|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
SYC
Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 269
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:16 pm Post subject: For XG-110, which way to go? 1080P/48Hz, 1080I/72Hz/96Hz? |
|
|
I would like to have a judder-free picture, and I have a Lumagen HDP, which can provide 1080P/48Hz, 1080I/72Hz, and 1080i/96Hz.
1080P/48Hz, of course judder-free, but I can see a little flash in bright scene like in commerical theater. But 1080p is a little difficult for an 8" CRT.
1080i/72Hz, I was told that it is best for 8" CRT and have almost 1080p feeling. But I think there should be a frmae with two different fields, so it should not be a correct fresh rate.
My thought is that 1080i/96Hz should be the best solution for XG-100, have anyone tried this before? Will it be judder-free?
SYC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:31 pm Post subject: Re: For XG-110, which way to go? 1080P/48Hz, 1080I/72Hz/96Hz |
|
|
| SYC wrote: | I would like to have a judder-free picture, and I have a Lumagen HDP, which can provide 1080P/48Hz, 1080I/72Hz, and 1080i/96Hz.
1080P/48Hz, of course judder-free, but I can see a little flash in bright scene like in commerical theater. But 1080p is a little difficult for an 8" CRT.
1080i/72Hz, I was told that it is best for 8" CRT and have almost 1080p feeling. But I think there should be a frmae with two different fields, so it should not be a correct fresh rate.
My thought is that 1080i/96Hz should be the best solution for XG-100, have anyone tried this before? Will it be judder-free?
SYC |
You will get a couple of opinions, Mark and I will tell you a 1080i variation, others will say 1080p. But, just so you know, the bandwidth of 1080i/96 and 1080p/48 is EXACTLY the same. 1080i/72 is less.
You will rarely ever see an interlacing artifact due to two different frames being painted even at 1080i/72. The only artifact you will see is some stairstepping on straight lines of around 30 degrees, and scan lines on white content.
Let me ask you this, you've watched 480i/60 your whole life, how many times have you seen interlacing artifacts from two different frames when watching movies? Probably never or rarely. You'll see them even less at 1080i/96.
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
From my experience with different resolutions and refresh rates on an XG 1080p/48 flickers to point of causing a bad headache, I would try 1080i@96Hz. IMO the hot setup with a Lumagen would be try running 1920X817p/60 for scope movies then stretch the image with the scaler to use all 817 lines after that compress back to the correct AR with the projector. I tried this with my HTPC got a great image but the aspect ratio control with a HTPC stinks so I just settled on 1080p/72 but do give up a little sharpness.
A Lumagen has very decent 2:3 pull-down from what I understand so the judder may not be that bad. I was extremely impressed on at 2:3 pull-down on a VP50 at 60Hz when I seen one at Cliff's place, I would think it’s just as good on a HDP. Assuming your doing your own setup, try several different combinations and see what you like. What are you using for HDCP, a Moome or HDFury?
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mike, I get some raster ringing on the LHS edge of my screen at 1080i 96hz (or 1080p 48).
If I move to 1080p 72hz it will get worse.
Does your XG show this effect? I can't try your timings unless I swap out my Oscilliator board, and maybe System board - it's still an XG-75 at heart.
SYC, I tried 1920x802p at 72hz for scope movies, and it didn't look any different to 1080i 96hz. I could still see field lines/scanlines on white objects. I went back to 1080i 96hz. I think this is the best match.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark_A_W wrote: | Mike, I get some raster ringing on the LHS edge of my screen at 1080i 96hz (or 1080p 48).
If I move to 1080p 72hz it will get worse.
Does your XG show this effect? I can't try your timings unless I swap out my Oscilliator board, and maybe System board - it's still an XG-75 at heart.
SYC, I tried 1920x802p at 72hz for scope movies, and it didn't look any different to 1080i 96hz. I could still see field lines/scanlines on white objects. I went back to 1080i 96hz. I think this is the best match. |
Using Kai timings I didn't get any ringing that I recall it was almost a year ago. I just didn't like the 1090i/96 looked but I never really took the time to do a full setup after I got 1080p/72 working.
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SYC
Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 269
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mike, I use Moome without gamma boost. I don't think 817p is a good way to go. It uses the same phosphor area as 1080p 16:9 set-up if we maintain the correct AR. So it is the same the electric guns can not distinguish two lines as Mark mentioned on an 8" CRT. I think I will try 1080i/72 or 96Hz
SYC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SYC
Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 269
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:44 am Post subject: Re: For XG-110, which way to go? 1080P/48Hz, 1080I/72Hz/96Hz |
|
|
| Person99 wrote: | | SYC wrote: | I would like to have a judder-free picture, and I have a Lumagen HDP, which can provide 1080P/48Hz, 1080I/72Hz, and 1080i/96Hz.
1080P/48Hz, of course judder-free, but I can see a little flash in bright scene like in commerical theater. But 1080p is a little difficult for an 8" CRT.
1080i/72Hz, I was told that it is best for 8" CRT and have almost 1080p feeling. But I think there should be a frmae with two different fields, so it should not be a correct fresh rate.
My thought is that 1080i/96Hz should be the best solution for XG-100, have anyone tried this before? Will it be judder-free?
SYC |
You will get a couple of opinions, Mark and I will tell you a 1080i variation, others will say 1080p. But, just so you know, the bandwidth of 1080i/96 and 1080p/48 is EXACTLY the same. 1080i/72 is less.
You will rarely ever see an interlacing artifact due to two different frames being painted even at 1080i/72. The only artifact you will see is some stairstepping on straight lines of around 30 degrees, and scan lines on white content.
Let me ask you this, you've watched 480i/60 your whole life, how many times have you seen interlacing artifacts from two different frames when watching movies? Probably never or rarely. You'll see them even less at 1080i/96. |
For CRT, I think it is really hard to see interlacing artifacts
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SYC wrote: | Mike, I use Moome without gamma boost. I don't think 817p is a good way to go. It uses the same phosphor area as 1080p 16:9 set-up if we maintain the correct AR. So it is the same the electric guns can not distinguish two lines as Mark mentioned on an 8" CRT. I think I will try 1080i/72 or 96Hz
SYC |
That is correct phosphor area is the same but the bandwidth requirements are much lower at 817p. For 16:9 you material you would use a different resolution 1080i/72 or 96, I just didn't like seeing the interlace artifacts, and prefer a progressive resolution. It just a matter of personal taste I guess.
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
Last edited by MikeEby on Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:40 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't see any interlacing artifacts.
I thought I did till I tried 802p and the scanlines were still visible.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bert Randolph
Joined: 03 Jul 2007 Posts: 81 Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
On my 1351LC I see some noise (squiggely lines) that get less obvious the higher the bandwidth is.
Therfore I use 1080i@120 Hz. Works perfect for me: No squiggeling lines, no flicker, no interlacing artifacts (even windows explorer looks like it was 1080p) and no pulldown artifacts.
Does a Lumagen hdp/hdq do 1080i@120 Hz?
Daniel.
Last edited by Bert Randolph on Tue Nov 25, 2008 8:18 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Post your timing Daniel - I'll give it a go.
I just (finally) converted my XG-751 (now) LC chassis to a proper XG-1101LC (except the sticker).
I tried 1080p 72 hz, just to test the higher scanrate, but I need a bazillion porch pixels or the image edges are cropped.
These are Kai's 1080i 96hz, or close to them anyway:
PowerStrip timing parameters:
1920x1080=1920,112,128,115,1080,46,5,30,126655,542
Generic timing details for 1920x1080:
HFP=112 HSW=128 HBP=115 kHz=56 VFP=46 VSW=5 VBP=30 Hz=48
VESA detailed timing:
PClk=126.66 H.Active=1920 H.Blank=355 H.Offset=96 HSW=128 V.Active=1080 V.Blank=81 V.Offset=46 VSW=5
Linux modeline parameters:
"1920x1080" 126.655 1920 2032 2160 2275 1080 1126 1131 1161 interlace -hsync -vsync
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bert Randolph
Joined: 03 Jul 2007 Posts: 81 Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark_A_W wrote: | Post your timing Daniel - I'll give it a go.
|
Will do that when I get home.
I guess in Australia the work-day is long over Or is it still sunday??
Daniel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's 10:10 Monday evening, I'm about to go to bed....tired...been staying up watching the projector until midnight too often...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bert Randolph
Joined: 03 Jul 2007 Posts: 81 Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark_A_W wrote: | | ...been staying up watching the projector until midnight too often... |
Always good to find time to actually WATCH something, instead of tweaking the little monster
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bert Randolph
Joined: 03 Jul 2007 Posts: 81 Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay,
here are my timings for 1080i@120 Hz:
PowerStrip timing parameters:
1920x1080=1920,0,48,508,1080,4,10,31,167130,536
Generic timing details for 1920x1080:
HFP=0 HSW=48 HBP=508 kHz=68 VFP=4 VSW=10 VBP=31 Hz=60
VESA detailed timing:
PClk=167,13 H.Active=1920 H.Blank=556 H.Offset=-16 HSW=48 V.Active=1080 V.Blank=45 V.Offset=4 VSW=10
Linux modeline parameters:
"1920x1080" 167,130 1920 1920 1968 2476 1080 1084 1094 1125 interlace +hsync +vsync
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bert Randolph wrote: | Okay,
here are my timings for 1080i@120 Hz:
PowerStrip timing parameters:
1920x1080=1920,0,48,508,1080,4,10,31,167130,536
Generic timing details for 1920x1080:
HFP=0 HSW=48 HBP=508 kHz=68 VFP=4 VSW=10 VBP=31 Hz=60
VESA detailed timing:
PClk=167,13 H.Active=1920 H.Blank=556 H.Offset=-16 HSW=48 V.Active=1080 V.Blank=45 V.Offset=4 VSW=10
Linux modeline parameters:
"1920x1080" 167,130 1920 1920 1968 2476 1080 1084 1094 1125 interlace +hsync +vsync |
Very interesting....I might try it myself.
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whoa!! 508 back porch pixels.....that's a lot of bandwidth.
I just tried it, I can't fill my screen. I'm 60mm short either side - I'd have to move the projector or tweak the H-width on the deflection board.
But I'm not getting any raster ringing on the LH side, which means I probably should move my projector back a bit for my 96hz res.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bert Randolph
Joined: 03 Jul 2007 Posts: 81 Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark_A_W wrote: | Whoa!! 508 back porch pixels.....that's a lot of bandwidth.
I just tried it, I can't fill my screen. I'm 60mm short either side - I'd have to move the projector or tweak the H-width on the deflection board.
|
I was wondering too why there's such a huge back porch...I think I used the arrow-buttons in powerstrip to center the image in my raster and this was the outcome.
I have no problem filling my screen (amplitude is 70ish). Then agein i have not maximized the rasters in order to stay within the wear pattern.
I will try to lower the back porch value, maybe i can further reduce amplitude and save some bandwidth.
Daniel.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|