View previous topic :: View next topic |
how much do you think this costs, or should cost? |
$200. or less |
|
18% |
[ 2 ] |
$500. or less |
|
72% |
[ 8 ] |
$750. or more |
|
9% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 11 |
|
Author |
Message |
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:25 pm Post subject: New audio toy |
|
|
I just bought the last piece I need to make my 2-channel system into truly a pure 2-channel, in other words I won't have my Denon receiver in the signal chain any longer.
I will be swapping interconnects around though for movies but tht's ok. So, I was wondering what you guys think this piece cost? Here's a brief description, BTW, it's hand built here in the US, not a Cheap Chinese knock-off
Quote: | Stereo Tube preamplifier with 3 sets of stereo inputs, 2 sets of stereo outputs. Features: Cast-aluminum Hammond chassis, chromed tube protectors, Stainless steel rails, bullet-proof construction. Upgraded parts are used through the signal chain for enhanced sound quality. 24 v.d.c., 1 amp, outboard power supply. |
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
70.15 KB |
Viewed: |
13807 Time(s) |
|
Last edited by draganm on Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:29 pm; edited 2 times in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
scoobydoo
Joined: 06 Apr 2006 Posts: 358 Location: Victoria BC
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sweet little tube unit.
I haven't really listened to a tube system but i'm interested in checking one out one of these days.
My two channel system concise of a creek 5350amp, NAD M55 cd player and B&W speakers.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12026 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You got robbed, Dragan. That thing's gonna sound all fuzzy.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TechToys Guest
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
garyfritz wrote: | You got robbed, Dragan. That thing's gonna sound all fuzzy. |
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scoobydoo wrote: | sweet little tube unit.
I haven't really listened to a tube system but i'm interested in checking one out one of these days.
My two channel system concise of a creek 5350amp, NAD M55 cd player and B&W speakers. | well stay away from tube amps. I tried one and quickly found out you need a very efficient speaker, like 95db or higher. however I heard that a tube pre-amp like the one above driving a nice solid state amp can be really sweet. wish me luck
garyfritz wrote: | You got robbed, Dragan. That thing's gonna sound all fuzzy. | yeah hopefully it sounds better than the pic looks. however i'm more concerned with the guys electronic skills than his Photography. So far i've read a lot of very positive reviews on it, real reviews from normal people not stereo rag nonsense.
no one's guessed price yet, chicken?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ill make it easy on you guys, i staretd a Poll. Reason is 2-fold.
1) it seems a lot of people are just hostile towards high end 2 -channel stereo, and have a very skewed notion of how much it costs.
2) Sometimes it can be outrageous, the new Ayre XKR pre-amp comes in at a hefty $18000. YEs, that's pre-amp ONLY.
Does anyone think you can find nice components, as in audiophile grade, for a reaonable cost?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CRT_Ben
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 1684 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
$200.00.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24305 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
Link Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll say $349.00. Any lower and his piece will lose credibility with the audiofools out there..
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bucketfoot
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 698 Location: Centennial, CO
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
$275 if new, $150 if used
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
LOL that's funny, Ben your view on value has been skewed by too much wal-mart shopping. Just the stainles steel handles are $6. each., i know because i use them on things I build (non audio).
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
papalek
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1537 Location: Longs SC
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
draganm wrote: | LOL that's funny, Ben your view on value has been skewed by too much wal-mart shopping. Just the stainles steel handles are $6. each., i know because i use them on things I build (non audio). |
OK $212.00
_________________ My current list of PJ's AmPro 1 1/2-4600,4200, 1/2-3600,2600.
I do love my AmPro's
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zebu Fellenz
Joined: 21 Dec 2006 Posts: 2567
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
draganm wrote: | LOL that's funny, Ben your view on value has been skewed by too much wal-mart shopping. Just the stainles steel handles are $6. each., i know because i use them on things I build (non audio). |
LOL that's funny, Draganm you're mixing up value and cost. I value that piece at around $100 becuase that is what it would be worth to ME. I'm guessing you value it higher becuase you bought it and paid more than $100 for it.
Seriously thought it looks like a nice piece, how does it sound? What is you two channel setup, sources?
Erik
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 17860 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CRT_Ben
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 1684 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
draganm wrote: | LOL that's funny, Ben your view on value has been skewed by too much wal-mart shopping. Just the stainles steel handles are $6. each., i know because i use them on things I build (non audio). |
Who says I shop at walmart? Just because I have "lowly" quality solid state components like a top of the line old-school Sony pre/pro and separate Adcom amps for each sound field (front/rear/center)?
StylinLP wrote: | Dragan /.../ he got away from his crappy Denon receiver and tried a few real phono preamps! He settled on a Bellari tube preamp for $200. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was wondering
1) what you guys thought it cost, as in how much would it sell for
2) not what you would pay for it.
The answer to the second question Kal answered pretty eloquently. I don' think Adcom is lowly, it's pretty typical mid-level home theatre type stuff. Hell, anything is better than a receiver, even a Denon. Curt was right on the money, it's about $350. which I think is really cheap for a point to point wired vacuum tubed pre-amp hand built in the US. To give you an idea, a typical kit like from Bottlehead costs twice that much, and that's juts a kit.
Professional tubed pre-amps from company's like Rogue audio and others typically sell for $1500. on up to thousands of dollars. BUT, the point I was trying to make is that you can build a very reasonable 2-channel rig with premium components for less than the typical $5K figure most people think.
I haven't heard listened to this yet, I hope it's worth it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
WTS
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1276 Location: Calgary
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So true that most tube gear is expensive. Early on in my audio life I ran all tube gear and it wasn't cheap even back in the 80's. Don't know if anyone has ever heard of TubeGod, they later changed thier name to NewYork AudioLabs. Not cheap but it sure sounded sweet running some Quad electrostats.
What are the tubes in your unit? The utbes I had in my pre were 6DG8s, 8 of them.
_________________ Thanks
Walter
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bucketfoot
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 698 Location: Centennial, CO
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
draganm wrote: | I was wondering
1) what you guys thought it cost, as in how much would it sell for
|
I already gave my answer...
$275 new
$150 used
Quite frankly tube circuitry is not that expensive to make, and this is just a stereo pre-amp without an expensive custom machined chassis (where much of the cost often comes from).
And of course the final sale price of much of the high-end audio equipment has nothing to do with BOM cost.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
WTS
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1276 Location: Calgary
|
Link Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I knew a few people back in the 80s who had very high end audio products on the market and typically the selling price was 4 times the build cost.
_________________ Thanks
Walter
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
Link Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bucketfoot wrote: | I already gave my answer...$275 new
Quite frankly tube circuitry is not that expensive to make, and this is just a stereo pre-amp without an expensive custom machined chassis (where much of the cost often comes from). | so you would build and sell that tube amp for $275. and consider it a worthwhile investment of your time? I don't think I would but I could see some people doing it as a hobby more than for profit. The guy who makes these BTW does use that figure as a starting point though without any upgrades like dual discrete power supplies, XLR balanced output jacks, etc.
A pair of tubes alone will cost roughly $20. each unless you get some really cheap Chinese ones and the same is true for rest of the circuit, nice parts are not cheap. You start putting in Audio grade components and it quickly adds up. You can't build a nice pre-amp with 20 bucks worth of junk parts from Radio Shack.
WTS wrote: | So true that most tube gear is expensive. Early on in my audio life I ran all tube gear and it wasn't cheap even back in the 80's. Don't know if anyone has ever heard of TubeGod, they later changed thier name to NewYork AudioLabs. Not cheap but it sure sounded sweet running some Quad electrostats.
What are the tubes in your unit? The utbes I had in my pre were 6DG8s, 8 of them. | these are a pair of 12AT7's. I'm really excited about trying this and by-passing my Denon receiver. I have always had a good or very good sounding system but I have never achived that truly sweet , jaw dropping sound you sometimes hear at an audio convention or well set-up dealer room. If this doesn't do it I might just give up and go pure 5 channel HT. It's been too mcuh time and money on the audiophile merry go round.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
WTS
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1276 Location: Calgary
|
Link Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I don't know how much of a jaw dropping improvement I would expect because you are going to be running this through a solid state amp. So the final sound is going to depend on the worse piece of gear in the chain, that's not to say that SS amps can't be good. Actually for purity/accuracy of sound I would say the SS is better, for ear pleasing sensations the right combo of tubes/speakers can be really moving. 12AT7's were quite common as a preamp tube, if I remember correctly Audio Research used it in a number of their preamps in certain stages.
_________________ Thanks
Walter
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|