| Author |
Message |
AFryia
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 965 Location: S.E. Michigan VPH-G70Q
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:16 am Post subject: Plasma Preference |
|
|
|
Samsung or Panasonic what is your preference for a Plasma TV?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom.W
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 6635
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Several friends including myself own Samsung plasmas and so far no failures. What made you consider a plasma over LED ? I was about to post a plasma vs LED pro/con post but this should do...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Based on what I've seen so far, not including cracked screens, I'd say the lifespan overall is better with plasma, but it also uses about 5X the amount of power as an LED.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AFryia
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 965 Location: S.E. Michigan VPH-G70Q
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tom.W wrote: | | Several friends including myself own Samsung plasmas and so far no failures. What made you consider a plasma over LED ? I was about to post a plasma vs LED pro/con post but this should do... |
My main TV (plasma) is broke. Temporarily I've hung the spare room LCD in its place. Just terrible on every account except brightness.
I know the newer LED/LCD TVs are better than the back lit LCD. I just haven't seen any that don't look cartoon-ish IMO.
Go ahead and Post the Pro's and Con's.
I plan on waiting till after Christmas to purchase. Maybe find some deals.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
If you're picky about image quality, I'd go by what you prefer. Frankly, anything I watch these days (until I hang my G90 over the holidays) isn't critical. I don't think (save for most of the no name brands) that there's any real life difference within the different manufacturers of the same technology. I know Tinman bought an LG based on power consumption alone.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Too bad pioneer doesn't make plasmas anymore, I'd have recommended one of them (I just got a 61" Professional plasma display from an interior design studio around here and :O :O now I know why people are still charging arms and legs for pioneer plasmas)
Anyway, given that fact, that leaves Samsung or Panasonic. Id have to say both are excellent brands for plasmas. Though I would have to go with a Samsung as my preferred plasma display. Samsungs have nicer looks, excellent customer service (they gave me $1100 for a defective 30" LCD they produced, without question) And as for their plasmas, they have the nicest PQ I have seen on a flat panel.
LED sucks, it still sucks, and it will always suck because it uses a crappy ass LCD panel still. My opinion though, you may prefer otherwise.
If you care about PQ, can tolerate the (what is it, $5 at most a month more for a plasma vs a LCD power consumption wooptie doo!) slightly higher cost to operate plasma, then go with plasma. The color is MMM MM good
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeremy112 wrote: | Samsungs have nicer looks, excellent customer service (they gave me $1100 for a defective 30" LCD they produced, without question) And as for their plasmas, they have the nicest PQ I have seen on a flat panel.
|
Ummm yeah, they had a class action lawsuit against them, it's right on their own website.
http://www.samsung.com/us/capacitorsettlement/
(it really kinda sucks, those sets were the fastest repairs ever, and I made good $$ getting them from the recycler and reselling them )
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My favorite plasma is one that is full of bullet holes..... well providing I put them there..........
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mac. your avatar bullets look like Duracells. Do you shoot AA or AAAs?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: | | Jeremy112 wrote: | Samsungs have nicer looks, excellent customer service (they gave me $1100 for a defective 30" LCD they produced, without question) And as for their plasmas, they have the nicest PQ I have seen on a flat panel.
|
Ummm yeah, they had a class action lawsuit against them, it's right on their own website.
http://www.samsung.com/us/capacitorsettlement/
(it really kinda sucks, those sets were the fastest repairs ever, and I made good $$ getting them from the recycler and reselling them ) |
Actually it was one of their 2560x1600 30" displays and it wasnt capacitor related, it was the reflective material they put in the LCD panel, somehow it had rippled in manufacturing and passed inspection and got sold to me that way. Obviously it couldnt be fixed because the ripples wouldnt come out (I did rip it apart to see if I could flatten it out a bit)
All they asked me for was a receipt which I was happy to provide and a week later I had $1100 sitting in my mailbox (along with a label for shipping the monitor back )
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: | Mac. your avatar bullets look like Duracells. Do you shoot AA or AAAs?  |
Yeah, I had to resize the original pic for it to be an avatar and the quality went to sh*t. I'll have to try a different method and see if i can clear it up..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | My favorite plasma is one that is full of bullet holes..... well providing I put them there..........  |
Elvis would agree with you
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AFryia
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 965 Location: S.E. Michigan VPH-G70Q
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can anyone shed some insight?
I've been to a number of local stores that carry a full complement of Samsung and Panasonic plasmas. All seem to be pushing Samsung. I'll say I'm looking for PQ over features, and the conversation turns straight back to Samsung. This happened at almost every store.
I know Panasonic are reducing plasma production volume over heavy financial loses. So one would think stores would want to clear out their panny stock.
Samsung was or did spin off the flat panel division into a separate entity post Cap-gate. So why the heavy push to Samsung?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AFryia wrote: | Can anyone shed some insight?
I've been to a number of local stores that carry a full complement of Samsung and Panasonic plasmas. All seem to be pushing Samsung. I'll say I'm looking for PQ over features, and the conversation turns straight back to Samsung. This happened at almost every store.
I know Panasonic are reducing plasma production volume over heavy financial loses. So one would think stores would want to clear out their panny stock.
Samsung was or did spin off the flat panel division into a separate entity post Cap-gate. So why the heavy push to Samsung? |
Well over here there is no doubt... Panasonic is the best PQ. I'm sure Samsung have more features..
But i guess most people love a smart tv calibrated to 9-10000K
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HogPilot
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Posts: 2383
TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Every year Value Electronics holds a rather extensive display shootout, judged by numerous respected calibrators and enthusiasts. IIRC, the most recent shootout found the Samsung plasmas to be the most accurate when calibrated, but the Panny plasmas had darker blacks.
There's all kinds of information on the shootout here (scroll down a bit): http://www.valueelectronics.com/
_________________
| ecrabb wrote: | | Curt Palme wrote: | | Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure. |
He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.
SC |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AFryia
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 965 Location: S.E. Michigan VPH-G70Q
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HogPilot wrote: | | Every year Value Electronics holds a rather extensive display shootout, judged by numerous respected calibrators and enthusiasts. IIRC, the most recent shootout found the Samsung plasmas to be the most accurate when calibrated, but the Panny plasmas had darker blacks. |
That is pretty much what I have found in my online searches.
And in store the Samsung do have the better smart TV features, better function IMO. PQ was difficult to judge as the feed was always terrible, every store. Only one store had a Sam/Panny side by side, I'd give the edge in PQ to Panasonic.
Normally I'd go Samsung with no hesitation if it wasn't for my current Samsung set dying premature.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HogPilot
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Posts: 2383
TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I also seem to remember that Samsung is less resistant to IR and burn-in than are the Pannys.
_________________
| ecrabb wrote: | | Curt Palme wrote: | | Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure. |
He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.
SC |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slackwarerobert
Joined: 03 Apr 2013 Posts: 30
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I went with the samsung because I wanted bluetooth 3d glasses. And it works great, no disconnects.
Had to drive 250 miles to see one, no one in state carried the plasma.
I bounced back and forth on the led / plasma for a couple months, energy use / better picture, then found a
great deal on the plasma. Only problem is the extra 3" I left for the center channel speaker was 1/4" to short,
I still had to move the tv mount up 2 inches and adjust the mount points.
Will be hooking up the outside antenna this week, and finally can try PIP feature. Sadly only antenna input
allowed for the PIP secondary source.
Now if I can just figure out why the male cat likes sitting on the subwoofer, and the female won't get near it,
all will be right in the world.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Das444
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 145
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
AFryia,
I have a 60 inch Panasonic plasma. When I had Gannon out to set up my XG he tweaked the plasma and it looks fantastic. Go to Paulson's in Farmington Hills.
Jeremy,
I think Pioneer sold the Elite line to Sharp.
Dan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|