|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So what if I were to say that age(years) by itself has no affect on the performance of it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | | So what if I were to say that age(years) by itself has no affect on the performance of it? |
Well if you properly re condition the capacitor that was stored for a long time then id say your statement can be correct.
except from that cap site:
Parts kept in long-term storage (2-3 years or more) may have very high leakage when first used and should not be subjected to full rated voltage (and should be current limited) until the leakage falls to normal. Reforming of the dielectric can be done by applying a voltage that is slowly increased to maximum over a period of several hours, with current limited to rated leakage current. Some manufacturers have published such elaborate recommendations for reconditioning capacitors after long storage that it seems easier to just buy new ones.
ok mac, what are you trying to get at with all this secrecy?
I'm Intrigued
Athanasios
_________________ Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan
One Smart Dog!!!
Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| draganm wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: | | Can you explain this better? Internal voltage leakage? 20%? | they vary in capacitance by up to 20% from rated spec's as new. So a 470 UF cap might only store 376. Once that number gets to 30% or more I consider that a leak, maybe not the best word to describe it but power that was designed to be stored and discharged by the cap under controled conditions is now just flowing straight thru. |
Ahhh, so it incorrect to say internal voltage leakage because its not the affect you were trying to say. Your talking about when a cap is out of range of its rated value. Power will not flow through it.
But let me just specify that were talking electrolytic caps in this discussion for now. There are other types that will short when they fail.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Nashou66 wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: | | So what if I were to say that age(years) by itself has no affect on the performance of it? |
Well if you properly re condition the capacitor that was stored for a long time then id say your statement can be correct.
except from that cap site:
Parts kept in long-term storage (2-3 years or more) may have very high leakage when first used and should not be subjected to full rated voltage (and should be current limited) until the leakage falls to normal. Reforming of the dielectric can be done by applying a voltage that is slowly increased to maximum over a period of several hours, with current limited to rated leakage current. Some manufacturers have published such elaborate recommendations for reconditioning capacitors after long storage that it seems easier to just buy new ones.
ok mac, what are you trying to get at with all this secrecy?
I'm Intrigued
Athanasios |
Ok, so what if its a cap that has occasional usage, such as our projectors which is the main topic of discussion?
Would age(years) be an issue?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Nashou66 wrote: | Mac, what would you do?
nashou |
This is suppose to be a learning lesson for many. I think many are confused. Kinda like mythbusters. A discussion of opinions and facts.
I was really hoping to get alot more opinions here but I think many are afraid to post. But I think alot here are googling and learning which is a good thing.
I see a lot of post with suggestions of cap change based on consistent reasons. So I figured we'd investigate these reasons and try and place facts with them and see how it all pans out.
Since age and temp seems to be common suggested reasons then thats where we should explore first.
As far as the process I'm using for this discussion I feel is better then just writing up some paragraphs that would be boring and possibly disregarded without basis.
As you already stated...you are intrigued.
People learn better when curious.
Yes I taught classes years ago but not electronics.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, good answer and this is what i hope you were doing.
Now, I googled stuff long ago and have hundreds of book marks from past AVS, Curtplame.com ,AVforums, and just almost every passive component company application data sheets. I just have got very interested in Electronics.
I also change caps out with newer technology, better ratings on all parameters for the fun of it and in a hope it will help my beloved PJ's last longer and give optimal performance.
At the onset of my dive into electronics first changed out some caps on my marquee because i found they were in fact leaking, a few popped tops. this was in my first marquee 8000. the caps were in the LVPS, leakers, then the HDM one popped cap. and another leaker on the CVA. I had so much enjoyment that i began to google all I could about upgrading parts in audio components and so forth, learning about ESR, ESL, voltage ratings, polar vs non polar film cap types, dialectics, resistor types, op amps etc.
Then I was turned to the P.O.O.G.E chronicles by Boilermaker. lots of interesting things in those articles and lots that can be applied to our PJ's POOGE for those who do not know stands for Progressive Optimization Of Generic Electronics. they would take older design or mass produced audio gear and some Video (DVD and Laser Disc) and look for ways to improve the equipment by only really changing out the generic parts with newer or better suited parts, not much in design changes but they did do that as well.
So i thought if it works there lets try it here. so thats how I began looking for better components for our Pj's. even if the parts I was replacing were not worn or failing, I just put in a better spec'd part or altered the values of certain parameters according to much of what found done by previous people.
there are still lots of things I have found as recently this theory by Ivor Catt "Nonsense about so-called “self-resonant frequency” of a capacitor."
Now there is some interesting stuff he puts out there, if you have not looked over his writings and theories i think you should.
here some interesting stuff here, Scandals in Electromagnetic Theory
Athanasios
_________________ Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan
One Smart Dog!!!
Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | Ok, so what if its a cap that has occasional usage, such as our projectors which is the main topic of discussion?
Would age(years) be an issue? |
Any takers?
Come on Open opinions welcome. No consequences if incorrect.... What you you thinking?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wallace123456
Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 2236 Location: Northwest VA area
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting article Don. Did you pick out the part in there that pertains to my questions on would age(years) be of any issue?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sparky015
Joined: 12 May 2009 Posts: 1185 Location: Cleveland / Akron, OH
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: | Ok, so what if its a cap that has occasional usage, such as our projectors which is the main topic of discussion?
Would age(years) be an issue? |
Any takers?
Come on Open opinions welcome. No consequences if incorrect.... What you you thinking? |
Ok, I'll inject my opinion. Age comes in to play, but not on projectors this new. I just recently recapped a 1940s tube radio because they finally leaked to the point of failure. That's an extreme case, but a new technology cap is not going to be bad based on age alone. I would not change caps for the simple fact that it's on a '95 vintage projector. I would in fact look change it if by looking at the schematic and seeing that it is a critical value and being driven hard. I mean "look" as in measuring it to see if it's bad, not necessarily changing it because you found a better spec cap out there. The POOGE theory does not always apply to electronics. Sure, there are cases where you can change an op amp or cap for another with less noise, ESR, etc., but electronics incorporate a a lot of design work. A basic cap may be all that's needed in a given circuit.
Heat plays a major part on any electronics. My day job is to take standard 85C-105C electronics, and make them last 2000 hours without failure at temperatures in the 175-200C all the while seening 12G shock and vibration. You wouldn't believe how fast you can kill a component by just applying heat. With that said, you again have to know the temperatures your applicaiton is seeing, and you have to understand the load the cap is undertaking.
My two cents!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very good, and correct. Based on the links posted here and others, we have determined that age(years) has no affect on cap performance. The only age related issue would be the sealant breaking down and allowing the fluid to leak out. But these sealants are good for decades.
But also know that cleaning boards with solvents can cause breakdown of the sealant and cause premature leakage so care must be given with cleaners and board wash.
We also now know that long term storage has little affect. Tests have consistently shown that 3 to 5 years dormancy yield no change and require no reforming. After that time they may require reforming but this can be accomplished by just using the device for 1/2 hour without disturbance allowing the process to take place. We found that even the defense dept doesn't throw out stock until 12 to 15 years which also means they would install and use a cap that is under this age limit and for who knows what time amount after that. And I'm sure that's premature by regular standards.
So if your projector has been stored for more then 4 to 5 years I would suggest turning it on without messing with it and just let it sit there and run for 1/2 to 1 hour. You could mute the tubes during this process. Then shut it down. Next startup should be fine providing there wasn't a problem to begin with.
If you use it occasionally then there are no issues.
So age(years) is not an issue.
If no one disagrees then we can continue. I'll continue in a few hours to see if anyone responds.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: | Ok, so what if its a cap that has occasional usage, such as our projectors which is the main topic of discussion?
Would age(years) be an issue? |
Any takers? Come on Open opinions welcome. | Old EL caps dry out, it's a known problem and there's no theory involved,
| Quote: | | Actually, the most common failure in aluminum electrolytics (at least for through-hole aluminums) is not loss of capacitance or leakage, but increase in ESR, due to loss of water from the electrolyte. | chain reaction goes something like this
dry cap= high Resistance cap= hot cap= bad cap or underperforming cap.
| macgyver655 wrote: | | No consequences if incorrect.... What you you thinking? | if this is just a friendly discussion then there really shouldn't be any wrong answers right? there's different opinion's on the subject even among Enineers who design and develop this stuff
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| draganm wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: | Ok, so what if its a cap that has occasional usage, such as our projectors which is the main topic of discussion?
Would age(years) be an issue? |
Any takers? Come on Open opinions welcome. | Old EL caps dry out, it's a known problem and there's no theory involved,
| Quote: | | Actually, the most common failure in aluminum electrolytics (at least for through-hole aluminums) is not loss of capacitance or leakage, but increase in ESR, due to loss of water from the electrolyte. | chain reaction goes something like this
dry cap= high Resistance cap= hot cap= bad cap or underperforming cap.
| macgyver655 wrote: | | No consequences if incorrect.... What you you thinking? | if this is just a friendly discussion then there really shouldn't be any wrong answers right? there's different opinion's on the subject even among Enineers who design and develop this stuff |
I was waiting for you Drag. I was going to PM you and state that I did not start this topic in any reference to what you do. But I forgot. You have already proven that your changing bad caps with the pics you posted. I started this more so based on many non tech comments on cap failures based on non failure. So relaaaaaaaaaaaaax.
So do you still want me to comment on your post?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am relaxed, for me that's about a 30% rage index. Sure, you can state whatever you feel about this or my comments. Just FYI, What's argued on this board doesn't really seem to affect what i do anyway. Kal told me this early on but I didn't believe it at first.
Oh and those nasty leaky caps I posted a pic of, that Convergence board actually worked just fine after being re-conditioned. i have to admit I didn't test it prior with those leakers in there though.....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wallace123456
Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 2236 Location: Northwest VA area
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: |
Interesting article Don. Did you pick out the part in there that pertains to my questions on would age(years) be of any issue? |
Yep. Even before I found the article, my thought was that the materials themselves would lose their values over time; why, I don't know, but that was my thinking.
wallace
_________________ Life Is Good, But BBQ Is Better! BBQ Competition Team
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wallace123456 wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: |
Interesting article Don. Did you pick out the part in there that pertains to my questions on would age(years) be of any issue? |
Yep. Even before I found the article, my thought was that the materials themselves would lose their values over time; why, I don't know, but that was my thinking.
wallace |
Oh, wait. Does that mean you think age(years) is a factor in cap life? Other then a sealant issue?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| draganm wrote: | I am relaxed, for me that's about a 30% rage index. Sure, you can state whatever you feel about this or my comments. Just FYI, What's argued on this board doesn't really seem to affect what i do anyway. Kal told me this early on but I didn't believe it at first.
Oh and those nasty leaky caps I posted a pic of, that Convergence board actually worked just fine after being re-conditioned. i have to admit I didn't test it prior with those leakers in there though..... |
Ok. I'll answer directly in your quote.
macgyver655 wrote:
macgyver655 wrote:
Ok, so what if its a cap that has occasional usage, such as our projectors which is the main topic of discussion?
Would age(years) be an issue?
Any takers? Very Happy Come on Smile Open opinions welcome.
Old EL caps dry out, it's a known problem and there's no theory involved,
This would be correct, but not from age itself. From use. We will be discussing this next. No one is saying caps dont wear out. Its what influences the wear and can it be altered.
Quote:
Actually, the most common failure in aluminum electrolytics (at least for through-hole aluminums) is not loss of capacitance or leakage, but increase in ESR, due to loss of water from the electrolyte.
chain reaction goes something like this
dry cap= high Resistance cap= hot cap= bad cap or underperforming cap.
Again true. But also again not from age itself but from use.
macgyver655 wrote:
No consequences if incorrect.... What you you thinking?
if this is just a friendly discussion then there really shouldn't be any wrong answers right? there's different opinion's on the subject even among Enineers who design and develop this stuff
Well as far as wrong answer then how about if there is a difference of opinion it is accommodated with some sort of fact. But I dont think your really disagreeing here yet. Age alone it not a factor, agreed?
As I continue I'm sure your going to be in agreement with it. I myself have changed tooooooooo many caps to say that they dont go bad. I just want everyone here to have a good understanding and hopefully comments will be more substantial.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nashou66 wrote: | this age thing has been discussed all over the internet and its tiring , some EE's thing it matters others don't. lets move on to the next topic about capacitors.
Athanasios |
Hey, pull your underwear out of your crack....
So your in agreement also. Age itself is not a factor?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|