Eisemann-Theater Simulation Grade Tubes better than VW1000ES

CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
[ Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]

Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers!

Eisemann-Theater Simulation Grade Tubes better than VW1000ES
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 66, 67, 68 ... 120, 121, 122 Next

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.

CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors

Author

Message

AnalogRocks
Forum Moderator

Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 26706
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 2:12 am Post subject:

Jeremy112 wrote:

Considering I've serviced over 500 digital projectors in the last 3 years, all varying levels of quality and ranging from low end to ultra-high end, yes I can safely say that every brand of digitals (especially Sony, Epson, and Hitachi) are very prone to failure. LCoS panel yellowing, power supply failure, mainboard failure, burnt polarizers, bad fans, fragile plastic chassis... most of them no older than 2008. Take your pick.

Curt has even pointed out on the Sony Qualia, a $28,000 projector, the design fault that is very well known that causes the Qualia to stop operating properly, and that was back in 2008 when the qualia was only 5 years old.

So yeah, your sh*t digital projector is going to die. Suck it up and move on.

Jeeze Jeremy, don't sugar coat it. Tell it like it is! Laughing

_________________
Tech support for nothing

CRT.

HD done right!

macgyver655

Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 8508

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 2:44 am Post subject:

Diddern wrote:

Well that is the first truthful thing you have posted here. And congratulations. It must of been a landslide and you deserve it. Laughing

Jeremy112

Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 2649
Location: Fond du Lac, WI

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 4:20 am Post subject:

AnalogRocks wrote:

Jeremy112 wrote:

Jeeze Jeremy, don't sugar coat it. Tell it like it is! Laughing

Well you know... I thought I'd be sensitive and open on the subject like Diddern, because... you know, that's working so well for him right now Mr. Green

_________________
When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it Wink

Diddern

Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:34 am Post subject:

Jeremy112 wrote:

Diddern wrote:

Jeremy112 wrote:

ElTopo wrote:

Just dropped my Cine9 into the dumpster some minutes ago because it looked like VHS !

Thanks Diddern i didn't know that.

Bought two VW1100 just in case one breaks

Now i live with:

- not acceptable black levels
- motion problems
- cheap plastic case

Mr. Green

Don't forget, in 5 years - It'll be so out od date you wont want to use it, that is; if it lasts that long Laughing

You have a really God point there. Digitals don't last that long I forgot.
Why don't you tell some digital horror stories.

Thank you for letting me in on that, LOL That was well saied Suck it up and move on what about all you here in the idiotclub?
Forget Sony, forget all just have focus on one digital THE JVC X500X/X700. A Sony cant match a CRT in backlevel.

But can say that a JVC X500 can. So forget all 20000 50000 dollar PJ. The JVC X500 prize MUCH LESS THAN THAT.
and then you do NOT get lack of black........

Diddern

Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:58 am Post subject:

macgyver655 wrote:

Diddern wrote:

Well that is the first truthful thing you have posted here. And congratulations. It must of been a landslide and you deserve it. Laughing

OOOOOH good hehehehehe ok that was +1 to you, did not think that you could do that with a Commodore 64

You work with digitals and CRT for companies? Then you much know everything I undertand, And there is a big difference of use in the business marked. We talk home Cinema.
hehehe

Diddern

Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:32 am Post subject:

Here will you all find you're selves spot on.
Hehe

image.jpg

Description:

Filesize:

35.03 KB

Viewed:

2272 Time(s)

Andreas21

Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 11:41 am Post subject:

thewolfman wrote:

Sure, that's what we've been saying all along, only you seem to resort to 720p and Optoma now over the 4K machine of yours that we really want to see.

In fact, post from the both you and earn some much needed credit. And if Andreas would do the same with shots from American Psycho, as he mentioned he might do earlier, than that will certainly earn him some goodwill.

Looking forward to see some shots from the both of you.

I did not have American Psycho so I could not post a screenshot from that move so I took this picture from Baraka. It is untouched only downsized to fit in this forum.

I put your in for comparison.

kids_106.jpg

Description:

Filesize:

326.22 KB

Viewed:

2250 Time(s)

Baraka kids.jpg

Description:

Download

Filename:

Baraka kids.jpg

Filesize:

326.15 KB

Downloaded:

177 Time(s)

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas

stridsvognen
Guest

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 11:57 am Post subject:

Wow.. Andreas.. Thats a special picture you posted there. Where do all the funny pixel structure in the image, and all the color banding come from.?

stridsvognen
Guest

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:05 pm Post subject:

Here is a zoom and crop of the 2 pictures.

thewolfman

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 1311
Location: Sweden

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:07 pm Post subject:

Andreas21 wrote:

thewolfman wrote:

I did not have American Psycho so I could not post a screenshot from that move so I took this picture from Baraka. It is untouched only downsized to fit in this forum.

I put your in for comparison.

Cool, I appreciate it. Smile

Only, and I assure it's true, my zoom button got broken last week so I can't zoom out from your very large image.. could you try and make it smaller by having it be only 1800 pixels wide and whatever you feel like for hight? Even that is to big for me now but tolerable and hence the pixels I'm seeing in any-once pictures these days.

So, no one is coming after you if play along and post images. In fact, you should do it more often.

mp20748

Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5689
Location: Maryland

TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:14 pm Post subject:

What projector is the Baraka shot taking from?

Andreas21

Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:18 pm Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:

Wow.. Andreas.. Thats a special picture you posted there.

Where do all the funny pixel structure in the image, and all the color banding come from.?

This has nothing to do with the projector. Send me a PM with your email and I will send you the uncompressed picture and you can see for yourself.
_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas

thewolfman

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 1311
Location: Sweden

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:19 pm Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:

Here is a zoom and crop of the 2 pictures.

That's interesting how very pixelated mine looks.. I asked Redfox yesterday how I should save images in the future to avoid pixelation, or to at least reduce it, and was told to save with PNG from now on.

I have some images left in the camera so I can redo them later and also shot some new once while at it.

You should shot and post some to Strids.. all I've seen from you is test patterns and Laser discs.

stridsvognen
Guest

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:26 pm Post subject:

I have a old screen shot from a 1996 Vidikron, standard machine with bad glycol( full of floating fungus) Made this one a few years ago right after i got my first CRT projector.

Andreas21

Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:40 pm Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:

I have a old screen shot from a 1996 Vidikron, standard machine with bad glycol( full of floating fungus) Made this one a few years ago right after i got my first CRT projector.

There is also alot of strange things going on in your picture one of the problems is banding.

Stridsvognen.jpg

Description:

Filesize:

356.32 KB

Viewed:

2203 Time(s)

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas

stridsvognen
Guest

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:47 pm Post subject:

Andreas21 wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

I have a old screen shot from a 1996 Vidikron, standard machine with bad glycol( full of floating fungus) Made this one a few years ago right after i got my first CRT projector.

There is also alot of strange things going on in your picture one of the problems is banding.

Yeah its amassing how well it holds up when you zoom that much right.?

Did you find out what was wrong with your pic? is it a camera issue or.?

Andreas21

Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:53 pm Post subject:

There is also alot of banding in the picture from Baraka on the CRT, but I don´t think there is much banding in this movie even on a poor crappy digital.

Banding.jpeg

Description:

Download

Filename:

Banding.jpeg

Filesize:

421.68 KB

Downloaded:

169 Time(s)

_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas

mp20748

Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5689
Location: Maryland

TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:56 pm Post subject:

Hello... can I get this answered?

mp20748 wrote:

What projector is the Baraka shot taking from?

Andreas21

Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 582

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:56 pm Post subject:

stridsvognen wrote:

Andreas21 wrote:

stridsvognen wrote:

I have a old screen shot from a 1996 Vidikron, standard machine with bad glycol( full of floating fungus) Made this one a few years ago right after i got my first CRT projector.

There is also alot of strange things going on in your picture one of the problems is banding.

Yeah its amassing how well it holds up when you zoom that much right.?

Did you find out what was wrong with your pic? is it a camera issue or.?

Don´t play stupid. It is not a camera issue, this is taken with a good digital camera. It is only compression artifacts, just as the pixels and banding in the CRT pictures.
_________________
http://www.minhembio.com/21Andreas

Jeremy112

Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 2649
Location: Fond du Lac, WI

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:11 pm Post subject:

mp20748 wrote:

Hello... can I get this answered?

mp20748 wrote:

What projector is the Baraka shot taking from?

No...

_________________
When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it Wink

	CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors	All times are GMT Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 66, 67, 68 ... 120, 121, 122 Next
Page 67 of 122


	You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum

Suport our site by purchasing through this link. We thank you!

[ Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]