View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
Link Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I won't know until tomorrow and first power-up. But I know what symptoms to look for now.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24301 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
Link Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While most of the troubled YA boards did indeed die around the 1500 hour mark, I did have one or two here that failed at about 4000-5000. I've had others of the same production run be fine at 8000 hours, so it's really a crapshoot.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
Link Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So what do you think about the program loop theory? Does the description of the loop symptom match up well to known failures of IC421?
You know, the lithographs for making those chips probably still exists somewhere in storage at Sony's fab lab.
I HAVE to wonder how much it would cost to have them dragged out of storage, set up, and have a new run of chips made.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24301 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
Link Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No idea. While others chased the possibility of cloning/making the chips, I think it's a dead issue at this point. Good luck trying to get anything out of Sony! I'm really surprised they avoided a class action lawsuit, as they discontinued the sets in 2004, and problems with the YA boards started in about 2006. Heck, Sony California even called ME looking for the chips in about 2007.
When my reply was 'Hey, you're Sony, why can't you get them?' the answer was 'we ran out of boards and chips'.
My understanding is that they offered a few people replacement Sony Ruby projectors-refurbs. Not sure if anyone took them up on that. I do know a couple of g90 owners waited 18 months for a used YA board to come up, when someone sold a set. The boards were selling for $2000 used at one point, now they are around $800 for a replacement. I've got one spare YA board in stock.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HaydnG90
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 1335
|
Link Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Curt Palme wrote: |
I do know a couple of g90 owners waited 18 months for a used YA board to come up, |
Yeah one of them was me. I eventually lucked out and found someone local selling a G90. Paid $1500 for the pj and offset the cost by selling the lenses and a couple of IFB boards. The YA has been good so far. John W in France kindly repaired my original YA board so at least I have a spare in case of another failure.
I've owned my G90 for 10 years and love it, especially with the darker green C-element, MP BA board mods, and running at 1080P/72. With only 3500 hours on the chassis and tubes I should be OK for another 10 years. And I have a complete donor chassis if any other boards go south.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
Link Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HaydnG90 wrote: | John W in France kindly repaired my original YA board so at least I have a spare in case of another failure. : | yeah that's what I thought too, these are repairable now right?
I though Craig knows how to fix them now too?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HaydnG90
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 1335
|
Link Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Repairable in that a working IC421 can be installed on an existing YA board. Once the IC421 is toast, thats it, game over.....
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
Link Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HaydnG90 wrote: | Repairable in that a working IC421 can be installed on an existing YA board. Once the IC421 is toast, thats it, game over..... |
in other words, you can fix it before it breaks, but once it goes bad then the board is dead-dead . Right-y-o?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HaydnG90
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 1335
|
Link Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No you can fix it after it breaks by replacing the faulty IC421 with a good one.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
Link Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I currently have two G90s that both run and although both need tubes to be sellable, they do work and make rather nice pictures despite some phosphor wear.
One has an interesting fault. Red 88 appears on the back display but only if the unit is in standby. It never occurs when running, only in standby, and it has to spend several minutes in standby for it to happen.
I smelled (once) a hot component smell with the red 88 showing.
Turn the unit off and let it cool down for about 2 minutes and it powers up with no error codes. Until it errors out again when presumably the part heats up again.
By direct board swaps between the two units I have ruled out problems with the YA, GA, GB, or F boards.
Whatever is the issue, it is in a board that receives power when in standby, which is NOT every board. So those boards that do
not receive power in standby can not be at issue. Problem is, I don't quite know which boards those are yet.
Having a thermal camera might help me to track down that hot part more quickly.
As for the IC421 issue, if the programming could ever be read out then it's possible that there's enough available information for an expert FPGA programmer to be able to develop an FPGA solution that would replace IC421.
I actually have asked an engineer friend of mine, who IS an expert FPGA programmer, to at least review this thread and the associated documents. See if he thinks it's worth his time.
Thinking about the idea of brewing up a replacement for IC421, it could be done with another CPLD if enough information is learned about the input commands and the output functions.
That'd start by knowing exactly what those DACS actually do. What functions they address. And what control functions send those commands.
Basically we'd have to break down every function in the projector and define which ones are relevant to this data path and which are not. For example, geometry and convergence functions may be handled by IC421, but that doesn't mean that color temperature settings are. (I don't know.)
At some point when we have a full list of functions handled thru IC421 and their range of possible values, then we have defined the outline of the required programming.
One thing that does work in our favor is that much of the programming can be expected to be repetitious. For example, both contrast and brightness would be substantially the same programming, only at different addresses. A lot of copy-and-paste with minor edits would define much of the programming.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HaydnG90
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 1335
|
Link Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure its really worth the effort and expense to develop a solution to this problem. A furor developed when many died around the same time and there was VERY limited options to fix the issue. When my IC421 failed I had to wait over a year for a solution and that came when someone local advertised a G90 on Craigslist.
At this point most of the IC421 chips that were destined to fail when programmed have already bitten the dust. There are enough spare working YA boards in circulation now to cover any future losses.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
Link Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually I just lost a YA board to a component failure but NOT an IC421 failure. That board is heading to Craig for repair.
I'm picking up two more G90s this weekend.
Whether or not the effort to reverse engineer IC421's functions is worth pursuing, I can't say. Five years ago it would have been worth doing. Today....maybe not.
FYI, I buy G90s if they're complete units. Price offered varies according to condition and failures.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1608
|
Link Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can have the G90's
The Cine9/909 are mine
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
Link Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed. I'll trade you even. One complete 909 for one complete G90. Just in case either of us finds any.
You get the Barcos, I get the G90s.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HaydnG90
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 1335
|
Link Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would take the G90 over the 909 even though the latter could potentially project a better image, if only because replacement parts are easier/cheaper to come by.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1608
|
Link Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Parts are not a problem if you have enough projectors
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
Link Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will be having a meeting with a well qualified engineer who has agreed to look at the IC421 problem with an eye toward developing a CPLD (Complex Programmable Logic Device) or FPGA replacement solution for it.
He's going to be charging a few hours of his time for this, at a rate of a hundred bucks an hour.
It is understood that data gathering to map out all the input and output functions on IC421 is going to take some time.
Once that data is gathered, all inputs identified and correlated to the control signals going to the DACs, then the real
work begins of drawing the flowchart that leads to the programming.
It is likely that this will also require fabricating a chip adapter as the selected device will probably not be pin compatible with the
original IC421.
I would like any interested parties to speak up and let me know if you would be interested in purchasing an IC421 replacement
solution for any of your own G90s. You can of course post such information here in this topic, but please also send me a private message so I can put it in a prospective customer file.
If you are willing to contribute to developmental costs, then those contributions go as credit toward the final product should there be any.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HaydnG90
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 1335
|
Link Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a spare working YA board (thanks John W) so I'm good.
Even so, glad to see someone taking the initiative, especially after Sony dropped the ball and failed to adequately address this issue when it became clear this was a major problem for their product. I'm sure they were pretty relieved not to have been slapped with a class action suit when the G90 could no longer be supported for the legally required timeframe after production ceased.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
Link Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Plans to replace IC421 with a custom FPGA or CPLD are moving forward but it's in the initial stages.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|