Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 62, 63, 64  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
Author Message
PaulB



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 359
Location: Bonnie (but rainy) Scotland

Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 5:05 am    Post subject:

Thanks for that guys. I'm just walking in the footsteps of giants and trying to give something back to the forum Thumbs Up

Still need to brush up my soldering skills though, that de-coupling sandwich on the VNBs was a nightmare, an absolute pig of a job that was. I'll be very surprised if I didn't cook one of the caps!

Thats a good link Tom. The layout of the page makes it very easy to read through, nice.
Paul
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:02 am    Post subject: Marquee Gamma Board PCB

well I Finally Finished the final CAD design board layout for the blue gamma boost and thank god
I sent jarmo the files to look at as he caught a mistake I had with one resistor( R199) being
parallel and not in series !! Shocked But APC in alberta are quick!
I sent them the files they needed and three days later the boards were delivered!!

here they are I made 6, i need to put the parts on and test it on my Modded 2005-03p Vim.




Looks really nice doesnt it!!

Now lets hope i got it right and it works ok !!!!

This will be part of the 2006-03p Vim upgrade once I get to that section.


Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal


Last edited by Nashou66 on Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:03 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 3:40 am    Post subject: CLM Power rail Mods Stage I

STAGE I CLM Mod

Ok now on the the Control Module or the CLM. I did the mods McPherve talked about in the
JeaHong_lee thread. Also Mike parker posted some pics of his mod to these rails
as well(he used larger values) and this is when I first attempted to do any upgrades
to my marquee component level wise. Back then I was a complete newbie and forgot to put the
caps on with the right polarity and I fried something I could not fix back then. Embarassed
On this next section i will not take pics of me doing the removal and of install as I think we all now
have a good feel of removing and installing parts.
I will show the locations on the non moded board and then the moded board. there are older versions
of CLM's(like the one I blew up) and I have not studied the schematics for them to name the parts
on those boards, so this is only for the newer boards as in the pics below. If i get time I may try to
mod an older CLM and post back here but some caps are the same and i'll mention those.

Mike parker did this mod to clean up noise the 5 and 15 Volt rails sent back into the rest of the projector
and he also found that after doing this focus sharpened up as well, I saw this also ,with just these mods.
These caps Decouple certain IC's on the board.
In the next section we will improve on this more by going after the caps right at the IC's.

Stock CLM with daughter boards removed:


Moded board


Ok first we will replace the four tants near the left connector pins, these are C1,C2,C6 and C113.

Four tantalums to be removed



We replace them with higher voltage value's and temp, Mike P also raised the cap values I have not on this
CLM but plan to on the stock one and compare the two. Since I do more mods that might not need the higher
values in these locations here.

EDIT: I originaly used a 47uf 40 V cap for C6 and C7 I have changed them
to 100uf 20v Oscons the previous cap was not an Oscon.So ignor the 47uf 40v caps


For C1 and C2 I used a 10uf 50v 105c low ESR cap, panasonic FC series. MP used 100uf.
For C6 I use an oscon 47uf 40v cap, sanyo made these.
For C113 I went with a 33uf 16v vishay tantalum, these are different than any tant I have seen before
smaller size but seem to work well, I ordered the smaller size by mistake ,the original
is a C size and I got the B size.

Now also here on the two pins that feed the + side of C2 and the - side of C1 we put 220uh inductors.
I use murata's as they were nice and small to fit in there. you need to lift or
cut(I lifted by desoldering from underneath) pins 27(-) and 28(+)
and solder the inductors from the lifted pin end to the hole of the removed
pin to complete the connection to the caps.

All caps and Inductors in place(one inductor is hiding under the other)
Also you can see the small orange 33uf Vishay tantalum





Next we will remove Tantalums C3,C7 and C43

Three tantalums to be romoved



C3 and C43 we replace with the same 33uf 16v tants
C7 decouples the same Ic's as C6(before) so we use the same 47uf 40v Oscon here.

Caps replaced, Oscon must lay down with longer leads to have daughter board fit over top



Next remove C12



Replace with another 33uf 16v tant



And last remove C145



Replace with same 33uf tant from before



Next time we'll replace a few IC's and more caps

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal


Last edited by Nashou66 on Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:23 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 10:33 pm    Post subject: CLM MOD STAGE II: IC's and Individual IC Decoupling caps.

CLM MOD STAGE II: IC's and Individual IC Decoupling caps.

EDIT: September 15th 2009: do not change the caps X31 and X32 to tants, these
are powered by the battery and using a polar cap here seams to drain the batteries if changed
already replace to the 100nf ceramic caps.


We will change out three IC's on this board and also a slew of caps, I have not gotten around to
all of them but have done at least half. there over over 100 ceramic decoupling caps at each
chip on the board. Most of these are digital circuits and you know what that does... yepp put
some digital noise into the power supply. Ken Hotte(KBK) changed out all these caps with no
issues, others have done them and have had start up problems. I have done 52 of the 122 I
counted in the schematic ( I will add this as a down load) so far, the rest will happen also.
The schematic helps with seeing which power rail goes to which caps. You will need to use a
continuity tester on your multimeter to make sure you put the right polarities of the caps to the
right side of the pad. From the schematic you find the large cap(ones we changed in previous stage)
that have polarities and locate all the caps that are fed from this cap or caps in a few cases.
You now need to take out your continuity tester put one end on the positive side of the power
rail cap and put the other end on the pads of the decoupling caps at each IC , when it
beeps(makes continuity) you found the positive side of the cap.
Just to make sure I also then test that cap i just found the positive side to and move the tester to the
negative side and test the other pad of the IC cap... it should beep also. I do about 5 caps at a time
then test the board.
I blew a few tants not getting this right so be thorough and don't rush!!!! You may blow more than
just the tants!!! So double check you have the right polarity,this is why i only do 5 at a time.

Here is what KBK said in his post on AVS Archives
KBK(Ken Hotte)
Quote:
I have suffered NO failures or odd behavior. This modification of the control board
brings about a huge increase in the stability of the line drawing and drops the noise floor
as a consequence, due to the fact that lines are being drawn in their proper spots, and
therefore this equates to alignment, which is gun-to-gun alignment (overlay) which directly
can be equated to maximum contrast range, or video S/N ratio. The effect this circuit has on
damaging the rest of the PJ's dealing with the quality of power in the -/+ 15 volt rails is quite
critical as well. When you run at 1920x1200 at 72hz like I do (simply a very high scanning
number, well over a 2X multiple of the original DVD transfer, and nearly a perfect multiple of
the original HD master the DVD transfer was created with), to get the BEST DVD overlay
possible; these modifications, and the clairity they bring to the PJ are CRITICAL.


That is quite a statement!! But From just the 52 caps I have cahged along with stage one mods
this is the biggest improvement I have made I believe . I was scepticle when first reading this
but once i did them after a few weeks of doing stage I , i was convinced i now saw scan lines running
my normal 1080p@48hz much more clearly than before.

Ken Hotte post on AVS Archives

ICs to change out are U73,U76 and U82 these are the focus waveform generator IC's of the
noisy type from the other boards we changed out. These are under the Deflection processor board.

Replacement chips:
U76=TLE2074 DGW(wide body)
U73=OPA4134UA
U82=TLE2074 DGW(wide body)

Pics of Chips on Board




"Hey !! what are those blue balls (not what your thinking Wink ) next to the chips "!

Glad you asked ! those are 22uf 16v diped tantalums across .1uf 16v SMT tantalums. Remove the
100nf ceramics and add both.Make sure they are low enough so the daughter board will
fit on top.Remember to use the continuity checker for the right polarity!!
Or look at the pic Wink

Next go to the schematic and track down the IC's decoupling caps and the power supply caps that feed them.
I started with the center of the board @ U46 with its corresponding cap X46 if you follow the lines back on
the schematics this cap is powered by either C6 or C7 so put one end of your continuity checker to the +
side of C7(easier to get to) and the other test probe to a pad on X46 when it beeps thats the + side!
Now go through the entire board like this doing 5 caps or a row of IC's caps at a time. Then test after each cap
change session. I would watch about 10 minutes worth of video to make sure all is well then move onto another 5 caps.
Remember to follow the schematics!! Don't daydream and forget to check
if the cap your working on goes to that power supply cap your testing from!!!!

Thats how I blew those caps!!! Embarassed

EDIT:Alternate method for cap polarity: Some times its difficult to find which side of the pad
is positive and negative as the next cap switches which main power cap you test from, I found this
out today (5/23/2008) when adding another 10 caps. So you may need to look up the data sheet for the chip
and find the power input pins and put the appropriate polarity of the decoupling cap to go to that pin on the chip.
You follow the trace from the pad to the pin on the chip, so if your following the +5v pin the + side of the tant
goes to it. the same for the -5v pin - side of tant to that.


Here we will change the value from 100nf way up to 47uf!!! use 6.3v caps size A if not use diped.
Look for these on Ebay as you can get a roll of 100 for cheap. However I couldn't Sad so Newark
was my source, look for either Kemet or Vishay brands.

Pics of 100nf caps changed to 47uf 6.3v tantalums





Hope your all having fun!!!

Athanasios



CLM Decoupling Schematics.pdf
 Description:
CLM Decoupling Schematics

Download
 Filename:  CLM Decoupling Schematics.pdf
 Filesize:  83.98 KB
 Downloaded:  515 Time(s)


_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal


Last edited by Nashou66 on Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:28 pm; edited 6 times in total
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:39 pm    Post subject: Mod warnings !!!!

Just a reminder to everyone, DO NOT DO THESE MODS TO A NON RUNNIG PJ !!!!!

When doing thses mods in the thread I assume every one should be doing a few changes to a board and then testing
those changes by watching actual movies. I try to use a movie that has a scence that goes from black
to very bright and back again Like in Aeon Flux. This is an extream test for circuits in the projector i would think
so it would show up any problems quickly. At least 15 minutes of viewing is what i suggest.

I will re print what made me add this post from another memebers thread.

Paul B had a problem with his CLM and admitted to not even having tested any of his mods at all!!!!

Quote:
Yep, I've been modding it without checking whether the mods work or not. Dangerous I know but couldn't help myself.


PAUL!!!!! You've been a bad boy!!!!!! Alway do mods to a working Projector to TEST WHAT YOUVE DONE!!!!!
Trying to find a problem after changing a million things is not fun!! Unless you have an entire set of working boars to put in one by one please do not do this any more!

stefuel wrote:
I cringe at the thought of someone doing mods to a non-functional projector. If you are going to make changes, you should always start with a fully functional projector. How else will you ever know if a problem exists with your work or somewhere else in the PJ. Multiple un-tested mods is the worse. One mod at a time, testing your work as you go please. Who cares how long it takes that way. After all, it's just a hobby.


Listen to Chip !!! Mad

This is the one thing i was worried about doing this thread, Everyone please makes a few changes then test and this means not an entire board then test this means a few parts then test. it takes me hours to do a complete board where i know i could do it in 45 minutes all at once...TEST TEST TEST !!!!!!

ok I am done venting now, lets keep having fun but do it with caution please. Smile

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
PaulB



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 359
Location: Bonnie (but rainy) Scotland

Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 8:28 am    Post subject:

Conversation from another thread moved here for continuity and relevance. Paul


Nashou66 wrote:
draganm wrote:

Athanasios I am slowly assembling a {growing) collection of bad CLM's. Most common problem I'm seeing now is boards that lose Synch at higher resolutions like 720P and 1080P.
I don't want to replace 150 little pieces on the module, just the critical caps. So I will be devoting some time to getting and installing the recomended parts for the CLM mods stage 1. I don't feel like doing all the Inductors but if the stage 1 CLM mods fix the "no synch" problem or improve focus I will post back. BTW, Thanks for posting that stuff. Thumbs Up



I have one of those too, I need to look at it as well. Sometimes it just losses the picture then it comes on again. Not sure its a sync issue with mine as I do not get a no sync message. If you do the stage one try one with a low esr same value as i did and then try the MP value 100uf 50v. I am looking at maybe trying some 100uf 20v oscons there, its 5 volt rail so it should be enough. I just really like Oscon caps wish they made them in higher voltages, i think 40 is max I have seen.

