|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013 Posts: 582
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And since Mike is already in screenshot mode why donīt he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines??
_________________ http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
Last edited by Andreas21 on Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013 Posts: 582
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | New picture from mike. |
Still a lot of black crush, and if it is how it is shown on screen he needs to adjust his out of this world CRT. By the way videolevel is 16-235.
And why did not the screenshot master post it himself?? |
He sent me the original camera file, and let me upload it here.
Now you mention black crush, what do you call the stuff going on in your picture.?
Lets see if Mike will send another picture later, and if he can still hold black, so it dont look gray/ green like in your shot. |
I get a good workout with all the laughter when I read your posts. |
Ohh thought u had left.. Now your still here, why dont you take a screen shot of that muddy face where we can see the details around the eyes. |
I alredy spent to much time here this weekend, now it is family time and I have told you 100 times I will not post anymore screenshots.
_________________ http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Andreas21 wrote: | | And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why donīt he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines?? |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mp20748
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 5689 Location: Maryland
TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Andreas21 wrote: | | And since Mike is already in screenshot mode why donīt he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines?? |
I could do this later or this coming week, because it would take about an hour to dial in 297mhz tight enough for that pattern. It's really not easy doing it on a CRT at very high resolutions
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013 Posts: 582
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mp20748 wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | And since Mike is already in screenshot mode why donīt he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines?? |
I could do this later or this coming week, because it would take about an hour to dial in 297mhz tight enough for that pattern. It's really not easy doing it on a CRT at very high resolutions |
Not very user friendly! And donīt forget to show it with all toubes on not only green.
And please do it.
I could do the same I just have to start my digital, but as I have already posted one of a digital I donīt have to.
And why is it not dialed in tight enough now??
_________________ http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
Last edited by Andreas21 on Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:07 pm; edited 3 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andreas21
Joined: 02 Oct 2013 Posts: 582
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why donīt he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines?? |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it. |
You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.
The other things you say is just BS.
_________________ http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | Tell me Mr. Stridsvognen.
How can it be possible that a CRT any brand can be better at showing how a picture shall be shown when the MTF is 30-50 compared to a machine almost resolve 1080p almost hundred % ,,, how is that possible? What happens to debth, clearness, details, and so on. Because of the MTF?
Tell me this and only this. |
Have you ever seen a high bandwidth CRT projector, or for that matter a CRT who will resolve more than 80Mhz.?
As i been trying to ask.. Is that muddy face shot the best you guys can do, or can you do it better.? |
Have read anything I wrote?
You don't know what you're talking about CRT is a interlaced machine.
You are right it will be something better but still many miles from today's technology. You have to wake up and smell the coffee |
A interlaced machine..?? lol
Please explain how that works.. |
CRT with lines or is it pixels?
And again waiting for your answer,
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PostLink Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:28 am Post subject: Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post
Tell me Mr. Stridsvognen.
How can it be possible that a CRT any brand can be better at showing how a picture shall be shown when the MTF is 30-50 compared to a machine almost resolve 1080p almost hundred % ,,, how is that possible? What happens to debth, clearness, details, and so on. Because of the MTF?
Tell me this and only this.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why donīt he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines?? |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it. |
LOL...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just a reminder...
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
48.03 KB |
| Viewed: |
1974 Time(s) |

|
Last edited by Diddern on Tue Mar 17, 2015 8:26 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | PostLink Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:28 am Post subject: Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post
Tell me Mr. Stridsvognen.
How can it be possible that a CRT any brand can be better at showing how a picture shall be shown when the MTF is 30-50 compared to a machine almost resolve 1080p almost hundred % ,,, how is that possible? What happens to debth, clearness, details, and so on. Because of the MTF?
Tell me this and only this. |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | Tell me Mr. Stridsvognen.
How can it be possible that a CRT any brand can be better at showing how a picture shall be shown when the MTF is 30-50 compared to a machine almost resolve 1080p almost hundred % ,,, how is that possible? What happens to debth, clearness, details, and so on. Because of the MTF?
Tell me this and only this. |
Have you ever seen a high bandwidth CRT projector, or for that matter a CRT who will resolve more than 80Mhz.?
As i been trying to ask.. Is that muddy face shot the best you guys can do, or can you do it better.? |
Have read anything I wrote?
You don't know what you're talking about CRT is a interlaced machine.
You are right it will be something better but still many miles from today's technology. You have to wake up and smell the coffee |
A interlaced machine..?? lol
Please explain how that works.. |
CRT with lines or is it pixels?
And again waiting for your answer, |
Please define Interlaced.. Do you have a clue what your talking about..
How can a CRT projector be a deinterlaced .?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Andreas21 wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why donīt he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines?? |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it. |
You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.
The other things you say is just BS. |
I have no problem admitting that MTF is very very bad on a CRT.. If what i say is BS, where did the details around the eyes of that muddy face shot go on your JVC with super high MTF.?
If its a camera thing, please take a new picture showing how much better it really looks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | PostLink Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:28 am Post subject: Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post
Tell me Mr. Stridsvognen.
How can it be possible that a CRT any brand can be better at showing how a picture shall be shown when the MTF is 30-50 compared to a machine almost resolve 1080p almost hundred % ,,, how is that possible? What happens to debth, clearness, details, and so on. Because of the MTF?
Tell me this and only this. |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it. |
Please define More lol this I must hear.
I think you need to dig a bigger grave lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | PostLink Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:28 am Post subject: Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post
Tell me Mr. Stridsvognen.
How can it be possible that a CRT any brand can be better at showing how a picture shall be shown when the MTF is 30-50 compared to a machine almost resolve 1080p almost hundred % ,,, how is that possible? What happens to debth, clearness, details, and so on. Because of the MTF?
Tell me this and only this. |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it. |
Please define More lol this I must hear.
I think you need to dig a bigger grave lol |
Ok.. look here. And tell me what picture displays the most details and looks most natural.
Last edited by stridsvognen on Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:40 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why donīt he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines?? |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it. |
You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.
The other things you say is just BS. |
I have no problem admitting that MTF is very very bad on a CRT.. If what i say is BS, where did the details around the eyes of that muddy face shot go on your JVC with super high MTF.?
If its a camera thing, please take a new picture showing how much better it really looks. |
But what do you think will happen. Do you really think that's a CRT will be better ? this is so far from reality.
The more you're right the more stupid you sound just continue.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why donīt he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines?? |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it. |
You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.
The other things you say is just BS. |
I have no problem admitting that MTF is very very bad on a CRT.. If what i say is BS, where did the details around the eyes of that muddy face shot go on your JVC with super high MTF.?
If its a camera thing, please take a new picture showing how much better it really looks. |
But what do you think will happen. Do you really think that's a CRT will be better ? this is so far from reality.
The more you're right the more stupid you sound just continue. |
What high bandwidth CRT projector have you seen.?
I never seen anyone else than Mike having luck getting higher bandwidth out of a CRT projector, and there is quite a lot of hes mods out there.. Is the one you compare to on this forum.?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | PostLink Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:28 am Post subject: Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post
Tell me Mr. Stridsvognen.
How can it be possible that a CRT any brand can be better at showing how a picture shall be shown when the MTF is 30-50 compared to a machine almost resolve 1080p almost hundred % ,,, how is that possible? What happens to debth, clearness, details, and so on. Because of the MTF?
Tell me this and only this. |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it. |
Please define More lol this I must hear.
I think you need to dig a bigger grave lol |
Ok.. look here. And tell me what picture displays the most details and looks most natural. |
I see 2 pictures with different cameras and screen. Different shutter different ISO so for me give me nothing if Not taken with him same camera on the same screen.
This is bull**** talk, you try to twist away from the fact that it's the fact.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | PostLink Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:28 am Post subject: Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post
Tell me Mr. Stridsvognen.
How can it be possible that a CRT any brand can be better at showing how a picture shall be shown when the MTF is 30-50 compared to a machine almost resolve 1080p almost hundred % ,,, how is that possible? What happens to debth, clearness, details, and so on. Because of the MTF?
Tell me this and only this. |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it. |
Please define More lol this I must hear.
I think you need to dig a bigger grave lol |
Ok.. look here. And tell me what picture displays the most details and looks most natural. |
I see 2 pictures with different cameras and screen. Different shutter different ISO so for me give me nothing if Not taken with him same camera on the same screen.
This is bull**** talk, you try to twist away from the fact that it's the fact. |
Forget about your facts, just look at these pictures, and tell me what one has the most details, and look most natural.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Andreas21 wrote: | | And since Mike ia already in screenshot mode why donīt he post a picture of 1:1 vertical lines?? |
We know the CRT have very bad MTF. we got used to that. And we also wonder why a high bandwidth CRT shows so much more details in a complex image than a new Digital.
I guess the lack of extra digital processing and CMS correction. must be a part of it. |
You are talking against yourself here when you say the CRT shows more detail than a digital. And none of you have admitted CRT has very low MTF.
The other things you say is just BS. |
I have no problem admitting that MTF is very very bad on a CRT.. If what i say is BS, where did the details around the eyes of that muddy face shot go on your JVC with super high MTF.?
If its a camera thing, please take a new picture showing how much better it really looks. |
But what do you think will happen. Do you really think that's a CRT will be better ? this is so far from reality.
The more you're right the more stupid you sound just continue. |
What high bandwidth CRT projector have you seen.?
I never seen anyone else than Mike having luck getting higher bandwidth out of a CRT projector, and there is quite a lot of hes mods out there.. Is the one you compare to on this forum.? |
My God you making a fool out of self. Use the grave I think that is the best way for all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|