|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
AFryia
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 956 Location: S.E. Michigan VPH-G70Q
|
Link Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:16 pm Post subject: Did I Screw Up? |
|
|
Call it buyer remorse or mere confusion!
I have the OPPO BDP-93 with excellent video scaling (DVD) some noise reduction capability and excellent Blu-ray video.
I'm contemplating a Lumagen VP with excellent video scaling (DVD) very good noise reduction, CMS, Gamma, and greyscale.
In the Future I'm looking at a Digital projector JVC possibly with CMS, Gamma, grey scale, fair video scaling maybe?
So I'm seeing a lot of overlap. I'm wondering if I could have went cheap on the Blu-ray and PJ and partnered with the Lumagen? When I say cheap I mean lower cost less features.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HogPilot
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Posts: 2383
TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD
|
Link Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: Re: Did I Screw Up? |
|
|
AFryia wrote: | Call it buyer remorse or mere confusion!
I have the OPPO BDP-93 with excellent video scaling (DVD) some noise reduction capability and excellent Blu-ray video.
I'm contemplating a Lumagen VP with excellent video scaling (DVD) very good noise reduction, CMS, Gamma, and greyscale.
In the Future I'm looking at a Digital projector JVC possibly with CMS, Gamma, grey scale, fair video scaling maybe?
So I'm seeing a lot of overlap. I'm wondering if I could have went cheap on the Blu-ray and PJ and partnered with the Lumagen? When I say cheap I mean lower cost less features. |
Here's my thoughts:
1. Some video processing - most notably MPEG decoding and (if you're sending RGB) color decoding - can't be substituted by an outboard VP. What you get is what you get from the player. In this respect, the Oppo does EVERYTHING right; the same can't be said for a lot of BD players out there. As far as I'm concerned, the quick boot times, solid processing, and frequent firmware updates are worth the price alone.
2. I've had my Lumagen since 2007 - I haven't paid for anything but the 3D upgrade since then. It's gained a lot of functionality and outlasted many projectors, always able to fully calibrate and manipulate whatever video signal and projector I've thrown at it. The amount of processing power and flexibility that this processor has is unmatched by any other consumer processor, and has been one of my best HT investments ever.
3. I look at the scaling and CMS features on the JVC as a bonus. Each year you get to chose between the base model and one of the higher-end models; if you have a Lumagen, that choice is easy since things like CMS don't factor into the equation, and you're left evaluating whether the bump in CR or the e-shift is worth the extra money.
Overall what you've chosen contributes positively to the end result in its own way that cannot be duplicated by another device. The fact that each item duplicates some of the features of other items in no way changes the benefits that each individual piece brings to the table. If you have the money to spend and you're comfortable with that, I think you've chosen a combo that's going to make you very happy. I have all of those in my theater (BDP-93, Radiance XE, and RS55), and I couldn't be happier.
_________________
ecrabb wrote: | Curt Palme wrote: | Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure. |
He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.
SC |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
AFryia
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 956 Location: S.E. Michigan VPH-G70Q
|
Link Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:05 pm Post subject: Re: Did I Screw Up? |
|
|
HogPilot wrote: |
if you have a Lumagen, that choice is easy since things like CMS don't factor into the equation, and you're left evaluating whether the bump in CR or the e-shift is worth the extra money.
|
I was thinking along those lines. I remember an article in a theater mag awhile back that said the base JVC with VP outperformed the High end JVC without VP.
Can you really see the difference between 40K:1 and 60K:1 contrast? I'd be more concerned about black level.
1080p at 12ft. on 110" looks pretty good to me. As far as E-Shift I would need to see one in action. Anyone get a chance at an A/B comparison. What were your impressions?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HogPilot
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Posts: 2383
TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD
|
Link Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:44 pm Post subject: Re: Did I Screw Up? |
|
|
AFryia wrote: | HogPilot wrote: |
if you have a Lumagen, that choice is easy since things like CMS don't factor into the equation, and you're left evaluating whether the bump in CR or the e-shift is worth the extra money.
|
I was thinking along those lines. I remember an article in a theater mag awhile back that said the base JVC with VP outperformed the High end JVC without VP.
Can you really see the difference between 40K:1 and 60K:1 contrast? I'd be more concerned about black level.
1080p at 12ft. on 110" looks pretty good to me. As far as E-Shift I would need to see one in action. Anyone get a chance at an A/B comparison. What were your impressions? |
The answer to your contrast question is that it depends. It depends on your viewing environment and it depends on your sensitivity to black levels. In a hypothetical situation, if we have a JVC putting out 800 calibrated lumens at a particular throw distance and iris setting onto a 9' wide 16:9 screen (123" diagonal), you'd be getting 17.56 ftL at peak white. On the 40,000:1 machine this would yield 0.00043 ftL black level, and on a 60,000:1 machine it would yield 0.00029 ftL black level. Could one tell the difference? Sure. Is it going to jump out at you without a comparator? Possibly not. In the end you have to decide whether things like e-shift and a higher contrast are worth the jump in price. Also keep in mind that the CMS on an RS55/65 may yield a higher resale value since one doesn't have to have an external box to fully calibrate the projector.
I'd venture to guess that at your viewing distance, e-shift would be on the verge of making a difference. It really depends on your screen surface and your visual acuity, but you're right in the borderline area as far as e-shift's usefulness.
I know I've given you a lot of "it depends" answers which may not help, but I don't feel that any of your questions can be easily condensed down to a black and white, yes/no answer.
_________________
ecrabb wrote: | Curt Palme wrote: | Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure. |
He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.
SC |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|