| Author |
Message |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | Diddern.. Try kep this simple..
I told you many times this is not about the projectors.. We are talking about understanding the native resolution on the BLU RAY disc..
The way you argues shows that you have no clue where im trying to go with this.
So on your blue ray disc you have 1920x 1080 x 256--> Anything else you like to add.?
We can pick up talking about different display types, when we both agree how the sourse is defined. |
God that you admit that you try to drag the fact to your planet not knowing hehe
Like to continue send pm this is bull here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | Diddern.. Try kep this simple..
I told you many times this is not about the projectors.. We are talking about understanding the native resolution on the BLU RAY disc..
The way you argues shows that you have no clue where im trying to go with this.
So on your blue ray disc you have 1920x 1080 x 256--> Anything else you like to add.?
We can pick up talking about different display types, when we both agree how the sourse is defined. |
God that you admit that you try to drag the fact to your planet not knowing hehe
Like to continue send pm this is bull here.
|
Happy you put the word.. FACT..
Now im trying to let you post the facts, but you keep resisting from explaining the facts about resolution on the disc..
To keep the resolution simple, i think we need to drop the compression side of it, Just stick to adressing each pixel and what the pixel needs to know.
It would be nice if, when you add the last nr also explains what each nr to the resolution means, so everybody in the ende of this thread speak the same language when comes to the way we see resolution and other qualities in creating a image.
So how is the fact about resolution.. continue please.
1920 X 1080 x 256.and. facts..???
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | Diddern.. Try kep this simple..
I told you many times this is not about the projectors.. We are talking about understanding the native resolution on the BLU RAY disc..
The way you argues shows that you have no clue where im trying to go with this.
So on your blue ray disc you have 1920x 1080 x 256--> Anything else you like to add.?
We can pick up talking about different display types, when we both agree how the sourse is defined. |
God that you admit that you try to drag the fact to your planet not knowing hehe
Like to continue send pm this is bull here.
|
Happy you put the word.. FACT..
Now im trying to let you post the facts, but you keep resisting from explaining the facts about resolution on the disc..
To keep the resolution simple, i think we need to drop the compression side of it, Just stick to adressing each pixel and what the pixel needs to know.
It would be nice if, when you add the last nr also explains what each nr to the resolution means, so everybody in the ende of this thread speak the same language when comes to the way we see resolution and other qualities in creating a image.
So how is the fact about resolution.. continue please.
1920 X 1080 x 256.and. facts..??? |
This is bull, and have nothing to do with this topic, you just drag away from the fact. FACT to this topic.........
Do you not think that I know resolution on bd and what happens is you make adjustments hehe hehe hehe.
Stay with your CRT. Hehe. My god you're worse than some other people I know hehe. They also are CRT fanboys.
Last edited by Diddern on Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:42 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since Didder'n and me are so stupid I am sure you can explain everything for us and why the SXRD tech is so imited in bandwith and ability to show every aspect of resolution and what makes the CRT tech superior in even this aspect. I am not sure where you want to go with this, we don't have to know all different details about everything to know what a good picture looks like.
_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Andreas21 wrote: | | Since Didder'n and me are so stupid I am sure you can explain everything for us and why the SXRD tech is so imited in bandwith and ability to show every aspect of resolution and what makes the CRT tech superior in even this aspect. I am not sure where you want to go with this, we don't have to know all different details about everything to know what a good picture looks like. |
Hapy you joined..
Maybe you can finish the resolution.. Then we can continue talking about different display types.
This is not about what tech is superior.. That we can argue after we have adressed the resolution on the source material.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Andreas21 wrote: | | Since Didder'n and me are so stupid I am sure you can explain everything for us and why the SXRD tech is so imited in bandwith and ability to show every aspect of resolution and what makes the CRT tech superior in even this aspect. I am not sure where you want to go with this, we don't have to know all different details about everything to know what a good picture looks like. |
Like I said he is just dragging away with excuses. Far away from what this topic was about
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
And I think what you are asking for is 1920x1080x256 at 8 bits and that is the source of blu ray.
_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | Since Didder'n and me are so stupid I am sure you can explain everything for us and why the SXRD tech is so imited in bandwith and ability to show every aspect of resolution and what makes the CRT tech superior in even this aspect. I am not sure where you want to go with this, we don't have to know all different details about everything to know what a good picture looks like. |
Hapy you joined..
Maybe you can finish the resolution.. Then we can continue talking about different display types.
This is not about what tech is superior.. That we can argue after we have adressed the resolution on the source material. |
Where do you want to go whit this hehe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Andreas21 wrote: | | And I think what you are asking for is 1920x1080x256 at 8 bits and that is the source of blu ray. |
Thanks.. Nice of you to play along.. But right now we are still missing one of the very important progresses in displaying images.. It still looks way to black and white
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now I need to do other stuff today. check in later.
I watch the resolution you need to talk about it hehe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Du er den mest kverrulante persjonen jeg har diskutert med, tror du jeg er et barn som har null kunnskap??
_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok.. ill not drag this around any longer..
1920x 1080 x 256 x3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
The main problem here as i see it is that some seems just to look at each pixel adress. and forgets that each sub adress have 3 adresses, who have 256 options.
Thats way more complex than just looking at resolution as a 1920x1080 format.
Last edited by stridsvognen on Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:06 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | The main problem here as i see it is that some seems just to look at each pixel adress. and forgets that each sub adress have 3 sub adresses, who have 256 options.
Thats way more complex than just looking at resolution as a 1920x1080 format. |
Really that was new hehe
You talk to people like you think you know everything this is basic.
My god. You're incredible hehe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | The main problem here as i see it is that some seems just to look at each pixel adress. and forgets that each sub adress have 3 sub adresses, who have 256 options.
Thats way more complex than just looking at resolution as a 1920x1080 format. |
I know all this, but I rally want you to explain the strong and weak points of the different techs showing this??
_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | The main problem here as i see it is that some seems just to look at each pixel adress. and forgets that each sub adress have 3 sub adresses, who have 256 options.
Thats way more complex than just looking at resolution as a 1920x1080 format. |
Really that was new hehe
You talk to people like you think you know everything this is basic.
My god. You're incredible hehe |
Yeah its very basic.. Thats why i wonder why you just dident explained it at once.
Do you care to continue.?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sine you are takling about bandwith limitations all the time, what is the bandwith of a real 4K display at 60Hz and 8 bit.
And I don't care to continue because I am so stupid and know nothing about projectors and the ability to show a good picture!
_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Andreas21 wrote: | Sine you are takling about bandwith limitations all the time, what is the bandwith of a real 4K display at 60Hz and 8 bit.
And I don't care to continue because I am so stupid and know nothing about projectors and the ability to show a good picture! |
To calculate the bandwidth, i need to know the total amount of pixels in 4K.. Can you tell me.?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
