|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | you fail to ansver.. Is the pictures you clip out true to the original picture, or is there some addet distortion sharpness or other thing going on that was not seen in the original pics posted. ?
And how is what you post in the last clips ever the original pattern.. ?? |
When you zoom in you get more distortion sharpness of coerce, what did you think see the size of the pic also.
Why are you always trying to get bull**** out of nothing again.
And the original pattern is better correct, but also the pic so the same.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | nobody answers I wonder why???
I want you guys to tell me something. I have tested this and know the answer what I saw. Just want to hear what you think...
1. If you have brilliant sharpness and everything is adjusted correct do you get better 3d debt then compared with a less sharp one?
2. If you have much punch in picture and still can hold the black level at the same level as total shutdown(everything still adjusted correct), will this picture get more clear and true also feeling of better correct color?
3. If point 2 holds what happens to colors up to rec709 d65 from 0-100 ire
4. If pixels or scan lines are visible near screen then max up to 3-4 feet do you get less (CRT word ) Then with no visible artifacts movie feeling?
5. How important is ansicontrast ? How is on off contrast important? Or is combined the best way to get the perfect picture?
6. If the dynamics is better in projector A ,and all points from 1-5 holds. Witch picture will look closest to the source. Then with the same player.? |
1 Dept is more than sharpness, so not sure what to ansver here.
2 nothing can hold black as a total dark crt tube, guess your trying to ask about ansi contrast at different levels.
3 define colors.. Colors can measure perfect no matter the ansi contrast, sharpness or on off contrast.
4 visible scanlines or pixels on close range will have a effect on a long distance to, maybe you cant define the difference.
Do you put a grid in your window and think its still holds the same transparance, even you go so far back you cant see it.?
5 They are both important, but the common way they are measured dont make to much sense, its measured on a low resolution pattern, and cant be transfered directly to high resolution parts of a image. And aply at all kind of different levels.
As well as you dont measure a primary red color surrounded with random noise or other colors.. See what that will do to your measurement, and thats what goes on in a movie.
6 The projector that have native panels fitting the source, and have the best measurements should be most true to the source, but sometimes its just not so.. Its way more complex, and you would need much more advanced measuring methods to determine whats best. Ass soon you add scaling or digital corection stuff happens, the side effect will still not be measured on low resolution patterns.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | nobody answers I wonder why???
I want you guys to tell me something. I have tested this and know the answer what I saw. Just want to hear what you think...
1. If you have brilliant sharpness and everything is adjusted correct do you get better 3d debt then compared with a less sharp one?
2. If you have much punch in picture and still can hold the black level at the same level as total shutdown(everything still adjusted correct), will this picture get more clear and true also feeling of better correct color?
3. If point 2 holds what happens to colors up to rec709 d65 from 0-100 ire
4. If pixels or scan lines are visible near screen then max up to 3-4 feet do you get less (CRT word ) Then with no visible artifacts movie feeling?
5. How important is ansicontrast ? How is on off contrast important? Or is combined the best way to get the perfect picture?
6. If the dynamics is better in projector A ,and all points from 1-5 holds. Witch picture will look closest to the source. Then with the same player.? |
1 Dept is more than sharpness, so not sure what to ansver here.
2 nothing can hold black as a total dark crt tube, guess your trying to ask about ansi contrast at different levels.
3 define colors.. Colors can measure perfect no matter the ansi contrast, sharpness or on off contrast.
4 visible scanlines or pixels on close range will have a effect on a long distance to, maybe you cant define the difference.
Do you put a grid in your window and think its still holds the same transparance, even you go so far back you cant see it.?
5 They are both important, but the common way they are measured dont make to much sense, its measured on a low resolution pattern, and cant be transfered directly to high resolution parts of a image. And aply at all kind of different levels.
As well as you dont measure a primary red color surrounded with random noise or other colors.. See what that will do to your measurement, and thats what goes on in a movie.
6 The projector that have native panels fitting the source, and have the best measurements should be most true to the source, but sometimes its just not so.. Its way more complex, and you would need much more advanced measuring methods to determine whats best. Ass soon you add scaling or digital corection stuff happens, it will still not be measured on low resolution patterns. |
Oky you have no clue at all. That's good you talk and twist almost every question. And you manage to twist a question to a question. haha. You know what, stick to your patterns and CRT, because you also have a very god crt in my eyes.
And we leave this nonsense talk.
1. The 3D debt will be better with god sharpness fact and also sharpness in different layers, but of curse you need a god projector that holds god ansi and god on off contrast and everything else. I do not play with those.
2. If you think that CRT holds black in all levels best you are wrong and need to get back to earth. It gets washed out. But true what you say about the ansicontrast all colors get washed out some with more light and a feeling of a grey surface in all colors. But in near dark sense a crt will win over a normal hi end, but just some with a new jvc from x500 and up or the Sony VW1000.
This also need to be seen side by side, your eyes will fool you trust me.
3. You can measure colors perfect yes, but will get a deviation from 100% perfect. This if you have a poor ansicontrast.
But sometimes not visible for your eye you have to compare side by side to see it..if this is alone the ansicontrast i am not shore.
4. of Corse you will see pixels or scan lines more visible if the screen is bigger, but also get a smoother picture and un-sharp if not visible. That's why they use 4K PJ in large cinemas, to get less feeling of pixels. That's no problem on a CRT after what I remember. And if there is much noise in picture that I am not familiar with on a HW55 or a Vw1000 or a jvc x500 from normal distance. And the source have a lot to do with this after what I have seen, cables also, contacts, current and so on.
Then it comes to your bandwidth but no issue on the projectors I talk about here just CRT.
5. Correct a combination, a DLP with high ansi and low on off poor picture. Example the new JVC on/off native 60000:1 measured with minimum light I could be wrong, but calibrated maximum 20-30000:1 And ansi contrast not shore but I think 250:1 not tested by my calibrator but get the answers if I want. .Forget pattern se it in movie no problem if you take a side by side test. And you can see it in a normal movie. You will be shocked if you have seen this together with me.
I talk about 0-100 On a digital you have the constant light and that will never get total black, then you have to have a iris.
On crt no problem. But there is more to the 0-3% ire in a picture. What is more real like feeling, we all know that. It is never total darkness when there is some info. But a cool gimmick on the CRT. Fantasy yes, but I like it. And then not always.
And if you think that the newer models form sony or jvc shows this equal than a crt you are wrong.
And on nr 6 you are on thin ice, a crt gives out what it gets right... but after what I have seen far to soft for 1080P, but still manages to give out a good picture. The dynamic in a picture or a film are dam important and huge benefit a digital. All of this 1-6 and more together have a lot to say.
And if a scaling from 2k-4k looks better what is the problem? And it does, then I give a sh*t about one test pattern. And a vw1000 does a hell of a good job on almost all. This gives the feeling more like softer picture just like CRT, but not true to 1080P just the same as a CRT what I feel. But how can you know I just ask.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | nobody answers I wonder why???
I want you guys to tell me something. I have tested this and know the answer what I saw. Just want to hear what you think...
1. If you have brilliant sharpness and everything is adjusted correct do you get better 3d debt then compared with a less sharp one?
2. If you have much punch in picture and still can hold the black level at the same level as total shutdown(everything still adjusted correct), will this picture get more clear and true also feeling of better correct color?
3. If point 2 holds what happens to colors up to rec709 d65 from 0-100 ire
4. If pixels or scan lines are visible near screen then max up to 3-4 feet do you get less (CRT word ) Then with no visible artifacts movie feeling?
5. How important is ansicontrast ? How is on off contrast important? Or is combined the best way to get the perfect picture?
6. If the dynamics is better in projector A ,and all points from 1-5 holds. Witch picture will look closest to the source. Then with the same player.? |
1 Dept is more than sharpness, so not sure what to ansver here.
2 nothing can hold black as a total dark crt tube, guess your trying to ask about ansi contrast at different levels.
3 define colors.. Colors can measure perfect no matter the ansi contrast, sharpness or on off contrast.
4 visible scanlines or pixels on close range will have a effect on a long distance to, maybe you cant define the difference.
Do you put a grid in your window and think its still holds the same transparance, even you go so far back you cant see it.?
5 They are both important, but the common way they are measured dont make to much sense, its measured on a low resolution pattern, and cant be transfered directly to high resolution parts of a image. And aply at all kind of different levels.
As well as you dont measure a primary red color surrounded with random noise or other colors.. See what that will do to your measurement, and thats what goes on in a movie.
6 The projector that have native panels fitting the source, and have the best measurements should be most true to the source, but sometimes its just not so.. Its way more complex, and you would need much more advanced measuring methods to determine whats best. Ass soon you add scaling or digital corection stuff happens, it will still not be measured on low resolution patterns. |
Oky you have no clue at all. That's good you talk and twist almost every question. And you manage to twist a question to a question. haha. You know what, stick to your patterns and CRT, because you also have a very god crt in my eyes.
And we leave this nonsense talk.
1. The 3D debt will be better with god sharpness fact and also sharpness in different layers, but of curse you need a god projector that holds god ansi and god on off contrast and everything else. I do not play with those.
2. If you think that CRT holds black in all levels best you are wrong and need to get back to earth. But true what you say about the ansicontrast all colors get washed out some with more light and a feeling of a grey surface in all colors. But in near dark sense a crt will win over a normal hi end, but just some with a new jvc from x500 and up or the Sony VW1000.
This also need to be seen side by side, your eyes will fool you trust me.
3. You can measure colors perfect yes, but will get a deviation from 100% perfect. This if you have a poor ansicontrast.
But sometimes not visible for your eye you have to compare side by side to see it..
4. of Corse you will see pixels or scan lines more visible if the screen is bigger, but also get a smoother picture and un-sharp if not visible. That's why they use 4K PJ in large cinemas, to get less feeling of pixels. That's no problem on a CRT after what I remember. And if there is much noise in picture that I am not familiar with on a HW55 or a Vw1000 or a jvc x500 from normal distance. And the source have a lot to do with this after what I have seen, cables also, contacts, current and so on.
Then it comes to your bandwidth but no issue on the projectors I talk about here just CRT.
5. Correct a combination, a DLP with high ansi and low on off poor picture. Example the new JVC on/off native 60000:1 measured with minimum light I could be wrong, but calibrated maximum 20-30000:1 And ansi contrast not shore but I think 250:1 not tested by my calibrator but get the answers if I want. .Forget pattern se it in movie no problem if you take a side by side test. And you can see it in a normal movie. You will be shocked if you have seen this together with me.
I talk about 0-100 On a digital you have the constant light and that will never get total black, then you have to have a iris.
On crt no problem. But there is more to the 0-3% ire in a picture. What is more real like feeling, we all know that. It is never total darkness when there is some info. But a cool gimmick on the CRT. Fantasy yes, but I like it. And then not always.
And if you think that the newer models form sony or jvc shows this equal than a crt you are wrong.
And on nr 6 you are on thin ice, a crt gives out what it gets right... but after what I have seen far to soft for 1080P, but still manages to give out a good picture. The dynamic in a picture or a film are dam important and huge benefit a digital. All of this 1-6 and more together have a lot to say.
And if a scaling from 2k-4k looks better what is the problem? And it does, then I give a sh*t about one test pattern. And a vw1000 does a hell of a good job on almost all. This gives the feeling more like softer picture just like CRT, but not true to 1080P just the same as a CRT what I feel. But how can you know I just ask. |
I have never seen anything compete with CRT on 3D/ dept in movies. So i cant realy put that together with sharpness and ansi contrast. where CRT dont have any advantage.
When comes to bandwidth, again i am quite sure the pixels are activated by a voltage, making them light up at some given level, there you have a bandwidth,, the response to the signal. Als seems like some digitals have some sort of crosstalk betwen pixels, limiting them from go 1:1 full on off.
I still think that DLP is the most true DIGITAL machine. And the SONY and JVC is some mixup of digital signal path and analog ativated. I can be wrong, but i cant realy emagine how to activate a picel on those panels feeding them a digital signal, unless there is a converter in the panel chip translating that to a analog signal.
What you do with 4K scaled is to soften the edges, and make the image more CRT alike. Thats ok.. On a CRT we dont need scaling to go there. so we dont get the artifacts.
Then there is different kind of noise, and i find analog noise less harsh, or anoying as digital noise, same can be said about music.
As with projection its also very popular to add room EQ to the sound system, instead of fitting the room to the speakers and sound source.
Room EQ is to me just as much a coverup of bad acustics as digital CMS is to cover up digital projectors messed up gehaviour.
Why do Lumagen need to have a feature as 125, and 729 point CMS..? Whats native about that.? I do agree that the Radiance CMS greatly improves Digital projectors, but i realy have a hard time adding it to a good native CRT calibration, then ill prefer a higher DE value that have nice smooth curves.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | you fail to ansver.. Is the pictures you clip out true to the original picture, or is there some addet distortion sharpness or other thing going on that was not seen in the original pics posted. ?
And how is what you post in the last clips ever the original pattern.. ?? |
When you zoom in you get more distortion sharpness of coerce, what did you think see the size of the pic also.
Why are you always trying to get bull**** out of nothing again.
And the original pattern is better correct, but also the pic so the same. |
Ahh so you know your scaling the images, and adds ringing and distortion, and then find it ok to use them to display the performance of different projectors.
Why is it so hard to let them untouched, and leave it to the original poster to evaluate if they serve any purpose to display whats seen on his screen. I see you posted lots of screenshots who were down sized, after zoomed and looked absolutly useless. Sadly you dont have any respect, not even to your own pictures.
You even think you can mess up a native pattern, post a pic of it and call it native. its sad..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | you fail to ansver.. Is the pictures you clip out true to the original picture, or is there some addet distortion sharpness or other thing going on that was not seen in the original pics posted. ?
And how is what you post in the last clips ever the original pattern.. ?? |
When you zoom in you get more distortion sharpness of coerce, what did you think see the size of the pic also.
Why are you always trying to get bull**** out of nothing again.
And the original pattern is better correct, but also the pic so the same. |
Ahh so you know your scaling the images, and adds ringing and distortion, and then find it ok to use them to display the performance of different projectors.
Why is it so hard to let them untouched, and leave it to the original poster to evaluate if they serve any purpose to display whats seen on his screen. I see you posted lots of screenshots who were down sized, after zoomed and looked absolutly useless. Sadly you dont have any respect, not even to your own pictures.
You even think you can mess up a native pattern, post a pic of it and call it native. its sad.. |
Hehe the offer still stand Santa.
You are twisting again as usual. Think back what we discussed.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="stridsvognen"] | Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | you fail to ansver.. Is the pictures you clip out true to the original picture, or is there some addet distortion sharpness or other thing going on that was not seen in the original pics posted. ?
And how is what you post in the last clips ever the original pattern.. ?? |
When you zoom in you get more distortion sharpness of coerce, what did you think see the size of the pic also.
Why are you always trying to get bull**** out of nothing again.
And the original pattern is better correct, but also the pic so the same. |
Ahh so you know your scaling the images, and adds ringing and distortion, and then find it ok to use them to display the performance of different projectors.
Why is it so hard to let them untouched, and leave it to the original poster to evaluate if they serve any purpose to display whats seen on his screen. I see you posted lots of screenshots who were down sized, after zoomed and looked absolutly useless. Sadly you dont have any respect, not even to your own pictures.
You even think you can mess up a native pattern, post a pic of it and call it native. its sad..[/quote
Ohhhh hahaha to smile I just look at the screenshot I took.
Form your post replay. Life is fun.
Lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really hope that all here see here that you are the most annoying person alive.
And I rally want to give you a job as Santa this year. Even my oldest kid will maybe think that the impossible is possible.
Please take the job.
LOL LOL LOL
And what is 100% fact Stridsvognen is that your bull**** smells worse than a baby's sh*tty diper. Lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | I really hope that all here see here that you are the most annoying person alive.
And I rally want to give you a job as Santa this year. Even my oldest kid will maybe think that the impossible is possible.
Please take the job.
LOL LOL LOL
And what is 100% fact Stridsvognen is that your bull**** smells worse than a baby's sh*tty diper. Lol |
You are such a skilled writer, and its hard to keep up with all your kindergarden experience.
So ill leave the diper stuff unchalenged.. Is hard for me to tie it together with the tecnical aspects of projecting a image.
The santa stuff your refering to must be a movie titel, ill see if i can find it so we can debate it later. So sorry not replying to that, i dident realy had the know how to attatch santa to the projector debate.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | I really hope that all here see here that you are the most annoying person alive.
And I rally want to give you a job as Santa this year. Even my oldest kid will maybe think that the impossible is possible.
Please take the job.
LOL LOL LOL
And what is 100% fact Stridsvognen is that your bull**** smells worse than a baby's sh*tty diper. Lol |
You are such a skilled writer, and its hard to keep up with all your kindergarden experience.
So ill leave the diper stuff unchalenged.. Is hard for me to tie it together with the tecnical aspects of projecting a image.
