| Author |
Message |
Clarence
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 3827 Location: Smith Mtn Lake, VA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like an interesting toy. Did you buy all 5?
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CRT_Ben
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 1684 Location: Northern Virginia
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AnalogRocks wrote: | | Looks like an interesting toy. Did you buy all 5? |
For his sake, I hope he didn't! Shipping + Handling at 29.99, each additional item at 19.99, that's $110 dollars in shipping for 5 items that can reasonably be shipped for $15. I hate ebay bastards like this that charge absolutely ridiculous shipping
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clarence
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 3827 Location: Smith Mtn Lake, VA
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, I already have too many projects laying around. I haven't even played with my HDFury yet.
But the auction closed with no bids, I bet you could send the seller a $100 offer for all 5 shipped.
Inflated shipping costs seem like a loophole to set a minimum price. Plus I think the sellers' ebay fees are only calculated on the winning bid, not on the total price with shipping.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian Hampton
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 1173
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is interesting,..
But my Hdfury solved my HDMI problems before I even had any.
Anyone hoping to hack something that works like that and spend less then the ~$140 or so the Hdfury costs has got to be very talented or very lucky or both.
-Brian
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joust
Joined: 05 May 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Almonte, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Marquee 8501LC
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its one of those deals where he inflates the shipping $ to pay for it.
those should be banned. IMHO
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joust
Joined: 05 May 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Almonte, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Marquee 8501LC
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
also, this thing would output digital. not much good without a lot of detailed information about it.
I'd take one for $5 to play with but not much more than that. If it worked out after a lot of r&d and then I could get a lot of them cheap, it might be worth the effort. but for one, or even 5 ....forget it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like Joust says, the output is probably digital (TTL) to drive an OEM LCD panel.
I think it's an OEM power/CPU module for an LCD HDTV. It's a power supply tuner, scaler, switcher, and panel driver. Add a compatible LCD panel, maybe a voltage multiplier for the backlight, and an IR sensor, and you could probably scratch-build an LCD TV. The module even has its own LVPS. It was probably a fairly expensive component and you could probably get specs from the manufacturer... But, like Joust says, unless you could get a palette of them, the time invested could be a big waste. It's probably also hardware-limited to one or two LCD panel resolutions like 1366x768 or 1280x720.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CZ Eddie
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 1601 Location: Austin, TX
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CRT_Ben wrote: | | AnalogRocks wrote: | | Looks like an interesting toy. Did you buy all 5? |
For his sake, I hope he didn't! Shipping + Handling at 29.99, each additional item at 19.99, that's $110 dollars in shipping for 5 items that can reasonably be shipped for $15. I hate ebay bastards like this that charge absolutely ridiculous shipping  |
Why do you care?
Just figure it into your bid amount. It's not like it's a hidden charge or anything, so why would you hate?
I don't practice this myself (unethical, but nothing to hate for). But a lot of folks do this because of ebays outrageous fees. And one way to get out of the fees is to raise your shipping cost. Because you don't get hit with ebay fees on your shipping cost. So it's cheaper for the seller to sell the item.
I mean do you really think this item is only worth $9.99? Of course not. So add however much shipping costs, into the amount that you will bid. It's what any smart buyer will do.
Think of it as the seller putting the item up for sale at $39.99 with free shipping. Would you still be complaining? Well no, you might even look at it as a decent deal.
Not saying that you're dumb (you're not!). I'm just taking issue with all the seller haters out there. It's the buyers who try to scam you left & right, and abuse the heck out of someone with something to sell.
_________________ Back after a digital sabatical.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian Hampton
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 1173
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey,
This is why you have to call it shipping and handling.
Personally once I pay I consider the thing mine and I don't want people handling it but that's another story.
Anyway, selling shipping is all too common it's just part of the game on ebay. If I wanted to list up old video games I have just to keep from throwing them away I would put them up for a penny and charge a dollar extra on shipping for each of them. It's just part of how it works and has been as long as I've known about ebay.
So long as buyers can read ,.. it shouldn't be a problem.
-Brian
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CRT_Ben
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 1684 Location: Northern Virginia
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not a problem for the informed buyer, and I respect what you guys are saying, but think of it this way -
For the sellers like you and I, that don't pull this shipping BS, we're paying full ebay fees. The sellers that build the cost of the item into shipping, aren't. So for people like Phil who make a living online, the scumbags have a clear advantage as their operating costs are lower. As you pointed out the ebay fees are not cheap so the advantage is significant for volume sellers. Pretty crappy, huh? That's why I hate
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clarence
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 3827 Location: Smith Mtn Lake, VA
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another reason is that typically shipping is not reimbursed on returned items. So inflated shipping charge cuts down on returns.
So I can at least see the method to their madness. As long as the shipping chares are disclosed, I don't mind.
I wish ebay had a sort by total cost (price + shipping)... it's a pain when you're looking for a cable, camera battery, adapter, ink cartridge etc and you have to sort through the 99c items with $14.99 shipping.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justtaint
Joined: 21 May 2007 Posts: 191 Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Clarence wrote: | | I wish ebay had a sort by total cost (price + shipping)... |
They do. Whenever you do a search, in the drop down box at the top right of the search results, the Sort By box allows for (Price + Shipping:Lowest First), (Price + Shipping:Highest First) and (Price:Highest First). For some weird reason, I don't see (Price:Lowest First)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clarence
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 3827 Location: Smith Mtn Lake, VA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, I noticed they added "Price + Shipping" a few months ago. Maybe ebay read my post.
If they're still reading, I want them to add an option to filter out items with "Reserve Not Met". I don't like undisclosed reserves. I won't even add a "Reserve Not Met" item to my watchlist.
And I've never understood why a seller would list an item with a undisclosed reserve and then give the starting price at less than the reserve? If your reserve is $500, why set the starting price at $250? Why not just start it at $500?
I follow the used Canon lens market on ebay and lenses listed with NR end up selling for much higher than lenses listed with a reserve, even if the reserve is lower than the selling price of recently closed identical items.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justtaint
Joined: 21 May 2007 Posts: 191 Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You set a low starting price to entice more bidders/watchers. What's more enticing than a $500 lens with a $1 starting price? Sure, some people realize the reserve price is much higher, but it still gets them to bid or at least watch the auction.
I somehow missed that this thread was over a year old. My apologies for dredging up an old post.
_________________ Thomas
Sony 1272
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clarence
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 3827 Location: Smith Mtn Lake, VA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| justtaint wrote: | | What's more enticing than a $500 lens with a $1 starting price? | What's more enticing?... a $500 lens with no minimum starting price and no reserve.
I understand the "hidden reserve" seller's intent, but study the results of closed items... NR items end up with more bidders and higher winning bids.
The other ebay practice that seems flawed is when Buy It Now disappears after the first bid. If a seller is willing to sell for $500, why shouldn't a 2nd bidder be able to click "Buy It Now" anytime during the week?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justtaint
Joined: 21 May 2007 Posts: 191 Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed, but which case, high starting price with no reserve or low starting price with a reserve, ends up with the seller achieving the most profit? I don't know.
Its been a while since I've sold an item on Ebay (thanks to Craigslist), but I seem to remember if you have a BuyItNow and a reserve, the BIN doesn't go away until the reserve price is achieved. That could have changed in the years since I've sold something, but I thought that was a way to keep the BIN price option available for longer.
Last edited by justtaint on Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Lister
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 436 Location: Adelaide, South Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Listing fees are based on your start price so listing with a lower start price and a reserve keeps listing costs down, as long as the item sells so you don't have to re-list it.
Overcharging on shipping is not allowed as it is fee circumvention.
I got an e-mail from a US seller today that wanted to charge me US$157 to send a CPU to me in Australia, other sellers have quoted US$25.
Guess who's auction I won't be bidding on?
Ebay is a sinking ship, their attempt at forcing Paypal only in Australia has failed and they are in for a shock when the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) tell them that they also cannot force everyone to have Paypal in order to sell, currently Ebay expect all sellers to have Paypal in their listing (you can't list without it) but that is against the Trade Practices Act 1974, no matter how big Ebay think they are they cannot get past our Trade Practices act if they want to trade in Australia.
They also tried underhanded tactics to get as many people to sign up for Paypal as possible before the ACCC hands down it's final decision, they have sent Ebay a draft notice of their decision but that is just a formality.
The ACCC have acted within a few months on this for the first time ever, normally it takes years for them to act.
Major Australian companies are against Ebays plans and have sent in their views to the ACCC along with over 1000 Ebay users, another record for the ACCC which has never had such a response from the Australian public.
_________________ I don't believe in pixels or flaries!
Owner of a VPH1000QM with over 80,000 hours on the tubes.
Beat that you digital technicolour flashlight owners.
Stuff for sale;
http://www.quicksales.com.au/buy/auctions.aspx?i=&d=0&min=&max=&sort=0&pg=1&cat=0&keyword=&view=List&f1=&f2=&type=c&type2=&type3=&type4=&type5=tardis-workshop&s=&pcode=&dis=0&freepost=
http://www.ebay.com.au/sch/tardis_workshop/m.html?_dmd=1&_ipg=50&_sop=10&_rdc=1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GEBrown
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 729 Location: Denver
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dave Lister wrote: | . . . .
Ebay is a sinking ship, their attempt at forcing Paypal only in Australia has failed and they are in for a shock when the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) tell them that they also cannot force everyone to have Paypal in order to sell, currently Ebay expect all sellers to have Paypal in their listing (you can't list without it) but that is against the Trade Practices Act 1974, no matter how big Ebay think they are they cannot get past our Trade Practices act if they want to trade in Australia.
. . . . |
I don't see how the ACCC can stop eBay from doing business over the Internet in Australia.
_________________ Member of the Marquee Maniacs Club
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kwint Sommer
Joined: 04 Jun 2008 Posts: 31 Location: MIT
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GEBrown wrote: | | Dave Lister wrote: | . . . .
Ebay is a sinking ship, their attempt at forcing Paypal only in Australia has failed and they are in for a shock when the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) tell them that they also cannot force everyone to have Paypal in order to sell, currently Ebay expect all sellers to have Paypal in their listing (you can't list without it) but that is against the Trade Practices Act 1974, no matter how big Ebay think they are they cannot get past our Trade Practices act if they want to trade in Australia.
. . . . |
I don't see how the ACCC can stop eBay from doing business over the Internet in Australia.
 |
It's rather simple, they can sue the hell out of them for non-compliance. Whether or not they'd be able to enforce the fines is an open question but the threat of serious litigation would probably be enough.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|