| Author |
Message |
MYoung
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 369 Location: Madison, WI
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 6:21 pm Post subject: 1292Q no longer a high performance CRT projector? |
|
|
Maybe it's just me, but wasn't the 1292Q listed in the "high performance CRT projectors" section of the rankings?
http://www.curtpalme.com/Projector_Rankings.shtm
If it was then what caused it to be dethroned? Streaky picture issues? I see the G70 is listed in the high performance CRT projector section and I thought it wasn't capable of fully resolving 1080p. 8" tubes and almost 1080p is good enough to be considered a high performance CRT projector? Can you tell I own a 1292Q? I'll be the first to admit though, the streaks can be a pain in the ass. Maybe I just need to tweak my setup more to reduce their presence.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 18114 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MYoung
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 369 Location: Madison, WI
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess I missed the flame war.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fujifrontier
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 354 Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
did the 1020 get moved around at all?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 18114 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SweetChuck
Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Posts: 134 Location: Queensland Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a 1292 , XG135LC , and a 9500 .
The only Bitch I have with the Sony is noise and streaking , otherwise its the best projector I have owned to date .
XG is no whisper machine either , and rather retarded . As I found , it needs constant attention and spoon feeding
Can't comment on my 9500 yet as it has more fungus in the C elements than a goldfish tank in a crack house
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Smith
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 7717
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MYoung wrote: | I guess I missed the flame war.  |
Nope. There was no flame war. For the most part, everyone agreed with the changes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SweetChuck wrote: |
The only Bitch I have with the Sony is noise and streaking , otherwise its the best projector I have owned to date . |
But streaking is a major artifact that you don't find on the good 8" LC machines. My belief is artifacts = bad. Also, the noise level makes them pretty much unacceptable for home theater use.
| SweetChuck wrote: | | XG is no whisper machine either , and rather retarded . As I found , it needs constant attention and spoon feeding |
I agree with this which is why I would never own an XG. But, its small size at least makes a hushbox a bit mor practical the on a 1292--and it still isn't as loud as a 1292!
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deronmoped
Joined: 03 Nov 2006 Posts: 1154 Location: San Diego
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
What exactly determines a High Performance PJ? Is it the image or what?
Deron.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
The only reason the 4600 is still on the A-list is because of it's outstanding reliability
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 18114 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deronmoped
Joined: 03 Nov 2006 Posts: 1154 Location: San Diego
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apparently no one compared the NEC XG to the NEC 10PG, I used to have a XG and moved up to a 10PG. The 10PG is way sharper then the XG's. The other thing to consider is, sense the 10PG (and other 9" PJ's) have way more phosphor to work with, at the same brightness the tubes will last all most twice as long. A 8" tube probably has 20 square inches of usable phosphor, a 9" has like 35 square inches of usable phosphor. Not only that, blooming will occur sooner on smaller tubes and sharpness suffers way before blooming occurs on smaller tubes do to less phosphor. Of course, then again I can see these differences running a 160" screen
All I can say about the other PJ's that do not have the "Awesome colors" the NEC's have is, I hope these people enjoy their orange red's and their yellow greens
Deron.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Deron,
Your characterization of the tube sizes is way off. It doesn't matter that there's 20 vs. 35 sq inches (or whatever) because most of us are only using about the center half or so, and even less because of keystone. Set up a 9" machine on a 16:9 screen with some keystone, and you'll be using about 25% more phosphor than you would with an 8-incher - that's 25% max. In practice, it would be even less.
Using a more realistic number, if you'll get 8,000 hours out of your 9" tubes, I'll only get 6,000 out of mine. Obviously, it gives you some headroom to drive the projector not so hard, but you can easily run an 8"-er on a sane screen size to decent levels without blooming. Phosphor longevity - big whoop. How many of us will even have our CRT's (much less the SAME CRT) in 5 years?
As for your comparison and tiny sample size of two projectors, can you say your 10PG isn't better than most and is it possible that your XG wasn't up to snuff? Were you trying to light up the 160" screen with the XG? What lenses were you using - that's a big screen.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Smith
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 7717
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| deronmoped wrote: | All I can say about the other PJ's that do not have the "Awesome colors" the NEC's have is, I hope these people enjoy their orange red's and their yellow greens  |
That's a fallacy propagated by NEC owners for years. There are several PJs with the correct color filtering that are every bit the equal to the color performance of the NECs, and always has been.
People have a much better understanding of what makes a CRT PJ produce accurate colors now days. You can't just spout off crap like that and expect everyone to buy it any longer.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sonynut
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 Posts: 367 Location: Bradford,PA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jeez, even my lowly 12xx's have correct colors due to color filtering...
_________________ 1272 Stack coming soon:)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deronmoped
Joined: 03 Nov 2006 Posts: 1154 Location: San Diego
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Phil
Do not twist my words please, I did not say, like you infer, that all PJ's do not have the awesome colors the NEC's have. I just like to poke fun at the PJ's that are rated better then the NEC's, that do not have correct colors.
And what's that supposed to mean? People have a better understanding nowadays of what makes a CRT PJ produce accurate colors. I'm sure the people that designed and built these CRT's knew now to get accurate colors. Some of them just choose lumen output over more accurate colors, which was a wise choice when building a PJ for boardrooms or control centers...
Deron.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deronmoped
Joined: 03 Nov 2006 Posts: 1154 Location: San Diego
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
SC
No, your wrong
Size does matter 8)
I had several XG's, 1100, 1350, 75, a bunch of 8000's and 8500's, 1272... Dam, I forgot all the PJ's I've had over the years.
I found out that the 8" machines would not give me the sharpness I wanted on a super big screen. I spent a hell of a lot of time setting up several of them trying, maybe I could do better now, but when I installed the 9"er it was a done deal.
Deron.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deronmoped
Joined: 03 Nov 2006 Posts: 1154 Location: San Diego
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
SC
Oh, and by the way, do not let Curt know you will be offloading your CRT after five years
I've had my 10PG for like five years now, have a set of new NEC tubes, hopefully this thing will outlive me
Deron.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rabies_70
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 1189 Location: Carlsbad, CA
TV/Projector: Sony G70Q
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SweetChuck wrote: | I have a 1292 , XG135LC , and a 9500 .
Can't comment on my 9500 yet as it has more fungus in the C elements than a goldfish tank in a crack house  |
Sorry...that just cracks me up
_________________ Ray
I am an iconoclast
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChrisO
Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 3 Location: Livonia, Mi.
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:25 pm Post subject: 1292Q no longer a high performance CRT projector? |
|
|
| Quote: | The following were moved from "High Performance" to "Intermediate Level":
Sony 1292 |
I'm definitely not a CRT projector expert by no means.... ( but I can fake it REAL good! )
About 2 years ago I purchased 2 Sony 1292's locally from a CRT repair technician. It took me 2 years to get the theater "up and running" and I can honestly say one thing about these 1292's. Once you have them setup they are bomb proof! Colors are always dead on and I have not seen ANY streaking. The only drawback is the noise! and it's a monster!
I have see other 1292's performing and the image is always razor sharp and colors dead on!
The one thing that doesn't make sense to me, is the Lumen's rating on the 1292Q's. I have seen 9500's and 1292's with simular screen sizes that produce the almost the same brightness of image... Something doesn't add up there....
Has anyone made any progress on changing fans or "modifying" the case of the 1292Q to tame the beast??
-Chris
_________________ The 1292 will never die!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|