| Author |
Message |
CasetheCorvetteman
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 6326 Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah watching 3D movies i didnt care about the scaling.
_________________ Barco Cine 9, ,Sony VPL570ES 4K SXRD, 135" OZ Theatre Majestic 16:9 screen, Denon X6700in preamp mode, 2x 7ch Tonewinner amps, 2x Tonewinner 15" subs, 2x 10" subs, 7.2.6...
RUNCO DTV991 LC ( NEC XG 852 LC ) 100" 4:3 screen, H/K AVR 7.1...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tanwn
Joined: 26 Dec 2006 Posts: 104
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| redfox001 wrote: | | Perhaps do a reset on the motherboard losing all memory blocks? |
does it mean there's a reset on the main menu or how do i go about it? need to pull out any chip?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2257 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tanwn wrote: | | redfox001 wrote: | | Perhaps do a reset on the motherboard losing all memory blocks? |
does it mean there's a reset on the main menu or how do i go about it? need to pull out any chip? |
Just try setting everything to midposition and perhaps deleting every memory block. Lot of work but worth a try.
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey man,
is the Cine9 still up and running.
ElTopo
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2257 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The beauty (CineMax) has been replaced by The Beast I tried to make nice pictures but well, you just have to watch a movie on this one
This is a splitpack with the mainunit on the attick. All cables that end on the neckboards have been replaced. The coax video was soldered on the main board (below). Result was very low noise and perfect gamma.
The unit is positioned as low as possible to have very little keystone correction.
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
Last edited by redfox001 on Sat Nov 11, 2017 4:04 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you put all Cine9 boards (incl. fan boards) in the SplitPack ?
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2257 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ElTopo wrote: | | Have you put all Cine9 boards (incl. fan boards) in the SplitPack ? |
I used a mixture of boards, a new controller and most boards of the Cine9. I did not use the fan board because faster spinning fans at max speed is best for the boards and I do not hear it because it is on the attic.
The tube unit can be made a little more silent. At Francisco's place I heard it not make any sound at all!
So I still have the CineMax case with gold logo and the fanboards. Might sell them once.
I keep a lot of this stuff because it is going to be rare in the future I am afraid and I do not want the blue light led hazard everywhere around me. Already children are getting glasses much to soon. So I also replaced my uhd television for a plasma and most lamps in my house are carbon wire lamps except for some true light fullspectrum lamps that also emit ultra violet.
I will make a post here one day with what I have found on blue leds. How they disturb sleep and damage your eyes.
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blue light is bad, no question. But if you are careful to get what is called "warm white" here in the US (2800-3500K or so), they have very low blue emissions:
I also strongly recommend using f.lux (https://justgetflux.com/) to cut way back on blue emissions from your computer/phone after sunset.
I would not worry about too much blue emission from LCD projectors. The bulb may possibly have strong blue emissions (it almost has to, in order to have properly-calibrated D6500 colors), but the projector is only going to transmit the colors it's supposed to.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do know that Samsung has some displays they put in retail stores which are blue LED backlit and they're hard to even look at. And they look different to each eye!
I love blue, it's my favorite color, but something about blue LEDs is just NOT what our eyes were meant to see.
Blue LEDs as power indicators? OK. But as part of a light source? I'd rather avoid that.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2257 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi some short notes and measurements here. I am still working on the big picture.
This picture is about how our human vision is both scotopic and photopic. Day and night vision for short.
"Years ago it was thought that the cones were responsible for daytime vision and rods for nighttime vision. Because of this, light meters that measure lighting levels such as footcandles, lumens, lux, etc. are weighted to the cone activated part of the eye ignoring the effect of rod-activated vision. But according to a study by Dr. Sam Berman and Dr. Don Jewett the roles of rods and cones are not exclusive but actually share responsibility depending on lighting conditions. Their experiments, sponsored by the US Dept. of Energy, show that rods do play a role in typical workplace lighting conditions. Thus the devices we use to measure light are not consistent with our human perception of lighting conditions. This has led to a movement among some lighting professionals to modify our criteria to include for rod sensitivity."
http://www.jacomb.net/pdf/photopic_scotopic.pdf
Now to get photopic white the blue led is far more stimulating the scotopic region than sunlight does with a normal spectrum blue. This results in wider pupils (less sharp vision), sleeping problems and possible eye damage on frequent exposure.
Is this a hazard? There is a body of evidence that young and old people are at danger. Animal studies show simple blindness after long exposure of these animals.
people also sleep worse because this scotopic region also regulates sleep.
Recent alarming messages from optician are that they have to put glasses on young people much more often. What will be in the papers in 20 years from now?
My personal experience with a qled Sony uhd (samsung has these now) it made my eyes very tired and I could not watch more than one hour a day or so. With my kuro/crt I can watch much longer before getting tired.
But it is not just your television. It is also you lightning, ipad your phone your computer and they are even replacing street lightning with led.
Now just for fun I did some measurements with my i1pro spectrometer.
The first is a fullspectrum light
The second is a white led
The third is a warm white led (the spectrum Gary presented but this one is real, still some blue )
The fourth is a candescent light and the fifth a carbon wire lamp.
Now the final picture, this is a CRT. The blue light is not showing any dips so the blue you see with your photopic vison is the blue you get with your scotopic vision just like daylight
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
Last edited by redfox001 on Sat Nov 11, 2017 4:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fascinating stuff! I never believed the idea of a day/night "switch" between rods and cones. We didn't evolve only in full daylight and full dark. It only makes sense that there would be a transitional region where both mechanisms are in play.
But I've never heard of the photopic / scotopic perceptions. I'm confused by the concern about blue light stimulating the scotopic vision more than sunlight. There is a lot of blue-light energy in sunlight. I assume the rods are not "shuttered" during the day, so they're getting massive amounts of blue-light energy. Why would a blue LED projector or even a blue-emitting phone/pad screen cause more damage than the blue energy of the massively-brighter sun?
| redfox001 wrote: | The third is a warm white led (the spectrum Gary presented but this one is real, still some blue )
The fourth is a candescent light and the fifth a carbon wire lamp. |
What is a candescent light? Just a normal tungsten-filament incandescent bulb?
Is the carbon-wire lamp a heat lamp? It looks like it would emit some dull red light, but mostly infrared.
What was the color temp of the "real warm white" you measured? They have to have some blue to have a higher color temp. Maybe your bulb is toward the higher end of the "warm white" spectrum, 3000K or so. A warmer bulb, 2700K or so, would probably have much less blue.
On a related topic... I always wondered why 6500K bulbs looked so nasty-blue, since 6500K is supposed to be the color temp of sunlight. Well, tain't so. Turns out that sunlight is actually about 5778K. See e.g. some of the later responses to https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/130209/how-can-it-be-that-the-sun-emits-more-than-a-black-body
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
It never made sense to me that the parts of the eye that work in the dark stop working when there's plenty of light.
I always questioned that once I stopped to think about it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
El Duderino
Joined: 23 Jan 2011 Posts: 4653 Location: Portland, OR
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| garyfritz wrote: | | I always wondered why 6500K bulbs looked so nasty-blue, since 6500K is supposed to be the color temp of sunlight. Well, tain't so. Turns out that sunlight is actually about 5778K. | The temperature of the star we call the Sun is 5778K, but that's not the same as the Correlated Color Temperature of sunlight, which is based on the appearance of the color from a computation of the integration of a sources spectral power distribution.
Sunlight that reaches the earth (daylight) is filtered through our atmosphere and different parts of its spectrum are absorbed or reflected with different weightings under different conditions. Rayleigh scattering. A cloudless daytime sky looks blue because the smallest molecules scatter and reflect blue wavelengths more than the wavelengths toward the red end of the spectrum. Towards the evenings, the oranges and reds get weighted more and daylight red shifts. The CCT of sunlight that reaches the earth varies widely with time of day, seasons, locations, clouds, smoke, fog, etc.
I've seen 6500K for daylight referenced as noon, diffuse overcast, on an equinox. Wiki defines the CIE Standard Illuminant D65 (6504K) as: "D65 corresponds roughly to the average midday light in Western Europe / Northern Europe (comprising both direct sunlight and the light diffused by a clear sky), hence it is also called a daylight illuminant."
Last edited by El Duderino on Wed Oct 25, 2017 7:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2257 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| garyfritz wrote: | Fascinating stuff! I never believed the idea of a day/night "switch" between rods and cones. We didn't evolve only in full daylight and full dark. It only makes sense that there would be a transitional region where both mechanisms are in play.
But I've never heard of the photopic / scotopic perceptions. I'm confused by the concern about blue light stimulating the scotopic vision more than sunlight. There is a lot of blue-light energy in sunlight. I assume the rods are not "shuttered" during the day, so they're getting massive amounts of blue-light energy. Why would a blue LED projector or even a blue-emitting phone/pad screen cause more damage than the blue energy of the massively-brighter sun?
|
What I mean is that in sunlight and CRT you get a 'visible' amount of blue (that works on the photopic region) and an 'invisible' amount of blue that are roughly equal. With white led's you get an amount of visible blue that is far less than the amount of 'invisible' scotopic blue. So you do not turn down the light source because it does not look overly bright but at the same time you are damaging the eye in the invisible spectrum by overexposure.
Blue light on its own is very good during the daytime. It stops your body from breaking serotonine into melatonine. So you are full awake during the day feeling good and when you go sleeping the melatonine gets produced so you feel sleepy. So I like to get as much sunlight as possible during the day and little during the evening. Even the ultra violet (small amounts) is very important for vitamine D.
But part of the problem is the huge amount of lumens that led's can produce. CRT has its own safety build in because it can not get overly bright Present day projectors make lots of lumens!
| garyfritz wrote: |
| redfox001 wrote: | The third is a warm white led (the spectrum Gary presented but this one is real, still some blue )
The fourth is a candescent light and the fifth a carbon wire lamp. |
What is a candescent light? Just a normal tungsten-filament incandescent bulb?
Is the carbon-wire lamp a heat lamp? It looks like it would emit some dull red light, but mostly infrared.
What was the color temp of the "real warm white" you measured? They have to have some blue to have a higher color temp. Maybe your bulb is toward the higher end of the "warm white" spectrum, 3000K or so. A warmer bulb, 2700K or so, would probably have much less blue.
|
I ment incandescent tungsten lamp, correct. The color temp is 2700 K for the led.
The carbon wire lamp is an older type of lamp with carbon filament. They produce nice red light and warmth.
Turns out that the near infrared is also very healthy for your cels. The cells regenerate with the long wavelengths.
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is it possible to have the same fan curcuit chain inside the 909 Split Pack ?
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2257 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ElTopo wrote: | | Is it possible to have the same fan curcuit chain inside the 909 Split Pack ? |
I guess yes because it contains a temp sensor.
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well it should only put the two boards from the Cine9 into the SplitPack and also the Cine9 controller.
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2257 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ElTopo wrote: | | Well it should only put the two boards from the Cine9 into the SplitPack and also the Cine9 controller. |
Yes I think that way the fan should not spin at full speed. I have not tested this though.
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dummyload
Joined: 06 Apr 2006 Posts: 38 Location: belgium
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
And I think it is best to reverse mounting the fan in front of the focus board ,it has to blow air towards the focus board in order to make this extra fan board work correctly temperature wise , because al trays I have seen with this fan board installed have the focus fan reversed .
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2257 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The spectral distribution of blue is very important for potential eye damage, good sleep and my guess is that it is also important for good dark scenes. What you need is blue light from 460nm to 490nm. That is the positive blue. Blue of 440nm is potential damaging.
Especially kids I advise to limit the amount of time with blue light because because only after 16 years eyes develop some protection against these blue frequencies.
"One of the world’s leading opticians, Specsavers, has noticed a worrying trend in increasing eye problems, particularly myopia (short-sightedness), in children and are advising parents to limit screen time, make sure that kids get plenty of time outside..."
http://www.theleader.info/2017/09/01/increasing-eye-problems-children-observed-optical-group/#_
Here the spectral distribution of my CRT splitpack that I recorded myself. Notice the blue at the right frequencies of 460nm till 490nm.
CRT nice broad blue
UHP lamp from a digital JVC HD350 somewhat less nice, but still...
Spectrum distribution of the Samsung D7000 led television. Notice the damaging frequencies and the lack of good blue. Tiresome blue and potential damaging. Notice the higher intensity because it is a television. Look at the relative intensity of blue.
Xenon lamp of a Sony VW100 digital. Very nice lamp!
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
Last edited by redfox001 on Sat Nov 11, 2017 4:05 pm; edited 5 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|