Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Greyscale -Using Kal's Guide / XG-852 / So far so good...

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Audio & Video Calibration
Author Message
dropzone7



Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 1069
Location: Charlotte, NC

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:57 pm    Post subject: Greyscale -Using Kal's Guide / XG-852 / So far so good...

I thought I would start a new thread so as not to further clutter the main one dealing with Kal's guide. I'm posting some before and after graphs mainly for my own reference and to help document what I have done so far. I have to say that after my initial measurements I was confused about how all of that translates to the picture I see on screen. I thought it looked pretty good really. Well, last night was about a 5 hour session of squinting in the dark to read Kal's guide and go through all of the RGB HighEnd / LowEnd adjustments (did not touch Green as suggested). Wow! What a difference! Just with what I have done so far it's so much smoother and I had no idea how much my convergence was affected by bad greyscale and brightness settings. After this last session my convergence actually looks better than ever with crisper white lines with little to no color bleeding over. I still have a lot of work to do and I have yet to add my RTC2200 back into the chain for gamma boost so although my gamma improved after greyscale calibration, I expect it will get better when I reintroduce the RTC2200. After reviewing the data the thing that sticks out like a sore thumb now is my RGB levels below 30IRE. They are all over the place! What should I do to try and flatten those out? Just looking for comments and suggestions.


Measures - Before


Measures - After


RGB - Before


RGB - After


Gamma - Before


Gamma - After

_________________
"Coffee is for Closers."
Back to top
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 12088
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Greyscale -Using Kal's Guide / XG-852 / So far so good..

dropzone7 wrote:
Just with what I have done so far it's so much smoother and I had no idea how much my convergence was affected by bad greyscale and brightness settings.

I'm not sure how grayscale or brightness could affect your convergence!? Contrast maybe -- too high will cause blooming and that might mess up your convergence and certainly harm your sharpness. Maybe your high end (gain/drive) was too high and that was causing bloom?

Quote:
I have yet to add my RTC2200 back into the chain for gamma boost so although my gamma improved after greyscale calibration, I expect it will get better when I reintroduce the RTC2200. After reviewing the data the thing that sticks out like a sore thumb now is my RGB levels below 30IRE. They are all over the place! What should I do to try and flatten those out?

I'd guess the low-end craziness is almost certainly due to your sensor. I thought the Eye-One was supposed to do better than that in low IREs, but maybe not.

Definitely re-do the grayscale after you put the RTC2200 back in there. Your gamma is already too low (<2 for the higher IREs), but gamma boost mainly affects the lower IREs. If you boost the low end with the RTC2200, maybe that will bring the low-IRE gamma down to the same range as the high-end gamma, and then you can work on raising the whole gamma up to the 2.2-2.4 range. That will give you darker darks. With your current gamma I suspect the pic looks a bit washed out in the brighter areas and too dark in the darker areas.
Back to top
dropzone7



Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 1069
Location: Charlotte, NC

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:49 pm    Post subject:

Thanks for the comments Gary. Maybe it was just late and I was getting tired but my convergence did seem improved after I finished the greyscale. I'm not sure it would be a contrast issue because I normally run that at about 55 but right now it's at 75 which is factory default and what Kal recommends for doing the greyscale. I had also set brightness at default of 60 which is higher than my normal 44 or so when I have the gamma applied. When I finished adjustments which included following the guides procedure for setting brightness and contrast, I was at 47 for brightness and contrast was left at 75 if I remember correctly. I really can't put a finger on what may have caused this perhaps perceived improvement in convergence but I should say that I spent about an hour of last night's session tweaking convergence and redoing optical and electronic focus. Anyway, I apparently did something right and on top of that I THINK I took a step in the right direction with my greyscale. Back at it tonight I hope.

Oh yeah, you might be right about the sensor in the lower end measurements because the numbers kept jumping around all over the place, updating like every second or less instead of every three seconds or so in the above 30IRE readings. Still, much better than the Spyder II which I tried a few months ago.

_________________
"Coffee is for Closers."
Back to top
dropzone7



Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 1069
Location: Charlotte, NC

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:54 pm    Post subject:

Well, I have done this procedure about six times now and I'm still not satisfied. I'm having a big problem with gamma and luminance. My luminance measures are well above the target value even with brightness pretty low (app. 41) and gamma all the way down. My gamma hovers around 1.87 to 2.01 which if I read the guide correctly means that my gamma is too high as the lower numbers mean too MUCH gamma? I have turned gamma up and down as well as adjusting brightness several times using the video black / pluge pattern and still my results are near the same. I even tried adjusting brightness using the less subjective method of taking the Y reading and multiplying by 0.0065 and using that result as my target Y value for brightness measured with a 10IRE pattern. Although I preferred that method it did not seem to help with my high luminance and low gamma numbers, or is it high gamma numbers? Very confusing. The one thing I have not changed in all of these readings and adjustments is my contrast value. I'm set at contrast of 75 and am within or very close to the target foot lambert value for a projector. Should I try turning contrast down? Will it have an effect on my luminance and or gamma numbers the way that brightness does? BTW, this Eye-One meter is not doing so well in the lower IRE readings. The measurements are all over the place and won't stabilize. I can't get a Delta-E of less than about 80 for 10IRE and 0IRE is above 150 Delta-E. Help!!
_________________
"Coffee is for Closers."
Back to top
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:37 pm    Post subject:

dropzone7 wrote:
Well, I have done this procedure about six times now and I'm still not satisfied. I'm having a big problem with gamma and luminance. My luminance measures are well above the target value even with brightness pretty low (app. 41) and gamma all the way down. My gamma hovers around 1.87 to 2.01 which if I read the guide correctly means that my gamma is too high as the lower numbers mean too MUCH gamma?

Correct.

Hopefully some of the XG experts can chime in. The can be quite complex to set up given the amount of controls. You'll get there!

Kal

_________________

Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
dropzone7



Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 1069
Location: Charlotte, NC

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:53 pm    Post subject:

kal wrote:
dropzone7 wrote:
Well, I have done this procedure about six times now and I'm still not satisfied. I'm having a big problem with gamma and luminance. My luminance measures are well above the target value even with brightness pretty low (app. 41) and gamma all the way down. My gamma hovers around 1.87 to 2.01 which if I read the guide correctly means that my gamma is too high as the lower numbers mean too MUCH gamma?

Correct.

Hopefully some of the XG experts can chime in. The can be quite complex to set up given the amount of controls. You'll get there!

Kal


It's really fun trying! I appreciate your guide very much Kal. I wouldn't have gotten this far without it. My wife walked in the room Friday night at 12:30 am, looked at me and just shook her head. She said, "You are never going to be satisfied are you?" Laughing

_________________
"Coffee is for Closers."
Back to top
dropzone7



Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 1069
Location: Charlotte, NC

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:25 pm    Post subject:

I just can't seem to get this right. My measurements of luminance from day one have been too high according to the target range. I tried lowering contrast last night (from 75 to 65) because it's the only thing that has remained constant since I started this. I also lowered brightness after once again trying the Y measured value at 10IRE. It looked better the last time I tried that but this time it was too bright. I lowered it more judging by eye using the 0IRE pattern with the black bars. Well, as you can see from the graph below my red took a major dump at 50IRE for some reason. You can also see from the next graph that my luminance is still way high from the target. This is with gamma boost all the way off, brightness at 47 and contrast at 65. The gamma numbers did improve some and while it takes a steep drop my average is now 2.00. I don't understand what's going on and what I should do next really.






_________________
"Coffee is for Closers."
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:31 am    Post subject:

Drop are you defocusing the blue at all I didnt throughroly read through your entire post.
It can help gamma bit but some times a higher gamma is ok, it depends on what your looking at on the screen, if it looks better than before be happy !

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
dropzone7



Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 1069
Location: Charlotte, NC

Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:37 pm    Post subject:

Athanasios, I have the blue defocus turned "ON" in the options menu and I have also done some electronic defocus (set at +15) and it looks very defocused to me. I can already see the blue fringing around white text. I tried some different things last night including turning the gamma boost all the way up and recalibrating and also trying a few different brightness settings with the gamma all the way up. Some items improved while others got worse. It's difficult to find that fine balance I suppose.

Scan #1











Scan #2










_________________
"Coffee is for Closers."
Back to top
dropzone7



Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 1069
Location: Charlotte, NC

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:59 pm    Post subject:

A question for anyone that cares to respond. Although Kal's guide refers to calibrating RGB levels at the 30IRE and 80IRE patterns, would it be beneficial at all or advisable to try calibrating at other levels such as 20IRE and 50IRE? I continue to get a severe dip in red at 50IRE. However, I have finally reached a near target level with my luminance and average gamma. Attached is my latest attempt. Any suggestions?


82508-03.zip
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  82508-03.zip
 Filesize:  862 Bytes
 Downloaded:  10 Time(s)


_________________
"Coffee is for Closers."
Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Audio & Video Calibration All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum