|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emdawgz1 wrote: | | MikeEby wrote: | Around 100 Blu-ray, 10 HD-DVD's and 50 SD-DVDs. I stopped buying SD-DVD's years ago and started renting when I found out about the new HD formats coming.
Recently I started ripping them to a Media Server....Now I can access all off the HD Movies within seconds with the remote using Media Browser running in Windows 7 Media Center.
Mike |
How do you like windows 7? Worth the upgrade??? |
I'm still running Windows 7 RC 32 bit, it seems ok...Media Center seems is much impoved...If your upgrading over XP yes worth the upgrade...Over Vista with all the latest patches and service pack...questionable.
I'm a big Terminal Service user for testing software....So for me Ultimate is almost a requirement and is kind of pricey, plus I'm a cheap ass so I probably will not upgrade all of my machines for a while.
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dturco
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 3778 Location: Eastern Shore Maryland
TV/Projector: Runco DLP VX-3000i Marquee 9500 parts doner
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MikeEby wrote: | | emdawgz1 wrote: | | MikeEby wrote: | Around 100 Blu-ray, 10 HD-DVD's and 50 SD-DVDs. I stopped buying SD-DVD's years ago and started renting when I found out about the new HD formats coming.
Recently I started ripping them to a Media Server....Now I can access all off the HD Movies within seconds with the remote using Media Browser running in Windows 7 Media Center.
Mike |
How do you like windows 7? Worth the upgrade??? |
I'm still running Windows 7 RC 32 bit, it seems ok...Media Center seems is much impoved...If your upgrading over XP yes worth the upgrade...Over Vista with all the latest patches and service pack...questionable.
I'm a big Terminal Service user for testing software....So for me Ultimate is almost a requirement and is kind of pricey, plus I'm a cheap ass so I probably will not upgrade all of my machines for a while.
Mike |
I am waay out of my knowledge base here so....
I have an Acer dual core 160 gig drive running windows Vista. It is 2 years old and Vista came with it It only has a multi drive DVD no Blu-Ray,
Amd chip and Nivida sound card?
So do you just download the movies to the hard drive and that's it, and do you use Netflix or some equivalent to do this ?
_________________ Firefly rules. Can't stop the signal.
http://www.hulu.com/firefly
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Willie
Joined: 13 May 2006 Posts: 169 Location: Green Bay
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emdawgz1 wrote: |
How do you like windows 7? Worth the upgrade??? |
I am using Win 7 RC64 with Media Browser as the front end. I thnk it is the best OS MS has ever done. Media Browser is a pretty nice plug-in.
Oh yeah, 250 Blu-ray stored as MKV's plus about 30-40 DVD's and several years worth of Grey's Anatomy (WAF). I use an unRaid server about 8TB.
Willie
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emdawgz1
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 7949
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Willie wrote: | | emdawgz1 wrote: |
How do you like windows 7? Worth the upgrade??? |
I am using Win 7 RC64 with Media Browser as the front end. I thnk it is the best OS MS has ever done. Media Browser is a pretty nice plug-in.
Oh yeah, 250 Blu-ray stored as MKV's plus about 30-40 DVD's and several years worth of Grey's Anatomy (WAF). I use an unRaid server about 8TB.
Willie |
What do you use to rip b/r to mkv???
_________________ Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Willie
Joined: 13 May 2006 Posts: 169 Location: Green Bay
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use a combination of AnyDVDHD, eac3to and Makemkv. There is a howto thread on AVS that is a bazillion pages long; there may even be one here. Mike Eby has written a front end for eac3to, however I just use the command line.
Willie
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:42 pm Post subject: Re: How many movies do you have? |
|
|
| dturco wrote: | I was shocked to find out how many I have since, I've seen every one at least twice Many off them a whole lot more, I mean a whoooole lot more
<snip>
Total Movies/shows........ 317
|
Either you have no life or you are exaggerating. If you watched one disc per night, then it would take you almost 2 years to watch all of your discs twice and since you claim to have watched many "a whole lot more", then means over 2 years to watch all. Assuming a typical "frequent viewing pattern" of say 3 discs per week, it will take you just over 4 years to watch all of your discs twice.
The above illustrates the simple waste of money it is to purchase discs. One does not have nearly the time in life to watch an ever increasing number of owned discs multiple times.
Using either an online or local rental model, we can calculate the average per rental cost of between $2 and $3 (lets use $3 which is blockbusters current 1 night price even though netflix is cheaper). Let's assume an average blu ray purchase price of $18. Let's assume an EXTREMELY high side average viewing per disc is about 1.5 or so (half of all discs you watch you watch twice--way more than reality). Note that for the purposes of this, I have assumed an honest person, thus no content is stolen.
So, the average cost per disc of renting is $4.50. The average cost of purchasing is $18. That means purchasing costs $13.50 per disc more.
If you own 300 discs, that means you have spent $4050 more than you had to!!!!
Let's assume that you only buy discs that you watch 3 times or more (again we hit the point that this is impractical as people don't have that much time, so lets constrain this to a total of say 300 discs as if you owned 1000 discs, you could not watch them all three times).
For 3 viewings, purchasing the discs cost you $2700 more than renting.
Now, for those people that have in excess of 500 discs, they have clearly spent over $5000 on discs that they didn't need to spend FOR THE EXACT SAME VIEWING EXPERIENCE. In other words, for $5000 they got a little convenience and (maybe) bragging rights.
Doesn't it make more sense to spend that $5000 on your theater an actually get something for it--namely a better movie watching experience on EVERY MOVIE YOU WATCH?
Do so few people really understand the concept of ROI?
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dturco
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 3778 Location: Eastern Shore Maryland
TV/Projector: Runco DLP VX-3000i Marquee 9500 parts doner
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have no life, is a bit harsh.
I have been buying movies for more than 10 years and don't watch much over the air T.V. because even with 80 channels of cable, there is nothing on I want to see.
I enjoy watching movies. I buy nearly all of them used for less than $8. Local hollywood video sells them 3 for $15.
My thought pattern is it cost that much just to go to the theater in town for one person $7.50 matinee show. Now since my wife will go with me that's $15 to get in, and $16 more to buy the crap soda and popcorn. That makes it $31 just to see the Movie once, have my seat kicked from behind, and listen to the other movie goers talk too much.
No thank you. I enjoy myself at home watching my movies.
So I think I am saving money my way.
And I know I'm saving myself grief.
_________________ Firefly rules. Can't stop the signal.
http://www.hulu.com/firefly
Last edited by dturco on Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have about 200 SD-DVD's, about 10 HD DVDs, and about 50-60 Blu-rays. Just got done watching American Werewolf in London on BD.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| emdawgz1 wrote: | | Willie wrote: | | emdawgz1 wrote: |
How do you like windows 7? Worth the upgrade??? |
I am using Win 7 RC64 with Media Browser as the front end. I thnk it is the best OS MS has ever done. Media Browser is a pretty nice plug-in.
Oh yeah, 250 Blu-ray stored as MKV's plus about 30-40 DVD's and several years worth of Grey's Anatomy (WAF). I use an unRaid server about 8TB.
Willie |
What do you use to rip b/r to mkv??? |
https://www.curtpalme.com/forum_archived/viewtopic.php@t=17002.html
John, I don't want to hijack this thread...If you have any questions I can help you out there.
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Green
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 1394 Location: Calgary
TV/Projector: Marquee 9501LC / NEC 9PG+
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:42 am Post subject: Re: How many movies do you have? |
|
|
Wow, that's pretty harsh Dave (Person99). I'm surprised how critical you are in this thread since you've been in the home theatre forums longer than most. You are usually more understanding. I usually agree with a lot of what you have to say, but I have to admit I disagree completely saying Dave (Dturco) "has no life".
I currently have just over 500 DVD's and 40 Blu-ray discs. I have watched every single one of them at least once, many twice and at least 20 of them 5 times or more. Movies like "the good, the bad, and the ugly", the first "ghostbusters" movie and others up to 15 times. I used to watch an about a half of a 90 minute feature every day during lunch hour for about 5 years starting in high school and into college. Movies are my past time <vice> so I DON'T have the $30k sports car, go spend 3 hours every night at the bar with buddies, paying for seasons tickets to a sporting event (etc)... which all add up to a LOT of $$$. You spend where you are happiest. If you spend money on anything frivolous, then don't mock someone for having a nice movie collection and spending time at home with their spouse watching lots of moves in the comfort of their own home, just because you spend your spare $$ elsewhere.
You say owning discs is a waste of $5000. Like Dturco most of my collection was purchased as a previously enjoyed movie at blockbuster or rogers when they have the 2 for $20 or 2 for $16, old stuff $5-7 in the discount bin. I can guarantee I have less than $5000 into my collection. I think it's an amazing deal. This considering I don't go to movies at all anymore.
I've been married for 11 years so to do a movie that's 2 admissions + snacks and likely dinner before, so on average that's $30- $50 for the 2 of us to go see a movie. I haven't been in a theatre since the first LOTR (fellowship of the ring), which we didn't pay to see. Company function.
If you want to ask when was the last time I paid for a movie, it was Star Wars Episode 1. There were 5 laser pointers, a few cell phones, the guy at the end of the row with the shaking leg (shaking the row) and a guy behind us sneezed on my wifes head. The time before that was "Star Trek insurrection" (1998) and before that "the Saint" (1997). So in the 13 years we've been together we've spent under $300 on movie theatres. I would say anybody who rushes out with the wife and 3 kids to see every new release (for what $60?) is the waster of money. I at least still have the disc should I watch it again, when I want to, pause it for bathroom breaks...
Back to my point. $50/ night for the 2 of us to see a movie and make a night of it adds up fast. Not to mention if you want to watch it again. It's a complete waste of money (IMO) considering this forum is geared towards home theatre enthusiasts.
In my opinion if you pay to go see a movie (especially as a family), then decide you like it, then rent it, then you are wasting a load of money. Why pay for several people to watch it, then have to pay to rent? Buy it cheap once and watch at you convenience makes WAY more sense. <ramble ramble ramble...>
Basically, "Ditto" to Dturco's reply.
_________________ You can be young only once but, you can be immature forever.
Current Projector Marquee9501LC with PS3 (BLu-Ray) at 1080P LOVE IT! Screen is an Elunevision 120" 4:3 (2.4 gain - no hotspots). (also own a NEC 9PG+)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now, now, take what Dave (Person99) with a grain of salt, add some pepper (not what the Dr. ordered), and then reconsider his words. While people have a tendency to exaggerate, Dave may be less of a movie-buff than some of us while still being into Home theater.
I always like to look at one's personal habits as their own and that includes Dave's interpretation of what having no life means. Consider this, how much of a life would all of your friends say you have if you posted on this and other similar forums in magnitude?
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VideoGrabber
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 933 Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WanMan wrote:
> Now, now, take what Dave (Person99) with a grain of salt, add some pepper (not what the Dr. ordered), and then reconsider his words. While people have a tendency to exaggerate... <
Nicely said, WanMan.
I always think it's unfortunate that when Dave has a bit of wisdom to share, that might be worthwhile for folks to give some consideration to, he has to sh*t all over everybody and their pet dog to make his point. You're a smart guy, Dave. I just don't understand why you have to be so abrasive? If I were of the same ilk, I might point out that if _I_ had no life, I might make 4,762 posts on a certain on-line Forum... an average of 3.7 posts per day, every fricking day, for over 3.5 years. But I wouldn't do that , because it would insult some other folks here that don't deserve it.
Dave wrote:
> Let's assume an average blu ray purchase price of $18 <
I found that amusing. The most I've ever paid for any Blu-ray was $13 (Coraline), just because I wanted to have it without waiting (also, there's quite a bit of bonus material you don't get with a rental). I've got maybe 100-150 Blu-rays, and they averaged about $10 each.
> Do so few people really understand the concept of ROI? <
No, we're all morons here. Haven't you figured that out yet, after 3.5 years?
> Using either an online or local rental model, we can calculate the average per rental cost of between $2 and $3 (lets use $3 which is blockbusters... <
Well, speaking of local rentals, it's lucky that both (a) gas is free, and (b) so is my time to drive over and back to pick discs up and drop them off. It is true that online rentals eliminate most of that, but that option is fairly recent. Also, with online rentals, you have to keep them circulating fairly quickly, or the monthly rates will wind up averaging you more per disc than your supposition. Luckily, with online rentals they always have the movie you want to see, when you want to see it.
> they have clearly spent over $5000 on discs that they didn't need to spend FOR THE EXACT SAME VIEWING EXPERIENCE <
bull****! Sorry, I sneezed. Apparently, your rental experiences are very different from my own. I used to do quite a bit of renting, back in the day, and I encountered an unpleasant percentage of damaged or defective discs. It wasn't huge, but how many times do you have to get really into a movie, and then have it crap out on you, to say that it's an unpleasant experience? 10%? 5%? 2%? I think it was ~5% for me, which was WAY too much. It's certainly FAR from "exactly the same". Of course, Dave's mileage may vary.
I'd post some stats on my collection, but that would likely result in Dave calling me an idiot (because I haven't had time to watch most of them yet)... or worse yet, a thief (I have a lot of HD films I recorded from my cable service on hard drives [a 120T media server] and D-VHS tape).
I think the point that Dave could have made, that will likely be lost in the shuffle, is that as things are evolving, it will be neither necessary nor desirable for each of us to maintain our own collections and libraries. With MPEG4 compression and increasing broadband network speeds, I think eventually the quality will be good enough (not Blu-ray), and the selection broad enough (more than any one individual would ever collect), and the download/streaming PPV rates reasonable enough, that we can all sit back and relax at home, watching whetever we want, whenever we want. I don't see shiny discs going away any time in the immediate future, but you do have to wonder if they will survive beyond the next decade, assuming the providers get their tech together.
_________________ - Tim
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Green
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 1394 Location: Calgary
TV/Projector: Marquee 9501LC / NEC 9PG+
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WanMan wrote: | Now, now, take what Dave (Person99) with a grain of salt, add some pepper (not what the Dr. ordered), and then reconsider his words. While people have a tendency to exaggerate, Dave may be less of a movie-buff than some of us while still being into Home theater.
I always like to look at one's personal habits as their own and that includes Dave's interpretation of what having no life means. Consider this, how much of a life would all of your friends say you have if you posted on this and other similar forums in magnitude?  |
I thought I was being reasonably nice. I just said I thought he was being a bit harsh is all. Besides Dturco has 300 discs and I have 540... I must really have no life...
I quite enjoy *most* of Dave's (Person99's) posts.
It's a shame he went digital, since his posts are a lot fewer these days.
_________________ You can be young only once but, you can be immature forever.
Current Projector Marquee9501LC with PS3 (BLu-Ray) at 1080P LOVE IT! Screen is an Elunevision 120" 4:3 (2.4 gain - no hotspots). (also own a NEC 9PG+)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lexx21
Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Posts: 119
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have well over 2000 movies including almost 400 on laserdisc. I'm not really sure of the latest count. None of that number are in tape format.
I collect steel box sets, laserdisc, indy films, etc.. so I have a very wide selection. Luckily my g/f enjoys my HT as much as I do...lol. I'm like one of the other posters in here... I really don't watch OTA tv that much, so movies are what I enjoy the most.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
prover
Joined: 07 Nov 2008 Posts: 166 Location: Stuttgart, Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 18114 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 2:55 pm Post subject: Re: How many movies do you have? |
|
|
I'm not sure why this keeps coming up again and again and Dave always says the same thing...
| Person99 wrote: | Now, for those people that have in excess of 500 discs, they have clearly spent over $5000 on discs that they didn't need to spend FOR THE EXACT SAME VIEWING EXPERIENCE. In other words, for $5000 they got a little convenience and (maybe) bragging rights.
Doesn't it make more sense to spend that $5000 on your theater an actually get something for it--namely a better movie watching experience on EVERY MOVIE YOU WATCH?
