|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
yonexsp
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 311
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 3:04 pm Post subject: Going grey: Which one will make me cry less? |
|
|
After many years of happy CRT'ing I am having to go grey.
In my budget I have narrowed it to either:
1) Epson 8500UB
2) JVC DLA-RS10
Which one should I pick? The JVC would be used, or perhaps I will still have time for a B-Stock.
I'm thinking black level's so, the Epson I understand is better than the Panny 4000
Advice greatly accepted.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You'll be back with your CRTs before long.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
antorsae
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 297
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If I were you I'd probably wait till Cedia (if you can) as there would be a few more with better blacks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| antorsae wrote: | | If I were you I'd probably wait till Cedia (if you can) as there would be a few more with better blacks. |
Or at least cheaper prices on what is out now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Willie
Joined: 13 May 2006 Posts: 169 Location: Green Bay
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
RS10
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bbfarmht
Joined: 27 May 2006 Posts: 1273 Location: Where the Mississippi runs east to west!!
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Panasonic PT-AE4000U
_________________ Adam
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both"
Benjamin Franklin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
benareeno
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1614 Location: ottawa, canada
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would go and look at as many as you can...it's hard to comment for someone else's taste.
A crt'er will likely prefer dlp technology...but they are always louder...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| benareeno wrote: | I would go and look at as many as you can...it's hard to comment for someone else's taste.
A crt'er will likely prefer dlp technology...but they are always louder... |
3 chip maybe...the cheap single chip ones...I will pass.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
With 3-chippers you risk unfixable alignment problems. A single-chip will always be razor-sharp. With LED technology there's no color wheel so no noise, no mechanical parts to break, no hot bulb to cook the video path or to replace, etc. Seems to me that 1-chip LED DLP could be almost the ideal way to go. Might not do the greatest blacks though.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bucketfoot
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 698 Location: Centennial, CO
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RS10
I moved to an RS2 about 8 months ago and have not had a single regret.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| garyfritz wrote: | | With 3-chippers you risk unfixable alignment problems. A single-chip will always be razor-sharp. With LED technology there's no color wheel so no noise, no mechanical parts to break, no hot bulb to cook the video path or to replace, etc. Seems to me that 1-chip LED DLP could be almost the ideal way to go. Might not do the greatest blacks though. |
I thought the early LED DLP's were just replacing the lamp with LED and not providing an R, G and B LED...so a wheel would be included and rainbows would still be present...maybe I need to research a bit more.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There might be some projectors that used a "white" LED source, though I didn't see any. Most of the LED projectors available now are pico / portable / pocket projectors. But the HT projectors I found all pulse their LEDs, many using the Luminus PhlatLight LED modules. They're still pretty pricey but I'm sure the prices will come down.
LED projectors have huge advantages and fit very well with DLP:
* No bulbs to burn out, lose brightness or color fidelity, or replace
* Roughly 60% less power consumption -- no cooking the components, less cooling requirements
* No worries about blowing a bulb if the power goes out
* More shock-resistant
* LEDs can cycle far faster than a color wheel, which should eliminate rainbow problems even for sensitive types
... and there's probably more but you get the idea! I think LED DLPs will be the way to go.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HogPilot
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Posts: 2383
TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LEDs certainly have advantages over lamp-driven projectors - instant on/off with no lifespan penalty, ability to modulate the light source to improve CR (much like a DI), significantly longer life, relatively little light output drop over the life of the LEDs, and less light drop when calibrated to D65. However, LED-based PJs carry a significant price premium over lamp-based units (at least 2x), and they also cannot output the same amount of light that a lamp PJ can. Right now there's no HT LED PJs that are suitable for screen sizes above 100", unless you're using a high-gain screen of some sort.
I have yet to see an LED PJ in action, but they have garnered some positive reviews thus far. In all honesty I would think that a CRTer would prefer LCoS over DLP, just because the former more closely resembles a CRT with it's more "fluid" look (i.e. much smaller inter-pixel gaps and less pixel visibility than DLP) and deeper black levels. DLP - especially 1-chip DLP - definitely gives you a razor sharp image, but I personally find it to be too sharp to the point of being distracting, and improvements in black levels have stagnated in the last several years. The pixel structure on my RS35 - which is still a sharp unit - doesn't stand out nearly as much as on my buddy's BenQ W20000, or the Sim2 HT3000 that I played with for a bit. LCD would be my last choice, but it also offers the most "bang for your buck" if you're looking to keep the price in the sub-$2.5K area.
Ultimately I'd really recommend auditioning each display tech for yourself if you can - everyone is different and gravitates towards different techs for one reason or another.
_________________
| ecrabb wrote: | | Curt Palme wrote: | | Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure. |
He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.
SC |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spanky Ham
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 5643 Location: Comedy Central
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hog,
While in theory CRTers would prefer LCOS, there are a good number who have went DLP. I have a Marantz that looks pretty good. I theoretically bought a Sony 40, but the seller had an issue with it, so he backed out. I hope to still get it at some point. I know Brian likes his Sony, so I am hoping this looks good and is an improvement over the Marantz.
To me, the JVCs are the class of the field. Unfortunately, the used ones are still going for good prices. There is a rumor that Epson is going LCOS. If that is the case, then there could be some interesting developments in inexpensive pj category. All of a sudden, Cedia just got a lot more interesting.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My guess is, it will be 3D mania at CEDIA this year. Wish I was in Indy...Oh well I hope the XG holds up another year when it returns in 2011 to Indy. That way I can see all the choices in one spot.
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deronmoped
Joined: 03 Nov 2006 Posts: 1154 Location: San Diego
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do the LED PJ's produce good color? I always heard that the LED's had issues with getting the correct color or at least not being able to have a LED that produces a good white. Maybe this is not a issue if you are combining RGB LED's.
I still love the image my 10PG produces, just seems so natural.
Deron.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
benareeno
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1614 Location: ottawa, canada
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
From what I understand...the LED's have the ability to produce very accurate colors..I'm excited to see one. I love the fact that the projector puts out less heat and therefore less noise.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HogPilot
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Posts: 2383
TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spanky - that's certainly interesting that some CRT guys have switched over to DLP. You never know what people see that makes them like one over the other.
deronmoped/beenareeno - there's really two parts to answering the question about the accuracy of LED's colors. Firstly, the colors produced by each R, G, and B LED are "more pure" than the colors we filter from UHP or even Xenon bulbs, so you can get a much more saturated color. So LEDs are capable of producing a significantly larger/more saturated gamut than any other commercial display technology out there. That being said, "proper color" is attained by adhering to SMPTE-C/REC709 or whatever gamut the material you're watching was mastered using. So from the perspective, the color from LED PJs is no better or worse than the color from any other digital - it really depends on the abilities of the PJ's CMS. From what I've read, it seems that most LED PJs have a pretty nice CMS so the colors can be dialed in quite accurately.
If you ask me, the only things stopping LEDs from totally overtaking the bulb PJ market are 1) price, 2) light output, and 3) DLP native contrast ratio (i.e. no LED dimming or DI tricks). #1 will come down as sales and production increase, #2 will hopefully continue to increase, but #3 is going to be the tough one. But an LED-lit single chip DLP with lots of light output and JVC RS-series native contrast will be one hell of a machine - bright, sharp, deep blacks, instant on/off, long lifetime. Possibly a digital contender to compete with CRTs performance-wise in a couple years...
_________________
| ecrabb wrote: | | Curt Palme wrote: | | Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure. |
He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.
SC |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HogPilot wrote: | | Spanky - that's certainly interesting that some CRT guys have switched over to DLP. You never know what people see that makes them like one over the other. |
I think Dave (person99) ended up with a DLP, and he is about as picky as they come. Some DLPs look mighty good.
| Quote: | | deronmoped/beenareeno - there's really two parts to answering the question about the accuracy of LED's colors. Firstly, the colors produced by each R, G, and B LED are "more pure" than the colors we filter from UHP or even Xenon bulbs, so you can get a much more saturated color. So LEDs are capable of producing a significantly larger/more saturated gamut than any other commercial display technology out there. That being said, "proper color" is attained by adhering to SMPTE-C/REC709 or whatever gamut the material you're watching was mastered using. So from the perspective, the color from LED PJs is no better or worse than the color from any other digital - it really depends on the abilities of the PJ's CMS. |
Typical DLPs use a "white" source -- which is actually a bumpy/spiky source with different levels of various color wavelengths that our eyes perceive as white, see e.g. section 3.2 on this page -- and filter it (with the color wheel) to approximate the 3 SMPTE colors. How close they get to SMPTE depends on the color characteristics of the bulb and the color wheel.
LED DLPs use R/G/B LEDs. LEDs are "pure" in that they emit one single wavelength of color. If that one single wavelength happens to exactly match the desired SMPTE color, you're golden. If not, I don't think you could filter it -- since there shouldn't be any emissions at the desired wavelength. If you filter out the "wrong" wavelength, there "shouldn't" be anything left.
