CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum

[Boilermaker]

[Nashou66]

My Gamma is set for 2.4 all the way down to 10 IRE from what my i1 Pro can measure.

I did find a possible problem with my i1 Pro as it is used over time. After about 30-40 minutes of use
I think it looses readability of red on each and every Click(read) of CalMan.
Doc is sending me his to compare over time. SpectrCal might have missed it when in their Lab if they
only did a single run of greyscale and Gamut. I found I need an hour cool down to
get the same consistent reads for red values in the lower than 40 % White.. Not sure what is going on but
I noticed that after a calibration run of longer than an hour it just doesn't look right. This is why I am having a hard time
doing a true and proper matching of the PJ's.

Web Gallery, the hosting site i use that comes with .mac accounts does all the resizing. I do not think I can alter this.

Ok uploaded to Imagehsack to test, full size of Camera.

2848x2136

sorry i didn't want to resize it.

Thats how it looks if standing 2 feet away from the screen, maybe closer. but form seating it will of course look perfect.





One more for fun!



If you guys want to down load pics you can see them on my web gallery site

http://gallery.me.com/nashou.66#100166&view=grid&bgcolor=black&sel=302

The ones at the end are the latest. you can see many progressions of the blend.





Athanasios

[mp20748]

[Boilermaker]

[mp20748]

[Nashou66]

From 12 feet away it makes no difference Mike, i see no scan lines, and do you see any in my super huge picture
in the post above?So 800 is the perfect Horizontal res for a scope blend.

Also my processor does 1:1 pixel mapping.
So it matches each end every ACTIVE pixel of a 2.4 movie which has a pixel dimension of 1920x800,
2.35 has 1920x817 and 1.78 obviously has 1920x1080 pixels.

So the pixels in are the same going out. So in my 1064 vertical lines those are the only lines from the
original 1920 being displayed, the rest are cropped out. Also the 800 horizontal lines are all there from
the original 2.4 movie since the extra black bars are not resolved in a blend nor should they be.

So yes i do use 1064x800 on each PJ and not 1050, the blend zone is 208 pixels wide subtract that combined resolution of 2128 and you get 1920. Simple arithmetic.




Athanasios

[JOneil]

[Boilermaker]

[macgyver655]

OH.......MY.........GOD


Thats all I'm sayin!!!!

[mp20748]

[mp20748]

[Nashou66]

As long as it is a 2.4 aspect movie.

And the Tv-Ones are Commercial units not meant for Home use at all.

Athanasios

[mp20748]

Concerning the lines being fatter...

when 800 lines is drawn on a compressed section (16:9) of a 4:3 aspect tube surface, the lines are tighter. When the same amount of lines are also drawn on a full 4:3 aspect tube surface, the lines are stretched farther apart from each other.

[mp20748]

Ok, the test would be to prove the resolve power, which should be quite easily done when compared to a single CRT surface that's producing that entire rate on an even smaller surface. And it does it with almost twice the bandwidth.

Which should be technically impossible for a single CRT to resolve full 1080P over a blended setup that uses almost the entire CRT surface of TWO CRT's, and does it with almost half the bandwidth requirement..

Wouldn't you agree?

[Boilermaker]

[Nashou66]

We are not saying your PJ does not resolve 1080p@72, You said in my set up 1920x800p@ 72 will NOT show the same details.
It will and does. It doesn't have anything to do with my PJ or bandwidth, it has to do with the 1:1 pixel mapping.
if a pixel is at location 500x339 in the active area of the image then my scaler will put it there on my output.
Now if that pixel falls into the area not scanned like the black bars above and below it will not even be looked at in my Processor.
Only the active areas. I do not have my scalers set up for 1080p at all as i don't watch many movies of that Aspect ratio(1.78).
And if i do i just use my Oppo's 1/2 zoom which shrinks down the 1.78 to fit in the 2.40 screen hight wise. when that happens i do loose the 1:1 pixel mapping since it can't fit 1080 lines into the 800 output and some scaling is done.

Bob runs his I think with 1080p out, not sure though. At one point i will add that tot he set up but it involves a lot for me to do.
The resolutions are created on a PC program then uploaded to the VP. And the way these units work is the other memories do not save the the aspect ratios separately( one thing I hate about them) since they are used in commercial set ups that keep the same aspect ration to facilitate less issue when switching sources constantly and doing the fade in and outs they were designed to do.

Now explaining all that I am late for dinner at my sisters.

Athanasios

[mp20748]

[mp20748]

[macgyver655]

There's more to resolving an image then the area of the tube face being used. This also applies to 1:1 pixel mapping.

[mp20748]