View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
gonthorn
Joined: 25 Jan 2011 Posts: 6
|
Link Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 6:16 pm Post subject: 4K Blending - realistic options ? |
|
|
Hi All,
While I have been in the home theater hobby for 10+ years I have 0 experience with CRT projectors, so please go easy
I would say I am very DIY oriented and would like to take on a challenging project to cut costs.
I have been researching projector blending, and now have a new theater room to start building. My goal is a 4k 2.40:1 projector system with "long" lamp life..... on a reasonable budget. Today that is not possible, a laser light source "non- commercial" 4k projector from Sony is running almost $50k !
This leads me to CRT projectors which offer "long tube life" (greater than 2 - 3k hours traditional lamps offer) and great black levels, but most important ability to sync to custom resolutions.
Now time to burst my bubble, are any 9 inch CRT projectors able to run a custom resolution close to 2000 x 1600 ? With a blend zone 2 projectors would produce 3840 x 1600 (2.40:1 ratio)
I have read that Nvidia Quadro cards (k4200 series and above) offer native blending options that work across a Windows desktop, it works at the driver level so all applications can utilize the blended resolution.
Recently I have had my eye on Barco 1209s units, I read about video bandwidth on Curt's ranking page and I'm wondering if any CRT can properly handle 1600 lines ? All the talk about lens options and c elements is still a bit foreign to me.
I am looking to fill a screen about 11 feet wide, so each projector would have a 6 foot wide image to fill. I could even run a full 4:3 resolution to utilize the most of the tube face (2133 x 1600) but not sure there is bandwidth to accommodate that.
I was hoping to keep the cost of both projectors at 2000 or less, which is why the 1209s caught my eye, something like a Sony g90 seems too expensive (at least looking on ebay)
Any input is appreciated, I wish I would find a local CRT for sale for like 50 bucks just so I could play around and learn about them (even if its a 7 inch set)
Thanks!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
digitalayon
Joined: 02 Mar 2009 Posts: 921
|
Link Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well right now most on ebay are not too pricy. It's the shipping that runs more currently.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1608
|
Link Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Blending with the top of the line 9 inch should not be a problem.
2 x G90
or
2 x Marquee 9500LC Ultra
or
2 x Barco 909/Cine9/1209s (Graphics Version)
cheers
ElTopo
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
gjaky
Joined: 05 Jun 2010 Posts: 2790 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Link Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMO the Barco 1209 lacks the bandwidth to even resolve 1080p, but that is the lesser problem. A 9" tube running (no matter on what chassis) at 2000x1600 will look quite soft, plus you'd better to run all this at 72Hz refresh at least. I'm not saying a CRT can't do this, sure it will display, but the outcome won't be close to what you'd expect and beside all this the projectors will work very hard (= more likely to fail).
_________________ projectors in the past : NEC 6-9PG xtra, Electrohome Marquee 6-7500, NEC XG 1351 LC ( with super modified Electrohome VNB neckboard !!!)
current: VDC Marquee 9500LC
The MOD: VNB-DB, VIM-DB
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2251 Location: The Netherlands
|
Link Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ElTopo wrote: | Blending with the top of the line 9 inch should not be a problem.
2 x G90
or
2 x Marquee 9500LC Ultra
or
2 x Barco 909/Cine9/1209s (Graphics Version)
cheers
ElTopo |
He did you succeed in blending two 909? I am very faintly thinking about two splitpacks 919 blending. That would resolve the bandwidth issue. On the other hand the bandwidth issue is really not that visible but it will help a little. It would be a trade off between levels of grey in backgrounds and visible blending zone I fear.
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->hd1->hd350->vw100->cinemax+919sp+3x919+9500mp->cinemax+919sp(modded)+kuro600a
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1608
|
Link Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Theater room still in the builing process.
Next up mounting acoustic ceiling.
My screen size = 3,32 x 1,38m (1.2:40)
cheers
ElTopo
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jbmeyer13
Joined: 03 Dec 2010 Posts: 1135
|
Link Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gjaky wrote: | IMO the Barco 1209 lacks the bandwidth to even resolve 1080p, but that is the lesser problem. A 9" tube running (no matter on what chassis) at 2000x1600 will look quite soft, plus you'd better to run all this at 72Hz refresh at least. I'm not saying a CRT can't do this, sure it will display, but the outcome won't be close to what you'd expect and beside all this the projectors will work very hard (= more likely to fail). |
A properly modified 9500LC can handle 1920 x 1080p/72hz and look very good; so running a blend can be done but not quite at the 3840 H resolution. I'd say running a custom resolution of approx. 3500 x 1600 would work with no risk to the hardware.
The bigger issue is whether the OP has the time and inclination to deal with getting the blend zone to look decent. The expectations in that regard are the most critical and will make or break this project.
_________________ Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2251 Location: The Netherlands
|
Link Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
my opinion on the 4k thing is that I do not need the extra detail. It is true that my 4k television shows more details but on my 1080p crt it just looks much better even though when I focus I see that there is a little less detail. I see much more blacklevel en shadow detail and depth on the CRT.
Perhaps with 4k original material I will need 4k?
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->hd1->hd350->vw100->cinemax+919sp+3x919+9500mp->cinemax+919sp(modded)+kuro600a
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1608
|
Link Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why 3500 x 1600 on one projector ?
Why not using 2048 x 1536 to one projector ? (you don't need the black bars on cinemascope so no 2160p in this case).
Finally you will get 4096 x 1536 which gives you a blend zone of 256.
cheers
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
gonthorn
Joined: 25 Jan 2011 Posts: 6
|
Link Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Its my understanding using an Nvidia Quadro card like a k4200 will allow good control of the blend zone and allow for all the fine tuning for each projector (gamma, color calibration etc). I haven't gotten that far yet, as Im still unsure if 2000 x 1600 is doable.
Some conflicting responses, some even saying 1080p is "too soft", I don't know what to believe. I realize manufacturer bandwidth specs may be overstated for marketing purposes, but I am surprised there isn't more interest in testing 4k. maybe when 4k bluray arrives that will change ?
So a Marquee 9500LC (ultra I guess) may be able to do it, but none of the Barcos? Not looking to spend 5k on 2 projectors
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
hansilili
Joined: 09 Mar 2007 Posts: 302 Location: Köln, Germany
|
Link Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 8:08 am Post subject: Re: 4K Blending - realistic options ? |
|
|
gonthorn wrote: | Hi All,
I have 0 experience with CRT projectors, so please go easy
|
And if several quite experienced people advise you that a vertical resolution of >>1080p is no good for a CRT projector and that a decent blend is tricky even at regular full HD resolution, will you pay attention?
Cheers
hansilili
_________________ HansA, alles andere ist euer Bier!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2251 Location: The Netherlands
|
Link Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
rmoved hansiii says it right.
Ok I wanted to say that with two Barco's you can go up somewhat in vertical resolution because the extreme small spotsize with the LUG and focussing system. If you place two next to eachother you will also solve the bandwidth problem.
With the Marquee there is no way I see to go up in vertical resolution. The spotsize of the LCP is to big. Horizontal it does better with the bandwidth.
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->hd1->hd350->vw100->cinemax+919sp+3x919+9500mp->cinemax+919sp(modded)+kuro600a
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1608
|
Link Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
1080p looks very sharp on a 9 inch unit if your setup is right.
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 2251 Location: The Netherlands
|
Link Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ElTopo wrote: | 1080p looks very sharp on a 9 inch unit if your setup is right. |
Yes but the Barco is a little sharper and the Marquee has a little more ansi contrast.
_________________ 701s->runco933->8500ultra->hd1->hd350->vw100->cinemax+919sp+3x919+9500mp->cinemax+919sp(modded)+kuro600a
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
hansilili
Joined: 09 Mar 2007 Posts: 302 Location: Köln, Germany
|
Link Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:44 pm Post subject: Re: 4K Blending - realistic options ? |
|
|
hansilili wrote: | gonthorn wrote: | Hi All,
I have 0 experience with CRT projectors, so please go easy
|
And if several quite experienced people advise you that a vertical resolution of >>1080p is no good for a CRT projector and that a decent blend is tricky even at regular full HD resolution, will you pay attention?
Cheers
hansilili |
">>1080p" means significantly greater than 1080p
_________________ HansA, alles andere ist euer Bier!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jbmeyer13
Joined: 03 Dec 2010 Posts: 1135
|
Link Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ElTopo wrote: | Why 3500 x 1600 on one projector ?
Why not using 2048 x 1536 to one projector ? (you don't need the black bars on cinemascope so no 2160p in this case).
Finally you will get 4096 x 1536 which gives you a blend zone of 256.
cheers |
It's not 3500 x 1600 on one projector; that's the total effective res after overlapping the two PJ's in the blend zone. It was an approximation as I didn't have a calculator in front of me to factor in the blend zone overlap. Getting any CRT to resolve 1920 is difficult enough so going to 2048 is really pushing it. The H res depends on whether the user decides to go with a 10% or 20% overlap in the blend zone. If you don't think that this matters hook up a pattern generator to your PJ and see the difference when viewing 2048 x 1536 vs. 1800 x 1200 (focus on the H res as the variable). You have to also factor in the refresh rate and it's effect on total BW. 2048 x 1536/60hz with proper timings to shift the raster ringing out of the image is likely going to require each projector to have a video chain capable of handling 250+ mhz. With MP's latest mods that me be possible but the total of 3500 x 1600 I suggested was to give a little cushion. Ultimately it requires experimentation to see what works best with your hardware.
As to the pros and cons of using a 10 or 20% overlap when calibrating the blend zone it's best to speak to Nashou66. There's nobody on the planet who has spent more time calibrating a blend than he has.
_________________ Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1608
|
Link Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Barco lists 2048 x 1536 on the internal pattern list.
Why is it listed there ?
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
gjaky
Joined: 05 Jun 2010 Posts: 2790 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Link Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ElTopo wrote: | The Barco lists 2048 x 1536 on the internal pattern list.
Why is it listed there ? |
Sure it will display, but that don't mean it is fully capable ióof doing that...
[irony on] Figure that the NEC XG 135 has a "marketing" max resolution of 2500x2000 and it's 8" machine, that would be great for 4K blending... [irony off]
_________________ projectors in the past : NEC 6-9PG xtra, Electrohome Marquee 6-7500, NEC XG 1351 LC ( with super modified Electrohome VNB neckboard !!!)
current: VDC Marquee 9500LC
The MOD: VNB-DB, VIM-DB
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1608
|
Link Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well then i use 1064x800@72Hz like Nash on each
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jbmeyer13
Joined: 03 Dec 2010 Posts: 1135
|
Link Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ElTopo wrote: | Well then i use 1064x800@72Hz like Nash on each |
You surely can but the point was to run 4K. Don't you have your TV One blend units up for sales anyway?
_________________ Projector: Modded 9501LC ULtra- MP VIM, Vold VNB, ETECH LVPS, Silver VIM Cables, HD10F's & a V1 case!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|