Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletters ]

 
Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Photo AlbumsPhoto Albums  RegisterRegister 
 MembershipClub Membership   ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

so who has switched?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly view    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Digital Projectors
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nettwerkjohn



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 507
Location: Nelson, sunshine capital of New Zealand


PostLink    Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:19 am    Post subject: so who has switched? Reply with quote


        Register to remove this ad. It's free!
so, who has switched to the dark side? and what to?

we have the ruby, and it's still going strong. still happy with it...
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
greg_mitch



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 5198



PostLink    Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Technically that is the light side...CRT is the dark side.

If I had cash I would think about the AE3000. Darn NEC won't break either.
Back to top
Zebu Fellenz



Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 2548
Location: Phelps, New York


PostLink    Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Person 99, and Riderbreck (sp?) both switched.
_________________
-peace
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
secstate



Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 718



PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't switched, got a deal I couldn't refuse on a 9" but honestly I probably would be quite happy with a decent digital these days but I am cheap bastard and I will probably wait several more years not because digitals aren't good enough but more because I like to get my "money's worth."
Back to top
nuttall_chris



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 825
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada


PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I switched from a modded Marquee 9500 Ultra to an RS2 with a Lumagen Radiance about a year ago. I've been very happy with the RS2 Smile

Chris.
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
nettwerkjohn



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 507
Location: Nelson, sunshine capital of New Zealand


PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

had you seen the ruby? we are about due to re-lamp, but MAY just upgrade to the JVC...
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
nuttall_chris



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 825
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada


PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've never seen the Ruby. If I were buying now I'd buy the JVC RS-20. The RS-20 has about twice the contrast ration of the RS2 and is quite a bit brighter. Also with the adjustable iris you can keep the light level at the same amount as the bulb ages.

I've spent a lot more time watching movies since I bought the RS2 and alot less time "tweaking". The Radiance made a huge difference with the full CMS. I've put 400 hours on the RS2 in the last year. I got an extra bulb when I purchased the RS2 and even if I change the bulb every 1000 hours, I should get 5 years out of the current 2 bulbs. At that point I'll likely upgrade to another digital.

Chris.
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
nettwerkjohn



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 507
Location: Nelson, sunshine capital of New Zealand


PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

we're at just under 2000 hours on the ruby. sure, it doesn't do total fade to black, but it is razor sharp, smooth, and luckily, our convergence is spot on...

i'd go xenon again, bar the ludicrous $28k (about $20k) that sony want for the vw200 here...

then again, the xenon lamps are $2500 here... or landed for $1200 out of singapore
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
WanMan



Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 9668



PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nettwerkjohn wrote:
had you seen the ruby? we are about due to re-lamp, but MAY just upgrade to the JVC...
Ok, I am a little curious here. There must be something fundamental to the JVC that is missing from the Sony SXRD projectors. I mean, if you are considering upgrading a whole projector then what are you finding feature-wise in JVC that is not found in the newest Sony SXRD projectors?
_________________
Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
Back to top
nuttall_chris



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 825
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada


PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The native contrast ration (contrast ration without using an automatic iris) is significantly betting on the JVC projectors than on any other brand.

Chris.
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
WanMan



Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 9668



PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nuttall_chris wrote:
The native contrast ration (contrast ration without using an automatic iris) is significantly betting on the JVC projectors than on any other brand.

Chris.
I thought this was due to JVC's ability to modulate the lamp output before it entered the light engine where Sony modulated the light after (and with an iris). I take it the iris has not been all that pleasing to you in its performance, but wonder how it might have changed in recent years since the Ruby's inception.
_________________
Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
Back to top
nuttall_chris



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 825
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada


PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The JVC doesn't modulate the lamp not sure how they get the better contrast ratio but they do. The auto iris's are getting better but I've yet to see on that doesn't have visible pulsating "artifacts". The JVC RS-20 can get 50000:1 contrast ratio without an auto iris, some of the other manufactures claim to be able to get a higher contrast ratio but they use an iris to achieve those results. As soon as ANY light is put on the screen the iris opens up and the black background level elevates. The native contrast ratio of most of the non JVC brands are in the 5000 to 10000:1 range.

