|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
rs232guy
Joined: 30 Aug 2008 Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:05 am Post subject: New product idea: Frame rate tripler (1080p24 to 1080p72) |
|
|
There has been some interest on this forum and over at AVS in 1920x1080p72 (or 75hz) - to eliminate judder for film sources.
From what I've read, an HTPC is the easiest way to achieve this. Most (if not all) scalers will not output 1080p72, due to hardware bandwidth constraints. Some have discussed workarounds, with custom timings that fall within the 165Mhz limit. There are Blu-ray players and scalers that can output 1080p24 (and 25?) today. Some flat panel displays claim to accept 24p and produce 72hz or 120hz judder-free images. Please correct me if I am wrong so far on any of this.
The product I imagine would:
- Accept an HDMI input, up to 1080p60
- If the frame rate is standard 50 or 60hz, pass it through unchanged
- If the frame rate is 24hz (or 25hz), triple it to output 72hz (or 75hz)
- Output RGBHV analog
So I am wondering:
1) Would you be interested in this product?
2) Is it technically possible to build at a reasonable price?
3) Would anyone (like Moome or HDFury, etc.) be interested in producing this product?
One frame of 1920x1080 8-bit content is only 6MB (6,220,800 bytes) of memory. Theoretically, the delay could be no more than 1 (24hz) frame, or 40ms.
It seems to me like a 'frame rate tripler' would fill a specific unmet market niche. But I will defer to the experts (both users and technical wizards) on this thread.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 18114 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is certainly an interesting idea. Not sure of the feasibility of something like this but I've forwarded the request.
They way I see it, this could be a value-add to existing HDMI converters: If the input is 24 Hz then I could see the user having a switch or setting that lets you choose either x1, x2, x3, x4, or x5 refresh rate for the output. This would allow someone to take a 24Hz signal and output it at 48/72/96/120Hz.
And why stop at 1920x1080 (1080p)? Why not allow it for any resolution who's refresh rate is 24 or 25 Hz?
Kal
P.S. I'm 99% sure the reason something like this isn't done easily is because most HDMI converters are limited by what the IC they use can do. Yes, you can design chips or circuits to do absolutely anything but the cost goes up astronomically. Still a good idea however.
_________________
Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Last edited by kal on Sun Nov 28, 2010 3:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rs232guy
Joined: 30 Aug 2008 Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for your response, Kal - and for passing this idea on!
| kal wrote: | | If the input is 24 Hz then I could see the user having a switch or setting that lets you choose either x1, x2, x3, x4, or x5 refresh rate for the output. This would allow someone to take a 24Hz signal and output it at 48/72/96/120Hz. |
Absolutely! Great idea.
| kal wrote: | | And why stop at 1920x1080 (1080p)? Why not allow it for any resolution who's refresh rate is 24 or 25 Hz? |
Sure - that makes sense too.
| kal wrote: | | P.S. I'm 99% sure the reason something like this isn't done easily is because most HDMI converters are limited by what the IC they use can do. Yes, you can design chips or circuits to do absolutely anything but the cost goes up astronomically. Still a good idea however. |
This is way over my head, but I was imagining using field programmable gate arrays (FPGA's) to implement this. If I am correct, these are as cheap as any purpose built silicon. I believe many scalers were (and still are) built using these. (I know the VP50 uses them.) My hope is that programming an FPGA to buffer a single frame and repeat it 2, 3, 4, or 5 times is doable - and relatively easier than implementing a full blown scaler. But, again, this is way beyond my expertise.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I wished for a tripler like this quite a while ago. Nobody jumped on the idea, though.
rs232guy, it's certainly possible to implement stuff in an FPGA. But you've just dramatically increased the effort and complexity of the project if you do that. Not only do you have the hardware design, now you've got to design the programming of the FPGA -- NOT a trivial job.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wonder if you can do it with an analog circuit?
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1031
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 657 Location: Finland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AnalogRocks wrote: | | Wonder if you can do it with an analog circuit? |
No.
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perisoft
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2920 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure if there are 1080p-capable capture cards for PCs that are any kind of reasonable price, but if so you could build a pretty cheap (for the PC components) PC-based solution - build it on a light RTOS. Then it'd be pretty easy to implement various scaling features too, and it would basically be a software / packaging problem.
There's at least one company that claims to have such a card for $250, so you could probably throw this together for a reasonable amount of money (Depending on what that is - you'd still be looking at a $2k price on the low end), plus have nifty on-screen menus, custom timing, and so forth.
If fifty people want one, I'll build 'em.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| perisoft wrote: | | you'd still be looking at a $2k price on the low end), plus have nifty on-screen menus, custom timing, and so forth. |
And what would be the point then? A Lumagen HDP that does it quite well is $1100 new and ~$750 used.
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perisoft
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2920 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Person99 wrote: | | perisoft wrote: | | you'd still be looking at a $2k price on the low end), plus have nifty on-screen menus, custom timing, and so forth. |
And what would be the point then? A Lumagen HDP that does it quite well is $1100 new and ~$750 used. |
Ah. Well, given that the OP said, 'Most (if not all) scalers will not output 1080p72, due to hardware bandwidth constraints', I assumed there wasn't such an option. Problem solved!
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SisterOfMercy
Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 155 Location: Zwart Nazareth, The Netherlands
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| perisoft wrote: | | Person99 wrote: | | perisoft wrote: | | you'd still be looking at a $2k price on the low end), plus have nifty on-screen menus, custom timing, and so forth. |
And what would be the point then? A Lumagen HDP that does it quite well is $1100 new and ~$750 used. |
Ah. Well, given that the OP said, 'Most (if not all) scalers will not output 1080p72, due to hardware bandwidth constraints', I assumed there wasn't such an option. Problem solved!  |
The lumagen does not do 72, however about the only CRT that stands a chance of handling that bandwidth without noticeable softening is the Cine 9. How many Cine 9 users we got here?
Uh, no one? Well, then why 1080p/72? Either flicker at 48, judder at 60, do 1080i/96 or scale the horizontal to something like 1700 for 16:9 content to meet the bandwidth requirements of the HDP and the CRT so do 1700x1080/72 and drop the black bars of 2.35 content to do 1920x817@72.
So, why a more expensive less proven solution?
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SisterOfMercy
Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 155 Location: Zwart Nazareth, The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Because we can? For PAL material I'd like to watch 1080p75. The PJ might not be as sharp at that resolution, but the scaler can't do it at all. It would be nice if you don't run into bandwidth problems with the stuff before the PJ.
_________________ The kissing and the colour come crashing down
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SisterOfMercy wrote: | | Because we can? For PAL material I'd like to watch 1080p75. The PJ might not be as sharp at that resolution, but the scaler can't do it at all. It would be nice if you don't run into bandwidth problems with the stuff before the PJ. |
So basically, "my display device cannot do this well, but I want to do it anyway", really?
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SisterOfMercy
Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 155 Location: Zwart Nazareth, The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No. It might, but I can't see it because of the scaler limitation.
Come to think of it, it doesn't matter at all what my display can do or can not do. We want to convert any material (video and film based, SD, HD, whatever) to 1920 x 1080 @ 75 Hz and beyond. That's the problem, not whether it is necessary or not. That's not interesting at all.
_________________ The kissing and the colour come crashing down
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SisterOfMercy wrote: | | No. It might, but I can't see it because of the scaler limitation. |
What PJ?
If you want to see, hook up a computer. Display 1920x1080/75 and 1650x1080/75. Bet the 1650 looks better! Or try 1920x1080/50 and 1920x1080/75. Bet 50 looks sharper. Then you'll know why you don't "need" it.
| SisterOfMercy wrote: | | Come to think of it, it doesn't matter at all what my display can do or can not do. We want to convert any material (video and film based, SD, HD, whatever) to 1920 x 1080 @ 75 Hz and beyond. That's the problem, not whether it is necessary or not. That's not interesting at all. |
I don't follow. It seems like you are saying you are saying something like, "I want a car that will do 1000 MPH even though I'll never be able to drive it more than 150 MPH." If this is what you are saying, I fail to see the logic?
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SisterOfMercy
Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 155 Location: Zwart Nazareth, The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh please, no car analogies. I've read enough of those.
_________________ The kissing and the colour come crashing down
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
At 1080p 72hz you will need custom porches. A simple tripler will not work.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WTS
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1276 Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd have to agree with Person99, and just what PJs are going to be able to use a 1080P/72hz signal without it looking very very soft. BW folks, it takes lots of BW to use that and I know of none that will including stock cine9 boards. Even my modded boards or Gregs or MPs won't handle this.
_________________ Thanks
Walter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|