I still need to add more of the 47uf tants to the IC's decoupling caps I only did about 52 or so, i want to see if I will get the power up problem that mark Haflic had on his, where MP had to remove about 5 to get it to start up. But that Might have been due to a low grade cap, you can say all you want that a cap is a cap but I think the higher quality caps work best and add less resistance than cheaper caps.

Athanasios


1031 wrote:


Actually if you have higher quality cap ,usually that measn lower ESR and that lower ESR is that what makes powering up harder. With those inductors in series on each supply line that startup load is litte easyer for powersupply.

Ot. Those pictures you posted on marquee modification&...thread Are those two "blue ones" really OS-Cons?? Those looks that they are from BC-Components (Philips)



Nashou66 wrote:


Yepp Oscons, Sanyo

Athanasios
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 11:38 pm    Post subject:

I was adding some more 47uf caps to my CLM and realized sometimes its difficult to find the correct polarity of the pad as some pads beep for both of the power cap polarites, so a pad on the 47uf tant will beep continuity to the +and- side of say test cap C2. so I added this to the original post for stage II.

EDIT:Alternate method for cap polarity: Some times its difficult to find which side of the pad
is positive and negative as the next cap switches which main power cap you test from, I found this
out today (5/23/2008) when adding another 10 caps. So you may need to look up the data sheet for the chip and find the power input pins and put the appropriate polarity of the decoupling cap to go to that pin on the chip.You
follow the trace from the pad to the pin on the chip, so if your following the +5v pin the + side of the tant
goes to it. the same for the -5v pin - side of tant to that.



Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 3:24 am    Post subject: CLM follow up: added more caps

Well I added about 30 more 47uf 6.3volt caps to the IC's on the +/- 5 volt rails . remember we are only doing the +/- 5 volt IC's not the ones on the +/- 15 volt rails.

On those we add the 22uf 16v dipped or A case tantalums, its your preference. I used the same Blue caps as on the three Ic's I changed out but I did not put in the .1uf tants as well. You could keep the 100nf ceramic there if you want and just add the 22uf 16v tant also to save time. Remember only the caps in the schematic which are mostly numbered with an X.
KBK also suggested to try 33uf 16v tants also and see which you like. I went smaller to try an avoid any power supply start up problem that may arise...None so far.

EDIT: 05/25/2008 After changing out more caps the stability of the image has greatly improved.
I watched live free or die Harder and was very impressed with what I saw.
The slight shimmer that is in my unmodded 8000 that my 8500 I am working on now also had is diminishing
more with each upgrade to my CLM. You wont notice the shimmy from your seat you need to get up to the
screen or look in the tubes. KBK was right that it was ironic the last mod he did was probably the biggest
improvement to the stability of the image. What I am saying is, I really like these changes cant wait to
finish with the 15 volt rails as well.

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 7:05 pm    Post subject: CLM FOLLOW UP # 2

I Finished all the cap mods to my CLM and watched about 45 minutes for different scene's I am familiar with and every think looked great. I was also using my Moded 2005-03p vim to see how the power supply would handle all the extra capacitance on both boards. While watching the wavy line came back so I pulled the clm to give it a good cleaning of all the chip sockets
and go over the board visually one more time when i noticed that 12 smt caps I put in were the wrong ones. I had 47uf 6.3 volts where I should have had the 22uf 16 volt caps. even though it was more capacitance everything was ok power up wise.
I was going to leave them then thought the lower Voltage would not be good for those 6 op amps . So I depopulated those 12
47uf smd caps and put in the 22uf dipped tantalums that were the right voltage. So i decided to watch some video to see how the lower value tants would compare. All looked good but then the power supply was acting up, half the image would be drawn and black horizontal lines would be in the image and at one point it lost HVPS and refocuses again. However when the image was up it was really nice. It only happened on certain scenes that obviously put more demand on the power supply. I thought what if I use the Unmodded VIM, I put that in and no problems for an hours worth of viewing, I put my Modded VIM back In and back to power supply trouble. So I removed 4 22uf dipped tants and replaced them with some physically
smaller size B 6.8uf tants, and tried it this way still the problem but not as frequent.

So now My question for the guys out there more knowledgeable than me on this stuff, Can caps of smaller value
but larger physical size draw more or need more power than higher value but physically smaller caps?

With the 12 47uf 6.3volt case A sized caps I watched two movies no problems at all and it looked great!
When i lowered those 12 cap Values to 22uf but to a physically larger size cap I encounterd the power supply problems.
is this Normal?

EDIT: problem was with the VIM, So those changes worked fine.


Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal


Last edited by Nashou66 on Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:16 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
tse



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 1014
Location: Sweatbucket, Fl.

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 11:33 pm    Post subject:

Good caps use no power. Larger value ones take more electrons to "fill up" or charge but once charged take nothing from the power supply. The Marquee power supply monitors current and if too much is being drawn at turn on it will turn itself off. This will happen in the first second of power on if it is going to happen.

Bad caps might use power if leaky. If leaky enough to cause problems they will usually get hot and burn up. Electrolytic and tantalum caps can go bad if stored for several years. They might "reform" when used or might not.

Scott

_________________
"Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want bread."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 3:37 am    Post subject:

tse wrote:
Good caps use no power. Larger value ones take more electrons to "fill up" or charge but once charged take nothing from the power supply. The Marquee power supply monitors current and if too much is being drawn at turn on it will turn itself off. This will happen in the first second of power on if it is going to happen.

Bad caps might use power if leaky. If leaky enough to cause problems they will usually get hot and burn up. Electrolytic and tantalum caps can go bad if stored for several years. They might "reform" when used or might not.

Scott


The thing is I have no problems starting up, its during viewing at certain scenes in the movie. Like that part of the movie causes something to happen to the circuit making the pictuer go dark in some areas with fine black streaks horizontally across the screen.

So the 22uf ones I used may just be older caps that are bad or going bad. they were the Ebay ones so that could be it.
That would explain why the Higher value 47uf caps had no issues with either VIM I was using. I'll order some SMD tantalums for those Op Amps and DAC's and see how that goes.

But I must say If i could trust the lower voltage caps at those locations I would have left them in. Image looked great, the 22uf alos did the times when they were not causing issues.

Thanks for the Lesson Scott

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
WTS



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 1276
Location: Calgary

Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 1:35 pm    Post subject:

I don't know if I'd be taking all the .1uF caps off in exchange for the 4.7uF ones. The .1 caps do a far better job of getting rid of the high freq. trash/noise on the supply lines than the 4.7uF do.
_________________
Thanks
Walter
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 1:48 pm    Post subject:

WTS wrote:
I don't know if I'd be taking all the .1uF caps off in exchange for the 4.7uF ones. The .1 caps do a far better job of getting rid of the high freq. trash/noise on the supply lines than the 4.7uF do.
'

Hi Walt glad you Joined in!


They are 47uf not 4.7uf....

This is one thing I am going to test with my other CLM as I thought of that as well. I plan to leave the ceramics there and just add the 47uf on top and maybe 100pf too, but not on all caps just the ones that are connected to the wave form generators. if the 100pf cause an issue they'll be easy to remove. Also I think KBK did not do this part of the mod for noise reduction , It was more for line drawing stability , at least thats what I got out of reading his post.

I still cant understand why the higher 47uf 6.3 voltage caps on the 15 v rail worked better than the 22uf 16v caps, you'd think the 47uf would give the power supply a harder time.

