| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
satish chatim
Joined: 27 Mar 2011 Posts: 1
|
Link Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:19 pm Post subject: calibrating cms |
|
|
|
As suggested in GREY SCALE FOR DUMMIES under topic COLOUR MANAGEMENT SYSTEM using EYE ONE DISPLAY LITE sensor with the 100% white window the contrast was set for a light output of 40ft lambert.The corresponding Y value was 147.Using 100% red window the colour was supposed to be adjusted to get Y value which should be 21% of above Y value of 147 ie 31.47.But this could not be achieved even by increasing the colour to its maximum value.The television that i was calibrating was a 26" samsung lcd.Will be grateful if you tell me where i am going wrong.The patterns were from AVS HD 720 colour hcfr window pattern.Thank you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChrisWiggles Opinionated SOB
Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 2514 Location: Seattle
|
Link Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:11 am Post subject: Re: calibrating cms |
|
|
| satish chatim wrote: | | As suggested in GREY SCALE FOR DUMMIES under topic COLOUR MANAGEMENT SYSTEM using EYE ONE DISPLAY LITE sensor with the 100% white window the contrast was set for a light output of 40ft lambert.The corresponding Y value was 147.Using 100% red window the colour was supposed to be adjusted to get Y value which should be 21% of above Y value of 147 ie 31.47.But this could not be achieved even by increasing the colour to its maximum value.The television that i was calibrating was a 26" samsung lcd.Will be grateful if you tell me where i am going wrong.The patterns were from AVS HD 720 colour hcfr window pattern.Thank you. |
The % target is really a bad idea. The % depends on accurate chromaticity, otherwise you have to recalculate your % target.
Recommend you stick to using colorbars properly which is reliable and accurate.
I don't recommend setting user color 'saturation' using this % method unless you know what you are doing and you have an accurate meter to verify accurate display chromaticity which your meter is not.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|