I don't understand how a CMS could change the primary but that may be because I don't understand how the CMS works.
| Quote: | | If you ask me, the only things stopping LEDs from totally overtaking the bulb PJ market are 1) price, 2) light output, and 3) DLP native contrast ratio (i.e. no LED dimming or DI tricks). #1 will come down as sales and production increase, #2 will hopefully continue to increase, but #3 is going to be the tough one. But an LED-lit single chip DLP with lots of light output and JVC RS-series native contrast will be one hell of a machine - bright, sharp, deep blacks, instant on/off, long lifetime. Possibly a digital contender to compete with CRTs performance-wise in a couple years... |
Yup, agreed. Though performance-wise they may compete sooner than that. Price-wise might take a bit longer.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HogPilot
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Posts: 2383
TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| garyfritz wrote: | | I think Dave (person99) ended up with a DLP, and he is about as picky as they come. Some DLPs look mighty good. |
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't knocking DLP - I started off with DLP (an Optoma H79, aka the bulb destroyer) and love many things about it. I had a Sim2 HT3000E in my home for a while, and that thing threw an amazing image, but unfortunately the blacks were nowhere near what I was used to with my JVC. I've also seen a couple 3-chip DLPs in local HT shops that totally blew me away - unfortunately, so did the price tag
| garyfritz wrote: | Typical DLPs use a "white" source -- which is actually a bumpy/spiky source with different levels of various color wavelengths that our eyes perceive as white, see e.g. section 3.2 on this page -- and filter it (with the color wheel) to approximate the 3 SMPTE colors. How close they get to SMPTE depends on the color characteristics of the bulb and the color wheel.
LED DLPs use R/G/B LEDs. LEDs are "pure" in that they emit one single wavelength of color. If that one single wavelength happens to exactly match the desired SMPTE color, you're golden. If not, I don't think you could filter it -- since there shouldn't be any emissions at the desired wavelength. If you filter out the "wrong" wavelength, there "shouldn't" be anything left. |
Actually, here's a cine4home measurement of a common FP LED light source:
LEDs aren't quite able to offer up a single wavelength of light (as lasers do), although the range of wavelengths is narrower than an unfiltered UHP bulb:
Note that UHP's unfiltered green is primarily a yellowish green, so a lot of that light gets thrown out when we filter to attain a desired wavelength of green; LED offers a more pure green to begin with. Also, LED offers a lot more red than UHP, which means that you can calibrate an LED machine to D65 with little or no loss in total light output (green and blue in most calibrated UHP projectors get thrown away because UHP's relative low red output is the limiting factor in attaining D65 white).
Both light sources, however, are capable of producing colors that are more saturated than called for by REC709, which I'll discuss in a second with respect to CMSs.
| garyfritz wrote: | | I don't understand how a CMS could change the primary but that may be because I don't understand how the CMS works. |
A CMS mixes colors in an additive fashion to attain specific primary color targets, as long as the "source" primaries - in this case, the most saturated red, green and blue that the display is capable of producing - are more saturated than the target primaries. For example, take a look at the gamut from the JVC RS1 (ignore the info for the Barco):
Starting with the RS1, JVC's projectors have had notoriously oversaturated gamuts, illustrated by the large difference between the RS1's native gamut and the target REC709 gamut above. As we all know, displays create white by mixing red, green, and blue - a CMS uses this exact same principle, to a much lesser degree, to desaturate and change the hue of a display's primaries so that they line up with the target values. In the example above, a CMS would add both red and blue to green to desaturate it and pull it in to the target value. To change the hue of a color, a CMS adds only one primary - in the example above, adding only green to red would change the hue to be closer to the target value of red. An LED projector would have an even much larger gamut than the RS1, however when properly calibrated with a CMS both projectors would adhere to the REC709 gamut, and should appear to have identical colors. So when someone asks which display has "better" colors, there is no clear answer as, when properly calibrated, the colors should appear identical - this is the entire reason behind calibrating!
Note that a CMS can not create a primary that's more saturated than the most saturated primary a given display is capable of producing. Assuming we had access to say DCI material, which has a gamut that covers every color visible to the human eye, an LED projector would be able to reproduce many more of those colors than a UHP projector, and no CMS can change this fact. However, we don't have access to such material in our homes, and for the time being, the only material we can access that's NOT SMPTE-C or REC709 is stuff shot on home camcorders that are capable of recording xvYCC color (which also encompasses all visible colors).
_________________
| ecrabb wrote: | | Curt Palme wrote: | | Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure. |
He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.
SC |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|