Eisemann-Theater Simulation Grade Tubes better than VW1000ES

CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
[ Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]

Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers!

Eisemann-Theater Simulation Grade Tubes better than VW1000ES
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 83, 84, 85 ... 120, 121, 122 Next

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.

CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors

Author

Message

stridsvognen
Guest

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:48 pm Post subject:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why don´t he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines??

We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.

I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it.

You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.

The other things you say is just BS.

I have no problem admitting that MTF is very very bad on a CRT.. If what i say is BS, where did the details around the eyes of that muddy face shot go on your JVC with super high MTF.?

If its a camera thing, please take a new picture showing how much better it really looks.

But what do you think will happen. Do you really think that's a CRT will be better ? this is so far from reality.
The more you're right the more stupid you sound just continue.

What high bandwidth CRT projector have you seen.?

I never seen anyone else than Mike having luck getting higher bandwidth out of a CRT projector, and there is quite a lot of hes mods out there.. Is the one you compare to on this forum.?

My God you making a fool out of self. Use the grave I think that is the best way for all.

So you think the picture from the JVC look the best.? If not, just post a new shot who do.

While i dig, try explain how those deinterlaced CRT machines works.

Diddern

Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:04 pm Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why don´t he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines??

You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.

The other things you say is just BS.

But what do you think will happen. Do you really think that's a CRT will be better ? this is so far from reality.
The more you're right the more stupid you sound just continue.

My God you making a fool out of self. Use the grave I think that is the best way for all.

So you think the picture from the JVC look the best.? If not, just post a new shot who do.

While i dig, try explain how those deinterlaced CRT machines works.

The picture of the jvc are way more zoomed in. And see no use commenting on down sampled pictures and then zoomed in on.
Again this is meaningless unless picture taken with same camera and same screen. and every adjustments the same

stridsvognen
Guest

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:06 pm Post subject:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why don´t he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines??

You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.

The other things you say is just BS.

But what do you think will happen. Do you really think that's a CRT will be better ? this is so far from reality.
The more you're right the more stupid you sound just continue.

My God you making a fool out of self. Use the grave I think that is the best way for all.

So you think the picture from the JVC look the best.? If not, just post a new shot who do.

While i dig, try explain how those deinterlaced CRT machines works.

Feel free to post as high resolution as you desire to show the details from the JVC.

Or you like me to zoom more on the details on the CRT picture.?

You guys still have the best camera, the best room, the best projector, we are just waiting for you to display it.

Your welcome to send the original camera file to me, and ill post a 500Kb file for you.

Diddern

Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:11 pm Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why don´t he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines??

You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.

The other things you say is just BS.

But what do you think will happen. Do you really think that's a CRT will be better ? this is so far from reality.
The more you're right the more stupid you sound just continue.

My God you making a fool out of self. Use the grave I think that is the best way for all.

So you think the picture from the JVC look the best.? If not, just post a new shot who do.

While i dig, try explain how those deinterlaced CRT machines works.

I live in the stone age, so I only got polaroid camera.

stridsvognen
Guest

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:15 pm Post subject:

So while we wait for you to get out of the stone age, please explain how these deinterlaced CRT machines works, and where you seen that high bandwidth CRT machine.?

stridsvognen
Guest

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:26 pm Post subject:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why don´t he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines??

You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.

The other things you say is just BS.

But what do you think will happen. Do you really think that's a CRT will be better ? this is so far from reality.
The more you're right the more stupid you sound just continue.

My God you making a fool out of self. Use the grave I think that is the best way for all.

So you think the picture from the JVC look the best.? If not, just post a new shot who do.

While i dig, try explain how those deinterlaced CRT machines works.

HogPilot

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 2383

TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:30 pm Post subject:

ecrabb wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

You just have to do your best, look at the picture, and confirm it represent whats on your screen.

Confirm it represents what's on your screen according to whom and what? You, looking at your computer monitor (which likely isn't calibrated, after it's been through a camera that also isn't profiled, then comparing it to somebody else's screenshots which were judged on a monitor which also isn't calibrated, under varying light conditions, from a totally different camera, screen, projector? This is process is so fraught with error and inaccuracy, that's utterly WORTHLESS for anything other than entertainment purposes.

Trying to judge black levels based on this process and saying things like, "I can tell the black levels are much better on this projector than that projector" or saying, "This projector just looks much more analog" when the photos were taken under completely different conditions is beyond ridiculous and ignorant.

stridsvognen wrote:

Lets see who can do the best screen shot of that mud face.

That's what you'll be finding out - who can do the best screen shot - which will have little to nothing to do with what people will actually be seeing in reality.

I also have to laugh at this whole "artificial sharpness" idea, like pixels are evil. Almost all movies are now shot on digital, and on the rare occasion they aren't, the rest of the entire post-production process, right up to and including the Blu-ray disc, is ALL DIGITAL. There are pixels in every single damn step of that process, yet somehow if a projector uses pixels, it's a horrible thing. <smh>

Guess what? If a digital guy want less sharpness and lower MTF, he can defocus the projector slightly. Even at 1080p, with typical viewing angles, nobody will see the pixels unless they strain to find them, and then only under certain circumstances. Even then, it's just the projector very faithfully reproducing the original signal, which is of course made up of pixels.

The CRT fanboy-ism here is just as pathetic as the digital fanboy-ism.

SC

This is one of the few useful posts over the last several pages - strangely enough, strids chose to ignore it. Do you have a reasonable response, Kurt? Or are you going to continue to demand answers to meaningless questions about equally useless pictures?
_________________

ecrabb wrote:

Curt Palme wrote:

Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure.

He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.

SC

Diddern

Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:35 pm Post subject:

Andreas21 wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why don´t he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines??

You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.

The other things you say is just BS.

The statements from The man who knows everything stridsvognen.
This is by far the most stupidest thing you have sayed on this forum.

You know that the CRT has bad MTF, just to remind you again 30 and up to maybe 50 but can't understand why CRT shows MORE details in a complex image than a digital. Are you drunk? And even more clueless to say that is lack of digital processing and cms correction. WHAT planet are you living on? Who teaches you this mumbo-jumbo. Must be CRT for Dummies.

You are correct on one thing higher bandwidth Will resolve on higher MTF.
But very little.

stridsvognen
Guest

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:36 pm Post subject:

HogPilot wrote:

ecrabb wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

You just have to do your best, look at the picture, and confirm it represent whats on your screen.

stridsvognen wrote:

Lets see who can do the best screen shot of that mud face.

Yeah ecrabb has for the longest been telling all about pictures, whats wrong, and how to make them right.. But he never post any shots.. so its hard to take the guy serious.

This game should leave all advances to the Digital, as the CRT have that bad bad MTF, and Mike uses a cheep camera in a room with some daylight.

There is 2 options here, and it would be nice to know whats the right one.

The digital sucks, or those guys cant make a decent screenshot.

And they hold the power to tell whats right, im just asking the question.

What image of that muddy face do you think looks the best.?

stridsvognen
Guest

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:40 pm Post subject:

Diddern wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why don´t he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines??

You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.

The other things you say is just BS.

Tell me what high bandwidth CRT machine you have seen.?

And you guys are free to post a new picture of that muddy face to prove your point.

Do the JVC suck, or is it just the screen shot posted who is not fair to the JVC.?

And im still waiting for you to explain how that deinterlaced CRT machine works.

Diddern

Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:53 pm Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why don´t he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines??

You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.

The other things you say is just BS.

Hehehe

This fits you so perfect.....

Last edited by Diddern on Tue Mar 17, 2015 8:27 am; edited 1 time in total

Diddern

Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:54 pm Post subject:

I really need a break from you stridsvognen. Keep this forum alive.

Andreas21

Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:16 pm Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

Diddern wrote:

PostLink Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:28 am Post subject: Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post
Tell me Mr. Stridsvognen.
How can it be possible that a CRT any brand can be better at showing how a picture shall be shown when the MTF is 30-50 compared to a machine almost resolve 1080p almost hundred % ,,, how is that possible? What happens to debth, clearness, details, and so on. Because of the MTF?
Tell me this and only this.