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 5:30 am    Post subject:

Well I removed all the 22uf caps and went with 100nf(.1uf) tants, this is the same value of capacitance of the original just a different type of cap, and I am still getting the problem with my modded VIM, I do not think there is anything wrong with that Vim either . I should test it in my other marquee(i'll do this later today). I also removed Caps from the VIM to lower the overall capacitance, I had caps in places I think really didn't need it . When using the unmodded Vim I have no problems...Hmmm maybe it is my modded Vim causing the issue? One thing I noticed is for the first 6-10 minutes it doesn't happen , only when it warms up the Black horizontal streaking occurs . Unless its the DPB acting up from all the constant removing and installing it. that will be the first thing I'll swap out as i have a few of those here.

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
1031



Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 657
Location: Finland

Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 5:46 am    Post subject:

Hello. I have looked that cap chaging stuff..I think there is alternative way to reduce noise on those control lines. When i tested better op-amp on focusmodule, i noticet that output on that "better op-amp" was much noisier than originals..Why? those better ones are lower noise than originals. That better op-amp has much wider bandwithd so it amplifies frequencues much higher that actuall control signal is. Ok that better op-amp can be much stable, and noise that amp generates itself is lower than originals etc.. How about using EMI-filters on those control lines. Those are available at different freq.ranges so those can selected for proper freq.range so that actuall control signall is passed but noise is bloked?

https://www1.elfa.se/data1/wwwroot/webroot/Z_DATA/45c48160-7921-11dc-bb36-0019bbdf5d02.pdf

I remember that when i had 1272 sony, those was used in certain lines.

_________________
Marquee 9500LC (Frankenyokes / Thomas electric tubes / HD-10L / +many modīs)
DVDO VP-50
New hobby, Rally
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX2Rtpr1njs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZP9FEFXV5c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j065vei6j6s
http://www.facebook.com/pages/JTS-Racing-team/204443719572685
Back to top
AnalogRocks
Forum Moderator


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 26706
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G

Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 6:39 am    Post subject:

A different aproach. Great!
_________________
Tech support for nothing

CRT.

HD done right!
Back to top
View user's photo album (27 photos)
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 10:59 am    Post subject:

1031 wrote:
Hello. I have looked that cap chaging stuff..I think there is alternative way to reduce noise on those control lines. When i tested better op-amp on focusmodule, i noticet that output on that "better op-amp" was much noisier than originals..Why? those better ones are lower noise than originals. That better op-amp has much wider bandwithd so it amplifies frequencues much higher that actuall control signal is. Ok that better op-amp can be much stable, and noise that amp generates itself is lower than originals etc.. How about using EMI-filters on those control lines. Those are available at different freq.ranges so those can selected for proper freq.range so that actuall control signall is passed but noise is bloked?

https://www1.elfa.se/data1/wwwroot/webroot/Z_DATA/45c48160-7921-11dc-bb36-0019bbdf5d02.pdf

I remember that when i had 1272 sony, those was used in certain lines.


I agree that they may allow a little more noise through but the increased stability of the signal I think
outways the increase in noise. I guess we could try putting those or say a very small mica cap on the outputs of the op amps to block that noise. but from my viewing i didnt think it was a big issue just having the lines drwn and not bounce as much as before is the real benifit. However you do bring up a good point and one I need to understand more. Thanks for the info Jarmo Thumbs Up let us know where we could use something like those filters. I think on the ouputs of the signal line on the op amps(tle2074 and opa 4134). I also was thinking of adding a small cap from pins 4>11 on the 14 pin chip . I read some where you could actually lift the pins on the pcb connectors and add a few small ferrite beads on them then put them back to place.

Edit:7:52am Now looking at the data sheet for those ferrite beads you linked i have some questions: the original op amps went to IIRC 4 mhz and these new amps are 10mhz, so we should look for a filter to block something in the original frequency range say higher than 4mhz like the DSN6NC51H102(1000pf) , from the graph it looks like it starts mid point between 1Mhz and 10Mhz. Another thought, I am not sure we want to mess with the actual waveform signal itself, do you think those right in the signal would alter it? Do we put them in series or I would think parallel correct?
For those interested here is some good examples of how to suppress noise in different applications
Noise suppression examples


Jarmo any ideas on my new CLM issue?

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
1031



Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 657
Location: Finland

Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 1:12 pm    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:


Edit:7:52am Now looking at the data sheet for those ferrite beads you linked i have some questions: the original op amps went to IIRC 4 mhz and these new amps are 10mhz, so we should look for a filter to block something in the original frequency range say higher than 4mhz like the DSN6NC51H102(1000pf) , from the graph it looks like it starts mid point between 1Mhz and 10Mhz. Another thought, I am not sure we want to mess with the actual waveform signal itself, do you think those right in the signal would alter it? Do we put them in series or I would think parallel correct?
For those interested here is some good examples of how to suppress noise in different applications
Noise suppression examples


Jarmo any ideas on my new CLM issue?

Athanasios


Hard to say what happened to you clm.. it is possible that those +-15v lines got some harm when you fitted those 6.3v caps on it.

About those emifilters. Those come series to signal. My idea was use better op-amps+ those emi filters at signal lines (input/output on op-amp..or both)
I think i got some time for testing at nextweek.

_________________
Marquee 9500LC (Frankenyokes / Thomas electric tubes / HD-10L / +many modīs)
DVDO VP-50
New hobby, Rally
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX2Rtpr1njs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZP9FEFXV5c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j065vei6j6s
http://www.facebook.com/pages/JTS-Racing-team/204443719572685
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 1:41 pm    Post subject:

1031 wrote:
Nashou66 wrote:


Edit:7:52am Now looking at the data sheet for those ferrite beads you linked i have some questions: the original op amps went to IIRC 4 mhz and these new amps are 10mhz, so we should look for a filter to block something in the original frequency range say higher than 4mhz like the DSN6NC51H102(1000pf) , from the graph it looks like it starts mid point between 1Mhz and 10Mhz. Another thought, I am not sure we want to mess with the actual waveform signal itself, do you think those right in the signal would alter it? Do we put them in series or I would think parallel correct?
For those interested here is some good examples of how to suppress noise in different applications
Noise suppression examples


Jarmo any ideas on my new CLM issue?

Athanasios


Hard to say what happened to you clm.. it is possible that those +-15v lines got some harm when you fitted those 6.3v caps on it.

About those emifilters. Those come series to signal. My idea was use better op-amps+ those emi filters at signal lines (input/output on op-amp..or both)
I think i got some time for testing at nextweek.


Not sure if I damaged anything since with my un modded VIM everything is fine. Unless the op amps(the 6 that run the convergence) somehow did get damaged and cannot put out a full strength signal now or there is a drop in voltage now to those same op amps and that is causing my problem. The drop being caused by the extra impedence of the VIM, I may have to try another LVPS now that I think about it. But i highly doubt that would be the problem as most likely it wouldnt start up at all.

After looking at the murata papers and some more on emifil i understand where you are coming from, the two outer pis carry the signal and the center pin goes to gnd filtering out the noise, it would be great to get that added help for the better amps!! One question is do you think the insertion loss would affect the output enough to cause a problem in signal strength?
which value would you suggest ? I would order a few different values to test also but I cant find those this side of the Atlantic and its an extra 15 dollars handling charge from Farnell.

I am very Glad your adding to this thread Jarmo !
Keep the ideas comming !!


Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
1031



Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 657
Location: Finland

Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 2:25 pm    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:


After looking at the murata papers and some more on emifil i understand where you are coming from, the two outer pis carry the signal and the center pin goes to gnd filtering out the noise, it would be great to get that added help for the better amps!! One question is do you think the insertion loss would affect the output enough to cause a problem in signal strength?

Athanasios


There should be no losses for signals, dc-resitance for those emifilters is near 0 ohm. Maybe smd-versions are much better for clm. i have few of those normal ones and iīm going test those at fcm..
Did you looked if Newark have those? (from what i understand Newark and Farnell are somehow connected..)

_________________
Marquee 9500LC (Frankenyokes / Thomas electric tubes / HD-10L / +many modīs)
DVDO VP-50
New hobby, Rally
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX2Rtpr1njs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZP9FEFXV5c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j065vei6j6s
http://www.facebook.com/pages/JTS-Racing-team/204443719572685
Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 62, 63, 64  Next
Page 8 of 64
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum