|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hahahahaha. I was doing a little searching and I found our buddy westom on another site. After a post or 2 by him this was the reply from another member...
"And here w_tom goes into his trademark pompous ass routine."
Could you be running out of forum friends westom?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well here's another one from a different forum. Looks like you've been pissing people off all over the web for years now, lol.
" Default Re: W_Tom - what is the part number/model of your whole houseprotector?
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:27:44 -0400, Rôgêr wrote:
> Leythos wrote:
>> Here is a question you can't squirm you way out of - what is the part
>> number/model of the whole house protector you use in YOUR HOME?
>>
>> Now, you can't complain about distance, all you have to do is find your
>> service entrance and go check the part number - let us know the part
>> number and vendor name so we can see what you feel is the necessary level
>> of protection for your own home.
>>
>
> I can't believe it. A post from Leythos that isn't totally devoted to an
> impotent attempt to skewer PCButts1. Can't you find something else to
> do? Is you whole life devoted to tracking down and pansy assed farting
> up the skirts of people better than you? Jesus H. ****ing Christ.
Actually, like BUTTS, w_tom just avoids the truth and has his own
religious beliefs that refuses reality. If you read the threads you would
know that, but thanks for trolling and enjoying the show.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow. I had a little time and did some searching and again, wow. westom is on site after site after site preaching his stuff and calling people dumb and pissing people off for years. And much of his posting seems to be the same CnP as here and this goes back years.
I think you thrive on this controversy westom. The pages and pages that I have just read on your conversations with others is just staggering. I cant believe you like abusing people like you do. I am actually shocked.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CasetheCorvetteman
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 6326 Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HAHAHAHAHA!!! Thats funny!! I got a good laugh from that one MacGyver, good researching!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dturco
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 3778 Location: Eastern Shore Maryland
TV/Projector: Runco DLP VX-3000i Marquee 9500 parts doner
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | Wow. I had a little time and did some searching and again, wow. westom is on site after site after site preaching his stuff and calling people dumb and pissing people off for years. And much of his posting seems to be the same CnP as here and this goes back years.
I think you thrive on this controversy westom. The pages and pages that I have just read on your conversations with others is just staggering. I cant believe you like abusing people like you do. I am actually shocked. |
Tell him to go away... or you'll post pictures of his house, his car, his dog, and his wife, [in the off chance he has one.]
I've seen you do it, and it worked
_________________ Firefly rules. Can't stop the signal.
http://www.hulu.com/firefly
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
westom
Joined: 14 Dec 2009 Posts: 56
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | | Wow. I had a little time and did some searching and again, wow. westom is on site after site after site preaching his stuff and calling people dumb and pissing people off for years. And much of his posting seems to be the same CnP as here and this goes back years. . | You could not reply with facts and numbers. To learn this stuff, you first must admit to being scammed. So you post nasty personal attacks. Then your ego will not have to admit to being scammed.
A majority never learned this stuff. Most will move forward to learn what was known even 100 years ago. But a few will always reply with insult. A minority cannot admit to insufficient knowledge. Deny by being nasty.
macgyver655 is a perfect example. Promoted a famous urban myth that only disconnecting can provide protection. Could not explain how to disconnect smoke detectors, dishwasher, furnace, - most everything inside a house. Just knows disconnecting is 100% protection. Why do telcos operates their computers, connected to overhead wires all over town - without damage? macgyver655 could not answer. So he recommends insurance - because 'failure is acceptable'.
Foolishly claims NEC requirements are sufficient for earthing. Never understood simple concepts such as no sharp wire bends, wire not inside metallic conduit, and why the connection must be short. Never learned even a simplest electrical concept: impedance. He is an expert; he need not learn. By posting nasty, nobody will notice his complete electrical ignorance.
He then claims a UPS (with near zero joules) is complete surge protection because retail propaganda said so. Then invented a myth about routine 100,000 amps lightning. When caught lying again, he repeatedly demands that I shut up.
Said "I will no longer have any conversations with you". Then kept posting more nasty replies and denials without electrical facts. Never posts a reason why because he cannot. In rereading, I am shocked. macgyver655 did not post any accurate electrical facts. He posted many myths and lies. But no accurate facts. macgyver655 - if you are going away, then go away. Why did you lie again? Why do you stay to only post insults?
He did not even know protection already exists inside every appliance. And finally posted the only thing he really understands: "blah, blah, blah".
Finally he did not know Zeus runs a master electron control center so that every electron knows where to go. macgyver655, they did not teach that to you in electrician’s school? Otherwise electrons would not know how to find earth ground.
macgyver655 has yet to post electrically cognizant. Even misrepresented how inline current limiters are used. In the tradition of inflated egos, disparaging remarks, and insufficient education, he now posts another cheapshot personal attack. People such as macgyver655 are why it takes so long to explain how surge protection from direct lightning strikes was done even 100 years ago. macgyver655's routine response are more spiteful remarks with a smattering of profanity to obfuscate reality. I could not answer in "yes or no"; therefore it must be wrong. So much anger because the world cannot be explained in "yes or no" answers.
Informed consumers who can learn will then earth one 'whole house' protector. Projectors and everything else - furnace, air conditioner, washing machine, clock radios, GFCIs, smoke detectors, doorbell - everything in a house is protected from the rare and so destructive surge. An event that might occur once every seven years. Then protection already inside every appliance is not overwhelmed. Protection is always about where energy dissipates. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Nasty replies never dispute this reality. However, macgyver655, to state it in a form you do understand. Yes. Is that simple enough for you? Sometime I will give you a tour of Zeus's electron control center. To show you why it is safe to go running naked in a field with a golf club above your head.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You need to go away westom. I spent some more time last night reading your crap on other forums and you do nothing more then abuse people. Time after time forum members have told you to go away. And this has been going on since at least 2001 if not longer. And I read from at least 20 other forums and there were still more.
I actually now consider you a spammer of sorts. If you dont stop your crap I will request that you be banned, like you have been banned from some other forums.
I strongly advise other members here to stop posting to this abuser. I have nothing more to say to you westom other then you have a real problem and need to seek some help.
And I'm ashamed to even have had a conversation with you at all. Your twisted abuse to others is just sickening.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
westom
Joined: 14 Dec 2009 Posts: 56
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | | And I'm ashamed to even have had a conversation with you at all. Your twisted abuse to others is just sickening. | You promised everyone long ago that you would stop replying. When do you tell the truth? When do you post anything that answers the OP's question or relevant to the underlying technology? When do you demonstrate even basic electrical knowledge? You even got inrush current limiters wrong. You are not sorry. You get off on being nasty. If you were honest, you will no longer reply. Good luck with that. The aluminum hat must not be working.
Or for you, a simpler answer. Yes.
For others, a more complicated answer. And without the cheapshots you so love. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
To be honest I am a little surprised at how few others responded in comment in this thread. I tried to stay out of the original conversation until you attacked another knowledgeable member. I commented in their defense. Maybe I am wrong. Perhaps I should be the one to leave here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HaydnG90
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 1356
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Wish I had the time to write this much crap....Hey W'om get a life, man and stop wasting bandwidth.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| westom wrote: | | You even got inrush current limiters wrong. |
And just for the record, did you not read the link I posted pertaining to this? So everyone else is wrong and westom is right. Gee, why do I believe everyone else and not westom. What the hell is wrong with me?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CasetheCorvetteman
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 6326 Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| westom wrote: | | To learn this stuff, you first must admit to being scammed. |
Sounds like a cultist religion really doesnt it... Does he have to relinquish all belongings and assets to the cult when he admits to being scammed?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Geez, I'm gone for a day and all is quiet. Where's my buddy westom. I thought for sure you would have a comment on my posts.
You know, I was a little confused on your post here.
| westom wrote: | You promised everyone long ago that you would stop replying. When do you tell the truth? When do you post anything that answers the OP's question or relevant to the underlying technology? When do you demonstrate even basic electrical knowledge? You even got inrush current limiters wrong. You are not sorry. You get off on being nasty. If you were honest, you will no longer reply. Good luck with that. The aluminum hat must not be working.
Or for you, a simpler answer. Yes.
For others, a more complicated answer. And without the cheapshots you so love. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground. |
I couldn't figure out why you were so insistent on me not posting anymore. I mean why should you care. Then I realized you are threatened by me. You avoid and ignore the real questions I ask you as if I never asked, then you take something I said and try to say its incorrect thinking others here don't have the knowledge to understand and hopefully think you are right. Or you continue with your usual rhetoric of copy and paste insignificant words and links and have even resorted to person attack.
Then you condemn others of their professional work saying it is inferior as to what is required even when it is done according to national code.
Why is it do you think that these national codes are not enough? Just because they are not enough for whole house protection. Well maybe it's because these guys who write the code are smart enough to realize that increasing the requirement of the code earth ground to harness a lightning strike is ridiculous. I mean the codes are pretty stringant and well thought out now, so if it was that simple to just make some minor changes to the earth ground like you say and be able to control that strike, then why not just do it?
So lets look at what your saying. You say that for protection you would need a good earth ground and a breaker box mounted surge protector, something like you posted some links to. Now you dont like the earth ground based on code so lets install triple #2 solid copper wires running almost straight and less then 5 feet to (3), 20 foot ground rods. Now there's a super duper earth ground, "grunt, grunt".
So your neutral/ground line by your theory should be able to send a direct strike harmlessly to earth.
Now we need to protect the incoming hot lines which is where your breaker box mounted device comes into play. So we install the box which is suppose to shunt an incoming surge to earth ground. But what if the strike hits the house directly? It still has to travel through the wiring to get to the whole house protector. So the box isn't much good for a direct house strike.
Now lets look at the box. Did you read those datasheets yet? So lets say a surge comes in the hot lines and comes to the protector box. First that surge must meet the clamping voltage of the box to shunt it to ground. If the clamping voltage is not met then the surge just continues on its way through your house. Someone here I think asked why after a nearby strike that the device was damaged but not their surge suppressor. You stated your usual that it was because of a poor earth ground. Maybe it was more likely that the clamping voltage of the surge suppressor was not met and the surge just passed by and damaged the device. The surge wasn't large enough for the device to send it to earth but large enough to damage the device. Of course this is all speculation but is another possibility.
So back to the box. Lets say its a large enough surge to clamp the device and it send the surge to earth ground. In this scenario the box works wonderfully and does just what it is suppose to do. Protection was achieved. Again, providing it wasn't a small hit on the house.
But, what if that surge exceeded the maximum rating of the box? I mean, look at those datasheets. the max rating of those boxes are not even a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a fraction (probably more) of the joules of a lightning bolt.
So an incoming surge that exceeds the rating of the box will either (1) shunt the maximun capability and allow the rest of the surge to pass right through, (2) damage the box and allow the entire surge through or (3) blow the box off the wall and again let the entire surge right through. And this is even with your super duper triple wire/ground rod earth ground.
So you have been saying that protection is only as good as earth ground but here protection is only as good as that little box you put in as a whole house protector. Your box only has a narrow window in which to achieve its goal.
So now you would probably say then get a larger protection box. All this does is increase the window of operation and would still be a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a lightning bolt. And at what cost now?
Plus this still doesn't help in the event that the house is struck directly.
I do now however think that I my have said an error in this thread, but I'm not even sure if I did say it but I need to correct this if I did. I may have said that 100% whole house protection is not possible and if I did say that then I am incorrect.
What I have learned from this thread is that I already have 100% whole house protection and it is 100 times more reliable that anything you have mentioned here or on any of the other forums you have been posting in for close to 10 years or more.
So my friend. What do you have to say?
Let me guess, more of your same copy and paste rhetoric that pretty much says nothing at all.
It's funny that you are so secretive about yourself. I mean if you had any type of credintials you would think you would use them to support your claims. Even your not wanting to even post what country you are from. Whats the big secret. I saw on other forums where others questioned if you were maybe a woman, not that that matters, and some claim you maybe just a kid doing some ego posting. It would seem odd to be ego posting for almost 10 years but then again to be abusing others with your twisted words for this long seems very odd.
Well whatever your agenda is I really dont care. But if you think you can bully me to stop posting here then you are completely out of touch with reality.
So the moral of the story here is...... even with a super duper earth ground (which national codes dont deem necessary) your box has only a small window of operation and only on an incoming surge, not a direct strike on the house.
Now every buddy only has to decide if its worth all that extra money to increase their small window of protection. And, for protection that they may already have that is 100 times better.
And I hope you have a nice day......
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sparky015
Joined: 12 May 2009 Posts: 1185 Location: Cleveland / Akron, OH
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been on the sidelines watching on this one. Westom's explaination of the theory is right on to what was taught me in college, and have enjoyed reading his theory, just not the extra innings chit chat, which is why I've stayed out.
A few comments, first, I agree, his posts could be a bit more professor-like and less demeaning. If he would do that, I think his posts would be a bit more accepted as his theory is right on, and there is always something to learn when you couple theory to real world applications. Westom, take it as contructive criticsm, or else no one will acept what you say, regardless if you are speaking truth. The ESD post was just not warranted, and lost credibility with a lot of members.
Second, I think on the basic principles, your all saying the same thing. The hangup I think is this: I don't think Westom has said that just earth ground and a whole house protector will protect from every strike, What he has said is that it takes the odds from 1 every seven years to 1 in 60? (I think, can't remember the numbers exactly, but that was the purpose of the years, more of an odds thing). What that is saying is, it takes the probability to near zero, enough that a Best Buy surge protector, or unplugging appliances is not needed unless your luck is REALLY bad. This is why if you look at the datasheets, it's clear it won't save you in every lightening application, but protect your house and it's electrical devices from the vast majority. An APS type device would be more for battery backup and power conditioning if you find you need it for your app than surge protection. With that said, yes, unplugging your appliances is the only way to protect yourself from every situation, but how often does a strike hit close enough and with enough energy to overcome the protection in place? I don't know the answer to that, and I imagine it varies based on your locale, but the odds have to be huge, and I think that's what he's trying to get across, just not in the best way The odds are so large, but if the general public (who lack electrical knowledge) understood that, then the surge protection product manufacturers wouldn't sell their $1000 fancy looking protectors, so they do a little propaganda and paint worst-case scenarios to you so you'll buy.
Hopefully I helped both sides, here. Like I said, enjoyable read accept for the extra batting practice. Westom, work on the post skills a little, and I think your good. You have the knowledge, just need to work on the delivery.
_________________ ~Paul
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sparky015 wrote: | I've been on the sidelines watching on this one. Westom's explaination of the theory is right on to what was taught me in college, and have enjoyed reading his theory, just not the extra innings chit chat, which is why I've stayed out.
A few comments, first, I agree, his posts could be a bit more professor-like and less demeaning. If he would do that, I think his posts would be a bit more accepted as his theory is right on, and there is always something to learn when you couple theory to real world applications. Westom, take it as contructive criticsm, or else no one will acept what you say, regardless if you are speaking truth. The ESD post was just not warranted, and lost credibility with a lot of members.
Second, I think on the basic principles, your all saying the same thing. The hangup I think is this: I don't think Westom has said that just earth ground and a whole house protector will protect from every strike, What he has said is that it takes the odds from 1 every seven years to 1 in 60? (I think, can't remember the numbers exactly, but that was the purpose of the years, more of an odds thing). What that is saying is, it takes the probability to near zero, enough that a Best Buy surge protector, or unplugging appliances is not needed unless your luck is REALLY bad. This is why if you look at the datasheets, it's clear it won't save you in every lightening application, but protect your house and it's electrical devices from the vast majority. An APS type device would be more for battery backup and power conditioning if you find you need it for your app than surge protection. With that said, yes, unplugging your appliances is the only way to protect yourself from every situation, but how often does a strike hit close enough and with enough energy to overcome the protection in place? I don't know the answer to that, and I imagine it varies based on your locale, but the odds have to be huge, and I think that's what he's trying to get across, just not in the best way The odds are so large, but if the general public (who lack electrical knowledge) understood that, then the surge protection product manufacturers wouldn't sell their $1000 fancy looking protectors, so they do a little propaganda and paint worst-case scenarios to you so you'll buy.
Hopefully I helped both sides, here. Like I said, enjoyable read accept for the extra batting practice. Westom, work on the post skills a little, and I think your good. You have the knowledge, just need to work on the delivery.  |
I'm not going to comment directly on your post Sparky but just wanted to clarify your one comment if you were even referring to my comment.
I wasn't referring to unplugging stuff as my having 100% whole house protection. My 100% protection does not require any unplugging in the event of a storm. It actually doesn't require me to do anything. And actually doesn't cost me any additional money.
And if you was not referring to my comment then disregard this post, LOL.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jkruger
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 2435 Location: Carlsbad, CA
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you really want to protect your equipment you can always just cut the power cords off!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sparky015
Joined: 12 May 2009 Posts: 1185 Location: Cleveland / Akron, OH
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: |
I'm not going to comment directly on your post Sparky but just wanted to clarify your one comment if you were even referring to my comment.
I wasn't referring to unplugging stuff as my having 100% whole house protection. My 100% protection does not require any unplugging in the event of a storm. It actually doesn't require me to do anything. And actually doesn't cost me any additional money.
And if you was not referring to my comment then disregard this post, LOL.  |
No, I wasn't singling you or any particlular post out. To be honest I come back to this thread only a few times a week, so I may have been remembering some of the earlier ones wrong, or getting some of the banter mixed in since I have to sift a bit. I think your all on the same page, just some misunderstandings and bad wording that sort of blew up a bit. This happens at my work as well since we are all located around the world and e-mails are used often (sometimes abused), and this is a case where the e-mails would stop and a phone call would happen to clear up where the wording got garbled.
Interesting thread to say the least!
_________________ ~Paul
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sparky015
Joined: 12 May 2009 Posts: 1185 Location: Cleveland / Akron, OH
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jkruger wrote: | If you really want to protect your equipment you can always just cut the power cords off!  |
I always make fun when someone forgets to plug something in and wonders why it's not working. "The box on that TV said it came with wireless built in, but they didn't mean power too!
_________________ ~Paul
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David_Web
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 418 Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think any one is arguing against that you need a really good ground and protector if you want to stay relatively safe if a lightning bolt hit your incoming lines.
Or that it is not possible to protect 100%
Or that overly expensive surge protector is a waste of money just like expensive power cables.
The constant CnP, saying that any in-house protector is useless, UPS won't protect at all (which I have seen it do, died in duty), and numerous attacks and attempts to discredit others just because their posts did not fit in with his vision. And the constant refuse to answer key questions posted by members.
That and many other reasons got people a little ticked off. Which generally leads to a downwards moving spiral. And probably some misunderstanding due to wording didn't help ether.
_________________ SNR of people are ridiculously low.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David_Web
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 418 Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sparky015 wrote: | | I always make fun when someone forgets to plug something in and wonders why it's not working. |
That is really funny when it happens, especially after you make sure they checked, then the service technician gets there and it's unplugged.
Then you have the power button, the one on the monitor does not turn on the computer, period.
Hooking up a printer to a UPS is a good one as well. "it's beeping from the printer". UPS was parked right behind it.
_________________ SNR of people are ridiculously low.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|