| Author |
Message |
daves123
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Posts: 126
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:36 pm Post subject: Masking crt tube face |
|
|
|
I read somewhere about masking the tube faces on crt projectors for a slight improvement. Just wondering if there is anything to this, and if I should bother trying it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perisoft
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2920 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess it depends on the exact mechanism by which contrast is reduced in an air coupled lens system. If a significant part of the contrast loss is due to back-reflection between the rear lens elements and the unused white phosphor, it seems there could be a significant improvement by masking the face.
But if it's internal to the tube - between the phosphor surface and the glycol chamber's front surface, and then out to the screen - masking wouldn't make much difference at all.
And the final issue is the same as with $40 home solar panels to reduce your electric bill by 90%, and those magnets you put on your fuel lines to improve your gas mileage: If it's that easy and useful, why isn't everyone doing it? Granted, there's always the first time for something like this, but in a community of obsessed tweakers who debate the relative merits of various types of capacitors, it seems unlikely that a mod with such a large potential gain / effort ratio would have gone unplumbed.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NEC put them on LC XG's, so their engineers must have seen some benefit.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J Kildare
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 164
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did it and when finished thought it was just a wonderful way to waste time.
Now I didn't make it real tight to the edge of the image, but could see no improvement.
I think you would get far more from even the slightest tweak to color calibration.
Jim
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daves123
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Posts: 126
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So probably just a big waste of time. I thought it might help cut down on stray light, but wasn't sure.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unless you did some pretty objective evaluation, I'm not sure with how much certainty you could say it helped or not. I'm assuming Jim, that you probably didn't go to much length to try any really objective evaluation... Of course, the point you make is valid... If you can't see the difference at a casual glance, then is it really worth it? OTOH, there are all sorts of little tweaks we do, that unless we looked at them in a direct A-B comparison, wouldn't be able to tell the difference... All those little tweaks together really add up to something, though.
I'd say there are other things you could better spend time on: Room acoustic treatments, lowering the sound floor (hush box), cleaning up cabling and improving the signal path, and even optical and mechanical setup. If you've already nailed all that stuff, though - why not?
Like I said, NEC's engineers must have seen an improvement, because as we all know, any company that kind a way to save $5 per unit certainly will. If the masks hadn't been of some benefit, they wouldn't have wasted the resources to install them.
I have other pressing issues, but I plan to install them on the G70.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zebu Fellenz
Joined: 21 Dec 2006 Posts: 2567
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: |
I have other pressing issues, but I plan to install them on the G70.
SC |
How would you do something like this on the G70, between the C-element and lens? I'd be afraid of scratching something.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1031
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 657 Location: Finland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zebu Fellenz wrote: | | How would you do something like this on the G70, between the C-element and lens? I'd be afraid of scratching something. |
The masks that NEC used looked like they were a pretty light plastic - not sure if there was felt on one or both sides. I don't see where there'd be a lot of risk of scratching unless you did something dumb.
| 1031 wrote: | | Tubeface masking work better on AC-machines. |
Works better, or gains more? I'd say the gain may be better with an AC (with lower ANSI contrast and halos to boot), but with the much better ANSI on my G70, I really notice even the subtle flare. I wonder if the masks wouldn't help that a little.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1031
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 657 Location: Finland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J Kildare
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 164
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | Unless you did some pretty objective evaluation, I'm not sure with how much certainty you could say it helped or not. I'm assuming Jim, that you probably didn't go to much length to try any really objective evaluation... Of course, the point you make is valid... If you can't see the difference at a casual glance, then is it really worth it? OTOH, there are all sorts of little tweaks we do, that unless we looked at them in a direct A-B comparison, wouldn't be able to tell the difference... All those little tweaks together really add up to something, though.
I'd say there are other things you could better spend time on: Room acoustic treatments, lowering the sound floor (hush box), cleaning up cabling and improving the signal path, and even optical and mechanical setup. If you've already nailed all that stuff, though - why not?
Like I said, NEC's engineers must have seen an improvement, because as we all know, any company that kind a way to save $5 per unit certainly will. If the masks hadn't been of some benefit, they wouldn't have wasted the resources to install them.
I have other pressing issues, but I plan to install them on the G70.
SC |
My Bad!!!!
I shouldn't have said "no difference". I should have said very, very, slight. I should also have said it was an 8500 ac with 300 hr tubes. And my rooom is a real cave, with all ultra flat black ceilings on the lower sections and black gom on the walls. I did not do a side by side or take a light meter and measure the difference around say the acon square. I will say this though, with switching hd-8 to 144 big difference, mp mods big difference, frankenyokes big difference, 03 vim real big difference, ac to lc big difference, Black GOM on walls big difference.
Having said all that, perhaps we need others to try it. Like you said, "All those little tweaks together really add up to something, though".
I think the room, type of lenses, type of screen, tube condition and other factors play a part, so ymmv.
It would be good to have a couple more opinions, but from my experience it would be the last mod of all of the above that I would do again.
Jim
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daves123
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Posts: 126
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So what would the benefits of masking be, potentially?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dturco
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 3778 Location: Eastern Shore Maryland
TV/Projector: Runco DLP VX-3000i Marquee 9500 parts doner
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spanky Ham
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 5643 Location: Comedy Central
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was going to say that I thought they were paper. I believe Guy Kuo said that putting them on the c element would help a little, but only if you have a bat cave. From this I would conclude that the ANSI cr only went up slightly.
Now as peri alluded to, the reason for LC is the light reflections are bouncing off of the c element at an angle and then hitting the tube face at reduced intesity. In an AC, the glass is flat and the reflections are hitting the tube face with more intesity. I probably didn't describe that well, but their is a picture in that 3M white paper.
I have said a couple of times that probably the best way to increase ANSI cr would be to either put a mask directly on the tube or the side of the glass facing the tube or the side of the c element facing the tube. Scott thought I was crazy when I mentioned it to him, but that is a common refrain.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
NEC masks are a simple paper sticker. Sometimes they stuck them on crooked or wrinkled.
And I think you are right Eric, the inside of the C element or on the Tube face directly would be better...but then the mask is inside the glycol, and you'd have to silicone on a bit of plastic or something. Way too much work to bother for me1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wallace123456
Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 2236 Location: Northwest VA area
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Other people must have liked it. I've had about 11 Sony 12xx models over the past 2 years. 3 of the projectors had tubes where they were masked. All of them, the person before me used black electrical tape on the tube face. (The tubes were shot when I got them, so I never even tried to see what the difference was.) I never tried it.
wallace
_________________ Life Is Good, But BBQ Is Better! BBQ Competition Team
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just to be clear, the tube face Wallace is talking about is the outside of the second piece of glass.
The "tube face" Eric and I were discussing is that actual front of the bare tube - inside the glycol.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spanky Ham
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 5643 Location: Comedy Central
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wallace,
I think black electrical tape might be worse than nothing at all.
Mark,
I was thinking of some sort of paint at first or maybe a fabric like black velvet, but I have no idea what would hold up in glycol. If you could do a mask and cover the inside of the lens with this material, then ANSI and resolution would be maximized. I thought about trying it with my AC pj, but a LC pj would probably be easier.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spanky Ham
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 5643 Location: Comedy Central
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Oh yeah, I tried uploading the 3M file, but it was to big. Does anyone know how to reduce a PDF file size.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|