Please define More lol this I must hear.
I think you need to dig a bigger grave lol

Ok.. look here. And tell me what picture displays the most details and looks most natural.

Insted of zooming in on already highly compressed images, take a closeup with the camera, then it is easier to see.
_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas

thewolfman

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 1311
Location: Sweden

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:59 pm Post subject:

I think that magnify the "Girl dining shot" was a brilliant idea, and to have a closer look at it, because I never thought that a CRT could stack up that good against a JVC x500, let alone a digital, in fact I'm honoured it got to be that close. But I'll have another go at when the following things have been sorted:

1. Obtain a REMUX from The Great Gatsby, and remove the borders only as mine are only 12,5 GB in size, as the real size should be in the range of about 20GB. So there is promise that it could be a lot better with the finer details in the hair for instance.

2. Install the MP modded boards within 2 weeks.

3. Give the magnets another go as they are not properly set yet.

I realize of course, that I'm probably the only one thinking it got to be a close race between the CRT and the Digital, but it's close enough for me, and everything that gets improved upon from here on is an added bonus.

CRT vs JVC Key areas.jpg

Description:

Filesize:

492.12 KB

Viewed:

1778 Time(s)

Andreas21

Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:09 pm Post subject:

thewolfman wrote:

This is proof that screenshots are worthless, the JVC image is taken with an iPad and it has a really crappy camera and still it looks better than the CRT on many points. So to draw a conclution with this is not very wise.

As you seem like a nice guy, we could arrange a meet and see your Marquee side by side with a JVC X500, as the only real way to see the differences is with a side by side test. Where in Sweden do you live??

And the first rule with movies, buy the BD copy don´t download. Wink

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas

thewolfman

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 1311
Location: Sweden

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:19 pm Post subject:

Andreas21 wrote:

thewolfman wrote:

Umeå. Not that far from the Norwegian border I guess.. so perhaps we should arrange a meet this summer.

I would like to repaint the room if I may.. dark dark blue and give you guys an invitation later. I'll provide the necessary case of beers of course! Smile

I for one would like to see that JVC myself as no one around here have it nor show it off in stores. It's fairly large town but pretty darn empty on high end projectors like these.

I'll let you know when to come. Smile

Andreas21

Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:31 pm Post subject:

thewolfman wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

thewolfman wrote:

Umeå is quite far from Oslo and Drammen where Diddern and I live, but it is possible.

You need to focus on non reflective surfaced to get the best picture on screen. My cinema is only non reflective surfaces like Protostar material on the roof black molton on the walls and a black carpet on the floor. And you can see it in my signature, the main carpet looks light gray in the pictures, but it is actually dark gray in real life, I have also a black carpet in the front.
_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas

thewolfman

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 1311
Location: Sweden

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:41 pm Post subject:

Andreas21 wrote:

thewolfman wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

thewolfman wrote:

This is a flat, and I plan on moving to Uppsala early next year as I'm fed up with this small town mentality, so can't make much more then paint into a much darker color. I have a dark burgundy/purple now, but I know images shows it as a bright lady color, so yes, I am aware how it looks on image, thank you very much!

The ceiling is painted black though, a square above the seating area so I will have to repaint the whole when flat I leave.. and not exactly looking forward to it.

Diddern

Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:50 pm Post subject:

thewolfman wrote:

The picture taken with my ipad Is also a remux, but I think its more or less the same as the blueray.
You manage to get a god picture on your crt. It is not tragic at all. But you see that the digital is similar to this compared.
But you see that.

What we can do I find a film I give you the exact frame and we take a closeup now is my turn . I see if I have the time. Very Happy

Last edited by Diddern on Tue Mar 17, 2015 8:27 am; edited 1 time in total

thewolfman

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 1311
Location: Sweden

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:59 pm Post subject:

Diddern wrote:

thewolfman wrote:

Sure, let's do this. We should stick with REMUX though to at least remove one anomalie.

	CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors	All times are GMT Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 83, 84, 85 ... 120, 121, 122 Next
Page 84 of 122


	You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum

Suport our site by purchasing through this link. We thank you!

[ Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]