Chris.
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
nettwerkjohn



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 507
Location: Nelson, sunshine capital of New Zealand


PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

exactly. and the re-lamp price of the ruby is approximately half the price of the jvc here.

to have the contrast range of the ruby (15000:1) WITHOUT an iris is appealing. however, we don't notice it pulsing in operation. just starry sky scenes, the stars look dim...(ish)
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
nuttall_chris



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 825
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada


PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The RS2 gets ~20000 to 30000:1 depending on the zoom and the RS20 gets 30000 to 50000:1 depending on the zoom. All of this without an iris. The RS20 goes for ~ $5800US and the bulb is ~ $350.

Chris.
Back to top
View user's photo album (2 photos)
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 12404
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-RS56


PostLink    Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've seen both the Ruby and Chris's RS2/Radiance. I don't like the Ruby at all (sorry!). It would be a big step backwards for me. Chris's RS2 was interesting to see since I know he knows his stuff so I was anxious to see it. It's a nice setup. Made me smile to see how far digital's come and that I'd be happy with that setup.

I have no intention to switch to something like that any time soon however since I would be a somewhat sideways move for me. It does some things a lot a better and some things not as well. In the end for watching movies I think it would be somewhat of a wash for me. Sharpness is certainly *miles* better but funny enough, for strictly movie watching sharpness is about the LEAST important factor (believe it or not). ANSI contrast is better but overall contrast isn't. Black level isn't as good. Colours with the radiance are good. It would be an absolute requirement for me to tame those overly saturated primaries.

So I wait... I want my first digital (probably in the $5-8K range) to be something that truly blows me away and is a significant upgrade.

Bulb cost of digitals is not something I care or worry about. It's not really an issue (IMHO) and is typically overblown. Setup time/maintenance of CRT is also overblown (IMHO). Any CRT projector worth owning for me would be new enough that it wouldn't drift (my current one built in 2000/2001 hasn't been adjusted in years why my older one built 10 years before that needed daily adjustment). All projectors require a lot of work for CMS/colour calibration regardless of technology used. No matter what technology is used, if you want perfection it's going to take a lot of work. This idea of digitals being plug and play if you want it to actually look good is simply not true.

Kal

_________________

My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
Mr. Green



Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 1214
Location: Calgary


PostLink    Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have one major beef with bulb projectors. Why does EVERY freaking one have to have a different bulb? Why is there no universal bulb/or 2 for each manufacturer? That would surely bring bulb costs down and you wouldn't have to worry about replacing the entire machine every 3 years because nobody has a bulb for it any more. Not everyone has the $$ to buy a 2nd or 3rd bulb at the time of purchase so end up getting screwed. At least with CRT, you can still get tubes for your 20 year old projector an parts will be around for a few years yet.

I wouldn't consider a "bulb" projector, however if the long life/ super bright LED's progress the way they have been, they should be worthwhile in a few years. It would be funny to replace a 200lb beast with something that will fit in a small bag if not a pocket.

_________________
You can be young only once but, you can be immature forever.

Current Projector Marquee9501LC with PS3 (BLu-Ray) at 1080P LOVE IT! Screen is an Elunevision 120" 4:3 (2.4 gain - no hotspots). (also own a NEC 9PG+)
Back to top
View user's photo album (28 photos)
nettwerkjohn



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 507
Location: Nelson, sunshine capital of New Zealand


PostLink    Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i bought a led micro in singapore for about $100USD. its a toy, but just perfect for the boat that we work on. home theater on a factory trawler...

Smile
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
nettwerkjohn



Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 507
Location: Nelson, sunshine capital of New Zealand


PostLink    Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i bought a led micro in singapore for about $100USD. its a toy, but just perfect for the boat that we work on. home theater on a factory trawler...

Smile
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Tom.W



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 6382



PostLink    Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whats a Dig- i -tal ?

Wink Wink Wink

Mr. Green
Back to top
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 12404
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-RS56


PostLink    Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Green wrote:
I have one major beef with bulb projectors. Why does EVERY freaking one have to have a different bulb? Why is there no universal bulb/or 2 for each manufacturer?

Because that doesn't make any sense. There are varying degrees of quality, colour span/output, and light output to digital projector bulbs. Some of the better ones emit a flatter range of white and stay more even over their lifespan (less adjustment required). Then there's all the different light output options available. The bulb is as much a part of the technology that makes one projector better than another. Making them all use the same one makes as much sense as making all cars use the same engine and then trying to remain competitive.

Kal

_________________

My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly view    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Digital Projectors All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 1 of 9
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum