| Author |
Message |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that's actually the problem - 4:3 material is output as pillarboxed 16:9. the frame shape seems to be cast in stone as 16:9. mode/flag 9 dictates how to display 4:3 material within that 16:9 frame - stretched or pillarboxed. what i want is the frame shape to be 4:3 and thus have material which is not 4:3 to be letterboxed appropriately.
that is how i had my old HD-DVD set up. it output a 4:3 frame. this gave me:
- full screen (height and width) for 4:3 material
- full screen for letterboxed 4:3 material which meant it was presented as full width 16:9 material, letterboxed
- full width letterboxed for material that is non 4:3 in ratio.
all this was over HDMI - so i know that it's possible .... the sammy just does not do it, and from the sound of it, neither does the OPPO
_________________ walk gently. leave a good impression.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RobertMfromLI
Joined: 29 Jun 2009 Posts: 114 Location: West Islip, NY
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi zaphod,
My mistake... I asked him the exact opposite of what you needed. Sorry...
Robert
_________________ Kirk's 5 Year Mission continues at Star Trek New Voyages: Phase 2
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no problem, dude.
_________________ walk gently. leave a good impression.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RobertMfromLI
Joined: 29 Jun 2009 Posts: 114 Location: West Islip, NY
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK... called Oppo back, they say there is an option in the menu for TV Output Ratio, in which, 4:3 can be selected, which will letterbox 16:9 and display 4:3 normally.
They claim that this option is available for all output modes/ports including HDMI. This time I asked about the BDP-83 unit:
http://www.oppodigital.com/blu-ray-bdp-83/blu-ray-BDP-83-Features.aspx
SO... if they know what they are talking about, then the answer to zaphod's question, is yes, (at least their BDP-83) player will work properly with a device that is 4:3 and has HDMI aspect ratios... (not that he has ever heard of one).
_________________ Kirk's 5 Year Mission continues at Star Trek New Voyages: Phase 2
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
energeezer
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 67
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kiev Savoie wrote: | | One thing i have always been hesitant about is running the risk of 4:3 wear in a 16:9 setup. given a choice i would rather risk the opposite, that is 16:9 wear in a 4:3 setup so that it can't affect that HD picture I worked so hard to get. And correct me if i'm wrong Analog, but doesn't that "postage size image" also concentrate the electron beam on the tube face rather than spreading it out causing excessive heat in a smaller area resulting in accelerated wear? |
I've been CRT PJ ing since 2001 and I agree completely with the above. If your masking is good the only real disadvantage IMO is that the 4:3 material is larger than the 16:9 material when truthfully HD movies should have max impact.
Having said that no matter what screen you use you will compromise on all other formats. On the plus side CRT is the only solution that will truly show them all in their native AR and resolution.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| RobertMfromLI wrote: | | OK... called Oppo back, they say there is an option in the menu for TV Output Ratio, in which, 4:3 can be selected, which will letterbox 16:9 and display 4:3 normally. |
cool, thanks for calling them back! good news indeed.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Where do you put your centre speaker with a 4:3 screen?
4:3 is for watching on the Tele, not on the Projector...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
right below the screen. my screen is 72 x 54, dropped from the ceiling with a 12" black header. this give me (96-12-54=) 30 inches or so from the floor. lots of room for the center channel.
_________________ walk gently. leave a good impression.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand any of those dimensions.
But when you watch a 2.40:1 movies (as most are) your sound is coming from a long away from your image.
And the centre speaker should be identical to the L and R, and it should be standing vertically, not horizontally.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
sorry, i just kind of dashed off those numbers... you asked where i put the center channel - i put it right below the screen, there is about 30 inches from the bottom of my 4:3 screen to the floor. my center channel is only 10" tall (36" wide) so there is lot of room for it under the screen.
my center is a Martin Logan Logos. all of the ML centers are wide not tall. my fronts are 5' tall (MartinLogan CLS) and if i were to have an identical center, i wouldn't be able to see the screen
the Logos can tilt up and down and this allows the height of the center channel sound to be lifted or raised as you desire. you are right in that with no tilt, the voices seem to come from below the screen, but with the correct tilt, the voices come from the center of the screen. since movies are vertically centered on the screen regardless of aspect ratio, the center channel sound always comes from the correct place
cheers
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
LOL, no I don't understand those dimensions because they aren't metric.
"but with the correct tilt, the voices come from the center of the screen".
No, they don't.
Tilting the speaker changes the frequency response. It doesn't perform magic.
With a 16:9 screen, or a 2.40:1 screen, the front speakers can be identical, and all at the same height, or close to it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
changing the direction of the speaker does change where the sound images . that's one of the reasons why speaker positioning is important in locating the sweet spot. next tiem you're listening to some 2 channel mix, change where one of the speakers is aimed, you should notice a change in the imaging.
this is even more so on a horizontal electrostatic center channel.
now, even if i did get a matching speaker fot the center channel (1.5 meter tall in my case), it would still have to be below the screen or it would block the screen. most center channels are long and wide and designed to go below the screen.
_________________ walk gently. leave a good impression.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nettwerkjohn
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 921 Location: Blenheim, Marlborough, New Zealand
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
my samsung WILL output un-anamorphic 4:3 over hdmi, but ONLY at 480i. normally i have 1080p out, into the ruby. non-anamorphic w/s is heavily windowboxed, and the ruby won't re-scale the image (that is at 1080p) aaaagggghhhh. i used to have to set the output to 480i, then change aspect ratio on the ruby, then change it back afterwards. big hassle.. so i stopped watching non anamorphic w/s material. problem solved.
out of this chaos, along comes the xbox 360 which exhibits none of this stupidity, so i use it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RobertMfromLI
Joined: 29 Jun 2009 Posts: 114 Location: West Islip, NY
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nettwerkjohn wrote: | my samsung WILL output un-anamorphic 4:3 over hdmi, but ONLY at 480i. normally i have 1080p out, into the ruby. non-anamorphic w/s is heavily windowboxed, and the ruby won't re-scale the image (that is at 1080p) aaaagggghhhh. i used to have to set the output to 480i, then change aspect ratio on the ruby, then change it back afterwards. big hassle.. so i stopped watching non anamorphic w/s material. problem solved.
out of this chaos, along comes the xbox 360 which exhibits none of this stupidity, so i use it.
 |
For similar reasons, when I go to Blu-Ray, I think I will try a PS3...
(yes, I live in the dark ages still and don't have any Blu-Ray)
_________________ Kirk's 5 Year Mission continues at Star Trek New Voyages: Phase 2
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|