|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:10 pm Post subject: Xbox 360 to offer 1080p streaming movies |
|
|
Unfortunatly you'll need an 8megabit + download speed to use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2009/06/xbox-360.html
1080p Streaming On Xbox 360 Will Require 8-10Mbps Connection For Full Quality
Last week at E3, Microsoft announced that later in the fall, 1080p streaming will come to the Xbox 360 using Zune video technology. While full details of the technology and how it works are not ready to be released by Microsoft, they did share some additional details on the service which I can make public.
Zune video on Xbox LIVE was built from the ground-up for Xbox 360 to take full advantage of the Xbox platform and is built on top of Smooth Streaming. It features what Microsoft is calling a "state-of-the-art encoder" for the highest level of fidelity and a high performance decoder capable of full-framerate 1080p playback, which enables Smooth Streaming playback, smooth fast-forward and smooth rewind functionality. Microsoft says their 1080p instant on technology will offer a level of quality and performance only previously seen with downloadable or physical media.
For the full instant on 1080p streaming and 5.1 surround sound experience, Microsoft recommends at least an 8 Mbps broadband connection. The beauty of the technology however, is that movies and TV shows on Zune video will automatically scale to the best possible resolution based on the speed of the users connection. So if a consumer has a 6 Mbps connection, they will still get 1080p and a great audio experience, but may not get 5.1. And as a back-up, Microsoft says anyone can have a 1080p/5.1 experience, but they may be required to download the content instead of streaming it if they don’t have an 8 - 10 Mbps broadband connection.
While no specific date has yet been given, Zune video on Xbox LIVE will launch sometime this fall with only a small inventory of video available at 1080p. While not exact numbers have been given on the volume of inventory available at launch, Microsoft said they will bring some of the best content from some of the top studios including Warner Bros., Universal, Paramount, CBC [Canada] and the MLB Network, Whether or not content from Netflix will take advantage of the new 1080p streaming technology is not yet known but I would not be surprised if there weren't at least a few title from Netflix available at launch.
While there has already been some speculation in the industry as to which CDN(s) will get this delivery business, that's still to be seen at this time. I've heard various answers including the idea that Microsoft may keep some of this delivery on their internal CDN.
No matter who gets to deliver this content, clearly it's not going to be a lot of traffic. The number of Xbox 360 users who have their console hooked up to a TV set capable of doing 1080p and having at least an 8Mbps connection can't be huge. Not to mention, most of the content available in 1080p is probably going to have to be purchased. Clearly the Internet is not capable of handing the streaming of 1080p content to any large scale and while this offering is all about the future, the Internet still won't be able to handle this level of streaming years from now.
For Microsoft, I believe this offering is their way of getting ahead of the rest of the market and saying they can do 1080p streaming before anyone else and prove the concept. Nothing wrong with that and as a Verizon FiOS user, I can't wait to see what it looks like. But for the average Xbox 360 user, I don't think they will be able to take advantage of 1080p streaming for a long time to come.
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And this is why there will never need to be a blu ray player for the XBox. Blu ray, meet your destroyer--streaming.
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Person99 wrote: | | And this is why there will never need to be a blu ray player for the XBox. Blu ray, meet your destroyer--streaming. | Yeah, because a lot of folks have 8mbps download speeds not shared (nor aggregated) by other broadband subscribers.
Here is food for thought ... an ADSL2+ DSLAM can have +1400 subscribed ports on it. If the first few ports all tap out to 8mbps then you get 125 subscribers with happy coexistent service. Unfortunately, the +1200 ports will eat into that bandwidth like a mofo.
Same for cablemodem infrastructure. It all aggregated. And for pre ADSL2+ platforms, its even worse because instead of sharing a single 1Gbps backbone connectivity you are sharing a 45mbps connectivity. Best hopes that no one in your neighborhood cares about this.
There is a reason why the cable and telephone operators are using switched video systems.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Person99 wrote: | | And this is why there will never need to be a blu ray player for the XBox. Blu ray, meet your destroyer--streaming. |
I disagree, Dave. From my experience, I can tell you that streaming of any kind sucks ass with a 1.5mbps ADSL or T1 connection. It looks just OK on a notebook or even a computer monitor, but looks like crap beyond that. I don't mean DirecTV crap, I mean crap crap... just over VHS crap... Never mind HD.
The last stat I read was that about 2/3 of adults now have broadband at home. But, I can't find any breakdowns on bandwidth at all. So, you've got millions of people with 512kbps-1.5mpbs (probably the majority if you take away metro areas)... that all suck for streaming video. Period. I HATED streaming video on my 1.5mpbs ADSL connection. Hulu was unusable. YouTube HD videos were unusable. Even the "HQ" videos on YouTube wouldn't work right. So, a lot has to happen on the subscriber end of things. How many people do you think have 8mbps+ connections? I'm a tech geek, I've had ADSL since they rolled it out in the Des Moines market back in 1997, and I JUST got a connection faster than 1.5mbps only this summer.
Then, add to that the fact that the backbone providers are all going to have to upgrade infrastructure to support streaming movies in large numbers too, and I just don't see streaming happening any too soon...
I don't see streaming catching on for years - not until well after Blu-ray is completely established, entrenched in everyday culture, and well on its way to replacing DVD. Yes, I'm talking several years. DVD is on the decline, and Blu-ray is growing. Streaming is growing too, but they're different markets right now, and will be for some time to come.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it is a sham that DSL providers get to call that high speed internet. If you want the speed you have to pay.
Looks like I will be happy with it!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| greg_mitch wrote: | I think it is a sham that DSL providers get to call that high speed internet. If you want the speed you have to pay.
Looks like I will be happy with it! |
What do you have for a connection Greg?
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Just plain old cable...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Greg, try sustaining that performance when a 20-30 people in your neighborhood are trying that d/l at the same time.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nuttall_chris
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 832 Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chris
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WanMan wrote: | | Greg, try sustaining that performance when a 20-30 people in your neighborhood are trying that d/l at the same time. |
I've never seen that go very far below 10 is my point. I don't pay for any extreme package either...just plain old cable.
Major jealousy Chris!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
akajester
Joined: 09 Jul 2008 Posts: 934 Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
To be honest, I can't imagine anyone else in my neighborhood doing streaming HD, let alone with an xbox. maybe my suburbia hasn't caught up with others yet. Right now I'm the one screwing up the curve for everyone else. hehe.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| greg_mitch wrote: | I think it is a sham that DSL providers get to call that high speed internet. If you want the speed you have to pay.
Looks like I will be happy with it! | Service went out last night. My personally owned modem wasn't accepting the pushed firmware upgrade so someone came and plugged directly into the modem and upgraded it.
Its strange because when I test from DSL Reports the downstream is half what Speakeasy is reporting. I do not doubt for a second that compression is taking place.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| greg_mitch wrote: | | I think it is a sham that DSL providers get to call that high speed internet. |
Why, Greg? It's not like "high speed" is a technical term! Compared to dialup, 1.5mbps is awesome... Going from 5 or 6kBps downloads to 150kBps is HUGE. Being able to do some decent video, streaming, downloading, etc. compared to practically none is a big deal. Yeah, I know cable has been faster for several years now, but in the grand scheme, it hasn't been that long now. I don't see why if one technology offers even faster speeds, the old tech isn't "high speed" anymore.
Besides, I've already noticed a wild variation in bandwidth in my neighborhood. I've run tests in late evening that showed me well under 10mbps - a far cry from the 20mbps I signed up for. Of course, if I test again at midnight or 1am, I'm back close to the 20. By your standard, Qwest couldn't call it "high speed", but would have to call it "low speed", and Mediacom couldn't call the service offering I signed up for "high speed", but would have to call it "variable speed internet".
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | | greg_mitch wrote: | | I think it is a sham that DSL providers get to call that high speed internet. |
Why, Greg? It's not like "high speed" is a technical term! Compared to dialup, 1.5mbps is awesome... Going from 5 or 6kBps downloads to 150kBps is HUGE. Being able to do some decent video, streaming, downloading, etc. compared to practically none is a big deal. Yeah, I know cable has been faster for several years now, but in the grand scheme, it hasn't been that long now. I don't see why if one technology offers even faster speeds, the old tech isn't "high speed" anymore.
Besides, I've already noticed a wild variation in bandwidth in my neighborhood. I've run tests in late evening that showed me well under 10mbps - a far cry from the 20mbps I signed up for. Of course, if I test again at midnight or 1am, I'm back close to the 20. By your standard, Qwest couldn't call it "high speed", but would have to call it "low speed", and Mediacom couldn't call the service offering I signed up for "high speed", but would have to call it "variable speed internet".
SC |
Just like that new Swiffer I bought was an HD swiffer. You can call it what you want it isn't going to make it seem like less of a sham to me.
Marketing should be held accountable. Wild unjustified claims should be called out.
It is misleading to advertise to a bunch of people who don't know what a mouse click is to say that DSL is high speed and when they go hook up their new computer they can't watch the youtube video their kid sent them for 3 minutes because it is buffering. (MIL example)
No they dont want to switch because it would be hurting the telephone companies feelings.
Not really looking to start a debate...I personally don't think DSL is high speed internet. I realize it is relative and I think it is relatively slow speed.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But, who's making "wild unjustified claims"? Like I said, 1.5mbps IS high speed. It's like a frickin' internet connection from God if all you've had was dialup or even ISDN. Besides, there are now many flavors of DSL that run at different speeds depending on the switching equipment, premise equipment, etc. Besides, like I said, Mediacom calls my connection "Max" and says "up to" 20mbps, but it's not usually that fast. More often than not, if I check during normal hours, it's much less.
Regardless, back on topic, most DSL, and even many cable customers aren't going to be able to use a service like this if requires an Xbox and a 8mbps internet connection. For one thing, what about QoS? Even if you have a 10 or 12mbps pipe (which isn't most people I imagine), what happens to that movie you paid $6 to watch in 1080p HD if your bandwidth drops below 8mbps because a couple of your teenage neighbors are torrenting porn DVD rips?
Never mind the millions in less-than-urban areas that don't even have access to "high-speed". I don't see people streaming HD in huge numbers for years. I mean, watching some Hulu or YouTube content for free is one thing... Paying good money to watch a movie is a whole other ball of wax.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | But, who's making "wild unjustified claims"? Like I said, 1.5mbps IS high speed. It's like a frickin' internet connection from God if all you've had was dialup or even ISDN. Besides, there are now many flavors of DSL that run at different speeds depending on the switching equipment, premise equipment, etc. Besides, like I said, Mediacom calls my connection "Max" and says "up to" 20mbps, but it's not usually that fast. More often than not, if I check during normal hours, it's much less.
Regardless, back on topic, most DSL, and even many cable customers aren't going to be able to use a service like this if requires an Xbox and a 8mbps internet connection. For one thing, what about QoS? Even if you have a 10 or 12mbps pipe (which isn't most people I imagine), what happens to that movie you paid $6 to watch in 1080p HD if your bandwidth drops below 8mbps because a couple of your teenage neighbors are torrenting porn DVD rips?
Never mind the millions in less-than-urban areas that don't even have access to "high-speed". I don't see people streaming HD in huge numbers for years. I mean, watching some Hulu or YouTube content for free is one thing... Paying good money to watch a movie is a whole other ball of wax.
SC |
I would doubt that this technology is being developed for people in the less-than-urban areas. Heck even my former home town of 7,000 has mediacom max (granted it is less than an hour from state capitol).
Turns out you are technically correct based on FCC requirements:
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/highspeedinternet.html
| Quote: |
What Is Broadband?
Broadband or high-speed Internet access allows users to access the Internet and Internet-related services at significantly higher speeds than those available through “dial-up” Internet access services. Broadband speeds vary significantly depending on the particular type and level of service ordered and may range from as low as 200 kilobits per second (kbps), or 200,000 bits per second, to six megabits per second (Mbps), or 6,000,000 bits per second. Some recent offerings even include 50 to 100 Mbps. Broadband services for residential consumers typically provide faster downstream speeds (from the Internet to your computer) than upstream speeds (from your computer to the Internet). |
High speed v broadband...whatever. I can't stand 1.5m.
THere are very large pushes for giving access to broadband to a very high percentage of people but unfortunately with 200kbps being the minimum required no one will be able to stream this stuff.
The question is...will there be enough who can to make BR stall out?? I happen to think there will be especially when these BR players are including HD streaming in the same box! You think Sony would ban that...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
No way. There is something about the possession of tangible goods that is part of being human. The only reason why MP3's took off in their intangible form was because of pirating. And while I personally do not buy music anymore, the wife does, in disk form.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WanMan wrote: | | No way. There is something about the possession of tangible goods that is part of being human. The only reason why MP3's took off in their intangible form was because of pirating. And while I personally do not buy music anymore, the wife does, in disk form. |
You want to use declining CD sales as your argument for people wanting tangible goods?
I need to find a chart comparing downloaded music vs cd sales. I'm sure it has been declining for quite some time now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
The point is simple. People like to have something in the hand for the money unless they are eating it.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| WanMan wrote: | | The point is simple. People like to have something in the hand for the money unless they are eating it. |
You are thinking last generation man...Brad Pitt is yesterday's cup of tea!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|