|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
CasetheCorvetteman
Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| redfox001 wrote: | | CasetheCorvetteman wrote: | | redfox001 wrote: | But the whole discussion of G90 and 909 and Marquee is based on dvd source material. Even if you upscale to 1080p you still have around 3 pixels with almost the same brightness. With 1080p source material we do need higher bandwidth to keep up with digital that have unnatural sharpness by the way  |
And who really cares? Thats the source material available to home theatre users.
Since you love to back Kurt so much, maybe you can have a go, in your own words ofcourse, at explaining why a G90 is not a good machine for home theatre use? |
Ok I removed that but you are very sensitive to criticism on you projectors. When I say something about your Nec you go completely nuts. Now Kurt is saying something about a G90 and you feel offended. I do not get that. He said a lot about 909 and I learned from his knowledge. Some things I just let go and I still enjoy the 909 but it is the hobby to search for something even better. |
No im not, im just not as resistant to dickheads as some of the others here. But theyre catching on...
I never go completely nuts, but when you say something about NEC youre talking out your arse with zero experience, yet make claims as bold as "XG has terrible bandwidth" and "unplugging focus yokes while under load will be zero risk to focus board damage"... "The splitter either works or it doesnt, there is no in between and it can never cause focus issues"...
When i see it, im going to call you on it every time.
You really do think im offended by his statements? That is really quite amusing that you cant tell the difference between dispelling horse sh*t comments and being offended  How many times will it have to be said to you before you can actually understand what is being said to you??? How long will it be before you relise that just because i dissagree does not mean im offended by the comment?
Kurt talks utter sh*t, we reply and dissagree... We're all offended??? Get real man... You come along and dissagree with some sugested tests on a Barco set and make some uninformed comments about NECs and removing inductive loads from power supplies, i call it out because id rather not see a guy risk damage to his set, and im offended and over sensitive?? HAHAHA!!!
What honestly makes you think that someone as strong minded as me is ever going to be offended by someone like you???
I wasnt offended when you tried a number of times to blame me for spending money on items i never told you to buy, you claimed then that Gábor said to you that i did the same thing to him, which you made up all on your own, you told me my recent illness was a cop out to slink away into the shaddows and avoid the questioning to my integrity, shall i go on??? Its pretty good for a laugh though anyway
_________________
Barco Cine 9, ,Sony VPL570ES 4K SXRD, 135" OZ Theatre Majestic 16:9 screen, Denon X6700in preamp mode, 2x 7ch Tonewinner amps, 2x Tonewinner 15" subs, 2x 10" subs, 7.2.6...
RUNCO DTV991 LC ( NEC XG 852 LC ) 100" 4:3 screen, H/K AVR 7.1...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
km987654
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia
TV/Projector: Barco BG809s
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HogPilot wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Why is there none of you guys who pick up on my post, and document me wrong on some of the week/ bad points i state related to the G90.? |
Because that's not how this works. No one is right until proven wrong; the burden of proof lies upon you to prove your position. I'm not a CRT guy, but your track record of grossly misinformed/biased/subjective comments about digital projectors in general (and JVC projectors) doesn't imbue me with any confidence that this situation is different. Prove me wrong 
| km987654 wrote: | | I said the whole discussion was silly not his questions. My points still stand. |
Given that the latter is a subset of the former, you're making even less sense than Kurt.  |
Someone asks a question(s) and then a discussion follows so the discussion is separate to the question(s). This guy was so confused he went and offered a low ball price and ended up with nothing. Was that the right outcome? Perhaps not. I believe the discussion started out fine but went down hill fast with views about noise and streaking as if the G90 is the only projector with those faults.
If I have read his original post correctly he had the required funds but wanted to know if he should buy so was he better off without those two G90s?
It is certianly my view that financially most CRT projectors (if not all) don't make sense and I believe there are a few posters in this thread that have indeed moved to digital perhaps for that reason. I will continue to buy CRT parts and tubes and I know the cost doesn't make any sense so I am talking from my own experience.
For me as said the discussion was silly and didn't help him but rather just confused him. He and others may not agree with that but this my view.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| km987654 wrote: | | HogPilot wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Why is there none of you guys who pick up on my post, and document me wrong on some of the week/ bad points i state related to the G90.? |
Because that's not how this works. No one is right until proven wrong; the burden of proof lies upon you to prove your position. I'm not a CRT guy, but your track record of grossly misinformed/biased/subjective comments about digital projectors in general (and JVC projectors) doesn't imbue me with any confidence that this situation is different. Prove me wrong
| km987654 wrote: | | I said the whole discussion was silly not his questions. My points still stand. |
Given that the latter is a subset of the former, you're making even less sense than Kurt. |
Someone asks a question(s) and then a discussion follows so the discussion is separate to the question(s). This guy was so confused he went and offered a low ball price and ended up with nothing. Was that the right outcome? Perhaps not. I believe the discussion started out fine but went down hill fast with views about noise and streaking as if the G90 is the only projector with those faults.
If I have read his original post correctly he had the required funds but wanted to know if he should buy so was he better off without those two G90s?
It is certianly my view that financially most CRT projectors (if not all) don't make sense and I believe there are a few posters in this thread that have indeed moved to digital perhaps for that reason. I will continue to buy CRT parts and tubes and I know the cost doesn't make any sense so I am talking from my own experience.
For me as said the discussion was silly and didn't help him but rather just confused him. He and others may not agree with that but this my view. |
If we expand our horizon a bit and consider all the different projectors on the marked, ill still say that a standard G90 dont hold any reference level, alone the ventilator noise would be plenty to not even give it a chance in a modern HT.
Image noise, streaking, bad ansi contrast and so on is normal CRT issues, but that dont make the G90 better. Its still issues who is not issues on most modern digital projectors.
I also did state i would prefer my JVC over a standard G90 any day, others posted potential problems who might cost a bit extra to keep it running, i never had those issues, so in all i think he should get a fair understanding what CRT is all about.
For some its a passion and a hobby, others its a living, and someones passion and others living, dont fit on everybody.
1 CRT projector becomes 2 CRT projectors, + a bit extra and so on, and in most cases they never see any action.
I count 6 complete CRT projectors here, + a pile of extra tubes and boards. So its not like i hate CRT.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CasetheCorvetteman
Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
For the first time Kurt you have said something meaningful and factual there...
Have you been talking with Aussie_Al a bit lately??? Described him almost to a T, 1 CRT projector became 2 CRT projectors, and then some extras, has now become 7 CRT projectors and some spares, none of which ever see much action, and unlikely ever will. He even had the opportunity to sell a set of spare tubes he will never ever use for the same price he paid a couple years ago, and wouldnt even consider it, knowing he had two more complete sets still brand new!! Not even to help out a mate.
So yep, i agree with that statement there
_________________
Barco Cine 9, ,Sony VPL570ES 4K SXRD, 135" OZ Theatre Majestic 16:9 screen, Denon X6700in preamp mode, 2x 7ch Tonewinner amps, 2x Tonewinner 15" subs, 2x 10" subs, 7.2.6...
RUNCO DTV991 LC ( NEC XG 852 LC ) 100" 4:3 screen, H/K AVR 7.1...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CasetheCorvetteman wrote: | For the first time Kurt you have said something meaningful and factual there...
Have you been talking with Aussie_Al a bit lately??? Described him almost to a T, 1 CRT projector became 2 CRT projectors, and then some extras, has now become 7 CRT projectors and some spares, none of which ever see much action, and unlikely ever will. He even had the opportunity to sell a set of spare tubes he will never ever use for the same price he paid a couple years ago, and wouldnt even consider it, knowing he had two more complete sets still brand new!! Not even to help out a mate.
So yep, i agree with that statement there |
All i did was repeat myself + a bit extra and a different angle to it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Curt Palme
CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 24396
Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
IN my case, 5 original Barco 800s became over 3000 over the years....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CasetheCorvetteman
Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | CasetheCorvetteman wrote: | For the first time Kurt you have said something meaningful and factual there...
Have you been talking with Aussie_Al a bit lately??? Described him almost to a T, 1 CRT projector became 2 CRT projectors, and then some extras, has now become 7 CRT projectors and some spares, none of which ever see much action, and unlikely ever will. He even had the opportunity to sell a set of spare tubes he will never ever use for the same price he paid a couple years ago, and wouldnt even consider it, knowing he had two more complete sets still brand new!! Not even to help out a mate.
So yep, i agree with that statement there |
All i did was repeat myself + a bit extra and a different angle to it. |
Yeah, was that bit extra you added that made all the difference
_________________
Barco Cine 9, ,Sony VPL570ES 4K SXRD, 135" OZ Theatre Majestic 16:9 screen, Denon X6700in preamp mode, 2x 7ch Tonewinner amps, 2x Tonewinner 15" subs, 2x 10" subs, 7.2.6...
RUNCO DTV991 LC ( NEC XG 852 LC ) 100" 4:3 screen, H/K AVR 7.1...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HogPilot
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 2383
TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| km987654 wrote: | | HogPilot wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Why is there none of you guys who pick up on my post, and document me wrong on some of the week/ bad points i state related to the G90.? |
Because that's not how this works. No one is right until proven wrong; the burden of proof lies upon you to prove your position. I'm not a CRT guy, but your track record of grossly misinformed/biased/subjective comments about digital projectors in general (and JVC projectors) doesn't imbue me with any confidence that this situation is different. Prove me wrong
| km987654 wrote: | | I said the whole discussion was silly not his questions. My points still stand. |
Given that the latter is a subset of the former, you're making even less sense than Kurt. |
Someone asks a question(s) and then a discussion follows so the discussion is separate to the question(s). This guy was so confused he went and offered a low ball price and ended up with nothing. Was that the right outcome? Perhaps not. I believe the discussion started out fine but went down hill fast with views about noise and streaking as if the G90 is the only projector with those faults.
If I have read his original post correctly he had the required funds but wanted to know if he should buy so was he better off without those two G90s?
It is certianly my view that financially most CRT projectors (if not all) don't make sense and I believe there are a few posters in this thread that have indeed moved to digital perhaps for that reason. I will continue to buy CRT parts and tubes and I know the cost doesn't make any sense so I am talking from my own experience.
For me as said the discussion was silly and didn't help him but rather just confused him. He and others may not agree with that but this my view. |
Even if you ignore that he fully participated in said discussion, you're still splitting hairs. You simply don't like the outcome of a 100% reasonable line of thought that was arrived at by the OP with help from multiple experienced forum members. You've also completely ignored that he stated he doesn't want to spend the extra money required to get even one of these sets up and running, and that he has zero experience with CRTs. Newsflash: some people don't enjoy the large amounts of time involved in setting up and keeping a CRT running.
He most certainly didn't walk away with nothing. He very clearly stated that he's been considering a Sony HW40, which is an incredibly capable projector and will require significantly less setup/maintenance time than a G90. It will be brighter, quieter, sharper, and throw a great image. You're just (oddly) upset because he didn't make the same decision that you would have, even though it was based on solid information.
_________________
| ecrabb wrote: | | Curt Palme wrote: | | Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure. |
He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.
SC |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HogPilot
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 2383
TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CasetheCorvetteman wrote: | | For the first time Kurt you have said something meaningful and factual there... |
No kidding...I thought it very reasonable as well, and outlined several of the reasons the OP seemed disinterested in pressing with acquiring the projectors.
_________________
| ecrabb wrote: | | Curt Palme wrote: | | Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure. |
He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.
SC |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
km987654
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia
TV/Projector: Barco BG809s
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2015 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HogPilot wrote: | | km987654 wrote: | | HogPilot wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Why is there none of you guys who pick up on my post, and document me wrong on some of the week/ bad points i state related to the G90.? |
Because that's not how this works. No one is right until proven wrong; the burden of proof lies upon you to prove your position. I'm not a CRT guy, but your track record of grossly misinformed/biased/subjective comments about digital projectors in general (and JVC projectors) doesn't imbue me with any confidence that this situation is different. Prove me wrong
| km987654 wrote: | | I said the whole discussion was silly not his questions. My points still stand. |
Given that the latter is a subset of the former, you're making even less sense than Kurt. |
Someone asks a question(s) and then a discussion follows so the discussion is separate to the question(s). This guy was so confused he went and offered a low ball price and ended up with nothing. Was that the right outcome? Perhaps not. I believe the discussion started out fine but went down hill fast with views about noise and streaking as if the G90 is the only projector with those faults.
If I have read his original post correctly he had the required funds but wanted to know if he should buy so was he better off without those two G90s?
It is certianly my view that financially most CRT projectors (if not all) don't make sense and I believe there are a few posters in this thread that have indeed moved to digital perhaps for that reason. I will continue to buy CRT parts and tubes and I know the cost doesn't make any sense so I am talking from my own experience.
For me as said the discussion was silly and didn't help him but rather just confused him. He and others may not agree with that but this my view. |
Even if you ignore that he fully participated in said discussion, you're still splitting hairs. You simply don't like the outcome of a 100% reasonable line of thought that was arrived at by the OP with help from multiple experienced forum members. You've also completely ignored that he stated he doesn't want to spend the extra money required to get even one of these sets up and running, and that he has zero experience with CRTs. Newsflash: some people don't enjoy the large amounts of time involved in setting up and keeping a CRT running.
He most certainly didn't walk away with nothing. He very clearly stated that he's been considering a Sony HW40, which is an incredibly capable projector and will require significantly less setup/maintenance time than a G90. It will be brighter, quieter, sharper, and throw a great image. You're just (oddly) upset because he didn't make the same decision that you would have, even though it was based on solid information. |
Oh really. So now you know what I am thinking. My only concern is that the advice was relevant and objective. It wasn't in my view. you are obviously happy he went digital. Did I read somewhere you don't own a crt projector?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CIR Engineering
Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 4269
Location: Chicago USA & Berlin Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I kind of feel like posting, but after reading three pages after my first post I'm spent.
...I guess i am not obsessed or on a crusade...
That doesn't mean Kurt doesn't know half of what he thinks other people don't know they didn't know, or forgot they didn't know when they knew it. If you don't understand the fundamentals of video signals, or how the anatomy of the human eye works, and why humans see the way they see (and don't see what they can't), certain conclusions from otherwise scientific experiments are meaningless because the said conclusions are fallacious due to lack of knowledge.
craigr
_________________
JETI 1501-HiRes 2nm Spectroradiometer
JETI 1211 Spectroradiometer
Photo Research PR-650 Spectroradiometer
Klein K10-A Colorimeter
Murideo Fresco SIX-G HDMI 2.x Multimedia Generator
Murideo Fresco SIX-A HDMI 2.x Analyzer
Light Illusion ColourSpace XPT Color Calibration Software
Light Illusion LightSpace XPT Pro Version 10.x Color Calibration Software
OMARDRIS JVC Software Patch to use K10-A and Jeti with JVC OEM AutoCal Software!
Sencore CR7000 CRT Tube Analyzer / Rejuvenater
Authorized Dealer for Lumagen & just about everything worth buying
www.CIR-Engineering.com - craigr@cir-engineering.com
Phone: 865-405-6892
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CIR Engineering wrote: | I kind of feel like posting, but after reading three pages after my first post I'm spent.
...I guess i am not obsessed or on a crusade...
That doesn't mean Kurt doesn't know half of what he thinks other people don't know they didn't know, or forgot they didn't know when they knew it. If you don't understand the fundamentals of video signals, or how the anatomy of the human eye works, and why humans see the way they see (and don't see what they can't), certain conclusions from otherwise scientific experiments are meaningless because the said conclusions are fallacious due to lack of knowledge.
craigr |
Then its good that evaluation of the G90 was made with eyes ears and wallet only.. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CIR Engineering
Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 4269
Location: Chicago USA & Berlin Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | CIR Engineering wrote: | I kind of feel like posting, but after reading three pages after my first post I'm spent.
...I guess i am not obsessed or on a crusade...
That doesn't mean Kurt doesn't know half of what he thinks other people don't know they didn't know, or forgot they didn't know when they knew it. If you don't understand the fundamentals of video signals, or how the anatomy of the human eye works, and why humans see the way they see (and don't see what they can't), certain conclusions from otherwise scientific experiments are meaningless because the said conclusions are fallacious due to lack of knowledge.
craigr |
Then its good that the evaluation of the G90 was made with the eyes ears and wallet. |
Which for the second time in this thread will prove to veterans how little experience you have in this field Kurt. My history and contribution to the hobby are beyond reproach. Yours are a slanted interpretation of Mike Parker's words, opinion, and ideas sprinkled with your lack of fundamental understanding and infinitely finite wisdom.
You see, I've known Mike for a long time. I've been to his house on many occasions, played with Marquee's there, played with G90's there, and I've spent hundreds of hours on the phone with him working on Marquee, Sony, and Barco projectors. Mike is a good friend and I have a lot of respect for his capabilities. Because of all that, I know Mike well enough to see him through your ramblings and I understand that many of your ideas arise from a flimsy understanding of Mike's ideas.
Do you know why humans see in black and white when it's dark? Do you know how that translates to why component video works, do you know that you can not see one pixel errors in chroma resolution? Have you ever even thought about it? Oh wait, you just happen to be the only human on Earth who can one pixel errors on chroma resolution even when they are not present in the signal to begin with.
Kurt, there was a time that I thought you would be a valuable contributor to the hobby. Unfortunately, you often come to conclusions after experimentation that are incomplete or flat out incorrect. I am not saying that you don't know anything or that you are not smart. You do however lack a full background in video concepts and this leads you to erroneous conclusions. After that your rather obtuse and dickish personality provides you with the motivation to perpetuate these incorrect facts over and over and over and over and over and over in nearly every recent thread on the forum. The same thing in every thread all the time. And this is why I think you are deleterious to the hobby. You spread more misinformation at a higher volume than knowledgeable folks care to take the time to correct. This causes confusion and misconception by newer or less informed hobbyists.
It's really a shame and I find it unfortunate.
craigr
_________________
JETI 1501-HiRes 2nm Spectroradiometer
JETI 1211 Spectroradiometer
Photo Research PR-650 Spectroradiometer
Klein K10-A Colorimeter
Murideo Fresco SIX-G HDMI 2.x Multimedia Generator
Murideo Fresco SIX-A HDMI 2.x Analyzer
Light Illusion ColourSpace XPT Color Calibration Software
Light Illusion LightSpace XPT Pro Version 10.x Color Calibration Software
OMARDRIS JVC Software Patch to use K10-A and Jeti with JVC OEM AutoCal Software!
Sencore CR7000 CRT Tube Analyzer / Rejuvenater
Authorized Dealer for Lumagen & just about everything worth buying
www.CIR-Engineering.com - craigr@cir-engineering.com
Phone: 865-405-6892
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Posts: 2257
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I do not think Kurt talks about one pixel errors but he talks about MTF and espescially bandwidth. All the experts say it translates to detail and sharpness.
So my opinion is people keep saying Kurt is wrong but they never come with arguments. But that does not mean that a G 90 is not a wonderfull projector that people would have a lot of fun with. Much more than with a digital unless it is a good dlp The JVC have all sorts of sharpness errors that look terrible and as if the panels are not convergent.
_________________
701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CIR Engineering wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | CIR Engineering wrote: | I kind of feel like posting, but after reading three pages after my first post I'm spent.
...I guess i am not obsessed or on a crusade...
That doesn't mean Kurt doesn't know half of what he thinks other people don't know they didn't know, or forgot they didn't know when they knew it. If you don't understand the fundamentals of video signals, or how the anatomy of the human eye works, and why humans see the way they see (and don't see what they can't), certain conclusions from otherwise scientific experiments are meaningless because the said conclusions are fallacious due to lack of knowledge.
craigr |
Then its good that the evaluation of the G90 was made with the eyes ears and wallet. |
Which for the second time in this thread will prove to veterans how little experience you have in this field Kurt. My history and contribution to the hobby are beyond reproach. Yours are a slanted interpretation of Mike Parker's words, opinion, and ideas sprinkled with your lack of fundamental understanding and infinitely finite wisdom.
You see, I've known Mike for a long time. I've been to his house on many occasions, played with Marquee's there, played with G90's there, and I've spent hundreds of hours on the phone with him working on Marquee, Sony, and Barco projectors. Mike is a good friend and I have a lot of respect for his capabilities. Because of all that, I know Mike well enough to see him through your ramblings and I understand that many of your ideas arise from a flimsy understanding of Mike's ideas.
Do you know why humans see in black and white when it's dark? Do you know how that translates to why component video works, do you know that you can not see one pixel errors in chroma resolution? Have you ever even thought about it? Oh wait, you just happen to be the only human on Earth who can one pixel errors on chroma resolution even when they are not present in the signal to begin with.
Kurt, there was a time that I thought you would be a valuable contributor to the hobby. Unfortunately, you often come to conclusions after experimentation that are incomplete or flat out incorrect. I am not saying that you don't know anything or that you are not smart. You do however lack a full background in video concepts and this leads you to erroneous conclusions. After that your rather obtuse and dickish personality provides you with the motivation to perpetuate these incorrect facts over and over and over and over and over and over in nearly every recent thread on the forum. The same thing in every thread all the time. And this is why I think you are deleterious to the hobby. You spread more misinformation at a higher volume than knowledgeable folks care to take the time to correct. This causes confusion and misconception by newer or less informed hobbyists.
It's really a shame and I find it unfortunate.
craigr |
Im not really sure where you like to go with this, And what it has to do with Mike.
All i did in this thread was to state that i dont think that the G90 holds any reference status in todays projector marked, as it has the problems who is common to most CRT projectors, including extreme ventilator noise.
That somehow seems to upset you.
Why dont you just try argument your point why the G90 is supposed to be a reference class projector, with its shortcomings.
I can understand that you find it annoying that i dont just do like most others, look at the screen and say woooow, Craig say this is a great image, and if Craig say so it is so.. Wooooow.
I know you have been selling and servicing G90 for a long time, i just fail to see how that makes much difference, other than you need to defend it as a reference projector and cant find good arguments to support that.
I had never expected to see so emotional and unprofessional behavior from someone like you involved in sales and service of these projectors, i had thought you were above the hole personal level, and was able to stick to the subject.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
And that hole just keeps getting deeper...and deeper....and deeper............ Hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooo down there.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CasetheCorvetteman
Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| redfox001 wrote: | I do not think Kurt talks about one pixel errors but he talks about MTF and espescially bandwidth. All the experts say it translates to detail and sharpness.
So my opinion is people keep saying Kurt is wrong but they never come with arguments. But that does not mean that a G 90 is not a wonderfull projector that people would have a lot of fun with. Much more than with a digital unless it is a good dlp The JVC have all sorts of sharpness errors that look terrible and as if the panels are not convergent. |
Ofcourse, but youre no expert yourself, what he says just sounds good to you.
_________________
Barco Cine 9, ,Sony VPL570ES 4K SXRD, 135" OZ Theatre Majestic 16:9 screen, Denon X6700in preamp mode, 2x 7ch Tonewinner amps, 2x Tonewinner 15" subs, 2x 10" subs, 7.2.6...
RUNCO DTV991 LC ( NEC XG 852 LC ) 100" 4:3 screen, H/K AVR 7.1...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Posts: 2257
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
When you will reread this thread again in some time* you will see how stupid and emotional some answers are
There are more threads like this. One is about focus and people are saying Kurt can not have a sharp picture with the thompson yokes. If you reread that thread it becomes obvious who has a fresh look on crt and who talks nonsense. Just saying look at this as if you are one month older
* for some that might mean reading for the first time
_________________
701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
Last edited by redfox001 on Sat Jan 10, 2015 9:41 pm; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
km987654
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia
TV/Projector: Barco BG809s
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 5:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | | And that hole just keeps getting deeper...and deeper....and deeper............ Hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooo down there. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| redfox001 wrote: | When you will reread this thread again in some time* you will see how stupid and emotional some answers are
Yes, we have all read most of your posts and couldn't agree more.
There are more threads like this. One is about focus and people are saying Kurt can not have a sharp picture with the thompson yokes. If you reread that thread it becomes obvious who has a fresh look on crt and who talks nonsense.
Either you have not read many of those posts or you do not understand what was being posted. So I think you should reread them.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|
