Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Speaker wattage question...
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Audio
Author Message
MYoung



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 369
Location: Madison, WI

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:13 am    Post subject: Speaker wattage question...

I just bought an entry-level 5.1 surround sound system in a box (Sony HT-DDW700) for my beater basement home theater setup. It's 900W system -- 140W x 5 + 200W subwoofer. I got it for $190 after taxes and 10% off code from CircuitCity.com with same day pick-up (yeah, I'm just as shocked that I actually found something worth buying there!). I was thinking of replacing the dinky left and right channels with a little larger, 2 driver, bookshelf speakers. That way I can get some richer sound when playing music. Granted, I'll have to turn down the sub a bit. The tiny speakers it came with are rated at 140W, though I think my bookshelf speakers are 100W (I still have to dig 'em out and verify that). What are the negative consequences of hooking up 100W speakers when the spec speakers are 140W? Crappy sound? Risk of damaging/blowing the lower wattage speakers? Fire hazard? Dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria?!?!
Back to top
MYoung



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 369
Location: Madison, WI

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:24 am    Post subject:

Hmm, in digging around the Internet I see some people stating that it's not a huge deal to run a little lower wattage speakers on an amp than what it's rated for -- though one shouldn't "crank it" too loud, as that's where distortion comes in and potentially, damage to the speakers. Does that sound right?
Back to top
Curt Palme
CRT Tech


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 24396
Location: Langley, BC

TV/Projector: All of them!

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:45 am    Post subject:

Here's the scoop:

Speaker ratings are somewhat ambiguous when it comes to wattage. THe key is: CLEAN POWER! I was running a pair of 10 watt bookshelf speakers off a 250 watt amp in high school, ran them WAY louder than I should have, but never blew them because the amp gave out clean unclipped power. It's actually easier to damage a 100 watt speaker with a 50 watt amp than a 50 watt speaker with a 100 watt amp.

MOst manufacturers in the 'old days' with rotary volume knobs hit clipping (max power) at about the 12:00 mark. Past that the amp would clip, and you'd blow your tweeters.

General rule:

Blown tweeters- amp run into the clipping point.
Woofers blown- too much power into low power speakers.

Then there's speaker efficiencies, etc.

Bottom line is, speakers will be damaged well BEFORE you can hear the distortion. If you hear distortion, you're way too loud for what the amp can put out, so turn it down.

Chances are you'll never blow your speakers though.
Back to top
Tom.W



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 6635


Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:46 am    Post subject:

Better to run the amp at about half power anyways. It should run cooler with less distortion. Can you put a limit on the amp output to the speakers to prevent the wrong hands at the master volume control ?
Back to top
MYoung



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 369
Location: Madison, WI

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:05 am    Post subject:

Thanks for the info, Curt! So the bottom like is that so long as I'm not a jackass with the volume, I'll be okay. I suppose that if I do blow the speakers, no big loss. They're 3 year old $80 Sony speakers. El cheapo, but still better than the rinky-dink satellite speakers that come with the system. The system still gives good bang for the buck. Beats the poo outta the 15W Altec Lansing speaker set I got from Walmart for $26. The receiver cannot switch video, but I think I'm going to opt for a separate 4x1 switcher that will switch component video and digital optical audio.
Back to top
mike calcott



Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 307
Location: Australia

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:43 am    Post subject:

make sure the impedence match is correct, if the amp outputs at 8ohms use 8ohms not 4ohms.
_________________
Old dog learning new tricks
Back to top
View user's photo album (6 photos)
MYoung



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 369
Location: Madison, WI

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:09 pm    Post subject:

The receiver is pretty low end and doesn't appear to have any controls for limiting power output. I don't even think I can specify cross-over frequencies, which is kind of a bummer now that I'm using left and right channel speakers with more base. Though turning down the sub seems to work fine. I know I'm matching the impedence, but thanks for the reminder. $190 and worth every penny! It will be a good beater setup. It sure beats getting a POS RCA surround sound system from Walmart.
Back to top
ecrabb
Forum Moderator


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 15909
Location: Utah

TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:37 pm    Post subject:

I'd also like to point out the fact that the system that is sold as outputting 900w (140x5) is probably not even outputting 1/4 of that in reality - never mind whether it's clean power. I'd guess that receiver is good for maybe 50w with all channels driven. And the sub - 200w? Yeah, right.

High-end $1500 receivers with discrete power supplies can often barely output their full rated power (if they do), let alone a cheap HTIB system. The way they rate those systems is practically criminal. One manufacturer uses one channel driven, another uses two channels, one uses a 4khz test tone, another 2khz. I wish the FTC and a trade group made up of responsible manufacturers would force a REAL standard rating system to be used to sell any sort of amplifier.

Note, I'm not saying the little Sony systems isn't just fine for what it is. Compared to one of the tiny little RCA box systems, it's probably great. The tiny systems probably can't muster 25w on a good day.

Mike - Take a look at the labels on the back of the receiver and the sub. It should list power consumption on it somewhere - in watts - Just for fun, tell us what those ratings are.

SC
Back to top
View user's photo album (10 photos)
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:07 pm    Post subject:

ecrabb wrote:
I'd also like to point out the fact that the system that is sold as outputting 900w (140x5) is probably not even outputting 1/4 of that in reality - never mind whether it's clean power. I'd guess that receiver is good for maybe 50w with all channels driven. And the sub - 200w? Yeah, right.

High-end $1500 receivers with discrete power supplies can often barely output their full rated power (if they do), let alone a cheap HTIB system. The way they rate those systems is practically criminal. One manufacturer uses one channel driven, another uses two channels, one uses a 4khz test tone, another 2khz. I wish the FTC and a trade group made up of responsible manufacturers would force a REAL standard rating system to be used to sell any sort of amplifier.

Note, I'm not saying the little Sony systems isn't just fine for what it is. Compared to one of the tiny little RCA box systems, it's probably great. The tiny systems probably can't muster 25w on a good day.

Mike - Take a look at the labels on the back of the receiver and the sub. It should list power consumption on it somewhere - in watts - Just for fun, tell us what those ratings are.

Couldn't say it any better myself. Glad someone else posted this. Like all less expensive stuff there's a single amp chip in there rated at 140W and it shares it across all 5 channels so it can only do 140W total, and that's probably at 10% distortion. Clean power probably rolls off after 20-30W at most. Nothing wrong with it like SC said, but the specs are absolutely meaningless. I've seen amps rated at 20W/ch play cleaner and louder than some of the 200W/ch units put out by the mass market guys (Sony/Technics/etc).

There's a reason why a good 5-channel amp of around 150-200W/channel will cost you at least $1000 if not more.
Take the Emotiva XPA-5: http://www.emotiva.com/xpa5.html
It's only $799 which is crazy low priced for such a beafy amp but should give you an idea. Above that you're paying for "refinements" in audio quality and general markup.

Kal

_________________

Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0


Last edited by kal on Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:40 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
ecrabb
Forum Moderator


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 15909
Location: Utah

TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:25 pm    Post subject:

Kal,

I've never seen those Emotiva's before - those are damn good prices for that much power. If they had an XPA-6, I could sell my Crowns and pick one of those up. I was always an ATI fan, but they're way out of my price range. These look about as well-built as the ATI's. The LPA-1 is a really great price, but I think it actually has less power than my Crowns. Looks like a hell of an amp - have you heard them?

BTW, you linked to the XPA-5 instead of the LPA-1.

SC
Back to top
View user's photo album (10 photos)
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:43 pm    Post subject:

Emotiva's got a pretty strong following. IIRC they spun off of AV123.com. The only problem is that their prices scare me a bit. They have (supposedly) fully featured pre-pro's for about $1000 with some high end HDMI units coming out this year to compete in the $3-8K league... but at around $1000-$1400!

There are some threads over at AVS where they compare a bunch of $4-12K pre-pros and a $799 Emotiva unit and it reviews extremely well.

I'm keeping my eyes on them.

Kal

_________________

Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
MYoung



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 369
Location: Madison, WI

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:16 pm    Post subject:

Believe me, I'm in no way making a case that this system I got is anything fancy. It's quite low-end. I just wanted to make sure I wouldn't have problems hooking up 100W speakers when the receiver states 140W per channel.

I was considering getting a better receiver for my main setup -- one that would switch HDMI so I could then convert my video chain to digital and get a HDfury, but I decided to just live with component video and 5.1 analog audio from my HD-A1 for now as I still have yet to see many titles on Blu-ray I'm interested in. I have no complaints about the HD-A1's component video output quality. Perhaps I might even end up staying with component video and getting a stand-alone Blu-ray player with better component video output than the PS3, assuming they have better component video output. I'm finding I'm using the PS3 much more as a gaming system than a Blu-ray movie player. The PS3 has been living in the basement attached to the D50, sparing the 1292Q static burn-in from hours upon hours of Call of Duty 4! Speaking of that, it will be nice to play that game with surround sound. It's frustrating hearing sounds and having no idea where they're coming from in the game! Of course, it remains to be seen how good the surround sound is implemented in the game.
Back to top
perisoft



Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2920
Location: Ithaca, NY

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:37 pm    Post subject:

The per-channel thing is why I've got separate amps for each set of channels and to each sub... I've got relatively lousy home audio receivers (rated at maybe 100w/channel) but am driving the fronts with one, the center with one, the rears with one... so I don't have to pull near maximum power and I can get reasonably clean sound out of a bunch of salvation army amps that were basically free. The only one I paid anything significant for is the one driving the fronts, which isn't too bad.

To do that, though, you have to have per-channel analog output and have some kind of control of what goes where, which usually means HTPC. I'm not sure many stand alone players have anything but digital output.

_________________
Back to top
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:19 pm    Post subject:

MYoung wrote:
Believe me, I'm in no way making a case that this system I got is anything fancy. It's quite low-end. I just wanted to make sure I wouldn't have problems hooking up 100W speakers when the receiver states 140W per channel.

As Curt said, it's pretty meaningless to say a speaker can only handle "100W". You're more likely to wreck them by using a 10W amp than a 1000W amp as the 10W amp will be driven into clipping (distortion) way before the 1000W amp.

Kal

_________________

Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:21 pm    Post subject:

perisoft wrote:
The per-channel thing is why I've got separate amps for each set of channels and to each sub... I've got relatively lousy home audio receivers (rated at maybe 100w/channel) but am driving the fronts with one, the center with one, the rears with one... so I don't have to pull near maximum power and I can get reasonably clean sound out of a bunch of salvation army amps that were basically free. The only one I paid anything significant for is the one driving the fronts, which isn't too bad..

Yup - better amps have separate storage and transformers per channel so that sharing of power isn't done by all channels.
I have a 3 channel amp for the front and a 2 channel one for the back.

Kal

_________________

Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
greg_mitch



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 5320


Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:52 pm    Post subject:

kal wrote:
Emotiva's got a pretty strong following. IIRC they spun off of AV123.com. The only problem is that their prices scare me a bit. They have (supposedly) fully featured pre-pro's for about $1000 with some high end HDMI units coming out this year to compete in the $3-8K league... but at around $1000-$1400!

There are some threads over at AVS where they compare a bunch of $4-12K pre-pros and a $799 Emotiva unit and it reviews extremely well.

I'm keeping my eyes on them.

Kal


I don't believe they were ever part of AV123 but they were sold by AV123. Several reported problems with the LMC-1 pre/pro but the LPA-1 has probably never seen a bad review. Great products for the money is all that you will ever find.

I am awaiting a lot of user reports on their higher end pre/pro before I draw any judgements.

Can't believe I don't see anyone from here over at the AV123 forum. It would be strange to see the same people on three different forums.
Back to top
Curt Palme
CRT Tech


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 24396
Location: Langley, BC

TV/Projector: All of them!

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:04 am    Post subject:

Give me brute force class AB amps over anything. A good amp weighs 60 lbs minimum..Smile

None of this nancy boy digital switching 1 giga watt per channel, and it only weighs 11 lbs BS for me!
Back to top
mike calcott



Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 307
Location: Australia

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:35 am    Post subject:

When I was selling power/pre combo's 30 years ago, amps like original US Marantz, Phase Linear and the like had huge power supplies which was the major contribution to their weight. The constant reserve of power contributed to the constant output wattage over the full dynamic range. Most modern amps/receivers rated at 100-150 watts over 5 channels lack the low end grunt that the older amps used to give, it seems the output of modern amps are rated around the midrange, but lack the low end performace due to the lightweight power supplies and small output caps which do not supply sufficient output voltage required for good low end performance
_________________
Old dog learning new tricks
Back to top
View user's photo album (6 photos)
Curt Palme
CRT Tech


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 24396
Location: Langley, BC

TV/Projector: All of them!

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:53 am    Post subject:

Exactly! I explained it to rookies coming into my old repair shop this way (a bit technically flawed, but it made understanding the concept easy):

A large heavy amp has big filter caps that store electricity for when the big bass notes come along. They dump their power into the speakers, then store themselves up again over time.

A small switching amp doesn't have these large capacitors in them, so they don't have as large of a reserve within the amp, and rely on the AC power line to instantaneously supply the power needed for the big bass notes. If the power isn't available because you're running the coffee maker right next to the amp at the same time, the amp clips, blows up, blows the speakers, or distorts.

I got a lot of customers to repair their old amps that way instead of buying new..Smile
Back to top
AnalogRocks
Forum Moderator


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 26706
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:15 am    Post subject:

Curt Palme wrote:
Give me brute force class AB amps over anything. A good amp weighs 60 lbs minimum..Smile

None of this nancy boy digital switching 1 giga watt per channel, and it only weighs 11 lbs BS for me!


1.21 gig watt's?! Are you mad doc? Smile

_________________
Tech support for nothing

CRT.

HD done right!
Back to top
View user's photo album (27 photos)
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Audio All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum