|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
jbmeyer13
Joined: 03 Dec 2010 Posts: 1135
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 5:50 pm Post subject: Sharp 80" LED LC-80LE632U |
|
|
I stopped into a local electronics retailer to kill some time last night prior to seeing a movie and auditioned both of the current 80” Sharp LED sets.
The 632U was playing a BD of Harry Potter and the image looked so bad I thought it was a behind the scene’s documentary. The image did not look like film at all; more like watching a live video feed. While I realize these sets have various types of picture/motion “enhancement” features that should ideally be turned off, the image was so un-natural that it’s hard to believe this thing carries an MSRP of $5K.
It’s a shame Pioneer got out of the display business because they really set the benchmark with their Plasma sets.
_________________ Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:04 pm Post subject: Re: Sharp 80" LED LC-80LE632U |
|
|
| jbmeyer13 wrote: | | The 632U was playing a BD of Harry Potter and the image looked so bad I thought it was a behind the scene’s documentary. The image did not look like film at all; more like watching a live video feed. While I realize these sets have various types of picture/motion “enhancement” features that should ideally be turned off, the image was so un-natural that it’s hard to believe this thing carries an MSRP of $5K. |
Umm... I know what you're trying to get at... But, seriously... Saying what you said is like saying, "I test drove a new Z06, and the thing wouldn't even do a damn burnout. While I realize these cars have traction control and launch control, the thing wouldn't even do a burnout and carries an MSRP of $59,000!
You grab the remote, enter the menu, turn the motion enhancement off, and boom - looks like film. Seriously, a lot of these new sets look really, really good after calibration.
Even a lot of "HT" projectors now have motion enhancement. Most turn it off in the first 10 minutes the projector is turned on, just as I did.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
and the bottom line for 90% of consumers is:
'LOOK, I GOT AN 80" TV FOR $2500!"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: | and the bottom line for 90% of consumers is:
'LOOK, I GOT AN 80" TV FOR $2500!" |
So? IMHO, that's pretty impressive, Curt! Longevity and repair issues aside for a second, these new sets are really, really impressive!
Barely 10 years ago, a 40" Sony XBR was nearly that much money, and the f*cking thing weighed 200 pounds and took 4 people to carry into a house and put on a stand. (That set is worth essentially zero today, BTW.)
Or, for that money or more, you could get a 65" RPTV that again took 3-4 people to carry in, took up a MASSIVE amount of living space, and looked like crap with the lights on or for anybody sitting more than 10-15 degrees off-axis.
Now, practically anybody can afford a 42-50" set, and lots of people can afford bigger because they're a mere FRACTION of the price sets used to be (unless you're talking about the really big stuff). They look great with the lights on, and even off-axis, they take up no floor space, and practically everybody who buys them loves the crap out of them.
Sorry, but other than long-term reliability, I'm not seeing the problem. IMHO, I love the choices we have now versus 10 or 15 years ago.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jbmeyer13
Joined: 03 Dec 2010 Posts: 1135
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:31 pm Post subject: Re: Sharp 80" LED LC-80LE632U |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | | jbmeyer13 wrote: | | The 632U was playing a BD of Harry Potter and the image looked so bad I thought it was a behind the scene’s documentary. The image did not look like film at all; more like watching a live video feed. While I realize these sets have various types of picture/motion “enhancement” features that should ideally be turned off, the image was so un-natural that it’s hard to believe this thing carries an MSRP of $5K. |
Umm... I know what you're trying to get at... But, seriously... Saying what you said is like saying, "I test drove a new Z06, and the thing wouldn't even do a damn burnout. While I realize these cars have traction control and launch control, the thing wouldn't even do a burnout and carries an MSRP of $59,000!
You grab the remote, enter the menu, turn the motion enhancement off, and boom - looks like film. Seriously, a lot of these new sets look really, really good after calibration.
Even a lot of "HT" projectors now have motion enhancement. Most turn it off in the first 10 minutes the projector is turned on, just as I did.
SC |
Well out of curiosity I plan to go back and do just that; the store was closing so I didn't have time to play around with the menu. However, IME these settings typically offer subtle differences and reviews I read on this set confirm as much.
Have you actually seen this particular set in person? The characteristic I'm speaking of is blatant.
I'm not saying all flat panels are crap, just that this model's price and performance do not appear to be commensurate to one another based on what I have seen thus far. The worst part is that when I mentioned this to the sales manager (rather than telling me to adjust the settings) he blamed the movie by saying it was "old".
_________________ Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jbmeyer13
Joined: 03 Dec 2010 Posts: 1135
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I went back last night and switched off the "dynamic mode" and it did yield a better image. As expected, it turned out being rather subtle with the image still lacking a film like quality. The source material was the same Harry Potter BD.
_________________ Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well... It is an LCD, and a cheaper edge-lit model at that. I'm not sure how much you expect it to "look like film".
I guess I feel like I need to point this out at this point... TV-buying 101... You really shouldn't expect these displays to look great in the store environment. It's been this way for years - going clear back to CRT direct-view and CRT RPTV (which really didn't look like film, either...)
Any display is going to require calibration to look good - just like our projectors. The brightness, contrast, color temp, saturation, and a host of other settings are all sub-optimal. They're all set to "torch" mode because everybody is trying to look brighter than everybody else. So, they're too bright, too colorful, color temp is too cool... And that's just the beginning.
Here's an example of how a lot of guys end up tweaking their sets to get them in the ballpark (this isn't even calibrating):
Movie mode
OPC off
Backlight -1
Contrast 30 (I found color sat problems above 30-31)
Brightness -1 (AVSHD disk is most helpful here and this setting is important)
Color 0
Tint 0
Sharpness 3
Hue: 2,8,2,6,5,1
Sat: 1,0,3,-3,13,3
Value: -5,-1,16,-3,-10
Color Temp Low
RGBlohi: 23,1,5,2,0,9
Gamma = 0 (this gave gamma close to 2.2)
black level low
film mode off
digital noise reduction off
color at -7 and tint at +7 seemed about right for SD
So, again... Don't judge how these sets look in a store setting. Most are capable of a much nicer picture than what you saw, and some are even pretty decent for what most of us would consider "critical viewing".
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ecrabb, I was being somewhat facetious.
I understand all the pros and cons of the different displays, but to me, the whole CRT thing has always been about playing with big toys and finding out why they break. It's far less about the picture, although I do prefer CRT over any digital. It's what I'm used to. AS I mentioned before, It's been about 2 years since I watched my own CRT projector, but now that I resurrected an HDMI switching Denon receiver, I guess I should fix the power supply and retweak my own system. With teenagers in the house, they'd love the projector for gaming.
My point was though, that 90% of people will throw their flat screen on the wall and call it a day. I can't wait until they start breaking down outside of warranty. The recycling places will be interesting to go to then!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jbmeyer13
Joined: 03 Dec 2010 Posts: 1135
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | Well... It is an LCD, and a cheaper edge-lit model at that. I'm not sure how much you expect it to "look like film".
I guess I feel like I need to point this out at this point... TV-buying 101... You really shouldn't expect these displays to look great in the store environment. It's been this way for years - going clear back to CRT direct-view and CRT RPTV (which really didn't look like film, either...)
Any display is going to require calibration to look good - just like our projectors. The brightness, contrast, color temp, saturation, and a host of other settings are all sub-optimal. They're all set to "torch" mode because everybody is trying to look brighter than everybody else. So, they're too bright, too colorful, color temp is too cool... And that's just the beginning.
Here's an example of how a lot of guys end up tweaking their sets to get them in the ballpark (this isn't even calibrating):
Movie mode
OPC off
Backlight -1
Contrast 30 (I found color sat problems above 30-31)
Brightness -1 (AVSHD disk is most helpful here and this setting is important)
Color 0
Tint 0
Sharpness 3
Hue: 2,8,2,6,5,1
Sat: 1,0,3,-3,13,3
Value: -5,-1,16,-3,-10
Color Temp Low
RGBlohi: 23,1,5,2,0,9
Gamma = 0 (this gave gamma close to 2.2)
black level low
film mode off
digital noise reduction off
color at -7 and tint at +7 seemed about right for SD
So, again... Don't judge how these sets look in a store setting. Most are capable of a much nicer picture than what you saw, and some are even pretty decent for what most of us would consider "critical viewing".
SC |
I understand that for any set to look good it needs calibration. However, all the calibration in the world will not change the motion characteristics of the image. I've been hearing that this has been improved greatly as of late which prompted me to see these displays in person. The reality is that my expectations and the capability of the technology are not in alignment.
_________________ Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm... Interesting. Of all the things I dislike about a lot of the newer LCD displays, motion is not one of them.
I also find it interesting that you (or anyone else) would characterize turning off the motion enhancement processors as having a "subtle" impact. On any set I've ever played with, it was night-and-day between having the motion "enhancement" turned on and off.
What, specifically was it about the motion you didn't like?
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
If I was serious about dropping $2500 on a flat panel I would be bringing my own source hardware and content. But considering its an 80" for $2500 I wouldn't be expecting much at all.
Flat panels are really the boob-tube replacements and critical viewing isn't applicable.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jbmeyer13
Joined: 03 Dec 2010 Posts: 1135
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | Hmmm... Interesting. Of all the things I dislike about a lot of the newer LCD displays, motion is not one of them.
I also find it interesting that you (or anyone else) would characterize turning off the motion enhancement processors as having a "subtle" impact. On any set I've ever played with, it was night-and-day between having the motion "enhancement" turned on and off.
What, specifically was it about the motion you didn't like?
SC |
The best way to describe is that it looks like watching material shot as broadcast video rather than film. For example if you watch a behind the scene's featurette shot in video it has a distinctly different look to it than film based material. I don't know the technical terminology but that is the most relatable way I can think to express what I'm seeing. Great for sports but not film.
_________________ Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jbmeyer13
Joined: 03 Dec 2010 Posts: 1135
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WanMan wrote: | If I was serious about dropping $2500 on a flat panel I would be bringing my own source hardware and content. But considering its an 80" for $2500 I wouldn't be expecting much at all.
Flat panels are really the boob-tube replacements and critical viewing isn't applicable. |
The set has a $5K MSRP not $2.5K. You could buy a sweet 9" PJ and screen for that much:-)
_________________ Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My bad, I went off what Curt said. The 633 80" model is at Costco for $4500. Because of where the display is sitting the pixel structure is huge. And without the ability to determine how crappy the black level is, there isn't any way I'd spend $4500 on it.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|