Do so few people really understand the concept of ROI? |
Tim hit some of the points but you're completely missing the point why some of us own a lot of movies Dave. I have ~200 Blu-ray's and about 800 DVDs. I've spent considerably more than $5K too.
I consider the convenience to outweigh the cost which is why I own. Nobody else can make that decision for me. It's a conscious decision I make. We never know who's coming over to watch or what they're going to want to watch on any given night. We entertain a lot and the cost of owning the movies is something I'm ok with.
But that's me and me only. Nobody else can take a dollar value and assume that it's "worth it" for everyone the way you've done. You're making the fundemental mistake by thinking that everyone's in the same financial situation as you and that everyone weighs conveniences the same way as you. That's not the case. We're fortunate to be 100% debt free and already invested up the ying yang for education/retirement. The money I spend on movies every year is irrelevent to me (note the "to me" - that's important!). My time the convenience of owning completely outweighs renting - for me.
I'd be sacrificing the quality of my family's life by renting instead of owning: When we have people and families come over to watch movies and we rented, I'd have less time to spend with the kids and my friends as I drive to and from the rental place after we decide what to watch.
If I could watch anything at the same quality and convenience using an on demand HD service for less money I would do it. In fact I'd probably even pay MORE for that as true on-demand would be great. Unfortunately it doesn't exist (at least here). I'd move to something like that as then it would free up space too.
ROI? But you're not comparing the same things here Dave. It's apples and oranges. Yes, it's the same movie viewing experience as you point out but as Tim mentioned you're forgetting about driving to the rental place (gas/car wear & tear), assuming they have what you're looking for in stock, scratch discs, etc. Even more importantly you're placing a $0 value on someone's time. That may be the case for you but again your position isn't the same as someone else's and you're making that illogical conclusion that everyone's the same and therefore anyone who owns a bunch of movies is crazy.
There may be some people who own who didn't consider renting and should. Everyone should think about it and make a conscious decision based on their specific needs.
Kal
_________________
Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Last edited by kal on Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:02 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emdawgz1
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 7949
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree w/ Kal. I have between 120 and 150. and 15 b/r i like my library.
1. I never know what i want to watch...going to the rental place was never fun.
2. So netflix wont work for me.
3. I like having a library. It starts conversation and lets me watch what i like when i want.
_________________ Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:03 pm Post subject: Re: How many movies do you have? |
|
|
| Person99 wrote: | | Do so few people really understand the concept of ROI? |
Actually, most of us completely understand the concept of ROI, Dave. But, unlike you, we understand that the "R" in "ROI" will be different for each individual.
I don't know how many times I've stopped by the rental store to pick something up, and gone home empty-handed because there was nothing there I was interested in watching, and instead went home and watched something from my personal library. Same when we have people over. You can't have people over, and say, "Oh, wait here for 30 minutes while I haul ass to the rental store and pick up a movie... I'll call you when I get there and we can decide what you want to watch." With a reasonable library, I can let the guests decide what they'd like to watch. Drama, action, new, old... We can decide... Without leaving the house.
It's beyond me why you're so insistent on projecting your own personal values onto everybody else.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Willie
Joined: 13 May 2006 Posts: 169 Location: Green Bay
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What the heck am I going to do with my ROI on discretionary income when I am dead? Leave it with WanMan's kids?
Willie
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lexx21
Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Posts: 119
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My reason for having the number of movies that I do is because I simply enjoy collecting movies that I like. Thus, the "R" in ROI for me is the enjoyment of being able to watch what I want, when I want. I don't always like to go to a theater and put up with noise from other patrons, temperature too high or low, out of focus projectors (happened to me last weekend), and any number of things that you find when going into a different environment for entertainment.
As far as having an excellent movie viewing experience, that's why I bought a crt projector and nice video processor. I fully enjoy it, so it works for me.
So, some people spend their extra cash on cars, motorcycles, etc..... some of us like to spend our extra cash on their video habit.
Just my 2 cents worth here. Mileage may vary, batteries not included.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|