Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 

Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Surge protection recommendations
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
Author Message
Cube



Joined: 06 Dec 2009
Posts: 77
Location: IL, USA

Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 8:59 pm    Post subject: Surge protection recommendations

I took down an old Runco (Zenith 851) that had been installed by a home theater installer in the early 90s. Planning to put up a Sony 1272 in its place.

The projector was plugged into an outlet on a private circuit coming from the breaker, but I noticed they used a ground adapter to defeat the grounding prong on the projector's power cord (to prevent loops?). I don't have whole-house surge protection other than the breaker, but the Runco did have its own replaceable fuse on the power supply (which has never blown). The "new" 1272 doesn't.

Would it better to plug the 1272 into an ordinary MOV power strip or just plug it directly into the outlet? I'm not thrilled with the thought of having a MOV hidden above a suspended ceiling. Or am I stupid not to get a whole-house surge protector?
Back to top
emdawgz1



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 7949


Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 9:19 pm    Post subject:

Panamax makes in wall surge protection.

http://www.panamax.com/Products/In-Wall/Default.aspx

_________________
Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
Back to top
View user's photo album (3 photos)
betel



Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 448
Location: Maryville, Tennessee (Just South of Knoxville)

Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 9:21 pm    Post subject:

The problem with local surge protectors is they have to absorb the excess energy which really limits their protection ability. Whereas a whole house surge protector shunts the excess energy to ground before it enters your home. I recently installed a whole house surge protector by Intermatic (IG3240RC). It was about $150. IMO local surge protectors are a waste of money.

Last edited by betel on Sun Jun 06, 2010 9:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
kschmit2



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1141
Location: Heidelberg, Germany

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 12:45 pm    Post subject:

I use Belkin PureAV Power Consoles
Back to top
AnalogRocks
Forum Moderator


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 26706
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 1:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Surge protection recommendations

Cube wrote:
I took down an old Runco (Zenith 851) that had been installed by a home theater installer in the early 90s. Planning to put up a Sony 1272 in its place.

The projector was plugged into an outlet on a private circuit coming from the breaker, but I noticed they used a ground adapter to defeat the grounding prong on the projector's power cord (to prevent loops?). I don't have whole-house surge protection other than the breaker, but the Runco did have its own replaceable fuse on the power supply (which has never blown). The "new" 1272 doesn't.

Would it better to plug the 1272 into an ordinary MOV power strip or just plug it directly into the outlet? I'm not thrilled with the thought of having a MOV hidden above a suspended ceiling. Or am I stupid not to get a whole-house surge protector?


Check out these guys it's an interesting read: http://www.brickwall.com/

_________________
Tech support for nothing

CRT.

HD done right!
Back to top
View user's photo album (27 photos)
WanMan



Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 10270


Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 2:09 pm    Post subject:

betel wrote:
The problem with local surge protectors is they have to absorb the excess energy which really limits there protection ability. Whereas a whole house surge protector shunts the excess energy to ground before it enters your home. I recently installed a whole house surge protector by Intermatic (IG3240RC). It was about $150. IMO local surge protectors are a waste of money.
And if something comes up the ground?

BTW, this path weekend was another lightning feat. I storm smaller than the mall I live behind but showing up red on the radar popped the power to the neighborhood (about 3/4 miles from a sub-station, too) and there went the telephone service again. I didn't discover this Saturday night event until Monday afternoon. Smile

_________________
Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
Back to top
emdawgz1



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 7949


Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 4:51 pm    Post subject:

betel wrote:
The problem with local surge protectors is they have to absorb the excess energy which really limits there protection ability. Whereas a whole house surge protector shunts the excess energy to ground before it enters your home. I recently installed a whole house surge protector by Intermatic (IG3240RC). It was about $150. IMO local surge protectors are a waste of money.


Until your (Tv, Vcr, DVD, B/R player) gets zapped by a lightning strike.

It's not the best solution but its better than nothing.

_________________
Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
Back to top
View user's photo album (3 photos)
Curt Palme
CRT Tech


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 24396
Location: Langley, BC

TV/Projector: All of them!

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 6:04 pm    Post subject:

Two points on this:

-if you have generally clean power like we do here in Vancouver (maybe 3 blackouts a year for a short period of time), then there's really no need for a surge protector, small, big or otherwise. THe hype by the 'plug your stuff into this and it will never fail' companies is ridiculous.

-if you do have surges or frequent lightning hits, then a whole house protector is the way to go.

Keep in mind though that you can protect your AC wiring all you want, but if lightning strikes a telephone pole outside, your AC _might_ be protected (usually not if the strike is very close to your house, the surge protector won't be big enough to absorb the power), but your cable, satellite and telephone lines won't be, and a surge through your cable can blow your TV and cable box and/or anything else.

Best bet if you know a storm is coming is to unplug the cable/satellite and AC cords.
Back to top
betel



Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 448
Location: Maryville, Tennessee (Just South of Knoxville)

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 8:03 pm    Post subject:

WanMan wrote:
betel wrote:
The problem with local surge protectors is they have to absorb the excess energy which really limits there protection ability. Whereas a whole house surge protector shunts the excess energy to ground before it enters your home. I recently installed a whole house surge protector by Intermatic (IG3240RC). It was about $150. IMO local surge protectors are a waste of money.
And if something comes up the ground?

BTW, this path weekend was another lightning feat. I storm smaller than the mall I live behind but showing up red on the radar popped the power to the neighborhood (about 3/4 miles from a sub-station, too) and there went the telephone service again. I didn't discover this Saturday night event until Monday afternoon. Smile


The charge distribution in a cloud is negative on bottom and positive on top (referenced to ground). From what I’ve read, most lightning strikes have a negative charge. Therefore, the potential difference between line to ground is still positive. Fortunately, positive charge strikes are rare and usually occur at the end of lightning activity. For a positive charge strike, not sure there is any practical way to protect against that. All bets are off for very close or direct hits.

Lightning strikes can induce high transient voltages in signal cables such as telephone & television coax. In my HT, I have these cables routed through a Monster active power protector. The Monster box was given to me and I guess it is better than nothing but it does have some pretty lights on it.


Last edited by betel on Thu May 20, 2010 1:14 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
stefuel



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 3353
Location: Green Harbor MA USA

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 10:51 pm    Post subject:

I like my solution very much. I have a giant APC rack mount UPS in my theater equipment rack. Everything associated with the theater including the projector which is 50 feet away from the rack is plugged into it. It has "Smart Boost" and "Smart Trim" which means it monitors the incoming voltage and kicks in if there's about a .04 percent variation in line voltage. It also communicates via RS-232 to my Crestron system to trigger a safe shut-down of my system in the event of a total power failure. The theater will stay running for 7 minutes if the power does not come right back on. The power has gone out many times since I installed it for less than 7 minutes and I never knew it if I was watching a movie. The only indication that there is a power problem in the theater is a pop-up screen on the control touch panel that says "POWER" along with a count down timer.
_________________
Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels

Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
Back to top
David_Web



Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 418
Location: Sweden

Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 4:18 pm    Post subject:

UPS is nice, however not nice to break. Eats a little electricity in the mean time though but it's worth it.

I'm thinking of DIYing that brickwall filter.
Got to find a simple way to keep "bias" running around 2V over peak voltage. Not happy with the resulting ripple current otherwise.
Then follow line voltage as it changes, which it does a lot.

A simple sim shows initial great results though.

Should even have some suitable inductors laying around.

_________________
SNR of people are ridiculously low.
Back to top
westom



Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 56


Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 1:22 am    Post subject: Re: Surge protection recommendations

Cube wrote:
Would it better to plug the 1272 into an ordinary MOV power strip or just plug it directly into the outlet? I'm not thrilled with the thought of having a MOV hidden above a suspended ceiling.
What happens when a protector, rated for hundreds of joules, is eventually challenged by a typically destructive surge. What happens when it must absorb hundreds of thousands of joules? Read its spec numbers. Then view these scary pictures before putting an ineffective protector in the ceiling:
http://www.hanford.gov/rl/?page=556&parent=554
http://www.ddxg.net/old/surge_protectors.htm
http://www.zerosurge.com/HTML/movs.html
http://tinyurl.com/3x73ol : entitled "Surge Protector Fires"
http://www3.cw56.com/news/articles/local/BO63312/
http://www.nmsu.edu/~safety/news/lesson-learned/surgeprotectorfire.htm
http://www.pennsburgfireco.com/fullstory.php?58339

Either the protector circuit disconnects as fast as possible - leaves the surge to confront the appliance. Or those scary pictures result.

Effective protection is always about where energy dissipates. Any posts that do not discuss that may be reciting retail mantra. Myths that promote ineffective plug-in protectors.

Either energy dissipates harmlessly outside the building. Or it must seek earth destructively via appliances. If that energy is inside the building, it must hunt for earth via appliances. Either that energy is outside the building. Or you have surge damage. It is that simple.

An effective protector is installed so that even direct lightning strikes cause no damage. When promoting ineffective protectors, the naive must avoid that reality. Myths come without numbers. The numbers: lightning is typically 20,000 amps. So a minimally sized 'whole house' protector starts at 50,000 amps. Must earth a direct lightning strike. And remain functional. What happens when a direct lightning strikes hits incoming wires? Nobody knows the surge even existed. Energy dissipates harmlessly outside the building.

Every protection layer is defined only by one thing. Only thing that must absorb energy - single point earth ground. Absorb is the secondary protection layer - defined by earth ground near the electric meter and power panel. Also inspect your primary surge protection system:
http://www.tvtower.com/fpl.html

Protection is always about where energy dissipates. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground. You do not want that energy dissipating destructively in the ceiling. Protectors adjacent to appliances can even make appliance damage easier.
Back to top
David_Web



Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 418
Location: Sweden

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 11:16 am    Post subject:

That last link is scary. Thankfully I live in Sweden where this sort of thing would result in prison or heavy fines.

I have a few MOV protecting most electrical equipment. Ill have to check so if it catches fire it won't burn down the house.
Putting a fuse before the MOV is not a bas idea. It's only for "last resort" anyway.
Every substation have real lighting tubes that take any hit. And a direct hit after it should not happen as everything is under ground.
The gas-filled tubes only have a limited life though so I hope they look after them.

My biggest worry is phone line as it has high enough resistance to get hit anywhere. Thankfully ADSL filter took the biggest hit.
Thinking of putting some sort of MOV or other clamp where it enters the house, then have two thin wires before it that can burn off if it hits.
I don't really want to burn the incoming lines.

Between network equipment I have put a bunch of surge protectors, I had them already and no dropped packets yet so why not.
A mix of old UPS and addons that had network protection, thing most of them use diodes I think.
Last time I was a hit on the pone lines the surge traveled through the LAN taking out a few things. The switch lost a few ports, modem and router went and Squeezebox lost it's wired network. Good thing wireless still works.
The ADSL splitter had evaporated the traces in the PCB so it took the most amps and probably saved most of the other equipment.
Electrical was protected by the substation as we only lost power for a few minutes, no other equipment was hurt. Not even CFL that usually dies if you look at it wrong.

_________________
SNR of people are ridiculously low.
Back to top
westom



Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 56


Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 5:25 pm    Post subject:

David_Web wrote:
That last link is scary. Thankfully I live in Sweden where this sort of thing would result in prison or heavy fines. …
Between network equipment I have put a bunch of surge protectors, I had them already and no dropped packets yet so why not.

You missed the point. No protector - not even an earthed 'whole house' protector provides protection. Those scary pictures apply (are legal and occur) in every nation. Install one or one thousand protectors and still not increase protection. A protector is only as effective as the item it connects to. If not connected within meters of earth ground, then a protector does virtually nothing. Earthing is the protection - where energy must dissipate. A protector only connects that energy - within feet - to single point earth ground. Otherwise damage (scary pictures) can result. Does Sweden require all protectors to connect within a meter of earth ground? No. Legal is to use ineffective protectors.

Network damage occurred when a surge was permitted (human error) to find earth destructively inside the building. Energy was permitted inside the building. Every wire inside every cable must connect short to single point earth ground. Either connected directly (ie cable TV, satellite dish). Or connected via a protector (AC electric, telephone). Every wire must have a short connection to the same earthing electrode or system. If not, then energy hunts for earth destructively - such as through plug-in protectors - those scary pictures.

Protection is performed in layers. Each layer only exists at an earth electrode. Earthing must exist where all wires enter a building at a service entrance - a common point. That is secondary protection. Primary protection is located at utility transformers - as demonstrated by tvtower.com pictures. Where does that UPS connect within a meter to earth? It doesn’t.

Phone wires do not have high resistance. Resistance is irrelevant. Impedance is the critical number. Therefore a connection from each protector to earth must have no splices, be short, no sharp wire bends, separated from other non-grounding conductors. not inside metallic conduit, etc for low 'impedance'. Telcos enhance protection by locating each protector up to 50 meters distant from electronics. Separation (increased impedance) means better protection. To be effective, a protector must connect as short as possible to earth. And is located distant from appliances. Separation between appliances and protector increases protection. A protector too close to appliances may earth a surge destructively through a nearby appliance.

MOVs are not used on phone lines due to excessive capacitance. In North America, every phone line already has a superior 'whole house' protector. Therefore surges permitted inside a building often find earth destructively via telephone appliances - ie network ports. Incoming on AC electric. Outgoing via phone lines. Wild speculation usually says a surge entered on phone line. Nonsense. Outgoing to earth is via communication appliances when a free ‘whole house’ protector exists on phone lines. When no such protector exists at the mains breaker box. Damage because energy was permitted inside the building. Nothing inside a building can effectively avert damage.

Only homeowners are responsible for their earth ground. No earth ground means no effective protection. How to make an 'installed for free' protector even better? Upgrade and enhance single point earth ground. Effective protectors are within meters of earth. And distant from electronics. Protection is always about where energy dissipates. Either a protector (or UPS) connects short to earth - or does virtually nothing.

View numbers for that UPS. Near zero surge protection is above zero. So a sales brochure can claim it does 100% protection. UPS only does effective protection when hearsay replaces numbers and well proven science. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground.
Back to top
Cube



Joined: 06 Dec 2009
Posts: 77
Location: IL, USA

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 12:12 am    Post subject:

Forgive me for being obtuse, but what exactly is the best thing to do then? Avoid MOV strips entirely and make sure all the wiring coming into the house is grounded effectively at the breaker box?

Also, what's the deal with these expensive "series-type" surge protectors?
Back to top
westom



Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 56


Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 2:56 am    Post subject:

Cube wrote:
Forgive me for being obtuse, but what exactly is the best thing to do then? Avoid MOV strips entirely and make sure all the wiring coming into the house is grounded effectively at the breaker box?

In any location where damage cannot happen (ie telephone Central Office), power strip protectors and expensive series mode filters are not used. Damage must not occur. So they use a well proven (100+ year old) technology - 'whole house' protectors and earthing.

That power strip or series mode filter will not stop what three miles of sky could not. Obviously. The NIST (US government research agency) says what any protector must do:
> You cannot really suppress a surge altogether, nor "arrest" it. What these protective devices do is
> neither suppress nor arrest a surge, but simply divert it to ground, where it can do no harm.

Nothing to divert to means no protection. No 'magic box' solution exists. Protection starts with the only item always required in every protection system: single point earth ground.

No way around this reality. Either energy is absorbed harmlessly in earth. Or energy must hunt for earth ground destructively inside the building. Repeated often because so many cannot get it - the protector is not protection.

Described were protectors that are effective. For example, for AC mains, it must conduct at least 50,000 amps and remain functional. Either connected short to the best earth ground - or inferior protection exists. ‘Whole house’ protectors have that dedicated wire so that a ‘less than 3 meter’ connection to earth exists. No plug-in solution has that always required earthing wire. Will not even discuss earth - to protect high profit margins.

Earthing so critical that munitions dumps pioneered a superior earthing technique - Ufer ground. Because no surge must ever cause an explosion. Surge protection is routinely that effective. Some examples:
http://scott-inc.com/html/ufer.htm
http://www.psihq.com/iread/ufergrnd.htm
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00141.html

Other earthing techniques exist. But earthing - not some magic box - provides the protection. Difficult to get so many to stop thinking in terms of a magic box - because retail propaganda is so hard to undo once it has been believed. Protection is the earthing system – and how surges are connected to it. Repeated because so many find it so hard to stop thinking what Monster and APC have told them to believe.

Polyphaser's highly regarded application notes:
http://www.polyphaser.com/technical_notes.aspx

In every case, Polyphaser discusses the always required item in any protection system. The NIST then uses that same concept to define inferior protectors:
> A very important point to keep in mind is that your surge protector will work by diverting the surges to
> ground. The best surge protection in the world can be useless if grounding is not done properly.

See that power strip, Brickwall, or UPS protector? The NIST did not call it ineffective. The NIST called it 'useless'. Where is a short connection to earth? Why does the manufacturer avoid a discussion about earthing. Why does their protector not even list protection from each type of surge in the numeric spec sheets? Because even the manufacturer does not claim effective protection. How does it magically make hundreds of thousands of joules just magically disappear? Why do they never discuss energy? Somehow that Brickwall will absorb hundreds of thousands of joules? Where are their numbers that say that? Or do they only make subjective claims.

Protection is always - always - about where energy dissipates. Above is much reading. How it has been done for over 100 years. Your telco CO uses this technique to make over 100 surges per thunderstorm irrelevant. You do same to make irrelevant the one typically destructive surge every seven years. Earth ground – what they will not discuss to protect highly profitable sales. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground.
Back to top
David_Web



Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 418
Location: Sweden

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:51 pm    Post subject:

Most low voltage distribution is done under ground unless you are way outside a city, and even then it isn't that bad.
I'm not sure how the grounding is done in this house, but lightning won't really hit anything after the last substation. And before that there is usually a bigger substation before it goes in the air.

I am not trying to protect from a direct hit as it really won't happen, and if it does the lighting bolt is already in the house and it's game over.
I am trying to protect equipment from burning out due to a transient caused by lightning (which is pretty much the only thing causing them here).

I am pretty sure the power into the house did not flinch that hit, and the first device in (ADSL splitter) had burned(evaporated) traces where the two cables comes in. It is possible that it found ground through the modems wallwart or similar.

Network equipment usually uses an isolation transformer meaning no ground between them, you only have to worry about differential voltage on each pair. (unless you use a cable with ground and the equipment supports it)
Not sure if the cheaper modem and switch that died did though. Have to check.

100m phone line gets you around 17ohm or so, is that not high resistance compared to power lines?
Impedance will only be higher, although not that much as the lines are good for ADSL speeds.

SPICE simulation of a brickwall type filter (series mode) shows good results against short transients.
1000V lands around 110A through the second 180uF stage.
The coils actually drops all 1kV of the hit at first but then climbs to 100V above normal voltage.
100kW is dumped across the coil and 36kW into the capacitor.

Obviously this is only first simulations but it shows potential to stop otherwise harmful surges.


Will it stop a direct lightning hit? No. That simply won't happen. You can't capture or absorb lightning, you can only hope to divert it to ground.

I will read the links later. It's late here if the post seems slight disoriented =)

_________________
SNR of people are ridiculously low.
Back to top
westom



Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 56


Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 8:41 am    Post subject:

David_Web wrote:
Most low voltage distribution is done under ground unless you are way outside a city, and even then it isn't that bad.
I'm not sure how the grounding is done in this house, but lightning won't really hit anything after the last substation.

Makes little difference whether wires are overhead or underground. Either can carry a direct lightning strike into the building.

For example, lightning strikes a tree 10 meters distant from a cow. Therefore that cow is killed by a direct strike. Lightning is a connection from a cloud to charges maybe 5 kilometers distant. Therefore the shortest path is three km to the tree and 4 km through earth. Also in that path is the cow. Up its hind legs and down its fore legs. Killed cow is also part of that shorter electrical path.

Also explains why underground wires easily carry a surge into the building. Why all wires must connect to single point earth ground before entering a building. Else carry a surge - ie a direct lightning strike - into the building. A Polyphaser application note describes destructive surges via underground wires because these principles were violated (ie underground cable vault):
http://www.polyphaser.com/techdocs/telco%20and%20dataline.pdf

You are trying to protect from a direct lightning hit if you are trying to protect equipment burned out due to a transient caused by lightning. Lesser transients are routinely made irrelevant by protection already inside appliances. How often are you replacing dimmer switches and GFCIs? These devices with no external protection routinely make lesser transients irrelevant. Computers, et al are required to withstand even higher voltages without damage.

Surges are current sources. That means voltage increases as necessary to maintain a constant current flow. Votlage simply increases on the brickwall as necessary to blow through. Or simply uses its safety ground wire to completely bypass the brickwall. That brickwall is not used in facilities where damage must never happen. Surge voltage increases, as necessary, to blow through that brickwall. To stop or block a surge, a brickwall must absorb hundreds of thousands of joules.

Your concern is surges that can overwhelm existing protection already inside appliances. That means the potentially destructive surge (and lesser transients) are earthed before entering a building.

An underground ethernet cable interconnects two buildings. A struck first building can act like a lightning rod connected to computers in the second building. Surge damage in the second building because ethernet wires do not connect (where entering) to single point earth ground for each building.

Effective protection from all surges (including direct lightning strikes) costs about $1 per protected appliance. Necessary if wires are underground or overhead. Any protector without that always required earthing does not provide (and does not claim to provide) effective protection. In every case, protection is always about where energy dissipates. Each protection layer is only defined by its earthing. A protector with no earthing means no effective protection. No way around principles well understood and demonstrated even 100 years ago. Where does energy dissipate?
Back to top
macgyver655



Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 8508


Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 2:10 pm    Post subject:

Alright.................... I said this before and I'll say it again......and I think Curt said it here somewhere.............................There is only ONE way to protect your equipment from a lightning strike whether its at your house or down the road some miles.

UNPLUG IT


Surge protection is for minor variations in the normal flow of electricity into your home.
Back to top
David_Web



Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 418
Location: Sweden

Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 4:54 pm    Post subject:

And the times you can't unplug?
I do try to unplug most things but you can't unplug fridge etc.

Ill have too look over the ground. Maybe add one if needed. Can't hurt.
Otherwise the electrical should be fine as no dimmers or other equipment is broken yet.
That rebar/concrete method looks easy to do. Just use a grid meant for concrete reinforcement and connect it to ground. (after digging it down).
Code requires that any conductive reinforcement of concrete is connected to ground anyway.

How about the phone line?
I think it enters at another location, what is the most effective way to deal with that?
That is obviously the weak point right now.
Could possibly make a separate ground for it right outside if needed. Have to look it up.

I am thinking of adding a fiber link between the modem and router as I happen to have one, a little last resort paranoia maybe.

_________________
SNR of people are ridiculously low.
Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 1 of 8
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum