|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
nineballg
Joined: 28 Sep 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 8:54 pm Post subject: looking for some help (Moome vs HDfury) |
|
|
hi there hi have a nec xg110 projector and was planning to buy a hdmi input card or hdmi to rgbhv adapter. first off, there are 3 products i am considering. full hd xg 1.3 input card($450), the ext moome hdmi 1.3($339) and the new hd fury2($249). im very new to all this so please be patient if i get a little confused.
i am planning to get a bluray player that has 7.1 audio out and hook it up to my onkyo tx nr900 via multichannel.
therefore i wll not be using a hdmi 1.3 cable for audio. im just using hdmi 1.3 for video.
does anyone know if hdmi 1.1,1.2 is of the same quality as hdmi 1.3. is hdmi 1.3 the best for video(not talking about audio)?
next question i have, is does the hdfury2 hdmi 1.3 compatible. if it isnt and you plug in a hdmi 1.3 bluray player will it handle it or do you loose quality.
any feedback is greatly appreciated as i would like to get the best piece(1 of the above) for my system.
i will only need 1 hdmi input for my home theater set up, i am aware that the full hd xg 1.3($450) has 2 hdmi inputs, but thats irrelavent to my questions. i simply looking for the "quality" of these units. since the prices are so different, i just want to get exactly what i need, for example: if the hd fury2($249) is hdmi 1.3 compatible, is it everything i'll need? then i wont need to waste $200 extra dollars.
thank you so much for any feedback it is greatly appreciated!
sorry for the nightmare of so many questions.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moome
Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 497
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:45 pm Post subject: Re: looking for some help |
|
|
| nineballg wrote: | hi there hi have a nec xg110 projector and was planning to buy a hdmi input card or hdmi to rgbhv adapter. first off, there are 3 products i am considering. full hd xg 1.3 input card($450), the ext moome hdmi 1.3($339) and the new hd fury2($249). im very new to all this so please be patient if i get a little confused.
i am planning to get a bluray player that has 7.1 audio out and hook it up to my onkyo tx nr900 via multichannel.
therefore i wll not be using a hdmi 1.3 cable for audio. im just using hdmi 1.3 for video.
does anyone know if hdmi 1.1,1.2 is of the same quality as hdmi 1.3. is hdmi 1.3 the best for video(not talking about audio)?
next question i have, is does the hdfury2 hdmi 1.3 compatible. if it isnt and you plug in a hdmi 1.3 bluray player will it handle it or do you loose quality.
any feedback is greatly appreciated as i would like to get the best piece(1 of the above) for my system.
i will only need 1 hdmi input for my home theater set up, i am aware that the full hd xg 1.3($450) has 2 hdmi inputs, but thats irrelavent to my questions. i simply looking for the "quality" of these units. since the prices are so different, i just want to get exactly what i need, for example: if the hd fury2($249) is hdmi 1.3 compatible, is it everything i'll need? then i wont need to waste $200 extra dollars.
thank you so much for any feedback it is greatly appreciated!
sorry for the nightmare of so many questions. |
hi, here is the video path you can see, the EXT/IFB/VIM/XG-FULLHD is fully support 10/12bit deep color~
and other solution will be only 8bit path.
| Description: |
| other old hdmi (V1.1 V1.2) solution data path |
|
| Filesize: |
59.46 KB |
| Viewed: |
5547 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
| XG/IFB/VIM-FULLHD video data path |
|
| Filesize: |
53.56 KB |
| Viewed: |
5547 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
55.89 KB |
| Viewed: |
5547 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
| HDMI 1.3 source support deep color, but need HDMI RX support HDMI 1.3 also. |
|
| Filesize: |
96.56 KB |
| Viewed: |
5547 Time(s) |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nineballg
Joined: 28 Sep 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks moome for the feedback.
all the specs and numbers are a little over my head but i seem to understand somewhat.
my last question is that the "ext" hdmi 1.3 had a 10-12bit path(correct me if im wrong) and the"nec xg"hdmi 1.3 has a 12 bit path the only difference in the two units(despite the different hook ups and the ext hdmi having only one hdmi input)?
overall, i'm looking to find out which one of the above products will perform better. for my home theater setup, i will only need one hdmi input and would like to save some money if the second hdmi input is not needed.
thanks so kindly
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
moome
Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 497
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nineballg wrote: | thanks moome for the feedback.
all the specs and numbers are a little over my head but i seem to understand somewhat.
my last question is that the "ext" hdmi 1.3 had a 10-12bit path(correct me if im wrong) and the"nec xg"hdmi 1.3 has a 12 bit path the only difference in the two units(despite the different hook ups and the ext hdmi having only one hdmi input)?
overall, i'm looking to find out which one of the above products will perform better. for my home theater setup, i will only need one hdmi input and would like to save some money if the second hdmi input is not needed.
thanks so kindly |
hi, the EXT-FULLHD and IFB-FULLHD are good picture quality, there is not big difference between them~
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|
