| Author |
Message |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:56 pm Post subject: Marantz SR5006 Front Right Channel Distorted |
|
|
Mac,
I have a SR5006 here that has a distorted right channel. I took the amp out (it scarily looks rather identical to the VSX-50 amp, but is different), and the front right channel must have blown at some point and gotten repaired.
The problem I'm having is finding the bad part, there's an open component somewhere in the circuit and I can't locate it. Without the schematic I don't know where the hell it is.
Any ideas?
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Huh. I don't have that manual. Stops at SR 5005. Must be just new enough I don't have it yet. Checked some of my search places and nothing there either. Oh well.
So, tell me, how do you know the problem is in the amp section?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the FR channel has new outputs and emitter resistors, and there is a problem in it somewhere, I am reading open across 2 pins on a transistor where I should be reading 0.780 (as all other channels read on those 2 pins on that transistor)
And the FR channel is distorted, so that's what has led me to believe its the FR channel on the amp board. Otherwise the entire receiver, and all other channels work as they should.
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Have you pulled that transistor and verified good or bad?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yep I pulled the one im testing on and its fine, the outputs are as well, and the complimentary transistor to the A1024 is good as well.
There are 2 surface mount transistors on the back of the channel but I don't want to remove them and risk damaging them if they are good. In circuit they look fine, but when I test between them, I notice the same problem between the 2 xsistors on the bottom as I do on the 2 pins on the A1024
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Whats the location id of the transistor your getting the funny reading on?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Its Q414, the middle pin and the one outer pin that doesn't have a circle going around it are the ones I'm getting the off reading
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeremy112 wrote: | | Its Q414, the middle pin and the one outer pin that doesn't have a circle going around it are the ones I'm getting the off reading |
I think I may have the correct schematic.
The middle one is the collector. I need to now which other pin. Look up the datasheet for a KTA1024 and determine what the other pin is and let me know. I can't tell from your description of the circle.
I'm off for tonight. Be back tomorrow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a pic I took of the distorting FR channel, as well as partial of the SBL channel, the pic shows each channels A1024 and describes what they do on the multimeter in diode scale,
Positive lead is on the middle pin, negative lead is on the left pin. To be honest mac I get confused somewhat still with transistors, don't ask why, but I've never quite understood them
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The emitter is on the right, base is on the left
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeremy112 wrote: | | The emitter is on the right, base is on the left |
No, sorry, incorrect. usually that circle is indicative of base but I'm always skeptical so I asked you to check the datasheet. Guess we need a document reading class, LOL.
If I'm following this correctly it looks like your missing reading is from Q416 (2SD2560). Pull a good one and the bad channel one and compare diode readings and let me know. Don't put them back in until you give me your readings. Maybe we will talk testing transistors later. Gotta run out for a few hours.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How odd, I read it to you as the datasheet described... oh well
Anyway, I already had the 2560 out of circuit, along with a good 2560, both of them are identical readings. I don't get the .780 on the good channel with the 2560 out of circuit I don't get the .780 reading on the KTA1024 anymore though. The same still goes for the bad channel.
On a good note though, I have also tested the same 2 leads on the KTA1024s using resistance. Now that the good 2560 is out of circuit, the resistance reading is 200K, just like the channel with the questionable 2560 was with it in circuit (also reads the same out of circuit)
On another good 2560 that is IN circuit, it reads 131K ohm. So is it possible that while the 2560 is reading ok on diode scale it is leaking since I am getting the same resistance reading on it as I would out of circuit?
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Rather than get into a big conversation on testing those parts, just swap them between channels and see if the readings/problem follows.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From the datasheet. The upper picture is the front face of the transistor. Follow the red line. Pin 3 is what?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The base
By the way it was the 2560 mac, I put a good one in and it took care of the issue
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So this one is done? Now I'm bored. What else you got?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have one.. soon.. and you'll both be jealous! D
Pioneer SX1980. 1 owner. He offered to sell it to me, hadn't had it out of storage in years. He fired it up, it worked fine for a bit.. then the audio died. He was asking a reasonable (retail) price for it, but I passed. I bit as soon as it died.
I don't think I'll need help fixing it. No, I'm not selling it, it goes into MY 2 channel system that I'm building up..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: | I have one.. soon.. and you'll both be jealous! D
Pioneer SX1980. 1 owner. He offered to sell it to me, hadn't had it out of storage in years. He fired it up, it worked fine for a bit.. then the audio died. He was asking a reasonable (retail) price for it, but I passed. I bit as soon as it died.
I don't think I'll need help fixing it. No, I'm not selling it, it goes into MY 2 channel system that I'm building up.. |
You know, when I see some of these old receivers and what they are selling for I often shake my head and wonder if some of the many receivers I have thrown away in the past were any of these highly sought after ones. All I saved over the years were a few older Marantz ones that I still have not looked over, lol.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Damn you curt, damn you, I've owned 3 of the SX-1980s, one was literally new in condition, and I REALLY regret selling it, the other 2 weren't as nice, but man, WHAT A RECEIVER!!!
You win the YOU SUCK award for that one
And yes mac, we are done with this one pretty much, I had to order some 2560s and 1647s because I robbed them from a denon, and I ordered some KSA992s as well (plenty of those fail in denons )
Sorry that was so easy mac, lol. I'll see what else I can find, I think soon we're going to be working on some that have HDMI issues though
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got one for ya mac, its a Yamaha RX-V671 that's stuck in standby, I'll start a new thread
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|