View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10273
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:20 am Post subject: Who is feeding 1920x1080P by HTPC to X CRT projector? |
|
|
I am trying to get an idea of what people are using for a CRT projector when feeding said projector 1920x1080P signal. Is there anyone using an NEC XGLC (or rebadged unit), or something else?
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chuchuf
Joined: 11 Mar 2006 Posts: 548
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1080P here from my HTPC w/ HD DVD and BluRay to a Sony G90.
Terry
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zebu Fellenz
Joined: 21 Dec 2006 Posts: 2567
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1080p 60 to my G70
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
VideoGrabber
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 933 Location: Michigan
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Eby is doing 1080p @72 Hz to his NEC XG LC.
_________________ - Tim
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5238 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VideoGrabber wrote: | Mike Eby is doing 1080p @72 Hz to his NEC XG LC. |
Yep!
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10273
|
Link Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Terry, are you familiar with how Mike has his XG setup? I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. BTW, I had Storming Norm over on Friday for the drywall assessment. Dear god could this mean I actually get a finished basement soon!?!
I figured I'd go ahead and hang the XG, ask that you set it up and maybe build a screen for it, etc., etc., etc.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Angus_rg
Joined: 16 Dec 2007 Posts: 343 Location: A planet far, far away..... Baltimore, MD
|
Link Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm doing 1080p on my Marquastic 8500. The overall quality for me is the same as 1080i, but I'm blaming the remote between the loose nut and the CRT.
_________________ It's good to be the king.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nombz
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 119 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
Link Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am doing 1080i72 on a BG1209s/E and did 1080i72 on a BG1208s/2. The 1209 is MUCH sharper (not suprisingly). I tried lower resolutions on the 1208, but I liked the picture more with 1080 even though it was not as sharp.
_________________ BarcoGraphics 1208s/2 and BarcoGraphics 1209s/E
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
1080i 96hz to my XG LC.
I tried 1920 x 802p at 72hz for Scope movies, but it didn't look any different really to 1080i 96hz.
They both look GOOD.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10273
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find it amazing that some find interlace as good as the progressive for the same resolution. This disturbs me in that an interlaced setup will either produce notable line gaps without the strong persistence of phosphor, or the linearity balance and amplitude is such that the two fields being drawn are overlapping each other and potentially softening the picture.
For those not filling the line gaps and with persistence of phosphor not sufficient is the work around to produce a high enough redraw (i.e. 96 Hz) to overcome this issue? I know this approach may not be the primary reason (vs. tearing or judder), but I suppose it 'works'.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You answered your own question WanMan.
That's the reason we are not running 1080i 48hz...
Try a high refresh rate interlaced res.
The reason I tried 802p at 72hz for scope movies was to try and eliminate the appearance of scan/field lines on white highlights at 1080i 96hz. I assumed they were visible due to interlacing.
When I tried 802p 72hz they were still there. It's just analogue noise or scanlines.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|