|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
lyd
Joined: 15 Sep 2007 Posts: 390 Location: Lake Mills, Wi
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:16 am Post subject: Confused about optimum mounting height/projection angle. |
|
|
Howdy again. I have reviewed the primer and done some searching, but not quite gotten a handle on this yet.
I am trying to determine what height relative to the screen I should be shooting for. My initial impression had been that I want to get the horizontal center of the lenses as close to the center of the screen as possible, then adjust the angle of the projector on the mount as required. A number of things I have come across later seem to be suggesting that I am better off going with a specified vertical offset relative to the screen, which would keep the built-in 10 degree projection angle as-is and the projector level on the mount.
Can anyone help me determine what I want to be shooting for here? Feel free to just point me toward the relevant information, if that is appropriate.
To sum up, this is a Marquee 8500 with HD144 lenses and a 4.5' high 16:9 screen (96" x 54").
My continued thanks for all the help.
lyd
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Heywood Jablome
Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 1548
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dead perpendicular (centered in both axes and angled so the green tube is perpendicular to the screen) will give you zero keystone, which maximizes light output and the ability of the projector to resolve higher resolutions.
That said, typical front projection setups can't suffer this location... the projector will be in the middle of the room, in the middle of the air. Some have really high ceilings and really steep stadium seating, where the PJ is mounted in the risers, but besides that... probably not real practical.
The manuals for any given projector will list mounting options, but typically the PJ is parallel to the ceiling and the lens EDGE lines up with the screen edge.
Now, a rear projection setup, with or without mirrors, can be made zero keystone IF you've got the real estate behind the screen.
_________________ "Those countries which lag behind in industry, in the application of mechanics and technical chemistry, in the careful selection and utilization of natural products, where the respect for such activities does not permeate all classes of society, will unfailingly decline in prosperity. They will sink faster when neighbor states, with an energetic exchange between science and industry, go forward with renewed vitality."
-- Baron Alexander von Humboldt: 1769-1859
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Many projectors have a built-in "tilt" angle, so that when you hang them level they shoot "down" to the screen center. My XG and Dwin were like that, and I think the G70 was too.
I mounted my Marquee (with HD145's) level, thinking it would work the same way. This resulted in a centered raster shooting way high. I had to raise up the rear end of the projector (rear mounting feet about 1" higher than the front feet) to get a centered raster to project on the center of the screen.
My screen is about 85" wide and I mounted the projector at the appropriate distance for that. Actually I'm a few inches farther away than I should be for the HD145's but the tilt angle should be about the same.
Your angle will vary of course, depending on how far your screen center is below your projector, but that's what worked for my room.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lyd
Joined: 15 Sep 2007 Posts: 390 Location: Lake Mills, Wi
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think I am still confused.
Let me try asking this a different way....
The "built-in" angle of the 8500, the angle of the lenses with the base level, is 10 degrees, so I will treat that as my maximum. The manual says the allowable angle extends to 15 deg., but there is no reason for me to go past 10.
For my 96" screen, I calculate 120.5" (rounded) as the theoretical optimum distance for the lens face, using 1.144*(96+9.3). (HD144 lenses)
The vertical center of my screen is 5' 4.5".
So I extend a line perpendicular to the screen plane at that height, for that length, and that's my Adjacent.
Opposite/Adjacent=Tangent and Tangent*Adjacent= Opposite, so I calculate the following.
Maintaining the angle of 10 degrees, the bottom of my projector will be about 7 feet off the floor.
With the bottom of the projector at 6' 2" off the floor, about the lowest I think I would want to go, I can achieve an angle of about 7 degrees.
I understand that these calculations make a couple of fudges, but is this a roughly valid way to determine what my projection angle will be at a given mounting height?
If it is, just how much difference will that 3 degrees make in practice?
I'd rather have the thing up at 7', of course, but if it is a tangible payoff I can definitely make the rationalization for going lower.
lyd
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the easiest way to do this is just remember to have the projector within the range of the top edge of the screen to the bottom edge of the screen. You will have enough adjustment in the menu's to get it set up right.
EDIT: spelling
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
Last edited by AnalogRocks on Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:21 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Heywood Jablome
Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 1548
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lyd wrote: |
If it is, just how much difference will that 3 degrees make in practice?
lyd |
30%
CRT PJs paint a trapezoid on the tube face with side angles opposite the optical keystone effect (to compensate for this effect.) The lower the tube angle, the smaller the difference between the painted trapezoid and a theoretical max-phosphor-usage rectangle.
Unless you are going to go the route of MP mods and otherwise tweak the hell out of it to try to achieve 1080p, I'd say mount parallel to the ceiling at a height appropriate to your screen location and get on with it.... The added resolve-ability, light output, tube life, and cooler electronics will all be VERY marginal unless you are trying to achieve very high resolutions. At 1080i/720p/768p an 8500 won't even break a sweat.
_________________ "Those countries which lag behind in industry, in the application of mechanics and technical chemistry, in the careful selection and utilization of natural products, where the respect for such activities does not permeate all classes of society, will unfailingly decline in prosperity. They will sink faster when neighbor states, with an energetic exchange between science and industry, go forward with renewed vitality."
-- Baron Alexander von Humboldt: 1769-1859
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lyd
Joined: 15 Sep 2007 Posts: 390 Location: Lake Mills, Wi
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Heywood Jablome wrote: | | lyd wrote: |
If it is, just how much difference will that 3 degrees make in practice?
lyd |
30%
Unless you are going to go the route of MP mods and otherwise tweak the hell out of it to try to achieve 1080p, I'd say mount parallel to the ceiling at a height appropriate to your screen location and get on with it.... The added resolve-ability, light output, tube life, and cooler electronics will all be VERY marginal unless you are trying to achieve very high resolutions. At 1080i/720p/768p an 8500 won't even break a sweat. |
That's pretty much what I was asking. 30% sounds like a lot, but having nothing to compare it to I didn't know what it would look like. It is brightness I was most interested in, and it sounds like you are saying the difference in brightness is not going to be 30%.
Resolution-wise, I was hoping to be able to do 960p, however. Is that do-able more or less stock, or am I getting into "tweak the hell out of it" territory there?
lyd
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Heywood Jablome
Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 1548
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm certain the brightness will not scale linearly, but am too far removed from my physics classes to estimate the real impact.
I'm no Marquee expert, but you should get there with acceptable sharpness if you pay particular attention to static and dynamic astig.
_________________ "Those countries which lag behind in industry, in the application of mechanics and technical chemistry, in the careful selection and utilization of natural products, where the respect for such activities does not permeate all classes of society, will unfailingly decline in prosperity. They will sink faster when neighbor states, with an energetic exchange between science and industry, go forward with renewed vitality."
-- Baron Alexander von Humboldt: 1769-1859
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|