Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 

Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Barco 808s/Cine8/Cine9 brightness and contrast settings
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
Author Message
CasetheCorvetteman



Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia

Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 10:17 pm    Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:


About the VP, then most of them can input/output any format you like, so input 4:3 and output 4:3, set the timings to a 4:3 format, and then its possible to calibrate the output to the right video level., to match the projector.

If i output 1080P horisontal lines on my marquee, and fill up the tube face, 4:3 format i get anoying scanlines on the screen.

So i guess you will need higher resolution on a cine9 to make it ok to look at.?

I think that any good VP will improve the PQ on any CRT, if used right.

No kidding.... But i LIKE scanlines in retro games, that is how they were designed, and if you increase the lines you get jaggies as well as input lag. The CineMAX looks fine at 480i/p 120Hz, but the XG looks considerably better at that low res, mostly due to its vastly superior convergence.
Back to top
CasetheCorvetteman



Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia

Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 10:20 pm    Post subject:

ElTopo wrote:
Oppo 93 --> Receiver --> Lumagen XS --> Moome --> Cine9

Lumagen is also my CMS.

You go through all that, only to gut it to death with a MOOME box? You need to try straight unmolested RGB from a good PC... Youll be amazed at the difference.
Back to top
mx83toy



Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 322


Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 1:04 am    Post subject:

HTPC is definatly the route im taking with my XG now... I run my barco Cine7 50 brightness.... contrast with a good greyscale i can push towards 80... the higher i push the better my greyscale setup needs to be else i peak the white out to early and make a mess of things i have taken it further but it gets hard without a meter i have actually had it up higher but took me a while to get right...
Back to top
km987654



Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia

TV/Projector: Barco BG809s

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 1:43 am    Post subject:

CasetheCorvetteman wrote:
ElTopo wrote:
Oppo 93 --> Receiver --> Lumagen XS --> Moome --> Cine9

Lumagen is also my CMS.

You go through all that, only to gut it to death with a MOOME box? You need to try straight unmolested RGB from a good PC... Youll be amazed at the difference.


What about the receiver you really don't want that in the video chain do you? You can run sound that way but not video.

The Moome will be providing the analog connection to the projector. Is that an internal or external box?
Back to top
CasetheCorvetteman



Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:17 am    Post subject:

There is no internal MOOME for a Barco, so its external. It was bad enough that i went back to HTPC, which on a top end Barco made a HUGE step up from the MOOME V3 External.

Couldnt agree more on the receiver, but his bluray player might only have one HDMI output, in which case he'd have no choice.
Back to top
stridsvognen
Guest






Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:11 am    Post subject:

CasetheCorvetteman wrote:
ElTopo wrote:
Oppo 93 --> Receiver --> Lumagen XS --> Moome --> Cine9

Lumagen is also my CMS.

You go through all that, only to gut it to death with a MOOME box? You need to try straight unmolested RGB from a good PC... Youll be amazed at the difference.


What VP do you have experience with, and how did you set it up.?
Back to top
gjaky



Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Posts: 2802
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:19 am    Post subject:

mx83toy wrote:
HTPC is definatly the route im taking with my XG now... I run my barco Cine7 50 brightness.... contrast with a good greyscale i can push towards 80... the higher i push the better my greyscale setup needs to be else i peak the white out to early and make a mess of things i have taken it further but it gets hard without a meter i have actually had it up higher but took me a while to get right...


XG? What XG? What about the Marquee? Smile

_________________
projectors in the past : NEC 6-9PG xtra, Electrohome Marquee 6-7500, NEC XG 1351 LC ( with super modified Electrohome VNB neckboard !!!)
current: VDC Marquee 9500LC
The MOD: VNB-DB, VIM-DB
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
km987654



Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia

TV/Projector: Barco BG809s

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 7:28 am    Post subject:

CasetheCorvetteman wrote:
There is no internal MOOME for a Barco, so its external. It was bad enough that i went back to HTPC, which on a top end Barco made a HUGE step up from the MOOME V3 External.

Couldnt agree more on the receiver, but his bluray player might only have one HDMI output, in which case he'd have no choice.


Ooops I read the bit about XG Laughing
Back to top
CasetheCorvetteman



Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:18 am    Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:
CasetheCorvetteman wrote:
ElTopo wrote:
Oppo 93 --> Receiver --> Lumagen XS --> Moome --> Cine9

Lumagen is also my CMS.

You go through all that, only to gut it to death with a MOOME box? You need to try straight unmolested RGB from a good PC... Youll be amazed at the difference.


What VP do you have experience with, and how did you set it up.?

I dont, im talking out my arse...

gjaky wrote:
mx83toy wrote:
HTPC is definatly the route im taking with my XG now... I run my barco Cine7 50 brightness.... contrast with a good greyscale i can push towards 80... the higher i push the better my greyscale setup needs to be else i peak the white out to early and make a mess of things i have taken it further but it gets hard without a meter i have actually had it up higher but took me a while to get right...


XG? What XG? What about the Marquee? Smile

He updated to something decent Gabór Wink
Back to top
ElTopo



Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 1640


Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:41 am    Post subject:

I had a HTPC in the past, never again ! Too much work.

If you ever seen a Oppo performing you'll know what advantages this device has.

What is so wrong with the external Moome box ?

_________________
Barco Cine 9 the one and only
Back to top
CasetheCorvetteman



Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:47 am    Post subject:

The external MOOME is garbage compared to an internal MOOME. This is one perfect reason to look into the Greg Eisemann mods, he has an internal HDMI 1.4 input that bypasses the less than satifactory Barco input path, something im amazed your happy with, unless youve never seen it any other way.

The OPPO is not as capable as a HTPC, and there is not much work when you know what youre doing. Its easy, you should have no trouble.
Back to top
stridsvognen
Guest






Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:12 am    Post subject:

CasetheCorvetteman wrote:
The external MOOME is garbage compared to an internal MOOME. This is one perfect reason to look into the Greg Eisemann mods, he has an internal HDMI 1.4 input that bypasses the less than satifactory Barco input path, something im amazed your happy with, unless youve never seen it any other way.

The OPPO is not as capable as a HTPC, and there is not much work when you know what youre doing. Its easy, you should have no trouble.


So its the Barco inputs thats garbadge, its a quite important information.

And the oppo is just a player, what you mean must be that a OPPO and a Lumagen radiance is not as capable,.. But again how do you know if you never had any experience with it.?

Personaly i always try to avoid PC mixed up in my video or hifi.. its just a damn noise generator.. For low end displays i guess it will not be a problem.. Wink
Back to top
ElTopo



Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 1640


Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:28 am    Post subject:

Please give us some reasons why the external Moome is garbage ?

Have you ever had an Oppo or a Lumagen ?

I decided to go away from a HTPC of many reasons (setup, noise, reliability).

_________________
Barco Cine 9 the one and only
Back to top
CasetheCorvetteman



Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:23 pm    Post subject:

Reliability? Get real!! Hahaha!!! Thats a real joke.

Noise? Thats another joke, if you know what parts to use youll never hear it.

Setup is not hard at all, and capability goes far beyond movies.

I tried the external MOOME V3 against the internal MOOME in my XG, and the internal was noticably sharper.

The Barco RGB inputs are bad enough as they are without adding the external MOOME.
Back to top
stridsvognen
Guest






Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:47 pm    Post subject:

CasetheCorvetteman wrote:
Reliability? Get real!! Hahaha!!! Thats a real joke.

Noise? Thats another joke, if you know what parts to use youll never hear it.

Setup is not hard at all, and capability goes far beyond movies.

I tried the external MOOME V3 against the internal MOOME in my XG, and the internal was noticably sharper.

The Barco RGB inputs are bad enough as they are without adding the external MOOME.


How can you tell if its the XG RGBHV inputs or the EXT moome whos the bad one.?

What other DA converter have you used with your XG that worked better.?

I think you need to sit down and write about your expoeriences in details, how and why you did what, and what references your using..

Sorry for saying, but i think most of your posting just look like spam.. with no usefull content.

I have a lot of different VP, ill be happy to benefit with different experiences, and what i think performs best in different situations.

I dont have experience with the EXT moome, or HTPC, but that dont make me say its garbadge.

I do have a HD FURY 2 and 3, and 3 int Moome cards, and the RGBHV input on my Marquee VIM seems to do no harm to the signal, so using DVDO VP50 or Calibre Vantage HD2 or Crystalio 2 3800 works very well with analog out to my Marquee.

Ill test the Lumagen HDQ when i get it, but i think many in here can tell you how that works.

And if needet i can always put up my JVC X7 as a reference, if it have to be all digital..
Back to top
CasetheCorvetteman



Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 1:57 pm    Post subject:

Ive spoken about this in other threads. The MOOME V3 External was on a par with the HD Fury 3, no better, tested on both my CineMAX and my XG, the internal MOOME XG card was equal to the RGB input and both were better than both externals on the XG, and the PC RGB was better than both externals on the Barco. Its pretty clear what im saying here is the same as ive said before, the external MOOME is NOT the equal of the internal, and NOT the equal of RGB carried over 5x quad shield RG6 coax.

Im not saying a high end video processor is garbage, im saying a MOOME external box is garbage, it might be fine on a low end 8" or high end 7", but not a high enf 8", and certainly not a top end 9". Im also saying the possibilities when using a computer are very beneficial, as well as considerably cheaper, unless you run out of PCI-E slots you can basically have anything in there you like.

Now spam? Get real, what have i got to sell or gain? Nothing. Im calling it as i see it and as i have tested it. If others want to sit in the clouds then go for it, although it sounds like youve got a much cleaner signal path than Eltopo does. If he ditched the AVR and the MOOME external from his signal path he would probably be suprised at the step up to be had on his Barco.
Back to top
fragzero



Joined: 30 Aug 2012
Posts: 344


Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 2:07 pm    Post subject:

So with a barco there is no decent digital solution? You mentioned the Greg eisemann card, have you tried the HDMI 1.4 version?
Back to top
kabuby77



Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 147
Location: Italy

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 2:36 pm    Post subject:

ElTopo wrote:
Please give us some reasons why the external Moome is garbage ?

Have you ever had an Oppo or a Lumagen ?

I decided to go away from a HTPC of many reasons (setup, noise, reliability).


Hi I have Both internal and external moome for sony.
No doubt internal is superior. Projector input stages have limited bandwidth (few hundred MHz) respect to moome 1,5 GHz opamps, and are more noisy.
The video signal comes out from the moome internal pass through a relay and then goes directly to the neck board with a short cable. The cleanest path possible!
Back to top
Hulio



Joined: 15 Apr 2006
Posts: 494
Location: Belgium

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:23 pm    Post subject:

ElTopo,
Like Case and others have mentioned already, putting your brightness and contrast settings on the same level as another CRT projector means very little, if not nothing.
It depends on too much factors like screen type and size, light-control, resolution, source, cables, the input port, G2, beam spot focus, astig, cut off and gain settings and so on.
Even two identical machines with the same run-hours, performing on the same environment and screen, can end up with different brightness and contrast settings when they are perfect ISF callibrated.
However, since almost no one gave an answer to your request, let me do that if you think the info will be of any use.
I use to own an almost new BG808 with color filtered R&G HD8's. I let it ISF calibrated twice ( first time for upscaled SD-DVD and second time for bluray ). Here the settings:
Year 2007- runtime 435h, Pioneer DV-737 with SDI out-->Cinemateq POPII-SDI (1440x1152 )-->5BNC RGBHV cable--> Port 5 on Barco:
Cut off: R=54 Gain: R=43 Midpoint focus: R=46
B=49 B=36 G=50
B=46
Brightness=45 Contrast=66

Year 2009- runtime 731h, PS3(no games, only bluray @ 1080i )-->HDMI out-->HdFury 1-->Port 3 on Barco:

Cut off: R=49 Gain: R=56 Midpoint focus: R=57
B=37. B=47 G=57
B=69
Brightness=44 Contrast=67
Oh, almost forgot and is important: pitch dark HT room on 205cm wide screen, 1.2 gain ( Beamax ).
Hope it helps.
Back to top
CasetheCorvetteman



Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 6326
Location: Australia

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 12:13 am    Post subject:

fragzero wrote:
So with a barco there is no decent digital solution? You mentioned the Greg eisemann card, have you tried the HDMI 1.4 version?

I wouldnt say there is no decent solution, Greg's solution is certainly something that does interest me and i will be testing it as soon as i get around to getting his mods done on my CineMAX.

Hulio, im glad someone else finally came along and posted that from another perspective, hopefully will make things more clear!!

Kabuby77, this is what ive been trying to get through to them here!! Smile
Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum