| Author |
Message |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:56 pm Post subject: Plasma technology Question |
|
|
Plasma flat panel technology uses a mixture of noble gases that when excited turn into a plasma. This plasma gives off UV light that excites the metal halide coatings on the sub-pixels, which in turn give off a photon of color (red, green, and blue). I get all of this.
'Each cell on a plasma display has to be precharged before it is due to be illuminated (otherwise the cell would not respond quickly enough) and this precharging means the cells cannot achieve a true black.' I get that, too.
So, because the need for pre-charging is there then I interpret this to mean there is a small amount of plasma being generated, and in turn a small amount UV, and thus a small amount of visible light. So, the question is why not coat the metal halide phosphor layer with a UV filtering coating to which there is a threshold of UV needed (or or threshold of plasma energies)?
We know there is already a UV filter somewhere on the panel otherwise we'd be getting those tans we didn't ask for. Of course, I wonder now exactly how Pioneer is achieving better (reported, not observed) black levels. Anyone?
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First I'll say that the pre charging that your calling it is so faint that you cannot see it unless the room is almost completely dark. So it is not even close to being bright enough to affect visible black level.
Second, I dont know where your getting your info from but I like to read it. It is somewhat contradictory to what I have read.
Such as metal halide and UV light.
Last edited by macgyver655 on Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:41 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
changed for correctness.
Last edited by macgyver655 on Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:40 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | | Oh, and did you ever think that maybe the 3 color are being used to make black? |
Huh?
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: | | Oh, and did you ever think that maybe the 3 color are being used to make black? |
Huh?
SC |
LOL. I just went back to edit that. It only applies to paint..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought you were off in subtractive land.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | First I'll say that the pre charging that your calling it is so faint that you cannot see it unless the room is almost completely dark. So it is not even close to being bright enough to affect visible black level.
Second, I don't know where your getting your info from but I like to read it. It is somewhat contradictory to what I have read.
Such as metal halide and UV light. | All you had to do was click the link I provided and know where I was reading it from.
What exactly does Wiki report that seems contradictory and to what are you reading from?
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The problem I have with your explanation is your statement that the UV photon gives off the light. The UV photon actually contacts the phosphor and the phosphors atom jumps to a higher level and releases the visible light. The UV photon never exits the chamber.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Another thing I might add is that the front glass on a plasma is tinted which darkens the affect of the panel prime. This would help in the affect of the prime on the black levels.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WanMan wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: | First I'll say that the pre charging that your calling it is so faint that you cannot see it unless the room is almost completely dark. So it is not even close to being bright enough to affect visible black level.
Second, I don't know where your getting your info from but I like to read it. It is somewhat contradictory to what I have read.
Such as metal halide and UV light. | All you had to do was click the link I provided and know where I was reading it from.
What exactly does Wiki report that seems contradictory and to what are you reading from? |
Read about pre-charging.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WanMan wrote: | | WanMan wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: | First I'll say that the pre charging that your calling it is so faint that you cannot see it unless the room is almost completely dark. So it is not even close to being bright enough to affect visible black level.
Second, I don't know where your getting your info from but I like to read it. It is somewhat contradictory to what I have read.
Such as metal halide and UV light. | All you had to do was click the link I provided and know where I was reading it from.
What exactly does Wiki report that seems contradictory and to what are you reading from? |
Read about pre-charging. |
Well first off that's a patent application and has no merit by itself. Second, I know what pre-charge is and I have seen it on so many applications its not even funny. Third, I have seen a plasmas black level. Forth, that is to long for me to bother reading so how about you give my a summary of what you think they are saying.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm, I thought the initial paragraph described exactly the nature of pre-charge in a plasma panel. That's not much reading. But, if you wish to attribute the minimum black level attainable in a plasma flat panel to something else, I'd be more than interested in hearing about it. I have already asked you for this information once before.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WanMan wrote: | | Hmm, I thought the initial paragraph described exactly the nature of pre-charge in a plasma panel. That's not much reading. But, if you wish to attribute the minimum black level attainable in a plasma flat panel to something else, I'd be more than interested in hearing about it. I have already asked you for this information once before. |
What information have you asked me for before. Is there a question here or are you just making a statement. That first paragraph is just talking about panel electrode function. Unless I'm reading the wrong one.
I dont know how old that patent app. is or if it was even ever implemented, but a plasma panel is pre-charged when it is first turned on and stays charged until about 5 minutes after you turn if off. You cannot see the prime even with moderate room light. But if you mostly darken the room you can then barely see it. Try it for yourself.
The front glass of a plasma is also tinted which darkens the affect even more.
The point I'm getting at is if this very, very slight prime that you can only see with room lights off is going to affect the black level so that it bothers you.......... you have bigger problems..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | | WanMan wrote: | | Hmm, I thought the initial paragraph described exactly the nature of pre-charge in a plasma panel. That's not much reading. But, if you wish to attribute the minimum black level attainable in a plasma flat panel to something else, I'd be more than interested in hearing about it. I have already asked you for this information once before. |
What information have you asked me for before. Is there a question here or are you just making a statement. That first paragraph is just talking about panel electrode function. Unless I'm reading the wrong one.
I dont know how old that patent app. is or if it was even ever implemented, but a plasma panel is pre-charged when it is first turned on and stays charged until about 5 minutes after you turn if off. You cannot see the prime even with moderate room light. But if you mostly darken the room you can then barely see it. Try it for yourself.
The front glass of a plasma is also tinted which darkens the affect even more.
The point I'm getting at is if this very, very slight prime that you can only see with room lights off is going to affect the black level so that it bothers you.......... you have bigger problems..  | Look above and you will see where ... "What exactly does Wiki report that seems contradictory and to what are you reading from?"
I wanted to read what you were reading since you were questioning what I was reading.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, you want to see reading material from which my comments come from.
Well first we have the pre charge issue. That is from experience which is why I said try it for yourself. You can see the pre charge if you turn the lights off with no image but you cant with lights on. Better yet, send it a black image with room lights on and see if it looks black or if you can see the pre charge. You can read all you want but what your blacks look like is all that really matters.
As far as the UV comment I made, I believe I questioned your interpretation and I explained why. The process I explained can easily be found but I'll also comment again. The UV proton is not visible to humans. It is created in the plasma gas when more electrons are introduced causing an instability in the plasma atom which then throws off the UV proton. The only purpose of the UV proton is to collide with the phospher atom which then throws off visible light of the color based on the phospher coating mixture. The UV proton then no longer exists.
These words are not a copy and paste. These are my own words from the various plasma training manuals and documents I have already read years ago.
I will go back later and reread the wiki link you posted but I wll first say the wiki is not always a good source for accurate info. But I will reread it with an open mind but I'm not sure if what it said or what you said is why I contradicted it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|