| Author |
Message |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 2:49 pm Post subject: Why glycol? |
|
|
OK, stupid question time. What properties does glycol have that water or mineral oils (or Koolaid!) don't?
What would happen if you used something like baby oil in place of the glycol?
Just something that's been bugging me for years, and today someone emailed me the same question, so I thought I'd post.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nuttall_chris
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 832 Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Water expands when frozen (glycol doesn't). Most of the projectors are rated for storage temperatures below the freezing point of water. Expanding frozen water would break the tube face on AC sets and possible rupture the bellows on LC sets.
Also on LC sets the lenses/C-elements have been designed to work with glycol which has a higher index of refraction than water.
As for other substances....mineral oils, baby oil, Koolaid...don't know.
Chris
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Z-Photo
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 2749 Location: Huntsville - Alabama
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
glycol is non-flammable-
Baby oil - not so much.
_________________ Engineer by Day
Photographer by Night
My Portfolio
The Only GOOD AMPRO - is a Dead AMPRO.
wait - are they not all DEAD already?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jask
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 10187 Location: kamloops BC
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it is actually the optical refraction that would be the most correct answer
edit: the purpose is to as closely match the index of refraction in all the materials of the optical path..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
drice1234
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1309 Location: Allen, Texas
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | glycol is non-flammable-
Baby oil - not so much. |
I would very much like to hear the story on how this was discovered
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 18114 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Having spent the last 2-3 weeks trying different fluids for cooling my beer taps and lines and doing a lot of research on it, it also has to do with heat transfer coefficients and efficiency. Glycol's really good and consistent in this way - you don't get hot/cold spots (and it also has a much lower freezer point/much high boiling point).
Water just doesn't work that well for cooling. One of the reasons why you don't have water in your car radiator either.
Kal
_________________
Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jask
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 10187 Location: kamloops BC
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
this is a list of the indices of refraction for a few materials (no cool-aid, but you could just keep adding sugar till you hit the target gravity..)
acrylic glass 1.49
crown glass 1.52 (optical glass)
water 1.33 (@20C)
alcohol 1.36 grain
alcohol 1.32 wood
glycerine 1.47
turpentine 1.47
veg oil 1.47
lab oil 1.515 microscope oil
Glycol has the added bonus of being a very good conductor of heat,
if the tube face ever cracked a non-flamable fluid would make the choice of glycol over oil much easier!! I found a link to a patent that used siloxane polymers (silicone liquid) with a matched index for CRT projection lens groups...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it's all of the above.
Compared to water, ethylene glycol/glycerol has:
- lower surface tension (better interface between materials, fewer bubbles)
- a lower freezing point
- a higher boiling point
- an index of refraction closer to typical lens materials
- better thermal conductivity (like Kal mentioned - this and the freeze/boil points are why ethylene glycol is a good automotive coolant)
If you do some googling, you can find some patents from people working on some cool polymer-based coolants with similar properties to glycol, but non-corrosive and non-conductive. Wouldn't that have been cool (sorry, bad pun)? Too bad they were working on that stuff right before CRT's started their precipitous popularity decline. Stupid digitals.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bengalfan
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 157 Location: Moline, Ohio
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ethylene glycol (a type of alcohol) has a very good coefficient of exansion (0.00099), excellant clarity, and a very low refrative index (1.406) . It also has a high flash point of ~ 120°+ F and bp of 275° C. this is important, means it can absorb alot of heat w/o expansion (or at least minimal).
It appears that Barco also used some glycerol blended into the et-glycol, probably as a humectant.
Mineral oils (baby oils) are alkanes, part of the early cracking process of petroleums. As such, the flash point would be in the dangerous area (fire and projector, bad), plus with all the impurities the clarity would not be good, and the coef of expansion is not very good at all. It does expand with heat, but I don't know at what level.
Water - gets hot quickly and POP, there goes that nice lens.
So save the oil to slather up your honey and keep it away from the projector.
Van
(finally something I can write about!)
_________________ The only easy day is yesterday
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
God you guys crack me up with all your slide-rules, flash point and refractive index's. I've tried straight medical grade distilled water and it works just fine. In fact the sharpest image you'll ever get out of a LC. The only thing I can't say is how long before corrosion occurs.
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lucht Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bengalfan wrote: |
It appears that Barco also used some glycerol blended into the et-glycol, probably as a humectant.
|
Glycerine is hunectant (E1520), but a mixer with glycerine has a higher refractio index which bring it closer to these from your c-element. And you reduce the reflection from a normale air/glas from 4% to less 0,5% which is also possible with a good coating
From US patent 6268458
To date, ethylene glycol, mixtures of ethylene glycol and glycerol, and mixtures of ethylene glycol and water have been employed extensively as coupling fluids in projection TVs. The preferred fluid in recent years has been ethylene glycol/glycerol mixtures due to the relatively low volatility of the constituent components. As a result, the loss of coupling fluid through the last lens element of the projection lens system has been minimized. Also, the refractive index of an ethylene glycol/glycerol mixture is higher than pure ethylene glycol or a mixture of ethylene glycol and water. In addition, ethylene glycol/glycerol mixtures exhibit reasonable environmental friendliness, the ability to operate near 90° C., low cost, good compatibility with molded optics, good thermal conductivity, and good optical clarity.
A preferred composition for coupling fluids of this type has been 80% ethylene glycol and 20% glycerol. Further addition of glycerol would cause the projected image to squirm, due to natural convection associated with thermal gradients in a viscous fluid.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fujifrontier
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 354 Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
*ahem*
Good evening, sirs
I was actually the person who asked Curt the question earlier, and he responded lightning-quick, which I appreciate greatly.
The reason I'm asking is because on another forum they were talking about Magnavox RPTVs, whose CRTs like to grow the algae/deposits; and one of the members said you could just refill the CRT chamber with mineral oil. I thought it unlikely... and was wondering what other (safe) substitutes could be used, 'cos I admit I had a bit of sticker shock from the price of pure glycol.
How hot do the tubes normally run? How many containers of glycol would I need; the $46 isn't for a set of 3 bottles, is it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom.W
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 6635
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mr_ro_co
Joined: 08 May 2006 Posts: 1643 Location: Santa Fe NM
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't it propylene glycol (usually mixed with some water and glycerin), not ethylene glycol, that's used in crt projectors?
I had to take apart the entire chassis on my 9500 Ultra to clean up a major glycol leak that occurred in shipping. The stuff I was cleaning up looked and smelled just like the stuff that runs in HVAC chilled water and condenser water systems, which is typically propylene glycol. My understanding was ethylene glycol is used in applications that involve much higher temperatures (such as a car radiator).
_________________ Not only is there no god, try finding a plumber on Sunday!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Z-Photo
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 2749 Location: Huntsville - Alabama
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stefuel wrote: | | God you guys crack me up with all your slide-rules, flash point and refractive index's. I've tried straight medical grade distilled water and it works just fine. In fact the sharpest image you'll ever get out of a LC. The only thing I can't say is how long before corrosion occurs. |
How would you notice if an Ampro had corrosion?
Reminds me of a needle and haystack
_________________ Engineer by Day
Photographer by Night
My Portfolio
The Only GOOD AMPRO - is a Dead AMPRO.
wait - are they not all DEAD already?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom.W
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 6635
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom.W
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 6635
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just recieved the back ordered Tech spray glycol/glycerin mix today from Mat electronics
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jask
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 10187 Location: kamloops BC
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tom.W wrote: | Just recieved the back ordered Tech spray glycol/glycerin mix today from Mat electronics  |
How did they ship it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom.W
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 6635
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
15 pounds UPS ground $15.44. Got 10 16oz bottles.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ILOVEMYTHEATRE
Joined: 23 Jan 2007 Posts: 6 Location: NHILL, VIC AUSTRALIA
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:34 am Post subject: glcol vs baby oil |
|
|
Well ,read all the tech stuff posted and it all sounds like I should not have had used baby oil , but its been in my sony D50 for the past 6 years with no ill effects .The projectors been runnning with ambient room temperature around "35 degrees C " (or around 95 degrees F for our US friends) besides it smells nice too Tried it in my frie nds 1252 but the rubber groment swelled up
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|