| Author |
Message |
FoLLgoTT
Joined: 29 Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Location: Hannover, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 10:05 am Post subject: What are the Differences between revisions of Eye One Pro? |
|
|
Right now I'm measuring with an Eye One Pro Rev.A. I think this is the first model. In comparison with my Eye One Display 2 it reads much worse at lower IREs when measuring my G90. Under 30 IRE the results are pretty random. The Display 2 instead gives accurate results down to 10 IRE.
Are Rev.B or Rev.D more accurate at lower IREs?
_________________
Nils
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal
Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Eye One Pro should be better and should read consistenty. Something not right.
Re: The Display2 - Don't confuse accuracy with consistency. Just because it reads the SAME result every time doesn't mean it's accurate. The Eye One Pro should read a lot slower than the Display2 but it should do it more accurately.
I don't know what the problem is - sorry!
Kal
_________________
Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FoLLgoTT
Joined: 29 Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Location: Hannover, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@kal
Thanks for the answer.
| Quote: | The Eye One Pro should be better and should read consistenty. Something not right.
Re: The Display2 - Don't confuse accuracy with consistency. Just because it reads the SAME result every time doesn't mean it's accurate. The Eye One Pro should read a lot slower than the Display2 but it should do it more accurately. |
This is strange. Maybe HCFR is the problem. With this software the Eye One Pro reads much faster than the Display 2 even with averaging.
Driver is the actual version from X-Rite's homepage.
_________________
Nils
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
