Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletters ]

 
Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Photo AlbumsPhoto Albums  RegisterRegister 
 MembershipClub Membership   ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

A warning to others!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly view    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mp20748




Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5681
Location: Maryland

TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM


PostLink    Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


        Register to remove this ad. It's free!
I did have a few run of boards that had limited light output, and that's one of the reasons I offered the upgrade. Mak's boards were different, he o lay complained about a blue neck board problem, that he sent to me and I fixed it. One of the small series inductors fell off the board. A part I didn't change during the mod process.

After getting his boards the green has a marking on it that says focus problem. Not sure why that was there. I didn't notice the problem after maki g the changes to the boards, but did noticed it when pushing the contrast. And as he keeps saying, he only mentions a problem with the blue neck board. No mention of the green. Plus he forgets he sent me his contrast settings, when I was trying to find out if he had the limited problem. The green blooming problem had been corrected when the boards were here.

Concerning blooming, it could also be caused from weak tubes or low high voltage. And on an older marquee, it could be a number of other things as well. But for sure, no mention of a limited contrast or bllomimg problem was mentioned, just as in his many reports of the blue neck board failure. He never mentioned the green problem, nor was I made aware of a limited contrast. And it was not seen here
Back to top
Curt Palme
CRT Tech



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 24301
Location: Langley, BC

TV/Projector: All of them!


PostLink    Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I deleted the last two posts. MAK, you have the tracking number that Mike has given you, he sent it to me as well.

Posting more insults isn't going to do anything. Mike has sent you back your boards, you've accomplished what I allowed you to do by posting publicly.

Enough already.
Back to top
jbmeyer13




Joined: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 1135



PostLink    Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

racerxnet wrote:
How come nobody has shown his work with a calibrated projector and light output?

Mark


Well people like me who have MP's VIM's and Kurt's VNB in a fully calibrated set up don't put much value in screen shots. Kurt spent hours playing with different generations of digital camera's (old/new sensors) along with exposure rates/ISO, etc. I have no such desire to go down that path and I've put forth my opinion on this matter previously.

I haven't seen MP's projector since the fall of 2013 at which time it looked quite impressive (even with a messy set up). I've never been a fan of his screen shots and they never factored into my decision. Craig Rounds was the reason I went to meet with Mike and my friendship and partnering with Kurt/Mike is what kept me in the loop despite the hurdles that come with modifying boards.

The only thing (photo related) I've ever been interested in are test patterns which display bandwidth. Your performance on red (from MP's SMPTE shot) looks outstanding. If green and blue look comparable then I'd say you have a first rate set of boards from a BW perspective. Hopefully, light output and other attributes are on par with red channel BW.

Either way it appears you have moved on to a different solution so I expect this is the last we'll hear of this.

_________________
Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
Back to top
racerxnet




Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 362
Location: Illinois


PostLink    Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jbmeyer13 wrote:
racerxnet wrote:
How come nobody has shown his work with a calibrated projector and light output?

Mark


Well people like me who have MP's VIM's and Kurt's VNB in a fully calibrated set up don't put much value in screen shots. Kurt spent hours playing with different generations of digital camera's (old/new sensors) along with exposure rates/ISO, etc. I have no such desire to go down that path and I've put forth my opinion on this matter previously.

I haven't seen MP's projector since the fall of 2013 at which time it looked quite impressive (even with a messy set up). I've never been a fan of his screen shots and they never factored into my decision. Craig Rounds was the reason I went to meet with Mike and my friendship and partnering with Kurt/Mike is what kept me in the loop despite the hurdles that come with modifying boards.

The only thing (photo related) I've ever been interested in are test patterns which display bandwidth. Your performance on red (from MP's SMPTE shot) looks outstanding. If green and blue look comparable then I'd say you have a first rate set of boards from a BW perspective. Hopefully, light output and other attributes are on par with red channel BW.

Either way it appears you have moved on to a different solution so I expect this is the last we'll hear of this.


Until the boards come back and the components are tested that I am using, the case is still pending. Would you not agree to make sure the components function as should? Other than that I want to move forward with my projector.

MAK
Back to top
jbmeyer13




Joined: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 1135



PostLink    Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

racerxnet wrote:
Would you not agree to make sure the components function as should? Other than that I want to move forward with my projector.

MAK


Well Mike did hold on to these to test thoroughly so after all of this I'd be stunned if they weren't working. I see you have them up for sale. While I understand your frustration I'd highly recommend you keep them. Always good to have working spare neck cards around.

_________________
Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
Back to top
racerxnet




Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 362
Location: Illinois


PostLink    Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jbmeyer13 wrote:
racerxnet wrote:
Would you not agree to make sure the components function as should? Other than that I want to move forward with my projector.

MAK


Well Mike did hold on to these to test thoroughly so after all of this I'd be stunned if they weren't working. I see you have them up for sale. While I understand your frustration I'd highly recommend you keep them. Always good to have working spare neck cards around.


I am going with the Giaky mods which seem to be better engineered and have correction for the Blue. No need for the MP cards at this time. Thanks to all for keeping this somewhat civil.

MAK
Back to top
gjaky




Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Posts: 2790
Location: Budapest, Hungary


PostLink    Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cmjohnson wrote:
I really don't want to get into the middle of this but I am going to say that while I have seen compelling proof that in SOME cases, blooming is directly related to the performance of a neck card, when it comes to the Marquee it always will have some bloom at higher contrast levels due to the inadequate focus yokes that Electrohome continued to use even after switching away from Thomson CRTs (which the yokes were designed for) to Panasonic CRTs. (Which the yokes were NOT designed for.)


I don't agree with this assumption. All classic (unmodified) VNBs badly bloom at high contrast, with only changing the neckboards to the new style VDC in the same machine the blooming is way less pronounced with the new boards, at least this is how I saw...

_________________
projectors in the past : NEC 6-9PG xtra, Electrohome Marquee 6-7500, NEC XG 1351 LC ( with super modified Electrohome VNB neckboard !!!)
current: VDC Marquee 9500LC
The MOD: VNB-DB, VIM-DB
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
cmjohnson




Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 5180
Location: Buried under G90s


PostLink    Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2017 3:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I stand by my statement because I've TRIED other focus yokes in a Marquee and while every one of them changed the way the machine focuses in one way or another, most of them caused the machine to exhibit little to no blooming at high contrast levels, even leaving the stock neck cards in place and untouched, aside from of course having to remove and reinstall them as part of the yoke swap.

The fact of the matter is that the Thomson focus yokes that are stock on Marquees were engineered to match the Thomson CRTs that
the earliest Marquees were equipped with, and those Thomson tubes were built for a 40KV anode voltage and that totally changes the beam current profile which alters the magnetic field properties required to focus the beam. That dictates a different focus yoke design.

Even then the Thomson focus yokes did not deliver the sharpness even on Thomson tubes that we have come to expect out of our 8 and 9 inch Barcos and Sonys and even, yes, AmPros, too.

Panasonic's "partner" for magnetics was Kanto-Denshi. Electrohome is the only company that chose Panasonic projection tubes that DIDN'T choose to go with K-D focus magnetics, but when Electrohome switched tube vendors they chose not to re-engineer the Marquee chassis to work with K-D magnetics as it wasn't necessary in order to still meet the specifications set forth for their target market, that being the flight simulation market. If it's good enough, why spend the money to re-engineer it to be better when the customers didn't care?

That still doesn't change the fact that Marquees are the weakest performing projectors when it comes to focus performance, of all projectors that use the same Panasonic family of tubes.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly view    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Page 5 of 5
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum