| Author |
Message |
donr
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 162 Location: Montreal
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:50 pm Post subject: 4000G vs 6PG+ |
|
|
I just got a deal (I think) on a 6PG+ this morning. I purchased another projector to set up a game room for my son. He is playing with his ps3 on a 21", 480i TV. Horrible!
The previous owner of the pg said he put around 15 hours on the new tubes and then he stored it for a few years. Now I did not get a chance to verify this but if it is true, I am wondering how this thing would compare to my Ampro 4000G. My 4000 really throws an awesome picture on my 8 feet wide screen and, the LC tubes are really in good shape plus, it is already set up. I want to keep the best one for HT use. Just wanted to inquire with the people in the know to see what they think, pros and cons.
Don
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew Low
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 28
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 6PG+ has EM focus, so as the tubes age it will maintain a tighter focus.
If you look at the rankings chart http://www.curtpalme.com/Projector_Rankings.shtm they are in the same basic category. The Nec units are pretty famous for very loud fans.
The only Nec I've seen in person was an XG (LC) version, which was amazing - but its is a step up from the 6G+.
Glad to hear the Ampro is working well for you.
Roo
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donr
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 162 Location: Montreal
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks guys
Andy
Love the Ampro.
I am not using an htpc at the moment. I got that out of the loop last year. But now that I have a new quad core, just might bring it back and try the power strip timings. The scrrenshots are incredible.
Don
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
yeah, and the picture is actually way better on screen than the screenshots may indicate.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think the Ampro will still look better, but the NEC is no slouch either.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ohh, and here's a screenshot I took in late May:
| kschmit2 wrote: | NEC 6PG Plus at 1080i96:
 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donr
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 162 Location: Montreal
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was thinking tha,t if I worked at it a bit more and, if I used those power strip timings, I might be able to get a similar picture with the Ampro! Does the fact that it refreshes the interlaced signal 96 times a second improve picture quality or does it simply remove the jaggies? Again, great picture.
Don
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
it removes jaggies when playing movies (23.976 fps) and eliminates flickering.
Bandwidth requirements are of course higher than 1080i72, but are the same as 1080p48, and thus still significantly lower than 1080p60.
Kai
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donr
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 162 Location: Montreal
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What is the formula for figuring bandwidth requirement at a specific resolution?
Don
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For a display device it should be in the range of pixel clock devided by 2 to 1.5.
Don't get confused by Extron's claims that would suggest that a much higher bandwidth is needed. It's because their devices are in the middle of a display chain, and thus need to be spec'd higher to ensure no detrimental effect on the image.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the 6PG+ has been sitting check the tubes to see if there's still an air bubble in there. If not you'll need to bleed the tube and release the presure.
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| AnalogRocks wrote: | | If the 6PG+ has been sitting check the tubes to see if there's still an air bubble in there. If not you'll need to bleed the tube and release the presure. |
very true!
Instructions here: http://www.curtpalme.com/Bleeding_CRT_Tubes1.shtm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donr
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 162 Location: Montreal
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you gents for your help.
Don
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donr
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 162 Location: Montreal
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the question of which pj will throw a better picture is now irrelevant. The tubes on the Nec are toast. At least that's what it looks like after checking with a flashlight. Good for parts.
One thing I was wondering! Do these pj's come with HD 145 lenses because thats whats on them?
Don
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes, PG+ comes with HD-145 and Xtra comes with HD-144 or HD-145 lenses. Also the XG AC comes with either HD-145 (XG1350) or HD-144 (XG 750, 852) lenses.
PG6/9000 came with color filtered HD-6C ML lenses.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
one thing I forgot in my previous post:
it is highly recommended to not mount the PJ too close to the ceiling. The standard mount does not give enough clearance to keep temps low enough to allow for any fan mods.
Personally, I have the PJ mounted to a Sony PSS-10, with about 12" of clearance from the bottom of the PJ to the ceiling. Mounting it that way will result in tremendous temparature drops.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|