to focus the lens, you have to make a compromise between the top/bottom or side/side, then you're a good candidate for the flapping mod. My machine was very close to the spec for throw distance and angle for the spacers I had installed, so I never bothered with the mods.
If the blue is really dim, then your color balance is probably bad anyway, so the risk of messing with the blue focus and G2 (screen) controls. You can pick up a Spyder pretty cheap and use the free HCFR with Kal's guide and get it back in the ballpark, too.
On your last question... I always setup my machine first with the internal pattern (in your case, on the 4:3 screen), saved to all memories, then did tweaks for the external sources. In your case, you'd do tweaks for your external 4:3 source, then tweaks again for your 720p and 1080i memories, and yes - you'd use RGB SIZE to do the vertical squeeze.
Start looking for a G70!
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rosenbush
Joined: 14 May 2010 Posts: 94 Location: Brownsville Texas
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To find out if you can get better sharpness of what are you getting right now (We don't know how far are you from the best focus for 12XX), did you see the individual dots of the 'H' on Red and Green?
As ecrabb note, do not expect to get Formidable focus, but you can get a very decent and acceptable image. The point is if you already are on the top of the 12XX focus.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rosenbush wrote: | | To find out if you can get better sharpness of what are you getting right now (We don't know how far are you from the best focus for 12XX), did you see the individual dots of the 'H' on Red and Green? |
I jumped to conclusions... That's a very good point!
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cube
Joined: 06 Dec 2009 Posts: 77 Location: IL, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can just barely see dots on the red and green tubes if I turn the contrast way down. Even then it's not razor sharp. I'm thinking the blue is a lost cause... I'm seeing in a lot of archived threads that the blue is left intentionally unfocused to improve light output and color balance. It's not really that noticeable unless you put up the blue test patterns.
Looks like I'm really not going to get that much sharpness out of this, especially if the lenses are as you say. Just have to be satisfied with messing with the raster some more. You're sure I can converge the test pattern at 4:3 and just use RGB SIZE to get 16:9? I thought for sure that was the "wrong" way to do it... seems like I should be adjusting the geometry SIZE control until the test pattern is 16:9 and converge that.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cube wrote: | | I can just barely see dots on the red and green tubes if I turn the contrast way down. Even then it's not razor sharp. I'm thinking the blue is a lost cause... I'm seeing in a lot of archived threads that the blue is left intentionally unfocused to improve light output and color balance. It's not really that noticeable unless you put up the blue test patterns. |
OK, that sounds really bad. With no external signal, you should have nice, well-defined (if somewhat soft) green dots. Do you know how many hours the set has on it? A lot of hours on the ES-focused tubes will have a profound effect on the sharpness (or lack thereof). Have you gone back and forth between the electronic and optical focus a few times? Forget about the blue for the moment; you should be able to get some nice, relatively clear dots on the green.
| Cube wrote: | | You're sure I can converge the test pattern at 4:3 and just use RGB SIZE to get 16:9? I thought for sure that was the "wrong" way to do it... seems like I should be adjusting the geometry SIZE control until the test pattern is 16:9 and converge that. |
You know... I just don't remember from my 12xx which way I did it. To make matters worse, I never had a 4:3 screen. I watched so little 4:3, I didn't see any reason to have a screen to accommodate it, and if I did watch some 4:3, I was perfectly happy just pillarboxing on my 16:9 screen... IMHO, the 4:3 images should be smaller, not larger, than the widescreen images.
I guess I essentially had mine setup as you're talking about - using SIZE to adjust the rasters to the screen. That should be fine.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rosenbush
Joined: 14 May 2010 Posts: 94 Location: Brownsville Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Don't be afraid to move the focus pot, you need to adjust it in order to get the focus done, the manual refers to the 'SCREEN' pot wich is next to it, not to be touched. Just keep the eye on the screen as you rotate it in order to see the changes. If you only did the optical focus, you're far from real focus.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Put a piece of tape over the screen controls if your block of plate is missing
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cube
Joined: 06 Dec 2009 Posts: 77 Location: IL, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rosenbush wrote: | | Don't be afraid to move the focus pot, you need to adjust it in order to get the focus done, the manual refers to the 'SCREEN' pot wich is next to it, not to be touched. Just keep the eye on the screen as you rotate it in order to see the changes. If you only did the optical focus, you're far from real focus. |
Well, it says this on page 63 of the installation manual: "The blue electric focus is adjusted at the factory. If it is further adjusted, the white balance has to be also readjusted. Never adjust the blue electric focus." The blue knob has a plastic lock thing on it like the G2 controls. I'm afraid to mess it up since I don't have a colorimeter and I'm not sure it's worth buying one just for this detail.
Anyway, the tubes have about 4000 hours on them. They don't have any apparent wear pattern looking at the tube surfaces so it seems like they should be pretty good. I'm going to mess with the throw some more and see if I can get it sharper. I guess moving the projector closer to the screen would be a good place to start because the manual's recommended throw distance has the actual video raster way overshooting the screen. It doesn't help that the 1272's test pattern seems to be a lot smaller than the video raster. I thought they were supposed to make it the other way around so you could get convergence through the overscan area.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rosenbush
Joined: 14 May 2010 Posts: 94 Location: Brownsville Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My mistake, about the manual "Never adjust the blue electric focus.", you're right. I was reading the manual for the 1270, similar, but not the same.
After you adjust red and green, see how bad is the blue focus, the human eye can not focus very well the blue, if you see there is no much problem with the blue, leave it alone if you feel confortable with that.
The calibration factory has gone already because your tubes are used, and the calibration needs to be done as the tubes change their power. The factory defocus the blue in order to avoid the "Bump"of the blue in the Gamma. But is just a little bit, by now the factory focus has changed as the tube change. This "Defocusing" has to be electronic only, not optical, and at this point I think you have both. What I did, is get the blue the best focus I could get , and then, defocusing a little bit with the pot, until the dots merge each other of the H.
But if you're pleased with the image with out mess with the blue, thats what really matter.
Good luck
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cube
Joined: 06 Dec 2009 Posts: 77 Location: IL, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Thanks for the advice guys. I've got these issues mostly solved now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|