Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 

Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Eisemann-Theater Simulation Grade Tubes better than VW1000ES
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 101, 102, 103 ... 120, 121, 122  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
Author Message
Diddern



Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:27 pm    Post subject:

Think if you see this on a 110-130" screen LOL
MY GOD this is HUGE different LOL
Back to top
Diddern



Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:30 pm    Post subject:

put yours out I put mine out
haha
Back to top
mp20748



Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5689
Location: Maryland

TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:31 pm    Post subject:

Diddern wrote:
Again cleaness, sharpness, debth, dynamic. Compared in real your would look like crap....



Lol..

the difference is obvious, even after you downgraded my shots for comparison. I only hoped you would be able to see WHY most of us on this forum stay with CRT.

But you do win the sharpness part of things (as predicted).


Last edited by mp20748 on Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Diddern



Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:32 pm    Post subject:

put yours out I put mine out
haha
Back to top
Diddern



Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:34 pm    Post subject:

mp20748 wrote:
Diddern wrote:
Again cleaness, sharpness, debth, dynamic. Compared in real your would look like crap....



Lol..


I guess you figured that out. hehe
LOL all you want I know you don't.
Back to top
Diddern



Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:37 pm    Post subject:

Row row row your boat

Last edited by Diddern on Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:09 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Andreas21



Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582


Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:39 pm    Post subject:

mp20748 wrote:
Diddern wrote:
Are you done??????? now my PJ is turned off, so no more of this bull****.



NO!

Why can't you do what I ask you??????????????????????????????????

I asked you to not touch my shots. The shots you have reposted in comparison looks terrible.

So could you just post your shots and then I'll post mine in the next post. That way neither of us get to diminish the others shot. When you resized my shot it looks like it was taking from a digital projector, and you must know how much that displease me.

DO NOT RESIZE MY SHOTS


I think you need to stop your bull****, there is no major difference between your original posted image compared to Didderns resized.


When stridsvognen is zooming in on our pictures it is ok, but when Diddern resize them a litttle it is not?


Even if I donīt think screenshots have much value, the difference between the 9" CRT and X500 on these Baraka images is so big it is funny. Imagine how it will look on a 100-140" screen. LOL!

Diddern got you big time there! Laughing Laughing

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
Back to top
Andreas21



Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582


Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:44 pm    Post subject:

mp20748 wrote:
Diddern wrote:
Again cleaness, sharpness, debth, dynamic. Compared in real your would look like crap....



Lol..

the difference is obvious, even after you downgraded my shots for comparison. I only hoped you would be able to see WHY most of us on this forum stay with CRT.

But you do win the sharpness part of things (as predicted).



With these picture I donīt see any reason to stay with CRT.

The difference is so big it is funny, and not only sharpness. If you donīt see that you must be near blind. And on a big HT screen the difference will be much much bigger. And sharpness is only one of many things we can see even from these sh*tty screenshots. Cool

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
Back to top
stridsvognen
Guest






Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:46 pm    Post subject:

Andreas21 wrote:
mp20748 wrote:
Diddern wrote:
Are you done??????? now my PJ is turned off, so no more of this bull****.



NO!

Why can't you do what I ask you??????????????????????????????????

I asked you to not touch my shots. The shots you have reposted in comparison looks terrible.

So could you just post your shots and then I'll post mine in the next post. That way neither of us get to diminish the others shot. When you resized my shot it looks like it was taking from a digital projector, and you must know how much that displease me.

DO NOT RESIZE MY SHOTS


I think you need to stop your bull****, there is no major difference between your original posted image compared to Didderns resized.


When stridsvognen is zooming in on our pictures it is ok, but when Diddern resize them a litttle it is not?


Even if I donīt think screenshots have much value, the difference between the 9" CRT and X500 on these Baraka images is so big it is funny. Imagine how it will look on a 100-140" screen. LOL!

Diddern got you big time there! Laughing Laughing


Its funny how at times screenshots can not be used to compare or conclude anything, and later its the other way around..

Guess thats about the same as a interlaced CRT projector.
Back to top
Andreas21



Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582


Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:50 pm    Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:
Andreas21 wrote:
mp20748 wrote:
Diddern wrote:
Are you done??????? now my PJ is turned off, so no more of this bull****.



NO!

Why can't you do what I ask you??????????????????????????????????

I asked you to not touch my shots. The shots you have reposted in comparison looks terrible.

So could you just post your shots and then I'll post mine in the next post. That way neither of us get to diminish the others shot. When you resized my shot it looks like it was taking from a digital projector, and you must know how much that displease me.

DO NOT RESIZE MY SHOTS


I think you need to stop your bull****, there is no major difference between your original posted image compared to Didderns resized.


When stridsvognen is zooming in on our pictures it is ok, but when Diddern resize them a litttle it is not?


Even if I donīt think screenshots have much value, the difference between the 9" CRT and X500 on these Baraka images is so big it is funny. Imagine how it will look on a 100-140" screen. LOL!

Diddern got you big time there! Laughing Laughing


Its funny how at times screenshots can not be used to compare or conclude anything, and later its the other way around..

Guess thats about the same as a interlaced CRT projector.



You can not say anything about black, blacklevel, deep black, colors, color resolution+++

But you can say something about sharpness, detail, depth and HD feel from these pictures.

And if you read what I write, I donīt think they have much value, but the difference is so big it is funny. And the difference will only get bigger when you see it on screen.

I have never said CRT is an interlaced projector!

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
Back to top
mp20748



Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5689
Location: Maryland

TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:03 pm    Post subject:

Andreas21 wrote:

I think you need to stop your bull****, there is no major difference between your original posted image compared to Didderns resized


There is, and it goes without saying, whenever you resize an HD image, you degrade it.


Quote:
When stridsvognen is zooming in on our pictures it is ok, but when Diddern resize them a litttle it is not?


That's different moron. If you guys understood half of what you throw out here, you wouldn't keep coming back wit this nonsense.

He Zooms in, which allows to see the structure of the image. Resizing manipulates the source structure


Quote:
Even if I donīt think screenshots have much value, the difference between the 9" CRT and X500 on these Baraka images is so big it is funny. Imagine how it will look on a 100-140" screen. LOL!

Diddern got you big time there! Laughing Laughing


You're right. the X500 looks terrible artificial, muted colors, and flat dynamics
Back to top
Andreas21



Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582


Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:09 pm    Post subject:

mp20748 wrote:


You're right. the X500 looks terrible artificial, muted colors, and flat dynamics


You are a really funny guy!


Laughing Laughing Laughing

Post ypor originals and resize Didderns pictures and sse for your self. The CRT looks so soft and flat it is far from what this would look like in real life, the X500 ia aslo far from it, but waaay closer than the CRT. And flat dynamics is soo funny, the X500 is so much more dynamic than the CRT it is unbeliveable. The X500 looks so much more real than the CRT.

And can you explain to me what looks artificial on the X500 shots??

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas


Last edited by Andreas21 on Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
stridsvognen
Guest






Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:10 pm    Post subject:

Andreas21 wrote:
stridsvognen wrote:
Andreas21 wrote:
mp20748 wrote:
Diddern wrote:
Are you done??????? now my PJ is turned off, so no more of this bull****.



NO!

Why can't you do what I ask you??????????????????????????????????

I asked you to not touch my shots. The shots you have reposted in comparison looks terrible.

So could you just post your shots and then I'll post mine in the next post. That way neither of us get to diminish the others shot. When you resized my shot it looks like it was taking from a digital projector, and you must know how much that displease me.

DO NOT RESIZE MY SHOTS


I think you need to stop your bull****, there is no major difference between your original posted image compared to Didderns resized.


When stridsvognen is zooming in on our pictures it is ok, but when Diddern resize them a litttle it is not?


Even if I donīt think screenshots have much value, the difference between the 9" CRT and X500 on these Baraka images is so big it is funny. Imagine how it will look on a 100-140" screen. LOL!

Diddern got you big time there! Laughing Laughing


Its funny how at times screenshots can not be used to compare or conclude anything, and later its the other way around..

Guess thats about the same as a interlaced CRT projector.



You can not say anything about black, blacklevel, deep black, colors, color resolution+++

But you can say something about sharpness, detail, depth and HD feel from these pictures.

And if you read what I write, I donīt think they have much value, but the difference is so big it is funny. And the difference will only get bigger when you see it on screen.

I have never said CRT is an interlaced projector!


Who was it that talked about the morning coffe and CRT projectors was interlaced..? Was it your friend dildo.?

So what i understand you saying now is that no matter the camera or the man behind the camera, any random screenshots can be picked up, and used for sharpness detail dept comparison.?
Back to top
stridsvognen
Guest






Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:11 pm    Post subject:

Andreas21 wrote:
mp20748 wrote:


You're right. the X500 looks terrible artificial, muted colors, and flat dynamics


You are a really funny guy!


Laughing Laughing Laughing


Hey im also a funny guy... I have seen a X500 side by side with a CRT.. I agree with Mike.
Back to top
mp20748



Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5689
Location: Maryland

TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:16 pm    Post subject:




Mine
Back to top
Andreas21



Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582


Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:18 pm    Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:
Andreas21 wrote:
stridsvognen wrote:
Andreas21 wrote:
mp20748 wrote:
Diddern wrote:
Are you done??????? now my PJ is turned off, so no more of this bull****.



NO!

Why can't you do what I ask you??????????????????????????????????

I asked you to not touch my shots. The shots you have reposted in comparison looks terrible.

So could you just post your shots and then I'll post mine in the next post. That way neither of us get to diminish the others shot. When you resized my shot it looks like it was taking from a digital projector, and you must know how much that displease me.

DO NOT RESIZE MY SHOTS


I think you need to stop your bull****, there is no major difference between your original posted image compared to Didderns resized.


When stridsvognen is zooming in on our pictures it is ok, but when Diddern resize them a litttle it is not?


Even if I donīt think screenshots have much value, the difference between the 9" CRT and X500 on these Baraka images is so big it is funny. Imagine how it will look on a 100-140" screen. LOL!

Diddern got you big time there! Laughing Laughing


Its funny how at times screenshots can not be used to compare or conclude anything, and later its the other way around..

Guess thats about the same as a interlaced CRT projector.



You can not say anything about black, blacklevel, deep black, colors, color resolution+++

But you can say something about sharpness, detail, depth and HD feel from these pictures.

And if you read what I write, I donīt think they have much value, but the difference is so big it is funny. And the difference will only get bigger when you see it on screen.

I have never said CRT is an interlaced projector!



Who was it that talked about the morning coffe and CRT projectors was interlaced..? Was it your friend dildo.?

So what i understand you saying now is that no matter the camera or the man behind the camera, any random screenshots can be picked up, and used for sharpness detail dept comparison.?
Laughing Laughing

I have always said I donīt like screenshots for comparison, but the difference here is so big it is ridicilous. So I can draw this conclution.

You on the other hand can draw adwanced conclutions about color, blacklevel, color resolution and so on.

And you are also a funny guy!


Laughing Laughing

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
Back to top
Andreas21



Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582


Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:21 pm    Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:
Andreas21 wrote:
mp20748 wrote:


You're right. the X500 looks terrible artificial, muted colors, and flat dynamics


You are a really funny guy!


Laughing Laughing Laughing


Hey im also a funny guy... I have seen a X500 side by side with a CRT.. I agree with Mike.


The test you were at never showed them side by side and thus you can not draw any conclution from that. This is wat Seegs108 who owned the X500 said after the meet, you never side by side tested them. Cool

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
Back to top
Andreas21



Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582


Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:22 pm    Post subject:

And MP, the CRT still looks the same, like sh*t. Wink

Look at the red leafs, grass, the person, water+++ what looks more like what you would see in real life??

And muted colors on the X500??

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas


Last edited by Andreas21 on Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
mp20748



Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5689
Location: Maryland

TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:24 pm    Post subject:

Great


Give me this one



Last edited by mp20748 on Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
stridsvognen
Guest






Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:26 pm    Post subject:

Andreas21 wrote:
stridsvognen wrote:
Andreas21 wrote:
stridsvognen wrote:
Andreas21 wrote:
mp20748 wrote:
Diddern wrote:
Are you done??????? now my PJ is turned off, so no more of this bull****.



NO!

Why can't you do what I ask you??????????????????????????????????

I asked you to not touch my shots. The shots you have reposted in comparison looks terrible.

So could you just post your shots and then I'll post mine in the next post. That way neither of us get to diminish the others shot. When you resized my shot it looks like it was taking from a digital projector, and you must know how much that displease me.

DO NOT RESIZE MY SHOTS


I think you need to stop your bull****, there is no major difference between your original posted image compared to Didderns resized.


When stridsvognen is zooming in on our pictures it is ok, but when Diddern resize them a litttle it is not?


Even if I donīt think screenshots have much value, the difference between the 9" CRT and X500 on these Baraka images is so big it is funny. Imagine how it will look on a 100-140" screen. LOL!

Diddern got you big time there! Laughing Laughing


Its funny how at times screenshots can not be used to compare or conclude anything, and later its the other way around..

Guess thats about the same as a interlaced CRT projector.



You can not say anything about black, blacklevel, deep black, colors, color resolution+++

But you can say something about sharpness, detail, depth and HD feel from these pictures.

And if you read what I write, I donīt think they have much value, but the difference is so big it is funny. And the difference will only get bigger when you see it on screen.

I have never said CRT is an interlaced projector!



Who was it that talked about the morning coffe and CRT projectors was interlaced..? Was it your friend dildo.?

So what i understand you saying now is that no matter the camera or the man behind the camera, any random screenshots can be picked up, and used for sharpness detail dept comparison.?
Laughing Laughing

I have always said I donīt like screenshots for comparison, but the difference here is so big it is ridicilous. So I can draw this conclution.

You on the other hand can draw adwanced conclutions about color, blacklevel, color resolution and so on.

And you are also a funny guy!


Laughing Laughing


So if i understand you right, any random picture from any camera, or no matter the man behind it can be used for sharpness evaluation.?

What CRT projectors have you used for a side by side comparison with the X500.?

And what was the source.?
Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 101, 102, 103 ... 120, 121, 122  Next
Page 102 of 122
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum