Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletters ]

 
Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Photo AlbumsPhoto Albums  RegisterRegister 
 MembershipClub Membership   ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

Why would you "need" bitstreaming?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly view    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Source Devices
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
greg_mitch




Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 5321



PostLink    Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:57 pm    Post subject: Why would you "need" bitstreaming? Reply with quote


        Register to remove this ad. It's free!
The difference between the A30 and A35 is that the A35 bitstreams the advanced audio codecs. Why would I need to bitstream?

Is it just so that people can get their new receiver to display DTS HD MA?

Perhaps the receiver or pre/pro has better bass management that works only with the bitstream audio?

I am a bit confused. Same with the Pany BD30k.
Back to top
Person99




Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 4901
Location: Flower Mound, TX


PostLink    Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is easy to apply DSP to the bitstream. If you want to apply DSP to a PCM stream, you effectively have to get it into a "usable" format. Given this, most receivers or pre/pros will not apply DSP to a PCM stream, only to bitstreams. So, chances are, if you want (for example) a 7.1 mix from a 5.1 DD True HD source, your receiver or pre/pro is going to need the bitstream.
_________________
Dave

A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
greg_mitch




Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 5321



PostLink    Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, so let's say, Harman's Logic 7 can only be applied to a bitstream?

Besides increasing the channels from 2 channel or 5.1 channel sound why would one want to use a DSP.

I never understood the "concert" and "jazz" functions on my old receivers.
Back to top
Person99




Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 4901
Location: Flower Mound, TX


PostLink    Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

greg_mitch wrote:
Oh, so let's say, Harman's Logic 7 can only be applied to a bitstream?

Besides increasing the channels from 2 channel or 5.1 channel sound why would one want to use a DSP.

I never understood the "concert" and "jazz" functions on my old receivers.


For me? Going 5.1->7.1 is the main reason. Some people like the other modes, like the THX processing.

_________________
Dave

A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
greg_mitch




Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 5321



PostLink    Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So if you have a 7.1 setup and you have an A30 and you have it set to DTS HD MA you will not hear sound from all speakers? You will just hear 5.1 sound?

I guess I see "bitstream" being thrown around as if everyone needs to make sure they have it or else but it seems like it isn't necessary to me.

Thanks for the clarification Dave.
Back to top
Welwynnick




Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 229
Location: Welwyn, Herts, UK


PostLink    Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Person99 wrote:
It is easy to apply DSP to the bitstream. If you want to apply DSP to a PCM stream, you effectively have to get it into a "usable" format. Given this, most receivers or pre/pros will not apply DSP to a PCM stream, only to bitstreams. So, chances are, if you want (for example) a 7.1 mix from a 5.1 DD True HD source, your receiver or pre/pro is going to need the bitstream.
Dave, to the best of my knowledge, it's the other way round. DSP is only applied to PCM. PCM is fully decompressed and ready for reproduction. Bitstream is what’s multiplexed with the video when it comes out of the decoder. Whether DD, DTS, THD, DTS HR or DTS MA, when people talk about bitstream they really mean compressed audio. Digital signal processing doesn’t work on compressed audio – it works on decompressed – the data structure wouldn’t be correct otherwise , and there would be even more variables that the DSP would have to cope with. PCM is the lowest common denominator of all the digital audio formats, and is independent of the compression scheme used in the storage or broadcast layer.

The bitstream issue is one of my hobbyhorses. I don’t believe anyone “needs” bitstream, apart from some desperate CE marketing types; it’s kind of wrapped up with the HDMI V1.3 nonsense. There’s compressed audio on every SD, HD or BD disc, so bitstream audio must exist at some point in every system. The issue is where it should be decompressed from bitstream to PCM. In the case of lossless compressed audio like THD or DTS MA, the original PCM stream should be recovered without loss or degradation. Therefore, the logic goes, it shouldn’t matter whether it’s decompressed in the player and output as PCM, or output as bitstream and decompressed in the AVR. The result should be the same, and either way, the PCM will be D to A converted in the AVR as usual.

However, some people suggest that bitstream decoding in the amp sounds better than player decoding, and that’s many want bitstream output. But does it? I don’t think anyone, anywhere, knows for sure yet. The answer probably lies in the system-level digital audio replay architecture, and in particular how the timing information is managed. Digital audio consists of digital amplitude data and analogue timing info, and both have to right. Assuming the decompression of the amplitude data is always accurate (reasonable), that leaves differences in timing info to explain audible differences.

Several months ago I speculated that PCM may be more susceptible to jitter form poor timing info transmission, because de-compressed digital audio carries timing info from the player to the amp, but bitstream does not. Advantage bitstream.

However, HD audio of any type is carried by HDMI, and that separates out amplitude and timing info. The audio clock in the amp is tied to the video clock in the player. More recently I figured, this architecture would also apply to a bitstream connection – otherwise how does the amplifier maintain synchronisation between the audio and the video? No advantage.

Last month, I heard from Amir M that the bitstream replay architecture is indeed different to the PCM architecture, and audio timing is solely derived within the amplifier. Advantage Bitstream again.

Where now?

Dunno.

Nick
Back to top
Person99




Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 4901
Location: Flower Mound, TX


PostLink    Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welwynnick wrote:
Person99 wrote:
It is easy to apply DSP to the bitstream. If you want to apply DSP to a PCM stream, you effectively have to get it into a "usable" format. Given this, most receivers or pre/pros will not apply DSP to a PCM stream, only to bitstreams. So, chances are, if you want (for example) a 7.1 mix from a 5.1 DD True HD source, your receiver or pre/pro is going to need the bitstream.
Dave, to the best of my knowledge, it's the other way round. DSP is only applied to PCM. PCM is fully decompressed and ready for reproduction. Bitstream is what’s multiplexed with the video when it comes out of the decoder. Whether DD, DTS, THD, DTS HR or DTS MA, when people talk about bitstream they really mean compressed audio. Digital signal processing doesn’t work on compressed audio – it works on decompressed – the data structure wouldn’t be correct otherwise , and there would be even more variables that the DSP would have to cope with.


Yes, what you say makes sense. I thought most of the Receivers out did not do DSP on PCM and that was to be added with bitstream support. I may be mistaken. Embarassed

Of course, why the hell can't my receiver make a 6.1 mix out of a 5.1 analog input source, all they have to do is matrix a back channel the way they got a center channel from a stereo analog source--but they don't. So, maybe it is just bitstream handling and DSP come together as features although they are unrelated. Hmmmmm.

_________________
Dave

A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly view    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Source Devices All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum