|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Elaine Benes
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 1416
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| VideoGrabber wrote: | Elaine,
If what you're claiming was true, all those films would have their original bitrates of ~28 MBit/sec, so they'd be easy to discern from other variants. |
Which is why they were so highly valued as downloads even though the films themselves had been posted from other sources many times. Their files were huge (30GB range) compared to the same film from HBO HD, etc generally being in the 10-14ish GB range for file size.
You're a newsgroup user, no ? These were posted at least a year ago... 5c is circumventable in the digital domain too, as Japanese WoWo movies are posted regularly too now...Again, the super high bitrates is exactly WHY people like them...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VideoGrabber
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 933 Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's interesting, Elaine. Thanks for the information. You're certainly correct about what the file size would have been.
> You're a newsgroup user, no? <
Well, I was a heavy newsgroup user, back in the 70's, 80's, and 90's, and participated in a lot of discussions over the years. But not at all in the last 5-8 years, though I am aware that large files get segmented and streamed in various alt.bin groups.
> 5c is circumventable in the digital domain too, as Japanese WoWo movies are posted regularly too now <
I have to say I'm more than a little surprised (I would have expected to have caught a hint of it through tech channels), but it sounds like you know more about it than I do, so it would be silly for me to argue the point. Thanks for educating me.
_________________ - Tim
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| VideoGrabber wrote: | That's interesting, Elaine. Thanks for the information. You're certainly correct about what the file size would have been.
> You're a newsgroup user, no? <
Well, I was a heavy newsgroup user, back in the 70's, 80's, and 90's, and participated in a lot of discussions over the years. But not at all in the last 5-8 years, though I am aware that large files get segmented and streamed in various alt.bin groups.
> 5c is circumventable in the digital domain too, as Japanese WoWo movies are posted regularly too now <
I have to say I'm more than a little surprised (I would have expected to have caught a hint of it through tech channels), but it sounds like you know more about it than I do, so it would be silly for me to argue the point. Thanks for educating me. |
Such a polite young man
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elaine Benes
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 1416
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| VideoGrabber wrote: | That's interesting, Elaine. Thanks for the information. You're certainly correct about what the file size would have been.
> You're a newsgroup user, no? <
Well, I was a heavy newsgroup user, back in the 70's, 80's, and 90's, and participated in a lot of discussions over the years. But not at all in the last 5-8 years, though I am aware that large files get segmented and streamed in various alt.bin groups.
> 5c is circumventable in the digital domain too, as Japanese WoWo movies are posted regularly too now <
I have to say I'm more than a little surprised (I would have expected to have caught a hint of it through tech channels), but it sounds like you know more about it than I do, so it would be silly for me to argue the point. Thanks for educating me. |
Large files...haha, "The Dark Knight" BD was over 48GB !
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VideoGrabber wrote: |
If what you're claiming was true, all those films would have their original bitrates of ~28 MBit/sec, so they'd be easy to discern from other variants. |
What he's claiming is true. The captures are raw bitstream captured from before the mpeg2 decoder. No analog conversion is involved.
The actual video bitstream on D-Theater tapes is 21.50 Mbps for titles with DTS audio, and 22.95 Mbps for titles w/o DTS audio. The transport stream mux rate with nullpackets is 28 Mbps in both cases.
Dolby Digital streams are 576 kbps, DTS streams are 1536 kbps.
Most titles have a hardcoded telecine sequence, bus some use telecine metadata (i.e. they essentially are progressive on the tape - same approach as on HD DVDs).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VideoGrabber
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 933 Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kai,
thanks for the details on the transport streams. I knew the TS achieved the constant (CBR) 28 MBit/sec with NULL packets. I didn't know the bitrate breakdowns though. The audio from D-Theater was always exceptional, and that explains why.
It also explains how it was accomplished, which was as I expected... a hardware hook that simply bypassed the encryption technique. So, in a sense, Dave is still correct that 5C and D-Theater protections have not been cracked, but simply circumvented. A moot point, in a sense.
_________________ - Tim
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
there is no "D-Theater" protection. That was all marketing hype.
The tapes only use 5C protection.
And any encryption system is broken once you can access the data w/o a key. Only the licensor of a circumvented/broken encryption system will claim otherwise. Their robustness requirements simply weren't adequate.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VideoGrabber
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 933 Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kai wrote:
> there is no "D-Theater" protection. That was all marketing hype. <
So why won't my D-Theater tapes play on my Mitsu 2000 D-VHS deck, only my JVC-30K, 40K, or 5U? Is it just a codec thing, and not an encryption thing?
_________________ - Tim
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elaine Benes
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 1416
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| VideoGrabber wrote: | Kai wrote:
> there is no "D-Theater" protection. That was all marketing hype. <
:?: So why won't my D-Theater tapes play on my Mitsu 2000 D-VHS deck, only my JVC-30K, 40K, or 5U? Is it just a codec thing, and not an encryption thing? |
Regular 5c encrypted tapes won't play in those either, will they ?
Your Mits decks don't have built in MPEG decoders(unlike the JVC's), so you have to transfer the bitstream to an outboard decoder for an image, right ? Wasn't 5c encryption designed to prevent exactly that ?Supposedly no digital transfer whatsoever depending on the flag ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VideoGrabber
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 933 Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the followup, Elaine.
> Regular 5c encrypted tapes won't play in those either, will they ? <
Yes, they play (and record) 5C just fine. It would be kind of silly if they didn't.
> Your Mits decks don't have built in MPEG decoders(unlike the JVC's), <
That is correct. No analog encoders OR decoders, and thus only digital bitstreams in and out.
> so you have to transfer the bitstream to an outboard decoder for an image, right? <
Yes. I can play them through my Samsung SIR-T165 tuner/switcher, or my LG LST-3410A HD-DVR. They can also be played on a FW-equipped TV (which I don't have), or through any of my JVC D-VHS decks (as long as Record isn't engaged). There are folks with Mitsu decks (rock-solid transports) playing their 5C tapes back through JVC deck (decoders), with totally non-functional transports.
> Wasn't 5c encryption designed to prevent exactly that? Supposedly no digital transfer whatsoever depending on the flag? <
No digital transfer to an untrusted recipient. All of the above devices I mentioned above can handle the 5C handshaking requirements. That capability is not limited to JVC decks.
It's always possible I was doing something wrong, the one time I tried playing one of my D-Theater tapes on my Mitsu, which is why I was inquiring. But since I "knew" (had read) that it wasn't possible for it to work, I didn't spend any time trying to finagle it.
_________________ - Tim
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elaine Benes
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 1416
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
But I thought the whole point of 5c was there were varying degrees of protection easily set via a flag ? What if the D-Theater tapes simply have a copy never flag set ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VideoGrabber
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 933 Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
> the whole point of 5c was there were varying degrees of protection easily set via a flag ? <
Yes, that's correct.
> What if the D-Theater tapes simply have a copy never flag set ? <
Then they can never be copied. That doesn't mean they can't ever be played.
_________________ - Tim
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KoBE
Joined: 25 Mar 2011 Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kschmit2 wrote: |
What he's claiming is true. The captures are raw bitstream captured from before the mpeg2 decoder. No analog conversion is involved.
|
What kind of equipment did they use to capture the raw bitstream?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|