The santa stuff your refering to must be a movie titel, ill see if i can find it so we can debate it later. So sorry not replying to that, i dident realy had the know how to trow santa into the projector debate. |
Have you headed the old song look who's talking now hehe
I am not a skilled writer and for me all your talk is just funny.
And about Santa ....No it's not a movie title ...I really want you as Santa. Because you are amazing at make people believe bull****. And even think that the not possible is possible. That Is very impressive. +1
But I think that you do not know much just playing that you do. Because if you did know much you would behave totally different. But you did make me read more about bandwidth. But I have no use for it, but enough to help my friend.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | I really hope that all here see here that you are the most annoying person alive.
And I rally want to give you a job as Santa this year. Even my oldest kid will maybe think that the impossible is possible.
Please take the job.
LOL LOL LOL
And what is 100% fact Stridsvognen is that your bull**** smells worse than a baby's sh*tty diper. Lol |
You are such a skilled writer, and its hard to keep up with all your kindergarden experience.
So ill leave the diper stuff unchalenged.. Is hard for me to tie it together with the tecnical aspects of projecting a image.
The santa stuff your refering to must be a movie titel, ill see if i can find it so we can debate it later. So sorry not replying to that, i dident realy had the know how to trow santa into the projector debate. |
Have you headed the old song look who's talking now hehe
I am not a skilled writer and for me all your talk is just funny.
And about Santa ....No it's not a movie title ...I really want you as Santa. Because you are amazing at make people believe bull****. And even think that the not possible is possible. That Is very impressive. +1
But I think that you do not know much just playing that you do. Because if you did know much you would behave totally different. But you did make me read more about bandwidth. But I have no use for it, but enough to help my friend. |
Ahh i think i got it.. Santa is about reproducing red and white.?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | I really hope that all here see here that you are the most annoying person alive.
And I rally want to give you a job as Santa this year. Even my oldest kid will maybe think that the impossible is possible.
Please take the job.
LOL LOL LOL
And what is 100% fact Stridsvognen is that your bull**** smells worse than a baby's sh*tty diper. Lol |
The santa stuff your refering to must be a movie titel, ill see if i can find it so we can debate it later. So sorry not replying to that, i dident realy had the know how to attatch santa to the projector debate. |
And then a question ,,,,all that you write and say does this have something to do with this topic on this forum?
You just twist answers question with a question, and just have only one goal. Spread real smelly bullshitt......
Read between the lines man. There is something that you do not want to get out. The truth.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | I really hope that all here see here that you are the most annoying person alive.
And I rally want to give you a job as Santa this year. Even my oldest kid will maybe think that the impossible is possible.
Please take the job.
LOL LOL LOL
And what is 100% fact Stridsvognen is that your bull**** smells worse than a baby's sh*tty diper. Lol |
You are such a skilled writer, and its hard to keep up with all your kindergarden experience.
So ill leave the diper stuff unchalenged.. Is hard for me to tie it together with the tecnical aspects of projecting a image.
The santa stuff your refering to must be a movie titel, ill see if i can find it so we can debate it later. So sorry not replying to that, i dident realy had the know how to trow santa into the projector debate. |
Have you headed the old song look who's talking now hehe
I am not a skilled writer and for me all your talk is just funny.
And about Santa ....No it's not a movie title ...I really want you as Santa. Because you are amazing at make people believe bull****. And even think that the not possible is possible. That Is very impressive. +1
But I think that you do not know much just playing that you do. Because if you did know much you would behave totally different. But you did make me read more about bandwidth. But I have no use for it, but enough to help my friend. |
Ahh i think i got it.. Santa is about reproducing red and white.? |
Yes ,,,you see you can also be a comedian +1 but not what I meant. Hehe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stridsvognen I ask you again since you are back on earth.
But still do you agree with me about this?
CRT still king or Crt better than Sony 4k? And the other we have been in.
Do you like to be on bull**** treads?
Why not start a forum that do not involve Digital.?
Then what I mean is this and the other bull**** that Greg started.
Agree or not agree.....nothing more.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | I really hope that all here see here that you are the most annoying person alive.
And I rally want to give you a job as Santa this year. Even my oldest kid will maybe think that the impossible is possible.
Please take the job.
LOL LOL LOL
And what is 100% fact Stridsvognen is that your bull**** smells worse than a baby's sh*tty diper. Lol |
The santa stuff your refering to must be a movie titel, ill see if i can find it so we can debate it later. So sorry not replying to that, i dident realy had the know how to attatch santa to the projector debate. |
And then a question ,,,,all that you write and say does this have something to do with this topic on this forum?
You just twist answers question with a question, and just have only one goal. Spread real smelly bullshitt......
Read between the lines man. There is something that you do not want to get out. The truth. |
I think so.. im very much questioning your skills to evaluate a moddet CRT projector, with help from your friends that have CRT projectors, guess they are so ashamed they dont even want to show up on this forum.
Where the fun begins is every time you feel that someone is picking on your beloved SONY.
Still i think that most uf us using CRT knows where the limitation is. We admit it and work around it, making the best of it.
I kind of think thats better than walking around beliving everything is perfect.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | Stridsvognen I ask you again since you are back on earth.
But still do you agree with me about this?
CRT still king or Crt better than Sony 4k? And the other we have been in.
Do you like to be on bull**** treads?
Why not start a forum that do not involve Digital.?
Then what I mean is this and the other bull**** that Greg started.
Agree or not agree.....nothing more. |
I agree that Greg might be right.. We have not seen any proves that he is not, and i find him inocent untill other is proven.
I also find you inkompetent as a judge in these matters. as you dont have any skills to setup and evaluate a CRT projector, and your 100% dependent on others to do so, who you cant confirm did a good or bad job at it.
I agree with another guy that comented that a display not being able to fit the native source dont have any reference value.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | I really hope that all here see here that you are the most annoying person alive.
And I rally want to give you a job as Santa this year. Even my oldest kid will maybe think that the impossible is possible.
Please take the job.
LOL LOL LOL
And what is 100% fact Stridsvognen is that your bull**** smells worse than a baby's sh*tty diper. Lol |
The santa stuff your refering to must be a movie titel, ill see if i can find it so we can debate it later. So sorry not replying to that, i dident realy had the know how to attatch santa to the projector debate. |
And then a question ,,,,all that you write and say does this have something to do with this topic on this forum?
You just twist answers question with a question, and just have only one goal. Spread real smelly bullshitt......
Read between the lines man. There is something that you do not want to get out. The truth. |
I think so.. im very much questioning your skills to evaluate a moddet CRT projector, with help from your friends that have CRT projectors, guess they are so ashamed they dont even want to show up on this forum.
Where the fun begins is every time you feel that someone is picking on your beloved SONY.
Still i think that most uf us using CRT knows where the limitation is. We admit it and work around it, making the best of it.
I kind of think thats better than walking around beliving everything is perfect. |
How many times do you ignore what I say and how many times do I have to write the same things. In a different twist.
I evaluate picture quality side by side. I do not adjust CRT and newer will anymore.
True they do not want to be on forum. Wonder why?
Pick as much as you want on the sony or jvc just bull.
And god for you, about CRT limitation some truth.
You definitely believe that a CRT is perfect. But you do not remember this forum and the other one.
Because I say that a digital is perfect jeep jeep jeep haha
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | Stridsvognen I ask you again since you are back on earth.
But still do you agree with me about this?
CRT still king or Crt better than Sony 4k? And the other we have been in.
Do you like to be on bull**** treads?
Why not start a forum that do not involve Digital.?
Then what I mean is this and the other bull**** that Greg started.
Agree or not agree.....nothing more. |
I agree that Greg might be right.. We have not seen any proves that he is not, and i find him inocent untill other is proven.
I also find you inkompetent as a judge in these matters. as you dont have any skills to setup and evaluate a CRT projector, and your 100% dependent on others to do so, who you cant confirm did a good or bad job at it.
I agree with another guy that comented that a display not being able to fit the native source dont have any reference value. |
Haha again shows how full of sh*t you are.
Another screenshot...
+2
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Again I wanted just a yes or no or agree or not agree.
You have to twist and twist.
Hehe
Greg have not seen a good digital at all. He have lied so many times. From now on I will call you Mr G stridsvognen because you and him are so alike.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stridsvognen
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | Again I wanted just a yes or no or agree or not agree.
You have to twist and twist.
Hehe
Greg have not seen a good digital at all. He have lied so many times. From now on I will call you Mr G stridsvognen because you and him are so alike. |
As long you dont call me Diddern im happy.
Your question is more like 3-4 questions and saying i agree.. i cant realy find out what i agree to other than you still dont have a clue about how complex the image debate are.
What is the resolution on a blue ray movie.?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|
