Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Marquee dynamic focus

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
Author Message
tse



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 1014
Location: Sweatbucket, Fl.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:55 pm    Post subject: Marquee dynamic focus

The Marquee uses a resonant configuration in the output amplifier to lower the power dissipation. There is actually a patent dealing with this. The resonant circuit reduces the voltage needed by the amplifier, when compared to a linear amplifier, for a given amount of output. The amplifier switches capacitors in or out depending on the frequency which means one cap value is used for a range of frequencies. Certainly one specific frequency would have an optimum value of cap. If that value were known it might allow an increase in output current without increasing the power supply voltages used by the output amplifier.

Attached is a schematic showing the difference in output voltage needed by a linear amp compared to the resonant circuit amp. Both output currents are the same.

Scott



FocusAmp.GIF
 Description:
 Filesize:  18.03 KB
 Viewed:  7483 Time(s)

FocusAmp.GIF



_________________
"Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want bread."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
tse



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 1014
Location: Sweatbucket, Fl.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 8:26 pm    Post subject:

A range of output voltages with caps from 85 to 100nF with horizontal sweep frequency of 68kHz. The minimum peak voltage looks like 95nF (red trace) is lowest. This would allow a little more gain in the amplifier before clipping happens. Spice is cool. Of course the actual world will be a little different.

Scott



MinPeak.GIF
 Description:
 Filesize:  13.02 KB
 Viewed:  7477 Time(s)

MinPeak.GIF



85-100nF.GIF
 Description:
 Filesize:  13.46 KB
 Viewed:  7477 Time(s)

85-100nF.GIF



_________________
"Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want bread."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:01 pm    Post subject:

I love when you do these little "lessons" as it might relate to conversations in other threads :frankenyoke thread Very Happy

I forgot if lowering the resistance of the dynamic coil was a benefit or if it was the for the Static coil? I deleted that PM. But IIRC it was for the linear amp section for the static.

From what you told me in helping me figure out my old focus board problem and what the manual says is ,caps are switched in to lower power requirements(voltage) for different frequencies, but current stays the same correct? So by finding the best capacitor where all frequencies benefit for the last one in the marquee would be a good idea or if you knew what frequency you were mostly going to use.

Am i close teacher?

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:14 pm    Post subject:

One more thing Scott, but when you change the cap for the dynamic wont there be some change to the dynamic and vice a versa? I now there is a compensation component that goes to the static from the dynamic, would this change the static to any degree?

And what if you set the sweep frequency to 72Hz? id like to try that cap value, i think it would still be Cx19 that be changed correct?

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
tse



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 1014
Location: Sweatbucket, Fl.

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:13 am    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:
I love when you do these little "lessons" as it might relate to conversations in other threads :frankenyoke thread Very Happy

I forgot if lowering the resistance of the dynamic coil was a benefit or if it was the for the Static coil? I deleted that PM. But IIRC it was for the linear amp section for the static.

From what you told me in helping me figure out my old focus board problem and what the manual says is ,caps are switched in to lower power requirements(voltage) for different frequencies, but current stays the same correct? So by finding the best capacitor where all frequencies benefit for the last one in the marquee would be a good idea or if you knew what frequency you were mostly going to use.

Am i close teacher?

Athanasios


Probably the most to gain is by lowering the resistance of the static winding. That will give more range of static focus if the gauss of the permanent magnet is off a bit.

Yep, the caps are switched in for different frequencies with the goal being to lower power dissipation. The current is the same, always the same parabola with the same peak to peak current. It is all determined by the image size on the tube face. Every resolution/frequency is basically the same size on tube face so same current. Low frequencies take a long time so a relatively small voltage can cause the current change. When the frequencies increase there is less time to change the current so the voltages have to increase.

Scott

_________________
"Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want bread."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
tse



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 1014
Location: Sweatbucket, Fl.

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:21 am    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:
One more thing Scott, but when you change the cap for the dynamic wont there be some change to the dynamic and vice a versa? I now there is a compensation component that goes to the static from the dynamic, would this change the static to any degree?

And what if you set the sweep frequency to 72Hz? id like to try that cap value, i think it would still be Cx19 that be changed correct?

Athanasios


The compensation circuit will take care of changes in the horizontal dynamic focus. I think you made a typo. The resonant caps are in the horizontal dynamic focus (15 to 135kHz). Yeah, I think Cx19 is inthe circuit at 72kHz,

Scott

_________________
"Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want bread."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:34 am    Post subject:

Yes I meant the Comp Circuit. So I might actually give this a try with a few different values at Cx19 locations since you said in real world test things do change... Do they make a variable Film cap in that range to find the exact value ? It kinda be like what you did with peaking circuit on the Vim.

PS: I still need to find out why those caps are not switching in on my faulty FCM, The signal to the drivers are fine, but there is where it gets screwy, Would a bad Zener diode near the actual switched in AMp cause a wrong reading also near the driver mosfet for the main mosfet?

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
1031



Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 657
Location: Finland

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:45 am    Post subject:

Scott, thanks for the info. Thumbs Up
_________________
Marquee 9500LC (Frankenyokes / Thomas electric tubes / HD-10L / +many modīs)
DVDO VP-50
New hobby, Rally
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX2Rtpr1njs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZP9FEFXV5c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j065vei6j6s
http://www.facebook.com/pages/JTS-Racing-team/204443719572685
Back to top
mp20748



Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5689
Location: Maryland

TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:06 pm    Post subject: This is my kind of thread.. :thumbsup:

I spent some time looking at this last night on the scope(s). So now I'm thinking I'll work at putting a set of Barco 909 focus coils in my Marquee.

And if I'm able to get the 909 coils to work, maybe that would also solve getting the other Barco coils to work on Marquees.

Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:37 pm    Post subject:

Mike are do the 909 coils have the same inductance or close to that of the marquee? if not they will need to be rewound. the 1208/808 coils i have here are not even close, but rewinding them to the same inductance as the marquees allows them to work pretty good if not better than the 1292 coils. The astig windings for all coils are all within close proximity.

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
mp20748



Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5689
Location: Maryland

TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:42 pm    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:
Mike are do the 909 coils have the same inductance or close to that of the marquee? if not they will need to be rewound. the 1208/808 coils i have here are not even close, but rewinding them to the same inductance as the marquees allows them to work pretty good if not better than the 1292 coils. The astig windings for all coils are all within close proximity.

Athanasios


It's been awhile since I've measured the DC resistance, but from memory it's not the same as the Marquee. so I'll have a bit of work to do.
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:06 pm    Post subject:

Inductance is actually more important, for the static a lower resistance will give you more range, but the inductance is what creates the magnetic field to either add or take away from the physical magnet structure. So if the dead( not connected) magnet of the 909 does not focus the grid well you need a lower resistance wind than a stock marquee but still have the same or close inductance. I have rewound the 1208 coils successfully using 34 gauge wire but I think i can get better results using 30 gauge . this will give less resistance and the same inductance and still have enough room on the bobbin to get the correct wind turns for the needed inductance.

use this excellent wind calculator, you need to put in the bobbin measurements and then the inductance you want.
it will then tell you how many winds you'll need with a given wire size. Very cool program.

http://www.pronine.ca/multind.htm

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
mp20748



Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5689
Location: Maryland

TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:36 pm    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:
Inductance is actually more important, for the static a lower resistance will give you more range, but the inductance is what creates the magnetic field to either add or take away from the physical magnet structure. So if the dead( not connected) magnet of the 909 does not focus the grid well you need a lower resistance wind than a stock marquee but still have the same or close inductance. I have rewound the 1208 coils successfully using 34 gauge wire but I think i can get better results using 30 gauge . this will give less resistance and the same inductance and still have enough room on the bobbin to get the correct wind turns for the needed inductance.

use this excellent wind calculator, you need to put in the bobbin measurements and then the inductance you want.
it will then tell you how many winds you'll need with a given wire size. Very cool program.

http://www.pronine.ca/multind.htm

Athanasios


thanks for this.. Thumbs Up

I had also planned to look at the barco focus coil drive board circuit (below), and see If I can borrow something from it to put the Barco coils in my Marquee. based on tse's diagram, the diagram of that same Barco board is more likely Linear. And I'm also thinking that because it operates VERY hot. I've not studied the diagram fully, but there are three TDA2030's (same as the vertical drives on the Marquee) that are heat sink mounted.

The 909 has very tight convergence, but they had upgraded the heat sink section of the focus board to larger heatsinks on their later versions.

Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum