Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

3D... It's working :)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
Author Message
CIR Engineering



Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 4269
Location: Chicago USA & Berlin Germany

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:50 pm    Post subject:

Thanks for the results John.

JohnHWman wrote:

PS : Craig, maybe the "MINUS" written SSG2100AB battery compartiment PCB may be unable to work at 96Hz (but work at 120Hz) while "-" version does Wink

Nope, ALL the Samsung glasses I have here work with the 3DFlightSim 3DFS-50 emitter Wink I have I think every type here at this point and every pair works, but only with the 3DFS-50.

craigr

_________________
JETI 1501-HiRes 2nm Spectroradiometer
JETI 1211 Spectroradiometer
Photo Research PR-650 Spectroradiometer
Klein K10-A Colorimeter
Murideo Fresco SIX-G HDMI 2.x Multimedia Generator
Murideo Fresco SIX-A HDMI 2.x Analyzer
Light Illusion ColourSpace XPT Color Calibration Software
Light Illusion LightSpace XPT Pro Version 10.x Color Calibration Software
OMARDRIS JVC Software Patch to use K10-A and Jeti with JVC OEM AutoCal Software!
Sencore CR7000 CRT Tube Analyzer / Rejuvenater
Authorized Dealer for Lumagen & just about everything worth buying Wink
www.CIR-Engineering.com - craigr@cir-engineering.com
Phone: 865-405-6892
Back to top
CIR Engineering



Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 4269
Location: Chicago USA & Berlin Germany

Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 12:01 am    Post subject:

Tim in Phoenix wrote:
Guys

I expect that P43 green phosphor will become a requirement at 120hz refresh and continue to be helpful at 96hz based on my experience with stereo back twelve to fifteen years ago, or the prospect of lag problems will be an issue.

P43 will be helpful Tim for 96Hz or 120Hz. Really the technique and system I developed is kind of like a band-aid to reduce ghosting. I mean we are applying huge vertical porches to allow more time for the active phosphor to decay between frames. At 120Hz there is more ghosting whit my technique because there is less available total bandwidth to dedicate to extra vertical timing. Going from 96Hz to 120Hz uses 25% more bandwidth for an equal resolution so this means 25% less vertical timings, so naturally there is more ghosting.

One thing I will be doing for 120Hz however is trying to reduce the horizontal active and total pixel counts to allow more bandwidth to be freed up to apply to the vertical timings. At this point I have only not done this because I really only have one 60Hz BD disc (FIFA 2010 highlights) and I don't have 3D on satellite yet.

I actually applied a similar technique when I setup Cliff's system the other week because Cliff does not have the XS or XE so he does not have the PLUS option. Because of the lack of PLUS, Cliff has less available bandwidth but I was still able to overclock his XD a little. I wound up setting up Vactive = 810 with Vtotal = 1360 by Hactive = 1024 with an additional V blanking of 550 lines. This worked pretty well and I suspect that it will do 120Hz pretty good too.

Kind regards,
craigr

_________________
JETI 1501-HiRes 2nm Spectroradiometer
JETI 1211 Spectroradiometer
Photo Research PR-650 Spectroradiometer
Klein K10-A Colorimeter
Murideo Fresco SIX-G HDMI 2.x Multimedia Generator
Murideo Fresco SIX-A HDMI 2.x Analyzer
Light Illusion ColourSpace XPT Color Calibration Software
Light Illusion LightSpace XPT Pro Version 10.x Color Calibration Software
OMARDRIS JVC Software Patch to use K10-A and Jeti with JVC OEM AutoCal Software!
Sencore CR7000 CRT Tube Analyzer / Rejuvenater
Authorized Dealer for Lumagen & just about everything worth buying Wink
www.CIR-Engineering.com - craigr@cir-engineering.com
Phone: 865-405-6892
Back to top
CIR Engineering



Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 4269
Location: Chicago USA & Berlin Germany

Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 12:01 am    Post subject:

overclkr wrote:
Yeah but doesn't the P43 put out less light output?

Preliminary test indicate that the P43 may actually NOT put out less light and that the color may actually meet REC709 with proper CElement.

I was supposed to be getting a dozen P43 tubes from Japan... but that was before the earth quake. I heard from them once and they said they would get my order out ASAP... but that was weeks ago. I will try and contact them again on Monday.

craigr

_________________
JETI 1501-HiRes 2nm Spectroradiometer
JETI 1211 Spectroradiometer
Photo Research PR-650 Spectroradiometer
Klein K10-A Colorimeter
Murideo Fresco SIX-G HDMI 2.x Multimedia Generator
Murideo Fresco SIX-A HDMI 2.x Analyzer
Light Illusion ColourSpace XPT Color Calibration Software
Light Illusion LightSpace XPT Pro Version 10.x Color Calibration Software
OMARDRIS JVC Software Patch to use K10-A and Jeti with JVC OEM AutoCal Software!
Sencore CR7000 CRT Tube Analyzer / Rejuvenater
Authorized Dealer for Lumagen & just about everything worth buying Wink
www.CIR-Engineering.com - craigr@cir-engineering.com
Phone: 865-405-6892
Back to top
dvh99



Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 2158
Location: nederland

Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 12:12 am    Post subject:

what is the advantage of shutterglasses vs polarized glasses.
i have tried 96hz at 1080p and it looked pretty cool.
i have seen 3d on a panasonic plasma television set and i wasn`t impressed.
the imax experience i had in the 80s was far better and that was of course with the 50cents glasses.

_________________
1 answer always poses multiple questions.
marquee 9500ultra HD10L moome hdmi1.3 v3+ some mods.
Back to top
royuk



Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 41


Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 9:33 am    Post subject:

I also have a question. Now that my Barco 1209s is running and set-up properly with it producing a fantastic 'real life' quality picture from Blu-ray i want to get 3D. It would be great to have it on my Barco CRT but there are concerns with quality and cost. As Craigr and others here are 'experts' and innovators it is much easier for those to try and work with different options etc and may be more likely to afford it. Ghosting and glasses is the main concern at present. Glasses seems to be nearly finalised with the emitter options now well covered. As for ghosting it's still ongoing.

When i watched disney's 'Tangled' at the cinema in 3D i saw ghosting twice so it too is not perfect but it didn't ruin the experience. I can not recall seeing ghosting in any other movies at the cinema though, so i would not expect it to be perfect at home either but it would need to be pretty close.

In my case i want 3D. Question is should i get it on my Barco 1209s CRT or go digital. I love CRT for the obvious reasons and with Blu-ray it can be a magical experience. Just watching 'Avatar' is remarkable. The picture is that good! Very Happy
3D is an unknown quantity though. Without seeing it first hand it will be an expensive investment but one i'm prepared for if the 3D quality is at least equal to 2D. The main costs will be getting a lumagen xs+ and some barco mods.

From the perspective of someone who knows and appreciates picture quality, watches 3D in the cinema, the digital options available (many cheaper than the crt route) and near future improvements (2k/4k, 48fps cinema film) what is the honest opinion of going down this 3d crt route at a cost of £3000 plus.
Back to top
JohnHWman



Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 215
Location: France - Grenoble

TV/Projector: Sony VPH-G90U (one unit for me, four others units repaired and sold)

Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 11:37 am    Post subject:

Hi Roy,

If you already own a Lumagen XS/XD/XE+ scaler to drive your Barco, the cost to upgrade your CRT to 3D is not that much money (CRT-3D dongle + IR transmitter + A pair of 3D shutter glasses is about $500).
If you have not such scaler today, you may go to digital but unfortunatly, most Hi-End 3D ready decent projector (like Sony VPL-VW90ES) will cost you more than £5000 and 2D picture is not as nice as 9" CRT !
CIR Engineering wrote:
Nope, ALL the Samsung glasses I have here work with the 3DFlightSim 3DFS-50 emitter Wink I have I think every type here at this point and every pair works, but only with the 3DFS-50.
Ah, OK. did you tried SSG2200AR glasses with the 3DFS-50 IR emiter @96Hz ? If it works, then I may buy it Wink
John

_________________
Home theater enthusiast for over 20 years !
My dedicated HT room !
Back to top
CIR Engineering



Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 4269
Location: Chicago USA & Berlin Germany

Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 12:53 pm    Post subject:

dvh99 wrote:
what is the advantage of shutterglasses vs polarized glasses.
i have tried 96hz at 1080p and it looked pretty cool.
i have seen 3d on a panasonic plasma television set and i wasn`t impressed.
the imax experience i had in the 80s was far better and that was of course with the 50cents glasses.

I am not sure this is a very good question really because the two; polarized and shutter are simply totally different technologies.

For CRT either could be considered simpler or better depending on what you want and like the sound of.

Polarized requires two projectors to be stacked, polarized lenses for the projectors, polarized 3D glasses, and a way to send left eye to one projector and right eye to the other.

Shutter can be used with one or more projector(s), shutter 3D glasses, a way to time the glasses, and a way to send right eye and left eye data frame sequentially.

Polarized should show less ghosting, be brighter (two projectors), but you will need to run a stack and use polarized lens assemblies. Shutter requires less hardware and can be done with your exiting hardware for the most part.

craigr

_________________
JETI 1501-HiRes 2nm Spectroradiometer
JETI 1211 Spectroradiometer
Photo Research PR-650 Spectroradiometer
Klein K10-A Colorimeter
Murideo Fresco SIX-G HDMI 2.x Multimedia Generator
Murideo Fresco SIX-A HDMI 2.x Analyzer
Light Illusion ColourSpace XPT Color Calibration Software
Light Illusion LightSpace XPT Pro Version 10.x Color Calibration Software
OMARDRIS JVC Software Patch to use K10-A and Jeti with JVC OEM AutoCal Software!
Sencore CR7000 CRT Tube Analyzer / Rejuvenater
Authorized Dealer for Lumagen & just about everything worth buying Wink
www.CIR-Engineering.com - craigr@cir-engineering.com
Phone: 865-405-6892
Back to top
cinema mad



Joined: 25 Nov 2009
Posts: 219


Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 2:50 pm    Post subject:

Hi Craig,

sorry if this has been asked before:
besides needing 2x Radiance min/xs+ would there be an advantage running A stack for 3D using Shutter(Active) compared to just one projector ?..

Regarding screens for both polarized & Active formats I found this thread (FAQ and Discussion - Screens for 3D Projection) A good read over on AVS
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1300238

Jase..
Back to top
Gerbrand



Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 199


Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 3:03 pm    Post subject:

CIR Engineering wrote:

Polarized should show less ghosting, be brighter (two projectors), but you will need to run a stack and use polarized lens assemblies. Shutter requires less hardware and can be done with your exiting hardware for the most part.

craigr


I am not sure that polarized should be brighter than shuttered. To polarize the light you basically throw away at least 50% of the light. This more or less negates the advantage of using two projectors. So IMHO the only advantage of polarized is the reduced ghosting.

Gerbrand

_________________
BG1209s (color filtered,new LUGs!), 13000h
Bat cave
Back to top
JohnHWman



Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 215
Location: France - Grenoble

TV/Projector: Sony VPH-G90U (one unit for me, four others units repaired and sold)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 11:15 am    Post subject:

CIR Engineering wrote:
I was supposed to be getting a dozen P43 tubes from Japan... but that was before the earth quake. I heard from them once and they said they would get my order out ASAP... but that was weeks ago. I will try and contact them again on Monday.
Let us know Craig Wink
_________________
Home theater enthusiast for over 20 years !
My dedicated HT room !
Back to top
speedyandre



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 291
Location: Netherlands

Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 8:41 pm    Post subject:

Gerbrand wrote:
CIR Engineering wrote:

Polarized should show less ghosting, be brighter (two projectors), but you will need to run a stack and use polarized lens assemblies. Shutter requires less hardware and can be done with your exiting hardware for the most part.

craigr


I am not sure that polarized should be brighter than shuttered. To polarize the light you basically throw away at least 50% of the light. This more or less negates the advantage of using two projectors. So IMHO the only advantage of polarized is the reduced ghosting.

Gerbrand


I think using 2 projectors has more advantages, how about the lower refresh needed and the ability to show 1080p in 3D?
My Sony 1292 can do 720p@120Hz but then the green tube may be to 'slow'.
Because I have 3 1292's my choice would be using 2 of them, get polarizing filters and a fixed BDII screen.
Also for 2D viewing this setup has advantages (higher light output).
The problem I still have is finding a hdmi-splitter and maybe the fact that I have only one scaler.
Correct me if I'm wrong with my story Wink

André

_________________
I'll be broke
Back to top
Gerbrand



Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 199


Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 8:58 pm    Post subject:

I think you're right: lower refresh rate and hence higher resolutions is another advantage.

Gerbrand

_________________
BG1209s (color filtered,new LUGs!), 13000h
Bat cave
Back to top
zGman



Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 599


Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 3:35 am    Post subject:

Ok - well - where are you going to find a processor that will buffer the 120Hz frames
and convert to simultaneous 60Hz projection. There is no real advantage to having
two projectors if they are forced to run at 120Hz with blackout frames.

G
Back to top
cinema mad



Joined: 25 Nov 2009
Posts: 219


Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 6:40 am    Post subject:

Apologies to Craig for being A little off topic..

To allow dual projector/stack 3D setups 2 of these cheap Optoma BG-3DXL work as A muxer when set 1 for Left 1 for right for Passive..

http://www.optomausa.com/store_productdetail.asp?product_subcategory=29&productcategory=3D Accessories

From my understanding they will work with HDMI 1.3 and pass any rez upto 1080p 60Hz per box..

Abviously still need these http://the3dmarket.myshopify.com/products/linear-polarized-filters..

Jase...



Optoma 3DXL output mode swich.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  51.68 KB
 Viewed:  26113 Time(s)

Optoma 3DXL output mode swich.jpg



Optoma 3DXL rear.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  50.25 KB
 Viewed:  26113 Time(s)

Optoma 3DXL rear.jpg


Back to top
speedyandre



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 291
Location: Netherlands

Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 7:21 pm    Post subject:

I don't think $800 for 2 of them is cheap, but it's a start.
Why would a hdmi demuxer output 120Hz?
The reason that I choose for such a box is that my crt's can do 1080p@60.
I suppose the 120Hz input results in 2x60Hz output because it alters the l + r frames.
The only box I've found yet is the Cypress HDMI 1.4 3D demultiplexer with two HDMI 1.3 (1080p@60) outputs.
Unfortunately there is no reseller, maybe it's still not ready for production...

André

_________________
I'll be broke
Back to top
jantje112



Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 328


Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 7:29 pm    Post subject:

Andre,

Why just don't use rgbhv to split? The last few inches cable and à good splitter would be good enough for two displays
Back to top
speedyandre



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 291
Location: Netherlands

Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 7:48 pm    Post subject:

jantje112 wrote:
Andre,

Why just don't use rgbhv to split? The last few inches cable and à good splitter would be good enough for two displays


I think about using 3 sources for 3D: PS3, maybe a pc and maybe an Oppo or similar bdplayer.
Two of them have a hdmi output and there is no converter capable of converting 3D 1080p (120Hz or higher) to rgbhv.
Only a pc could do that and output 2x 1080p as rgbhv.
I like to use the 2 Moome boxes I already own and long hdmi cables are easy to use.
Maybe I should start with 3D 720p, but then only a pc can play my bd's...

André

_________________
I'll be broke
Back to top
mhalsan



Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 146
Location: Astoria, Oregon

Posted: Sat May 28, 2011 4:10 am    Post subject:

The Cypress CH-332 demultiplexer is available from an Australian company, link below. Chris is the contact there. My set shipped from Sydney on Thursday. Should be here next week. I've had polarized 3D with dual 9500s since last summer- and it's worth the work. Filters and glasses from Berezin, 3D driver from IZ3D (PC Games), but no 3D Blu-Ray support until now.

http://www.cypconverters.com.au/other-products/ch-322.html

Thanks, Mark

_________________
Sigh. We are getting aggravated (yes, we are....)
Back to top
View user's photo album (8 photos)
mhalsan



Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 146
Location: Astoria, Oregon

Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 6:01 am    Post subject:

UPDATE: I received the Cypress components. The set consists of an HDMI splitter, and a pair of converters, one for left, one for right. Setup took less than an hour; no HDMI problems, and the Oppo BDP-93 recognized the devices properly. Watched Coraline and Shrek Forever After; the system works just like it should. No ghosting, lightweight glasses, and a fairly bright, immersive 3D picture.

I realize that not many people are interested in doing 3D this way, but- it does work, and pretty well! Frankly, the hard work was done last year, setting up and matching two projectors. That took longer than I would have guessed.

Thanks, Mark

_________________
Sigh. We are getting aggravated (yes, we are....)
Back to top
View user's photo album (8 photos)
speedyandre



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 291
Location: Netherlands

Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:05 am    Post subject:

How does the Cypress box with glasses compare to your setup with filters?
Can I use my high gain Carada screen?
It would be great if I don't need a new screen Thumbs Up

André

_________________
I'll be broke
Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Page 16 of 18
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum