|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
barco_75
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 171 Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Decibel, I didn't quite follow your statement. Do you mean, you cannot used tinted glycol in liquid coupled systems?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CasetheCorvetteman
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 6326 Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
That is what he is saying yes, the glycol is not a constant thickness.
_________________ Barco Cine 9, ,Sony VPL570ES 4K SXRD, 135" OZ Theatre Majestic 16:9 screen, Denon X6700in preamp mode, 2x 7ch Tonewinner amps, 2x Tonewinner 15" subs, 2x 10" subs, 7.2.6...
RUNCO DTV991 LC ( NEC XG 852 LC ) 100" 4:3 screen, H/K AVR 7.1...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gjaky
Joined: 05 Jun 2010 Posts: 2802 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CasetheCorvetteman wrote: | | That is what he is saying yes, the glycol is not a constant thickness. |
I know we have been saying this for yeras now, but I'm wondering if anyone actually experimented with this, sure it will change the refraction index, but by how much? I know there were experiments with adding water to the glycol...
Also, if the dye is changing the refraction in one way you only have to find an agent that is changing to the other way this is what my logic say. If I remember correct mc86 measured the coefficients of different glycols in the past, maybe someone can follow that path.
_________________ projectors in the past : NEC 6-9PG xtra, Electrohome Marquee 6-7500, NEC XG 1351 LC ( with super modified Electrohome VNB neckboard !!!)
current: VDC Marquee 9500LC
The MOD: VNB-DB, VIM-DB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CasetheCorvetteman
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 6326 Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Its not that, its the difference in the amount of fluid as you move toward the outer edges, the colour dye is going to limit the light output, and the more there is to travel through, the darker the image will be.
This will ultimately mean the edges will be quite dim compared to the centre, where there is very little glycol.
_________________ Barco Cine 9, ,Sony VPL570ES 4K SXRD, 135" OZ Theatre Majestic 16:9 screen, Denon X6700in preamp mode, 2x 7ch Tonewinner amps, 2x Tonewinner 15" subs, 2x 10" subs, 7.2.6...
RUNCO DTV991 LC ( NEC XG 852 LC ) 100" 4:3 screen, H/K AVR 7.1...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gjaky
Joined: 05 Jun 2010 Posts: 2802 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CasetheCorvetteman wrote: | Its not that, its the difference in the amount of fluid as you move toward the outer edges, the colour dye is going to limit the light output, and the more there is to travel through, the darker the image will be.
This will ultimately mean the edges will be quite dim compared to the centre, where there is very little glycol. |
Good point.
_________________ projectors in the past : NEC 6-9PG xtra, Electrohome Marquee 6-7500, NEC XG 1351 LC ( with super modified Electrohome VNB neckboard !!!)
current: VDC Marquee 9500LC
The MOD: VNB-DB, VIM-DB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barco_75
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 171 Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
One thing I'm not sure if I noted is I was wanting to stick with my Sony tubes not MEC 180's because of condition. Based on what I've heard no LC chambers will work with the Sony tubes. That leaves me with my existing MEC (which are condition 7-8), the Sony (condition 9) or buying P16. With all effort and cost maybe it doesn't make sense to try this. I wasn't looking for this to be a big dollar project and it seems like it might be going in that direction. I think if I could use the MEC 180 it might make sense but I would need to find HD 117 and chambers which is next to impossible. The HD18 would be fine if I didnt have to fabricate adapters. Or find chambers for HD-214 and c-elements I have but I'm not if that would be an improvement over the AC HD 144.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Decibel
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 904 Location: Roma - Italia
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| barco_75 wrote: | | One thing I'm not sure if I noted is I was wanting to stick with my Sony tubes not MEC 180's because of condition. Based on what I've heard no LC chambers will work with the Sony tubes. That leaves me with my existing MEC (which are condition 7-8), the Sony (condition 9) or buying P16. With all effort and cost maybe it doesn't make sense to try this. I wasn't looking for this to be a big dollar project and it seems like it might be going in that direction. I think if I could use the MEC 180 it might make sense but I would need to find HD 117 and chambers which is next to impossible. The HD18 would be fine if I didnt have to fabricate adapters. Or find chambers for HD-214 and c-elements I have but I'm not if that would be an improvement over the AC HD 144. |
I hope I understand your words.
The better improvement for Barco 808s is the conversion LC ... ok
But unfortunately the costs of conversion are very high.
The hirez tubes ... see here, here and here.
These LC tubes have native Barco's plates, no color corrected c-elements exist.
These LC tubes are fully compatible with HD117's but ABSOLUTELY INCOMPATIBLE WITH HD18.
These LC tubes can't mount into 808s chassis without adapters (no LC chambers can be mount in 808s chassis without adapters). The 808s chassis is make for his AC tubes, tube's frame and AC HD8's.
Also the making of diy chassis adapters cost much because it's impossible to make it in house.
Then you must buy LC lenses.
If you would the color corrected c-elements you must buy HD18 lenses, make diy plates (impossible to make it in house) and colored c-elements, obviously.
So, in my opinion, the best improvement that you realize without spend much money is the replace the worn 180 DVB's with your minty Sony's.
Then HD145 AC color corrected lenses (need joust adapters). Stop.
_________________ Domenico (Barco fan!)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barco_75
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 171 Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Dominico...that's what I was thinking too. I've had my HD-145 installed with adapters on the MEC tubes. Switching the slightly worn MEC out with better amps should help.
Based on cost the only option which remains is try and use what I have. You didn't speak directly about the option below:
Do you think the HD-214 with color corrected c-element would be improvement over HD-145 with my tubes. I would have to fabricate bracket (have friend who could do for free) and find chamber and use my slightly worn MEC with modified amps. Seems like a toss up to me. Less sharpness but better contrast. I used those the HD-214 lens for 100 in wide screen before but I never had the scheimpflug corrected (retro with fixed chambers). If i recall lens were at max screen width or a little over. I could focus center well. Corners was out of focus some...unfortunately I just can't remember that well. It's been a long time!! I remember the screen on the 808 was much brighter than the 708. Contrast was not as good...but I also had some issues with setup initially so it may not be fair comparison. Have you ever tried those lens combinations?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RaWsHaRk
Joined: 01 May 2009 Posts: 131 Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really dont know why you are going through all that trouble when in a huge town like chicago you could pick a G70 for 100 bucks or G90 for 500 if you surf the craigslist for a while...probably a 1209 barco for similar money or if youre lucky, for free...or a marquee.
here in Finland where there arent that much projectors I could understand..of if you just have to tinker as a hobby.. but if u just want to enjoy movies and crt, get a reasonable lc projector to start with.
_________________ Electrohome Marquee 7500.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barco_75
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 171 Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well, I like to tinker...and I really don't want to deal with installing a new projector. The 9" machines will require more power and my electrical would need to be upgraded as I'm running my entire home theater and lighting on one 15 amp circuit. I live in a loft / condo and pulling new power is not an easy task. I probably can't even get to some of the conduits without ripping out ceilings that are not in my unit. Honestly, I don't need more projector than I already have. I enjoy it a lot and like the challenge of squeezing a little more performance out of it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|